Skip to content
POL-67

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed bill · Education, Scientific Research, Culture, Youth and Sport

Student Grants, Assistance, Loans and Equal Educational Opportunities Law

Document numberPOL-67
Version1.0
Publication and update date
ScopeRepublic of Iraq

Executive Summary

Iraq has two separate student grant laws: the Public Iraqi University and Institute Student Grant Law No. (63) of 2012 and the Public School Pupil and Student Grant Law No. (3) of 2014. They were designed to reduce poverty's effect on students' continued attendance, but their structure is no longer sufficient to build a modern equal opportunities system. Higher education grant instructions issued in 2018 defined low income by a fixed household income threshold of 150 thousand dinars per month, which automatically becomes outdated as prices and incomes change. The budget law for 2023–2025 also effectively linked payment of both grants to students from households covered by the social protection network, indicating a more recent shift towards social targeting.

In 2026 the Council of Representatives continued to monitor educational grant payments to students from households covered by social protection. Higher education also offers exemptions and reductions for social groups and a free scholarship admission channel for medical disciplines at private universities and colleges. However, these instruments operate through separate channels. No single law determines when a grant is a needs-based entitlement, how accommodation, transport and equipment costs are covered, when loans may be used, or how poor students are protected against accumulating debt.

The bill unifies general rules and replaces the two older laws after a transition period without interrupting payments to beneficiaries. It adopts an ‘educational eligibility score’ instead of a fixed income threshold, drawing on social protection, income, household size, disability, orphanhood, displacement, geographical remoteness, accommodation and transport data. Households covered by social protection automatically enter the eligibility pathway, but poor students who are not registered are not barred from applying.

The law regulates a package of support: school grants, university maintenance grants, transport, accommodation, supplies and assistive technology assistance, digital support and school meals where needed, emergency assistance, exemptions from fees that may lawfully be charged, merit scholarships and scholarships for groups with less access. Overseas government scholarships and fellowships remain under their own system.

Student loans are a supplementary instrument, not a substitute for grants or free public education. They are designed to carry no interest for the student and require no personal guarantor or mortgage over the family home. Repayment starts after graduation or withdrawal and after income exceeds a subsistence protection threshold, and is automatically suspended during unemployment or reduced income. Debt is discharged on death and may be discharged for permanent total disability. Imprisonment or a travel ban may not be imposed solely for civil inability to repay.

Financially, the bill avoids new fixed amounts that would become outdated after several years. Instead, it requires an annual benefits schedule linked to inflation, the poverty line and educational costs, with a rule preventing reductions in the nominal basic grant except by law. It also requires loan guarantee costs and credit losses to appear in the budget rather than remain hidden outside public accounts.

The Legislative Gap

First — Monetary obsolescence: Older laws rely on fixed amounts or income thresholds. An amount representing ‘low income’ in 2018 cannot serve as a permanent criterion, and grants themselves lose real value through inflation unless reviewed regularly.

Second — Fragmentation: School grants, university grants, social welfare, fee exemptions, free scholarships and emergency university assistance operate separately. Students have no unified support file, and the state cannot readily identify the total support they receive or any remaining gap.

Third — A narrow concept of support: The two laws focus on monthly cash, while the actual barrier may be transport from a distant village, university accommodation, an assistive device for a student with a disability, a computer needed for study, or an emergency threatening withdrawal.

Fourth — Suspension conditions: Automatic suspension for failure or a specified absence rate may penalise a student facing illness, displacement, transport problems or a family crisis, although the grant's original purpose is to prevent dropout. The bill retains a continuation requirement but replaces mechanical suspension with examination of the cause, a warning and a support plan.

Fifth — No social loan system: There is no clear national legislative framework for subsidised, income-based student loans. If financing needs are left entirely to the market, loans become costly and require guarantors or collateral that poor students cannot provide. The bill therefore establishes a limited, protected model that does not displace grants.

Sixth — The data and equity gap: Support cannot be assessed for fairness without knowing its distribution by governorate, sex, disability, rural location and income. The law requires public indicators while protecting privacy, making equity measurable rather than merely declaratory.

Proposed Legislative Policy

  • A unified law: Integrate the legislative rationale of school and university grants into a single support system with a transition protecting current beneficiaries.
  • Dynamic targeting: Replace fixed income thresholds with an eligibility score linked to the poverty line, income, household size and educational costs.
  • Grants before loans: The poorest students receive non-repayable support first and are not pushed into borrowing to cover basic needs.
  • Multiple support instruments: Cash, transport, accommodation, equipment, disability accommodations, food, exemptions and emergency support, followed by supplementary loans where needed.
  • Updatable value: An annual benefits schedule prevents amounts becoming outdated and places financial responsibility before the budget process.
  • No new authority: A national budget programme and coordination committee, implemented through existing ministries, banks and institutions.
  • Less data and fewer documents: Direct government verification of social protection, income and enrolment, instead of repeated visits to government offices.
  • Effective grievance procedures: A reasoned decision, an objection before a body independent of the original decision, and then the right to judicial recourse.

