Skip to content
POL-34

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Proposed legislation · Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Fiscal Responsibility, Fiscal Sustainability and Stabilisation and Generations Fund Law

A permanent legislative framework separating public expenditure from immediate oil price fluctuations, linking the budget to debt, non-oil balance and expenditure growth rules, and transferring part of exceptional oil revenues to a dual-purpose stabilisation and generations fund, with independent oversight and full disclosure of fiscal risks.

Document number
POL-34
Version
1.0
Publication date
5 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq
Document type
Draft Framework Law
Axis
Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Executive Summary

Iraq has a legal system for budget management, borrowing and public accounting under Federal Financial Management Law No. (6) of 2019, as amended. It also adopted a medium-term federal budget for 2023–2025, and the Ministry of Finance continues in 2026 to publish in-year state accounts and public debt reports. A budget framework, however, does not automatically provide a rule countering oil cycles or a permanent legal mechanism requiring the state to save part of exceptional revenue increases and use it during shocks.

In the International Monetary Fund's 2025 assessment, the oil price required to balance the budget rose, according to the Fund's estimate, to around 84 dollars per barrel in 2024 from around 54 dollars in 2020. The report estimated fiscal deficits of 4.2% of GDP in 2024, 7.5% in 2025 and 9.2% in 2026, with government debt at 47.2%, 54.3% and 62.3% of GDP respectively. These are projected figures from the 2025 report, not substitutes for the Ministry of Finance's actual accounts. They nevertheless reveal the risk: permanent expenditure has become more sensitive to the price of a volatile, exhaustible resource.

The proposed law does not replace the Financial Management Law; it adds a fiscal responsibility layer. It sets a debt anchor of 60% of GDP and an upper limit of 70%, exceeded only in exceptional circumstances; uses the non-oil primary balance as an operational indicator; constrains current expenditure growth; and prohibits temporary oil windfalls from creating unfunded permanent commitments.

The draft establishes a “Stabilisation and Generations Fund” with two separate accounts. The stabilisation account holds highly liquid assets to absorb oil downturns and finance essential services instead of abrupt cuts or emergency borrowing. The generations account invests for the long term, converting part of an exhaustible resource into financial wealth. The proposed fund differs from the existing “Iraq Development Fund” established under Regulation No. (3) of 2023: the former is a savings and stabilisation instrument that does not directly finance domestic projects, while the latter is a development and investment instrument.

To prevent the Fund from becoming a parallel treasury, its resources cannot be spent under open-ended administrative discretion. The Law specifies deposit sources and ratios and withdrawal conditions, prohibits pledging assets or lending to the government or public enterprises, and requires dual auditing and publication of data. It also establishes an independent fiscal council with no spending power, providing public forecasts and assessments under a “comply or explain” principle. Final authority remains with government and Parliament while unjustified departures from the rules become harder to sustain.

Fiscal Baseline and the Problem

Iraq has both a major fiscal advantage and a source of vulnerability: oil revenues are substantial but highly volatile and depend on prices, quotas and production not fully controlled by the budget. When prices rise, spending scope rapidly expands; salaries, appointments, transfers and projects then become commitments difficult to reduce during downturns. This makes the budget procyclical with oil rather than an economic stabilisation instrument.

In its 2025 Article IV consultation report, the IMF estimated that oil would continue to dominate government revenue over the medium term, alongside a growing wage and pension burden and a weak non-oil base. It recommended a rules-based fiscal framework to reduce procyclicality, including a rule linked to improving the non-oil primary balance and saving oil windfalls to build buffers.

The Ministry of Finance has expanded budget and debt reporting, making in-year state accounts and public debt transparency reports available in 2026. This is an important institutional step, but transparency alone does not predetermine what should happen when oil prices rise or off-budget commitments emerge.

Fiscal and monetary buffers must also be distinguished. In March 2026, the Central Bank announced that its foreign reserves covered around twelve months of imports. Those reserves support monetary and external stability; they are not a budget financing fund.

Legislative need

Testing the Need for the Law
QuestionAssessmentConclusion
Is there an actual problem?Yes; oil volatility affects deficits, liquidity, expenditure and debt.A permanent rule, not an annual decision.
Is the Financial Management Law sufficient?It provides the foundation for budgeting, borrowing and transparency, but does not establish an integrated savings/withdrawal and rules system.A complementary framework law.
Do we need a new executive budget authority?No.The Ministry of Finance remains the executive body.
Do we need an independent assessment body?Yes, for forecasts, oil prices and compliance.A non-executive fiscal council.
Does a development fund already exist?Yes, the Iraq Development Fund.Keep the functions separate.

Proposed legislative policy

The draft has four interconnected levels. First, a medium-term fiscal framework links the draft budget to a path of at least three years. Second, fiscal rules establish a debt anchor, a non-oil primary balance rule and a current expenditure growth constraint. Third, a fund contains stabilisation and generations accounts with clear deposit and withdrawal rules. Fourth, independent transparency covers risks, guarantees, public enterprises, arrears, partnerships and tax expenditures.

