Skip to content
POL-57

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme

Proposed bill · Energy, Infrastructure, Water, Environment and Urban Development

Land Administration, Surveying, Real Estate Registration and Modern Rights in Rem Law

Document numberPOL-57
TypeProposed federal bill — legislative repeal and replacement
Version1.0
Publication and update date7 October 2026

Executive summary

This bill proposes a comprehensive modernisation of the legal framework linking land, rights and their holders in Iraq. According to the Ministry of Justice, the Real Estate Registration Department still operates primarily under Real Estate Registration Law No. (43) of 1971. That law provides established protection for the formal requirements of property transactions and the evidentiary authority of registration, but predates modern digital and geospatial data environments by more than five decades. On 16 July 2026, the Ministry of Justice announced that it had completed a draft amendment to the law and referred it to the Council of State in preparation for the legislative process. On 23 September 2026, the Council of Representatives also discussed aligning real estate registration with digital transformation and biometric title deeds.

This bill goes beyond partial amendment to provide an integrated replacement law bringing together registration, surveying, maps, property identifiers and the management of entries and registrable rights in rem, without creating a body parallel to the Real Estate Registration Department or rewriting the Civil Code. It establishes a fundamental rule: the official register is the source of publicity and protection; a card, printed deed or application is a means of verification and does not itself embody the right.

The law accommodates the automation already under way at the Ministry of Justice, gives the electronic register and digital extract clear evidentiary authority, and permits property formalities to be completed electronically subject to stringent safeguards. This requires a special provision because Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. (78) of 2012 originally excluded transactions for which legislation prescribes special formalities. It also connects the real estate register to the national spatial data infrastructure being developed by the Ministry of Planning, while keeping personal ownership data under the registration authority’s control.

The bill preserves the constitutional framework of ownership and decentralisation: Articles (23) and (27) of the Constitution protect private property and public assets, while Articles (115) and (121) require respect for regional powers in non-exclusive matters. The law therefore regulates the federal system and governorates not incorporated into a region, establishing a framework for mutual recognition and interoperability with the region rather than assuming centralisation that the Constitution does not establish.

Legislative gap and proposed policy

Gaps addressed by the bill
AreaExisting position or riskLegislative response
Principal legislationThe Real Estate Registration Law dates from 1971 and regulates registration in considerable detail, but predates modern digital transformation.Gradual repeal and replacement that preserves existing rights and entries while modernising formalities and procedures.
Surveying and mapsBoundaries, entries and maps are distributed across paper registers and multiple authorities, with potentially different levels of accuracy.A unified property identifier, cadastral register, geodetic reference, parcel lineage and links between maps and rights.
AutomationOngoing government automation and biometric deed projects require a permanent legislative basis identifying the legally authoritative data source.The electronic register becomes the official original following reconciliation; the card is a verification tool rather than the source of ownership.
Electronic signatureGeneral electronic signature legislation excludes transactions subject to special formalities.A special provision authorising electronic property formalities with enhanced safeguards after implementing regulations are issued.
Multiple databasesThe risk of conflicting copies of identity, planning, agricultural and state land data.The single-source principle and interoperability rather than repeated copying.
FederalismLand is not an expressly exclusive federal competence, and regions have constitutional powers.Direct federal application within federal authority and governorates not incorporated into a region, with mutual recognition with regions.
Damaged registersDisputes, displacement and missing documents in some areas.A procedure for renewed registration and reconstructing registers that protects absent persons and groups at risk of losing rights.
Legislative approach: Because the subject brings together land administration, surveying, registration and registrable rights, and because the government itself is amending the current law to accommodate digitisation, repeal and replacement is more coherent than adding dozens of digital provisions to a law built for a paper environment. Existing regulations and instructions nevertheless remain temporarily effective insofar as they do not conflict, avoiding an operational vacuum.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to protect private property and public assets; modernise the registration system established under Law No. (43) of 1971; link property rights to surveyed boundaries and unified identifiers; govern transition from paper to legally authoritative electronic registers; simplify transactions and extract issuance; prevent forgery, manipulation and duplication; improve administration of state land and rights in rem; and align registration with national spatial data infrastructure while respecting privacy and the constitutional distribution of powers.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why is a limited technical amendment insufficient?

