Skip to content
POL-62

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed bill · Education, Scientific Research, Culture, Youth and Sport

General Education and the Right to Modern Education Law

Document numberPOL-62
Version1.0
Publication and update date
ScopeRepublic of Iraq

Executive Summary

This bill proposes a modern Iraqi general education framework uniting learners' fundamental rights, free public schooling, compulsory attendance, curricula and assessment, quality, child protection, inclusive education, governance and data, financing and transition from older regulations. It complements rather than replaces the Ministry of Education Law's organisational provisions, establishing substantive citizen rights and educational service standards.

The bill particularly addresses legislative age: compulsory schooling remains historically grounded in a 1976 law, while parts of the school system operate under regulations from the nineteen-seventies. The Ministry Law was recently amended by Law No. (9) of 2025, and new private educational institution instructions appeared in 2026. The bill therefore adopts transitional repeal and replacement preserving study continuity and avoiding regulatory gaps.

Primary education remains immediately compulsory, with a five-year phased move to compulsory basic education through intermediate school. Crucially, families bear no liability where the state has not provided safe, accessible places and reasonable access. The bill prohibits hidden fees, violence, corporal punishment, discrimination and administrative immunity for educational decisions, and establishes grievances and judicial legality review.

Financially, it sets neither an arbitrary budget share nor an unverifiable national total. Instead, it requires medium-term financing, disclosed compulsory-education expansion costs and transparent resource allocation by safety, overcrowding, deprivation, population growth and disability, with regular parliamentary reports.

The Legislative Gap Addressed

The problem is not absence of a ministry or all school rules, but fragmentation between a relatively modern institutional law, a 1976 compulsory education law, historical school regulations and successive instructions amid major developments in child and disability rights, data, technology, private education and crisis management. Learner rights and service standards are dispersed across texts of different ages and legal levels.

Capacity challenges are concrete. Citing Ministry data, the World Bank reports a need for more than ten thousand additional school buildings and notes multiple shifts' effect on learning time. Recent studies confirm continuing overcrowding and infrastructure pressure.[8][10] The bill therefore links compulsory schooling to state provision of places and access and makes safety, overcrowding and learning time measurable and publishable, rather than merely declaring abstract rights.

The system must also move from input management alone to learning quality. The bill establishes legal foundations for periodic curriculum frameworks, national learning assessments, institutional evaluation and educational information systems, protecting data and preventing tests from becoming the sole judgment of schools or students.

Proposed Legislative Policy

  • Substantive education law, not another ministry law: The Ministry Law continues governing structures and staff; this bill defines learner rights and educational system standards.
  • Implementable compulsory education: Retain immediate compulsory primary schooling, then expand through intermediate education over five years subject to capacity.
  • Rights before penalties: Address absence and dropout through support and case management before family liability, without punishing poverty, displacement or public service failure.
  • Measurable quality: Curriculum frameworks, safe-school standards, learning assessment, annual reports and unified information systems.
  • No unnecessary new authority: Use existing Ministry, directorates and structures, with functional independence for evaluation and grievance teams where needed.
  • Cost-based financing: No assumed budget percentage: a medium-term framework, priorities and fair allocation criteria.
  • Orderly legal transition: Repeal the 1976 law and progressively replace old regulations without a regulatory vacuum or academic-year disruption.

Explanatory reasons

This Law is proposed to guarantee the constitutional right to education; modernise general-education legislation; unify basic safeguards for admission, free and compulsory schooling, learner protection, quality, curricula and assessment; address outdated compulsory-education legislation and school regulations; improve inclusion, continuity, governance and data; and organise a feasible transition to compulsory basic education while respecting constitutional competences and state financial capacity.

General explanatory memorandum

1. Why does Iraq need a new substantive general-education law?

Ministry of Education Law No. (22) of 2011, even after its 2025 amendment, essentially organises the Ministry, its formations and responsibilities. Citizens' education rights and rules on compulsory schooling, admission, discipline, curricula, quality, objections and the school environment are scattered across laws, regulations and instructions. The proposal clearly separates ‘who administers the Ministry’ from ‘the rights and standards governing educational services’.