The rules are not designed to prevent spending during crises. They include a clear “escape clause” for war, disasters, financial and health crises, severe recession and exceptional oil shocks. Flexibility differs from indiscipline because suspension is limited by reason, duration and amount, with a published return plan.

The 60% debt anchor is not presented as an existing Iraqi constitutional standard. It is a proposed prudential legislative choice, with a 70% upper limit and a transitional provision allowing gradual convergence where initial debt exceeds the anchor.

The bill

Proposed promulgation formula: In the name of the people, Presidency of the Republic: pursuant to approval by the Council of Representatives and ratification by the President of the Republic, and under the Constitution, the following Law is issued.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to strengthen fiscal sustainability and protect the budget from oil revenue volatility; build buffers preventing sharp cuts to essential expenditure during shocks; ensure temporary oil price increases do not become unfundable permanent commitments; improve debt sustainability, transparency and management of guarantees, risks and arrears; convert part of exhaustible oil revenues into financial assets for present and future generations; and establish independent assessment of forecasts and fiscal rules while preserving the government's and Council of Representatives' constitutional budget powers.

Explanatory memorandum

Why the Non-oil Primary Balance?

The overall deficit may improve solely because oil prices rise, even while spending expands unsustainably. The non-oil primary balance excludes oil revenues and interest payments and measures how much the state spends beyond its non-oil revenues. It is therefore a more useful indicator for assessing the fiscal policy stance across the cycle in an oil economy.

Why Combine a Debt Rule and an Operational Rule?

A debt rule alone is distant in horizon and may permit excessive spending before the ceiling is reached. An expenditure rule alone may not address high debt. The draft combines a debt anchor with the non-oil balance and expenditure growth, pairing a long-term indicator with annually monitorable tools.

Nature of the Numerical Limits

The proposed debt, transfer and withdrawal ratios are prudential legislative choices, not constitutional figures or existing international obligations for Iraq. The Law therefore provides review after five years to test them against debt costs, market depth, non-oil growth and Fund assets.

Why Two Accounts within One Fund?

Stabilisation needs liquidity and rapid withdrawals; generations savings need a long horizon and tolerance for market volatility. Combining both purposes in one portfolio produces unclear investment policy. The Law separates their accounting and investments while retaining common governance to reduce administrative costs.

Why Does the Fund Not Finance Domestic Projects Directly?

Iraq already has an investment budget, the Iraq Development Fund and project financing instruments. Allowing the savings fund to finance domestic projects directly would conflate stabilisation with development policy, create an off-budget spending channel, and potentially turn savings into illiquid domestic obligations.

Why Prohibit Purchases of Government Debt?

If the government borrows and its sovereign fund buys that same debt, no net financial wealth is created for the public sector; the obligation is merely rearranged within the state. The draft prohibits this route so savings remain genuine and available during shocks.

Distinction from Central Bank Reserves

Central bank reserves protect the currency, payments and monetary stability. Fund assets are treasury financial property serving different purposes. Operations must be coordinated, but central bank reserves shall not be treated as budget balances, nor Fund assets counted as official reserves merely because the Bank holds them in custody.

Why an Independent Fiscal Council?

Fiscal rules depend on oil, growth and revenue forecasts. If the body seeking higher expenditure also supplies the only estimate, the rule can become a matter of assumptions. The Fiscal Council does not prevent government decisions; it publishes a second assessment and requires departures to be explained. Decisions remain political and constitutional, but information becomes more balanced.

Rationale of the Fiscal Rules

Structure of the Proposed Rules
RulePurposeCorrection Mechanism
60% Debt AnchorProtect medium-term solvency.A seven-year return plan where exceeded.
70% Upper LimitPrevent open-ended borrowing.Exceeded only through an escape clause and parliamentary approval.
Improved Non-oil BalanceReduce spending dependence on oil.Annual improvement when debt is high or buffers weak.
Current Expenditure ConstraintPrevent an oil boom becoming a permanent commitment.Linked to trend non-oil GDP growth or new permanent revenue.
Saving Part of Windfall RevenueSeparate expenditure from immediate oil prices.Phased transfers reaching 50% of exceptional oil surplus.

No single rule should be read in isolation. In a year of higher oil prices and low debt, the rules permit investment and services to continue but prevent spending the entire increase. When prices fall, the stabilisation account cushions the shock. During an exceptional crisis, the escape clause is activated instead of silently breaching the rules.

Design of the Stabilisation and Generations Fund

Separation of the Accounts
ElementStabilisation AccountGenerations Account
ObjectiveCover revenue and liquidity shocks.Long-term savings and intergenerational equity.
HorizonShort to medium term.Very long term.
LiquidityHigh.Lower, with broader diversification.
RiskLow, prioritising capital preservation.Measured risks for long-term returns.
WithdrawalsFor revenue shortfalls or emergencies within limits.Principal protected for 15 years, followed by a limited sustainable withdrawal rule.

The draft sets a stabilisation account target of 10% of GDP. This is not an estimate of the next shock's scale, but a legislative reference for building a substantial buffer, reviewed after five years. During accumulation, 75% of Fund transfers go to stabilisation and 25% to generations; after the target is reached, priority reverses towards generations.