In July 2026, the Ministry of Justice announced completion of a draft amendment to the Real Estate Registration Law for digital transformation, an important step consistent with the January launch of sale and ownership-transfer automation and its subsequent Directorate expansion. Yet moving from paper to a digital register raises more than a change of medium: which original is legally authoritative when digital and paper versions differ? How is priority time established? How are parcel boundaries linked to rights? Who can amend entries? What is a biometric deed’s status? How far may other bodies access owner data? The bill therefore addresses legal and technical architecture together.

2. Preserving constitutive registration

The bill retains a central feature of the Iraqi system: property transaction formalities. Registration remains an essential element of transactions transferring or creating rights where law so provides. The change is that formalities may be fulfilled digitally inside a high-assurance official system, not through a private electronic contract outside the register. Digitising registration is thus distinct from removing legal control over transactions.

3. A biometric deed is not ‘the property’

A serious digitisation mistake would be to make a card, response code or mobile device the source of a right. The bill takes the proper approach: a secure or biometric card may exist, but only as a verification tool. Losing it does not lose ownership; forging it does not change the entry; and if it differs from the register, the approved register remains authoritative until lawfully corrected.

4. Integrating surveying with registration

Insecure ownership is not merely a question of names. The owner may be known but the boundary imprecise, the map outdated, or the cadastral district, parcel and physical reality inconsistent. The Law therefore links the rights folio to the cadastral register, a permanent identifier and parcel lineage following subdivision and amalgamation, preventing loss of property history when numbers change.

5. National geospatial data

During 2026, the Ministry of Planning is developing a National Spatial Data Infrastructure platform. The bill makes the parcel layer linkable through an exchange standard, without moving personal ownership data to a public platform or replacing registration with planning layers. This prevents duplicate databases and establishes source responsibility.

6. Federalism and mutual recognition

The Constitution does not list land administration among exclusive federal powers, while Articles (115) and (121) grant regions broad powers in non-exclusive matters. The Law’s scope therefore avoids claiming that federal procedural legislation alone can override regional competences. Conversely, the economy, judiciary, banks and citizens need to verify deeds across Iraq. The bill thus establishes interoperability and mutual recognition as a federal objective grounded in agreements and the Constitution.

7. Damaged areas and displacement

Housing, land and property rights programmes in Sinjar illustrate how registration reform can help restore post-conflict rights. In July 2026, the Ministry of Justice announced that cooperation with the United Nations Human Settlements Programme had resulted in issuing and distributing more than 4800 title deeds to Yazidi beneficiaries. The bill accordingly provides register reconstruction, notice, objection and absentee-rights protection tools, without granting administrative committees ownership-conferral powers not established by law.

8. Avoiding institutional expansion

A General Real Estate Registration Department and extensive network of directorates and local offices already exist. Reform does not justify a competing new body; it instead reorganises internal functions, establishes interagency coordination, accredits professional surveyors and ensures interoperability with government systems.

Alignment with existing legislation

Principal legislation affected
LegislationRelationship to the billTreatment
Civil Code No. 40 of 1951Establishes ownership, rights in rem and transaction rules.Remains the substantive reference; this Law regulates registration, surveying and publicity.
Real Estate Registration Law No. 43 of 1971The Department’s current operational law.Repealed and replaced upon commencement, with instructions temporarily continuing.
State Land Classification Unification Law No. 53 of 1976Regulates classifications and disposal rights in state land.Its substantive provisions remain; the bill registers these rights and prevents administrative deletion.
Expropriation Law No. 12 of 1981Regulates expropriation and compensation.Not replaced by the bill; the register implements outcomes once the legal basis is complete.
State Assets Sale and Lease Law No. 21 of 2013, as amendedRegulates methods of disposing of state assets.Remains effective; registration verifies completion of disposal procedures rather than repeating the auction.
Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. 78 of 2012 and its instructionsGives electronic signatures and documents evidentiary authority but excludes transactions requiring special formalities.This Law supplies the special provision authorising digital property formalities within the register under enhanced safeguards.
National Identity Card Law No. 3 of 2016Provides persons’ official identifier.Its data are used for minimum-necessary verification without unnecessary biometric copying.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Law No. 39 of 2015Imposes preventive and due-diligence requirements.The bill complements registration’s verification and reporting role without creating a parallel system.

