Skip to content
POL-53

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid’s political programme

Energy, Infrastructure, Water, Environment and Urban Development

Drinking Water and Sanitation Services and Service Provider Regulation Law

Document numberPOL-53
TypeProposed federal bill
Version1.0
Publication and update date7 October 2026

Executive summary

This bill governs the service chain that starts after water-resource allocation and extends beyond laying pipes: drinking-water quality, supply continuity, network efficiency, user rights, pricing, wastewater collection and treatment, industrial discharge, reuse and provider management. It complements, rather than replaces, the Water Resources and National Water Security Law (POL-52), which addresses resources, allocation, basins and wells. This Law focuses on public services from treatment plant to user and from wastewater generation to treatment or reuse.

Iraq’s sectoral functions are currently divided among the General Directorates of Water and Sewerage; Baghdad Mayoralty’s Water and Sewerage Departments; governorates; the Ministries of Health, Environment and Water Resources; and standards and planning bodies. This structure can operate assets but does not itself clearly separate provider, economic regulator and consumer protector. The proposal therefore creates a small regulator that neither operates facilities nor builds projects, but licenses providers, sets performance indicators and tariff methodology, benchmarks results and decides regulatory grievances.

Modern international practice confirms that ‘access’ alone is insufficient: safe services require water available when needed, free of priority hazards and managed preventively from source to consumer. WHO recommends water safety plans and independent health surveillance, while UNICEF’s Iraq programmes identify the need to clarify policy-maker, provider and regulator responsibilities. The proposal translates these into measurable legal obligations.

The Law sets neither uniform prices nor arbitrary national loss or treatment figures before baseline audit, and is not a construction plan. Instead, every provider must maintain a water balance, asset register, five-year plan, quality and continuity standards, tariffs and vulnerable-household protection, permits for industrial discharge and non-sewered sanitation, and emergency plans. The regulator must then publish performance benchmarking.

The gap addressed by the Law

Existing service system and regulatory gap
AreaExisting institutional positionGap addressed
Drinking-water production and distributionMultiple central and local bodies own and operate assets.Unified service licences, service standards, loss measurement, user contracts and performance comparison.
Drinking-water safetyOperational testing, health surveillance and national standards.Mandatory water safety plans, risk notification and separation of operational testing from independent health surveillance.
SanitationNetworks, plants and environmental standards divided among bodies.Prevent raw discharge, regulate industrial effluent, plan treatment-plant bypasses, and manage non-sewered sanitation and sludge.
TariffsHistorical and local arrangements not always linked to efficiency indicators.Transparent statutory methodology, protected basic block, targeted support, and no passing waste or fines to users.
Consumer protectionComplaint channels vary among bodies.Standard contracts, response deadlines, compensation, regulatory grievances and strict disconnection rules.
Provider regulationOwnership, operation and oversight overlap.A regulator that operates no assets, with ownership and operation retained by existing bodies or licensed contractors.

International data support moving from whether a source exists to whether service is actually safe. Recent WHO and UNICEF materials distinguish basic access from safely managed services, including availability continuity, water quality and wastewater treatment in performance measures. UNICEF in Iraq has expressly highlighted clear policy-maker, provider and regulator responsibilities.

Proposed legislative policy

The proposal adopts regulator–operator separation while retaining existing public operations. The Ministry sets policy and technical standards; Baghdad Mayoralty, governorates and public bodies own or supervise assets; Health monitors sanitary safety; Environment monitors outfalls and sludge; Water Resources allocates raw water; and the new regulator focuses on licences, tariffs, service quality, user rights and transparency.

The proposal neither assumes privatisation nor excludes it as a limited contractual tool. Water resources and core public assets remain governed by public interest. Competitive operation, maintenance, financing or construction contracts may be used where demonstrably better than public alternatives, while licensing, oversight and consumer protection remain outside the commercial contract.

Efficient operation and maintenance require sustainable funding, but the proposal rejects immediate full household cost recovery. It permits gradual transition, a reduced basic domestic block, targeted vulnerable-household support, and mixed capital funding from budgets, loans, grants and partnerships. Fines and administrative waste may not be passed through tariffs.

Reasons for enactment

To ensure citizens' access to safe, sustainable drinking water and sanitation services protecting public health and the environment; unify the regulatory framework for providers while preserving decentralisation and the constitutional distribution of powers; separate policymaking, operation and economic regulation; regulate quality, continuity, tariffs, meters, complaints, industrial discharge, non-sewered sanitation and reuse; improve asset efficiency, reduce losses and waste, and strengthen transparency and accountability, this Law is enacted.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why does Iraq need a service law rather than another infrastructure project?

Water and sewerage projects are indeed expanding, but an asset's value is not realised at inauguration. It is realised when the asset continues producing compliant water, or when the network collects sewage and carries it to effective treatment, backed by budgets for maintenance, spare parts, meter reading, collection and complaint response. The Law therefore addresses sustained operation, often weaker than the construction stage.