The deposit rule uses realised revenue, not estimates. Transfers do not occur merely because market prices rise for a few days, but only after net revenue exceeds a published benchmark.

Legislative and Institutional Alignment

Relationship with Existing Frameworks
Existing frameworkTreatment
Federal Financial Management Law No. (6) of 2019, as AmendedRemains the principal law for budget preparation, execution, accounting and borrowing; the draft adds sustainability rules, the Fund and Fiscal Council.
Federal Budget LawRemains the appropriation instrument, but must comply with permanent rules without implicitly overriding them.
Central Bank of Iraq LawThe Bank's independence and reserves remain unaffected; coordination concerns only custody, transfers and liquidity.
Federal Board of Supreme AuditRetains legal and financial oversight, with an explicit mandate to examine transfers, withdrawals and concealed obligations.
Iraq Development Fund — Regulation No. (3) of 2023Remains a development fund; is not merged with the Stabilisation and Generations Fund.
Financial Stability CouncilRemains a coordination framework; the independent Fiscal Council provides analysis and scrutiny rather than executive coordination.

Financial and Implementation Implications

The draft does not adopt an artificial aggregate cost figure. Most implementation falls to existing institutions: the Ministries of Finance and Planning, Central Bank and Federal Board of Supreme Audit. Additional institutional costs focus on the Fiscal Council and its small secretariat, Fund governance, accounting and asset and risk management systems, external audit, and connecting debt, guarantee, public enterprise and arrears data.

The most important cost is opportunity cost, rather than administrative expenditure: some oil windfall revenue will become assets instead of being spent immediately. This is not a treasury loss; it exchanges an extracted oil asset for a financial one, reducing immediate expansion capacity while improving later resilience.

During the first year, the implementing regulation shall provide a five-year estimate of deposit rules' expected liquidity effects, possible asset accumulation scenarios, effects on financing needs, asset management costs and expected returns expressed as ranges rather than guarantees.

Transition and Implementation

The Law addresses the risk of immediately imposing an ideal rule on public finances already under pressure. Windfall transfers therefore rise from 25% in the first year to 35% in the second and 50% from the third. Initial excess over the debt anchor requires a return plan rather than constituting an immediate violation.

Establishing the Fund requires neither deductions from historical funds nor borrowing to display a nominal balance. It begins with the first exceptional oil surplus realised after entry into force. During the first year, debt, guarantees, arrears and contingent liabilities must be inventoried, a unified register of partnerships and long-term contracts prepared, and definitions harmonised across relevant bodies.

International Standards Relevant to Iraq

IMF literature on resource-rich countries shows that more coherent frameworks combine a debt or net asset anchor with an operational expenditure or non-oil balance rule, supported by a resource fund and clear deposit and withdrawal rules. The primary objective is protection against shocks and reduced spending procyclicality with commodity prices.

For sovereign wealth funds, the Santiago Principles provide an appropriate governance benchmark: a declared legal purpose, clear separation of owner, board and management, risk-and-return-based investment policy, transparency, risk management and auditing. The draft uses these principles without elevating them above Iraqi legislation.

Sources and references

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of RepresentativesConstitutional basis for taxation, the budget, responsibilities, oil and gas ownership, and revenue distribution.
  2. Ministry of Justice — Issuance of Federal Financial Management Law No. (6) of 2019Official reference for publication in Iraqi Gazette Issue 4550.
  3. Ministry of Justice — Federal Financial Management Law No. (6) of 2019 with Its AmendmentUpdated official reference confirming the Law and its amendment.
  4. Ministry of Finance — Financial Management Law
  5. Ministry of Finance — Federal Budget LawsPublished laws include the Federal General Budget Law for fiscal years 2023–2024–2025.
  6. Ministry of Finance — Budget Execution Reports during 2026At document preparation, state accounts through July 2026 had been published.
  7. Ministry of Finance — Public Debt Department ReportsInclude debt transparency reports through 30 June 2026 and quarterly data.
  8. Ministry of Planning — Summary of the National Development Plan 2024–2028Includes prudent fiscal policy, correction of expenditure composition, and transition to programme and performance budgeting.
  9. Ministry of Justice — Iraq Development Fund Regulation No. (3) of 2023
  10. Iraq Development Fund — Official WebsiteExplains the existing Fund's development and investment character.
  11. Central Bank of Iraq — Reserves Statement, 8 March 2026Reported foreign reserve coverage of around 12 months of imports.
  12. International Monetary Fund — Iraq 2025 Article IV Consultation
  13. International Monetary Fund — Iraq 2025 Report, No. 25/183Includes debt, deficit and non-oil balance projections and sustainability risk analysis.
  14. International Monetary Fund — A New Fiscal Framework for Resource-Rich Countries, 2023
  15. International Monetary Fund — How to Design a Fiscal Strategy in a Resource-Rich Country, 2021
  16. International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds — Santiago PrinciplesA widely used international benchmark for sovereign wealth fund governance, transparency and risk management.

Proposed legislation within Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Prepared by

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.