Transition plan

Proposed principal timeframes
Period from entry into forceRequirement
90 daysEntry into force, with urgent arrangements for transaction continuity.
6 monthsAdopt the national transition plan, identifier and digital register standards, and risk priorities.
12 monthsComplete the register inventory and issue core surveying, digitisation and remote-registration instruments.
18 monthsSpecify linkage with national spatial data infrastructure and consequential legislative amendments.
24 monthsReplace former instructions based on Law 43/1971 insofar as necessary.
In stagesDeclare each Directorate or group of records an original electronic register after reconciliation and inspection.
Transition rule: There is no single national ‘cutover’ abolishing paper before readiness. Each area transitions after reconciliation, while new transparency, grievance and register-security rights apply to everyone from commencement.

Financial and implementation impact

The bill sets no unsupported national cost figure. Implementation costs depend on undigitised registers and maps, existing equipment, connectivity, building conditions and necessary resurveying. It first requires a technical and financial inventory before detailed estimates are approved.

Cost components and control method
ItemCost typeProposed control
Register and map digitisationScanning, indexing, data entry, verification and reconciliation.Prioritise endangered and heavily used registers; separate imaging from legal data conversion.
Digital systemSoftware, servers or government cloud, security, integration and maintenance.Use shared government infrastructure where possible and prevent single-supplier dependency.
Surveying and boundary redeterminationEquipment, surveyors and variable fieldwork.A risk-, value- and density-based approach, avoiding unnecessary comprehensive resurvey.
Training and change managementLegal, technical and digital training.Training linked to sensitive permissions, using existing universities and training centres.
Business continuityBackups, alternative sites and recovery tests.Integration with national digital-security infrastructure and government data centres.

The state already has assets to build on: registration directorates, ongoing automation, electronic archiving, Ur portal services and national spatial data initiatives. Costs should therefore reflect the gap remaining after inventory, rather than constructing a system from scratch.

Relevant international standards

The bill draws on the United Nations Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA), linking legal administration, geospatial information and institutional governance, and on fit-for-purpose land administration principles developed by UN-Habitat/GLTN, favouring flexible systems capable of progressive improvement over expensive accuracy unnecessary for every property from the outset.

Tenure protection, fair documentation and non-exclusion of vulnerable groups also align with the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT). These international frameworks are not direct sources of ownership in Iraq, but offer useful standards for transparent, accountable institutional design.

The bill chooses a ‘trusted register + audit log + signature and timestamp + backups’ approach rather than mandating a particular technology. Law should define trust and reliability characteristics, not bind the register to a platform or product that may become obsolete.

Sources and references

  1. Supreme Judicial Council — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005, particularly Articles 23, 27, 115 and 121.
  2. Ministry of Justice — General Real Estate Registration Department: competence, applicable law and organisational network.
  3. Ministry of Justice, 16 July 2026 — Completion of the draft Real Estate Registration Law amendment and referral to the Council of State.
  4. Council of Representatives, 23 September 2026 — Discussion of registration modernisation, digital transformation and biometric deeds.
  5. Ministry of Justice, 29 January 2026 — Launch of sale and ownership-transfer transaction automation.
  6. Ministry of Justice, 18 August 2026 — Expansion of automation and electronic archiving across registration directorates.
  7. Ministry of Justice, 11 May 2026 — Biometric deed training for registration staff.
  8. Ministry of Justice, 7 July 2026 — Cooperation with UN-Habitat on land, real estate registration and housing, land and property rights in Sinjar.
  9. Ministry of Justice, 18 June 2026 — Sale and ownership-transfer transaction volume data.
  10. Federal Court of Cassation — Decision 1686/Civil Panel/2026 on property-sale formalities and registration.
  11. Federal Court of Cassation — Decision on registration authorities’ competence to correct property classification.
  12. Supreme Judicial Council — Opinion on State Land Classification Unification Law No. 53 of 1976 and extinguishment of disposal rights.
  13. Ministry of Justice — Publication of National Identity Card Law No. 3 of 2016.
  14. Ministry of Justice — Publication of Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law No. 78 of 2012.
  15. Ministry of Justice — Instructions No. 1 of 2025 facilitating implementation of the Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions Law.
  16. Ministry of Planning, 16 September 2026 — Completing requirements for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) platform.
  17. Ministry of Planning, 21 January 2026 — Developing an integrated national geospatial information system.
  18. United Nations GGIM — Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA).
  19. UN-Habitat — Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration: Guiding Principles for Country Implementation.
  20. FAO/CFS — Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT).
  21. United Nations in Iraq — National Housing Policy 2025–2030.

Live sources last checked: 7 October 2026. References document the legal, institutional and technical context; the bill’s articles are drafted as an independent legislative text without source references inside each article.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.