2. Separating resources from services

The proposal separates management of the water resource from drinking water services. Raw water allocation, wells, basins and drought belong under water resources legislation. This Law begins with providers' obligation to obtain a lawful allocation, then addresses treatment, transmission, distribution, quality and billing. The same distinction applies to sanitation: the Law regulates collection, treatment and reuse, while reused resources enter the water balance under the relevant legislation.

3. Why a regulator?

When the owner or operator also sets service levels and tariffs and decides users' complaints, assessing performance becomes difficult even with sound intentions. A separate regulator enables licensing all providers against one standard, benchmarking governorates, setting tariffs based on efficient costs and publishing results. The regulator builds no plant and owns no network, keeping its size and regulatory function bounded.

4. Safety from source to consumer

The latest World Health Organization guidelines issued in 2026 emphasise preventive risk management from source to consumer, health-based targets, water safety plans and independent surveillance. The proposal converts these elements into legal duties while retaining the Iraqi standard as the binding reference, updated through the competent national body.

5. Sanitation is more than a network

The proposal measures sanitation success by safe treatment rather than pipe length. It therefore prohibits raw discharge, regulates industrial wastewater and pretreatment, requires plans for plant overflows and power failures, and brings sludge management and tank and pit emptying into regulation. This matters where a centralised network is neither the fastest nor the least costly solution.

6. Tariffs and social equity

Very low tariffs without alternative funding lead to poor maintenance, interruptions and waste, while high tariffs without social protection deny households an essential service. The Law therefore gradually links prices to efficient costs, establishes a reduced-price basic domestic block and targeted support, and requires clear billing, metering, instalments and disconnection safeguards. This framework provides explicit legislative authority for service charges instead of leaving them to scattered decisions.

7. Data before targets

The proposal does not immediately impose a single loss target or final treatment percentage before an audited baseline exists: Baghdad, Basra, Mosul and small towns differ in network age, sources and density. It does require each provider to prepare a uniform water balance, asset register and comparable indicators. After a year of baseline data, realistic targets can be established and audited.

Responsibilities matrix

Distribution of roles after the Law enters into force
BodyPrincipal roleWhat it does not do
Ministry of Construction, Housing and Public MunicipalitiesSector policy, national planning, technical standards and capacity building.Does not independently approve tariffs for a provider subject to the regulator.
RegulatorLicences, tariffs, service indicators, benchmarking, grievances and sanctions.Does not own or operate a network or plant.
Ministry of HealthIndependent health oversight, drinking water safety and health warnings.Does not manage billing or tariffs.
Ministry of EnvironmentEnvironmental limits, outfalls, sludge, assessment and environmental enforcement.Does not replace provider licensing or economic oversight.
Ministry of Water ResourcesRaw water allocation, abstraction permits, source protection and the water balance.Does not manage users' relationship with drinking water tariffs.
Baghdad Mayoralty and governoratesAsset ownership, local planning, direct operation or contracting, and local service monitoring.Do not exempt providers from national standards or licensing.
Service providerProduction, distribution, collection, treatment, maintenance, billing and user service.Does not set its own final performance standard or exempt itself from oversight.

Legislative and institutional alignment

Legislation and regulations requiring alignment
ReferenceRelationship to the proposalAlignment action
Constitution — Articles 28, 33, 114 and 115Fees, environment, health, water resources and shared powers.Interpret and implement the Law within the distribution of powers; impose no tariff beyond legislative authorisation.
Law on Governorates Not Incorporated into a Region No. 21 of 2008, as amendedDecentralisation and management of local departments and services.Retain local administration while subjecting providers to uniform regulatory standards.
Baghdad Mayoralty Law No. 16 of 1995Regulates the Baghdad Water and Baghdad Sewerage departments and their powers.Both departments remain as providers or operating units, obtaining transitional and then full licences.
Public Health Law No. 89 of 1981Drinking water safety and health oversight.No repeal; harmonise sampling and notification protocols with the Ministry of Health.
Environmental Protection and Improvement Law No. 27 of 2009Protection of water against pollution and discharges.No repeal; link service licensing to outfall compliance with environmental limits.
Iraqi drinking water standardTechnical limits for water quality.Remains the binding reference, periodically updated; the regulator does not create an alternative standard.
Proposed Water Resources and National Water Security Law POL-52Resources, abstraction, allocation, drought and reuse in the national water balance.Link provider licences to water allocations and avoid duplicate abstraction permits.

Transition roadmap

Key periods after entry into force
PeriodAction
6 monthsForm the regulatory board and begin preparing licensing, consumer protection and data regulations.
12 monthsIssue tariff methodology, water safety plans, non-domestic wastewater standards and the national baseline methodology.
18 monthsInitial transitional licences expire; submit compliance plans and obtain full or conditional licences.
24 monthsComplete the digital inventory of assets, meters, rights of way and performance databases.
30 monthsPublish the first complete national provider benchmarking exercise after an audited data cycle.
5 yearsReview the Law's impact and submit a report to the Council of Representatives.