Text of the Bill

Statement of Reasons

This Law is enacted to ensure equal educational opportunities and prevent poverty and indirect costs from causing dropout or denying continued education; modernise school, university and institute student grants and link them to updatable social eligibility criteria; regulate assistance, exemptions and support for transport, accommodation, disability and supplies; establish a controlled social framework for supplementary student loans without affecting free public education; and unify data, oversight and grievance procedures while preventing duplication.

General Explanatory Memorandum

1. Why is repeal and replacement preferable to amending two separate laws?

The two existing laws perform the same function at different educational stages, but each has separate amounts, conditions and procedures. Separate amendment would retain duplicated eligibility, data and objection rules. A unified law states common principles once, then provides specific school and higher education provisions, while each ministry retains implementation responsibility within its remit.

2. Why does the law not fix new amounts?

The fixed income threshold in the 2018 instructions illustrates the problem: the figure becomes outdated while the text remains unchanged. The bill therefore preserves existing nominal amounts during transition to prevent reduced support, but places future valuation in an ‘annual benefits schedule’ that must account for inflation, the poverty line and educational costs. Parliament and government thus remain accountable for annual costs without the law itself requiring amendment whenever prices change.

3. From the protection network to broader educational eligibility

Targeting through the social protection network is practical because it provides a government verification database, as used by the budget law for 2023–2025. However, it is insufficient alone: poor households may not yet have completed registration or may recently have lost income. The bill makes social protection coverage an automatic support pathway while opening a second route to assess actual need outside the network.

4. Why not suspend support automatically after the first failure?

The purpose of a grant is to keep students in education. Where failure results from illness, displacement, poverty or unavoidable work, withdrawing support may turn a setback into permanent dropout. The bill retains accountability, permitting suspension for unjustified absence or persistent difficulty, but requires examination of the cause, a warning and a support plan.

5. Loans are a last resort, not a means of privatising education

The bill's principle is clear: grants meet needs that should not become debt; loans address the remaining gap or costs that may lawfully be financed. It therefore prohibits using loans as a substitute for free public education, rules out personal guarantors and mortgages, and links repayment to income.

6. Why does the law include non-cash support?

A grant may cover stationery but cannot necessarily solve daily travel from a remote area or purchase an assistive device for a student with a disability. The law provides flexible instruments for choosing cash, services or exemptions according to lowest cost and greatest effect, while preventing duplicate assistance for the same purpose.

7. Relationship with private education

The aim is not to transfer private education costs to the budget. Support portable to a private institution is a regulated exception where it enables educational access unavailable through a suitable public alternative, or operates within an approved scholarship channel. In return, institutions must ensure transparent fees and refrain from increasing them for supported students.

8. Geographical equity

Educational costs differ between Baghdad and a village far from a secondary school or university. Distance and transport and accommodation costs therefore form part of eligibility, allowing a geographical multiplier to increase support where access costs more.

Multi-Instrument Support Model

Support instruments ordered by type of need
InstrumentNeed addressedNatureUse rule
Basic grantPoverty and daily costs of continued studyNon-repayablePriority for greatest need
Transport/accommodation assistanceGeographical remotenessCash or serviceAccording to distance and alternatives
Assistive technologyDisability and accessIn-kind provision or allowanceNot deducted from the basic grant
Emergency assistanceBreadwinner's death, displacement, disaster, housing lossShort-term paymentFast-track procedure
Exemption and reductionFees lawfully chargeableCost reductionAccording to need and programme type
Merit scholarshipAcademic or artistic excellenceNon-repayablePublished competitive criteria
Student loanRemaining financing gapIncome-based repaymentAfter grants and assistance are counted

Student Loan Model

The proposed loan is not an ordinary consumer loan. The state subsidises its cost and sets social conditions; banks administer disbursement and collection under Central Bank supervision. There is no personal guarantor or mortgage. Repayment begins after a grace period and once income exceeds the threshold. An unemployed graduate therefore does not default merely through the passage of time.

Safeguards for subsidised student loans
IssueProposed rule
InterestZero for students; subsidy cost shown in the budget
Guarantor and mortgageNo personal guarantor or mortgage over the family home
Start of repayment12 months after graduation or withdrawal and after exceeding the income threshold
InstalmentA progressive percentage of income above the threshold
UnemploymentAutomatic suspension without penalty
DeathBalance discharged and not transferred to heirs
Permanent total disabilityFull or partial discharge under an official medical report
Civil non-paymentNo imprisonment or travel ban solely for inability to repay

Transition from the Two Existing Laws

The transitional rule is ‘not a day without support because the law changes’. The two current laws therefore continue during the academic year implementation begins, while data and beneficiaries move to the new register. Effective repeal is announced only from the beginning of a subsequent academic year after government confirms payment readiness and no reduction in nominal entitlements.