2. Compulsory schooling through intermediate education

An immediate expansion of compulsory-school age without sufficient capacity could turn a right into a punitive family obligation. The proposal therefore takes a phased approach: primary education remains compulsory, and basic education through intermediate level becomes compulsory within five years, governorate by governorate or stage by stage, without holding families accountable before accessible places exist. This drives system expansion without criminalising poverty or school shortages.

3. Genuine free education

Free education is translated into prohibitions on tuition and hidden compulsory charges in public institutions, and on conditioning enrolment, results or documents on donations. Lawful optional services remain possible but separate from the fundamental education right.

4. Children as rights-holders rather than mere service recipients

The proposal brings safety, dignity, non-discrimination, privacy, grievances, reasonable accommodation and access to rules and results together in one legislative text. It prohibits corporal punishment, humiliation and collective punishment, and requires clear child-protection and violence-reporting policies.

5. Reforming Article (40) of the Ministry of Education Law

A Supreme Judicial Council study documents how current Article (40) bars claims involving technical examination matters and disciplinary penalties, while criminal offences remain outside that restriction. The proposal replaces this immunity with an approach more consistent with constitutional Article (100): administrative grievances remain, and courts review legality, procedure and arbitrariness without becoming marking committees or examination setters.

6. Curricula: disciplined periodic updating

The Law does not prescribe a particular textbook; it establishes curriculum-making processes: a national learning-outcomes framework, review at least every five years, scientific, linguistic and educational review, and consultation before extensive changes. It directs content towards reading, mathematics, science, languages, critical thinking, digital skills, citizenship, arts, sport and the environment while avoiding curriculum overload.

7. Quality extends beyond final examinations

Examination results matter but cannot alone assess schools. The proposal adds school self-evaluation and external evaluation, national learning assessments, and attendance, safety, inclusion and learning-time indicators. Comparative data must not oversimplify realities or punish schools in more deprived settings.

8. Overcrowding and multiple shifts

The proposal sets no unrealistic political deadline for ending double or triple shifts. Instead, it creates legal duties to measure, plan and publish, and prohibits permanent reduction of learning time as a solution. Investment can thus follow shortages of places, risk and population growth rather than allocation unrelated to need.

9. Private and foreign education

The proposal neither replaces the licensing instructions issued in 2026 nor creates a parallel licensing system. It establishes minimum institutional rights: safety and child protection, fee transparency, record preservation and continuity of pupils' rights during closure or licence suspension.

10. Data and privacy

Modern administration needs educational records and a unified information system, but this does not justify purposeless collection. Data are therefore linked to educational need, with confidentiality, minimisation and correction rights; wider details are referred to data-protection legislation when enacted.

11. Funding and feasibility

Major costs arise from expanding compulsory schooling, closing building gaps, improving water, sanitation, safety and accessibility, providing staff and inclusion support, and updating information systems and learning resources. Costs differ greatly among governorates and cannot be reduced to one reliable figure without surveying assets and capacity against student numbers. The proposal therefore requires a medium-term funding framework, baseline and published costing before major capital commitments.

Transitional provisions and implementation requirements

Phased implementation map
MilestoneMaximum periodLead bodyLegal/administrative output
General provisions and prohibitions on violence, discrimination and immunity take effect90 days after publicationMinistry, directorates and schoolsDirect application
New general-education regulation12 monthsCouncil of Ministers on the Minister's proposalRegulation covering enrolment, attendance, transfers, discipline and quality
Repeal of the 1976 Compulsory Education Law after replacement regulation takes effect12 months maximumMinistry and competent bodiesTransition without a legal vacuum
Building register and safety/accessibility baseline12 monthsMinistry/Planning/governoratesAsset and risk database
Replacement of old school regulations18 monthsCouncil of Ministers/MinistryModern regulations and instructions
Educational-record portability and harmonised data definitions24 monthsMinistry and directoratesUnified information system
Compulsory schooling extended through intermediate education5 academic yearsCouncil of Ministers/Ministry/governoratesCapacity-based expansion schedule
Comprehensive legislative impact reviewAfter 5 yearsMinistry and independent expertsPublic report to the Council of Representatives

Transition principle: Old provisions continue only as necessary for school continuity and insofar as consistent with the Constitution and this Law. Rights and express prohibitions on violence, discrimination and immunity from judicial review do not await implementing instructions.