Financial and implementation impact

The Law does not create a new national water or sewerage company or transfer ownership of networks and plants from existing bodies. Its direct fiscal impact therefore centres on establishing a modestly sized regulator, harmonising data and building licensing, benchmarking and consumer protection systems. The regulator may begin with a budget allocation and later recover part of its cost through a limited regulatory fee authorised by law, without turning it into a consumption tax.

The larger costs fall on providers, but most represent a shift from breakdown response towards preventive maintenance, metering and asset management rather than separate new expenditure. Priorities include production, distribution and consumer meters where feasible; GIS and asset registers; laboratories or laboratory contracts; leak detection; facility protection; industrial discharge monitoring; complaint management systems; and backup power for critical facilities.

The Law gives no single national capital requirement estimate because that requires an up-to-date inventory for each governorate, network lengths, plant condition, loss rates and coverage. Instead, it requires a five-year plan from each provider and a uniform baseline, then links tariff and investment approvals to actual data. This reduces the risk of inflated programme costs or repeated projects lacking adequate operating budgets.

Compliance and regulatory indicators

Indicators published by the regulator after the baseline is established
AreaIndicatorPurpose
SafetyShare of compliant drinking water samples, number of quality incidents and notification times.Measure safety rather than relying solely on plant capacity.
ContinuityAverage supply hours, interruption frequency and population affected.Distinguish nominal access from actual service.
EfficiencyNon-revenue water, energy consumption per cubic metre and operating costs.Link tariffs to provider efficiency.
AssetsShare of assets registered and inspected, network failures and preventive maintenance implementation.Prevent investment deterioration after construction.
SanitationCollected, treated and compliant flows, spills and safe reuse volumes.Measure actual environmental and health effects.
ConsumersComplaints per thousand accounts, resolution time, billing accuracy and compensation.Measure the quality of the service relationship.
Financial sustainabilityCollection rate, coverage of efficient operation and maintenance costs, and arrears.Identify the financing gap transparently.

Brief international comparison

International practices adaptable to Iraq
PracticeReferenceIraqi adaptation
A regulator separate from operators, measuring service quality and benchmarking providersUtility regulation models such as ERSAR and specialised economic regulators.A small regulator owning no assets, publishing performance and approving tariffs and licences.
Water safety plans from source to consumerWHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality 2026 and Water Safety Plan Manual.Require plans from all providers with independent health oversight.
Multi-year tariffs based on efficient costsUtility regulation in various countries.Published methodology, a basic domestic block, targeted support and exclusion of waste and fines.
Regulation of industrial wastewater before network entryCommon practice in modern sanitation utilities.Acceptance limits, pretreatment, load measurement and additional service charges for higher costs.
Non-sewered sanitation managed as a complete service chainModern WASH practices for small towns and unserved areas.License emptying vehicles, track them to receiving plants and prevent indiscriminate dumping.

Sources and references

  1. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005.
  2. Ministry of Justice — Second Amendment to the Law on Governorates Not Incorporated into a Region No. 21 of 2008, Iraqi Official Gazette, 2013.
  3. Ministry of Justice — Third Amendment to the Law on Governorates Not Incorporated into a Region No. 21 of 2008, Iraqi Official Gazette, 2018.
  4. Baghdad Mayoralty — Baghdad Mayoralty Law No. 16 of 1995 and the powers of the Baghdad Water and Baghdad Sewerage departments.
  5. Ministry of Construction, Housing and Public Municipalities — Ministry project dashboard: General Directorate of Water and General Directorate of Sewerage.
  6. Ministry of Planning — National Development Plan 2024–2028.
  7. Ministry of Planning — Discussion of the water and sanitation sector paper during preparation of the National Development Plan 2024–2028.
  8. Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control — Study of drinking water quality in Baghdad based on Iraqi Standard 417.
  9. World Health Organization — Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, fourth edition incorporating three addenda, 17 June 2026.
  10. World Health Organization — Water Safety Plan Manual, second edition.
  11. UNICEF Iraq and the General Directorate of Water — Measures to protect resources and ensure safe water, 23 March 2025.
  12. UNICEF Iraq — Water, sanitation and hygiene programme: clarification of policymaker, provider and regulator responsibilities.
  13. UNICEF Data — Iraq: drinking water and sanitation indicators.
  14. World Health Organization — Iraq data page and drinking water, sanitation and wastewater treatment indicators.
  15. UNICEF Iraq — Urgent call to protect Iraq's rivers and children's health, 28 September 2026.
  16. World Bank — Baghdad Water Supply and Sewerage Improvement Project, Implementation Status Report No. 20, 17 April 2026.
  17. ILO NATLEX/FAOLEX — Iraqi Environmental Protection and Improvement Law No. 27 of 2009.
  18. ECOLEX/FAOLEX — Iraqi Public Health Law No. 89 of 1981.
  19. ERSAR — Regulation of water and sanitation service quality and provider performance benchmarking in Portugal.

Electronic sources accessed: 7 October 2026. Sources inform the diagnosis and explanatory memorandum; they do not replace the official text published in the Iraqi Official Gazette for final judicial or legislative verification.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.