Financial and implementation impact

Current public sources offer no unified detailed basis for one reliable national cost of implementing all provisions. Costs vary with building conditions, multiple shifts, population growth, transport distances, staff availability, inclusion and services. The proposal rejects false precision and makes advance costing part of the implementation duty itself.

Cost drivers and estimation method
AreaCost typeProposed calculation method
Compulsory intermediate education expansionOperating and capitalChildren outside the stage × shortage of places + teacher requirements + transport + textbooks and services.
Buildings and overcrowdingCapital and maintenanceSurvey every school; classify risk, classroom gaps and lifecycle costs; prioritise triple shifts and fastest-growing areas.
Water, sanitation, safety and accessibilitySmall and medium capital works + maintenanceGap against each standard × local unit cost following market and code review.
Inclusive educationOperating and equipmentBeneficiary numbers and accommodation, specialist support, transport and accessible-material needs.
Curricula, assessment and trainingPeriodic and operatingReview cycles, professional development, printing/content, national assessments and measurement samples.
Information system and educational recordsEstablishment + operation and maintenanceIntegrate existing systems first, then cost software, hardware, connectivity, support and security gaps.

Article (54) prioritises safety, places, learning time, books and staff, requiring a three-year funding framework. Major commitments, such as nationwide building or school-transport expansion, therefore require published costing linked to the budget rather than an unsupported political figure written into legislation.

World Bank data illustrate measurable effects of targeted interventions: past projects rebuilt schools, served thousands of students and trained teachers. They cannot alone underpin national cost extrapolation because land and construction prices, capacity, location and time differ.[8]

Safeguards and oversight

  • Judicial review: No administrative-decision immunity, while respecting judicial limits on purely academic matters.
  • Functionally independent administrative grievances: A person or committee other than the original decision-maker shall review wherever possible.
  • Child protection: Absolute prohibition of corporal punishment and humiliation, safe reporting channels and referral of suspected crimes to competent authorities.
  • Transparency: Annual reports on data, budgets, quality, overcrowding and multiple shifts.
  • Privacy: Minimise collection and prohibit publication of sensitive individual data.
  • Resource equity: Published criteria reduce influence and donation capacity as factors in public-investment allocation.
  • Parliamentary oversight: Annual reports and an impact review after five years.
  • No punishment for service failure: Families are not accountable for non-attendance where accessible services or remedies for substantial barriers are unavailable.

International framework and comparative learning

The proposal considers Iraq's international obligations without copying a foreign model. Iraq ratified UNESCO's Convention against Discrimination in Education, acceded to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and is party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which enshrines education rights, compulsory free primary education and expanded secondary access.[15][16][17][19]

These obligations inform non-discrimination, inclusion, free schooling, progressive expansion and dignity provisions. Administrative tools such as national assessments, institutional evaluation and education information can be adapted to Iraqi institutions; they do not commit Iraq to a particular international ranking or management model.

The proposal aligns with the National Education Strategy 2022–2031 and programmes improving teaching, learning and management, such as ITALEEM, translating legislatively suitable principles into rights, powers and procedures enduring beyond funded projects or time-limited programmes.[9][12][13]

Sources and references

References prioritise official Iraqi texts and original institutional sources, followed by international and statistical references. The links below were available when the document was prepared on 5 October 2026.

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
    Constitutional basis for education, languages, equality, child protection, allocation of competences and judicial challenge.
    Iraqi Constitution — official parliamentary link
  2. Law No. (9) of 2025 — First Amendment to Ministry of Education Law No. (22) of 2011, Iraqi Official Gazette issue 4841
    Latest verified official legislative amendment to the Ministry of Education Law as of preparation.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.9724/
  3. Official text of Iraqi Official Gazette issue 4841 — Ministry of Justice
    Published First Amendment to the Ministry of Education Law.
    https://moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/13187abe0a88ba2e_4841_compressed.pdf
  4. Supreme Judicial Council — Study on Article (40) of the Ministry of Education Law and examination scripts
    Judicial reference clarifying Article (40), technical disputes and examination-related crimes.
    https://www.sjc.iq/view.69406/
  5. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette issue 4867 of 2026
    Includes Instructions No. (6) of 2026 on licensing establishment of private educational institutions.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.10273/
  6. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette issue 4871 of 2026
    Includes Instructions No. (5) of 2026 on non-official curricula in private educational institutions and licensing conditions.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.10377/
  7. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Legislation database
    Legislative record of the First Amendment to Ministry of Education Law No. (22) of 2011.
    Parliamentary legislation-search link
  8. World Bank — Iraq: Improving Quality of Education and Access to Enable All Students to Learn (2024)
    Discusses school-building shortages, multiple-shift effects and outcomes of education quality and access interventions.
    https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2024/10/29/iraq-improving-quality-of-education-and-access-to-enable-all-students-to-learn
  9. World Bank — National Education Strategy 2022–2031 / Iraq education project documents
    Reference for the national strategy, system indicators and reform areas.
    https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099091824091030738/pdf/P171165-cfac2b5e-6448-4093-a5a5-2591a8024209.pdf
  10. UNESCO — Iraq 2026 GEM Report Country Case Study
    Recent analysis of administration, capacity and multiple-shift challenges in Iraqi education.
    https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2026-gem-report-country-case-studies/iraq
  11. UNICEF — Education in Iraq
    Contextual reference on access and infrastructure gaps and protection of children's education rights.
    https://www.unicef.org/iraq/what-we-do/education
  12. UNICEF — ITALEEM launch with the Ministry of Education, European Union and UNESCO (2024)
    National programme improving teaching, learning and educational management.
    https://www.unicef.org/iraq/press-releases/ministry-education-european-union-unesco-and-unicef-launch-italeem
  13. UNESCO — ITALEEM / Equitable Quality Education in Iraq
    2025 update on support for educational quality and management in federal Iraq and the Kurdistan Region.
    https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/equitable-quality-education-iraq-improved-teaching-and-learning-and-enhanced-educational-management-0
  14. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — Sustainable Development Goal and education indicators
    Official Iraqi statistical source for available completion and learning indicators.
    https://www.cosit.gov.iq/ar/?id=374&jsn_setmobile=no&option=com_content&view=article
  15. UNESCO — Convention against Discrimination in Education / Iraq
    Iraq ratified the Convention against Discrimination in Education in 1977.
    https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-against-discrimination-education?hub=70211
  16. United Nations Treaty Collection — Convention on the Rights of the Child / Iraq
    Iraq acceded to the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1994.
    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showActionDetails.aspx?clang=_en&objid=080000028000292a
  17. OHCHR — International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 13
    Education rights, compulsory free primary education and expanded secondary education.
    https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
  18. United Nations — CRPD Article 24: Education
    Inclusive education and non-exclusion of persons with disabilities from general education.
    https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-%20%20disabilities/article-24-education.html
  19. United Nations Treaty Collection — CRPD / Iraq
    Iraq acceded to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2013.
    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showActionDetails.aspx?clang=_en&objid=080000028035ef8c
  20. Iraqi National Library and Archives — Catalogue of Compulsory Education Law No. (118) of 1976
    Official Iraqi catalogue reference confirming the previous law's existence.
    https://www.iraqnla.gov.iq/opac/fullrecr.php?hl=ara&nid=124820

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.