  1. Within 6 months: Establish the coordination committee and prepare the eligibility score and data exchange rules.
  2. Within 9 months: Issue the regulation and transitional benefits schedule and link social protection with educational enrolment.
  3. Within 12 months: Operate the unified register, objection pathway and emergency assistance.
  4. Beginning of the following academic year: Automatically enrol existing beneficiaries and repeal the two older laws if readiness testing demonstrates uninterrupted payments.
  5. Within 18 months: Launch student loans after Central Bank rules, budget arrangements and guarantees are complete.

Financial Impact and Cost Estimation Method

Sources published by the document date contain no single database combining actual school and university grant beneficiary numbers, regular disbursements, university exemptions and local transport and accommodation support sufficiently to produce a precise national estimate without major assumptions. The bill therefore gives no total cost figure.

A sound estimate must use an auditable formula: number of beneficiaries × average benefit × payment months for each support type, plus exemption and in-kind assistance costs, then loan subsidies including financing costs, credit losses and guarantees, followed by digital administration and audit costs. Costs must be broken down by school education, higher education, governorate and benefit type.

The law reduces some administrative costs by removing repeated paper evidence and linking databases, but may increase real expenditure if it identifies poor households previously unsupported. This is an intended effect where it reflects better coverage of eligible people, provided it stays within the budget ceiling and is not financed at the expense of school or university quality.

Financial rule: Non-repayable funding for those most in need takes precedence over loans and merit awards. Loans must not appear low-cost where the state bears interest or guarantees: these obligations and risks must be explicitly recorded in public accounts.

International Basis of the Right to Education

Iraq is a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, whose Article (13) recognises the right to education and the need to make secondary and higher education accessible through appropriate means. The Convention on the Rights of the Child also requires measures encouraging regular attendance and reducing dropout, making material support policies a legitimate part of protecting educational rights.

Disability rights conventions and non-discrimination principles affirm that equality is not limited to giving everyone the same amount. A student with a disability may incur additional costs to access the same opportunity. The bill therefore separates maintenance grants from accommodation costs and does not allow one to be deducted from the other.

The bill creates no international entitlement to a loan or grant of a specified amount; these are national instruments for implementing educational rights within available resources. It does, however, make resource allocation more accountable and prevent financial scarcity becoming undisclosed or discriminatory decisions.

Sources and References

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
    Constitutional basis for equality, the right to education and free education in public institutions.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A/
  2. Ministry of Justice — Public Iraqi University and Institute Student Grant Law No. (63) of 2012 with implementing instructions
    The applicable law establishing grants for low-income students in public universities and institutes.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.7953/
  3. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette, issue 4486 of 2018
    Includes Instructions No. (70) of 2018 facilitating implementation of the Public University and Institute Student Grant Law.
    https://moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4486.pdf
  4. Iraqi Gazette, issue 4308 — Public School Pupil and Student Grant Law No. (3) of 2014
    Establishes the school grant, its amounts, duration and suspension cases under current law.
    https://mop.gov.iq/documents/administration_financial/Announcements/%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%B0%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%20%D8%A8%D8%A3%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%88%D8%A8%20%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9%20%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%85%20(1)%20%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%86%D8%A9%202014%20.pdf
  5. Federal General Budget Law for 2023–2025 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
    Article (52) allocated monthly grants to students and pupils from households covered by the social protection network under the two existing laws.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%87%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-2025%D8%8C2024%D8%8C2023.pdf
  6. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Labour and Civil Society Institutions Committee, 21 April 2026
    Documents monitoring of educational grant payments to students from social protection households in 2026.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/blog/%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84-%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A4%D8%B3%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%AA%D8%B3%D8%AA/
  7. Ministry of Higher Education — Evening Study Rules 2025/2026
    Include fee reductions for students covered by social security and those with disabilities and special needs.
    https://mohesr.gov.iq/ar/assets/img/uploaded_files/dalel_2025_22026.pdf
  8. Ministry of Higher Education — Free scholarships for medical disciplines in private universities and colleges
    An existing free scholarship channel for medical disciplines within private education.
    https://pe-gate.mohesr.gov.iq/free.php
  9. Ministry of Higher Education — Admission of 1832 students to free medical-discipline scholarships for 2025/2026
    A recent example of scholarships within private higher education institutions.
    https://www.mohesr.gov.iq/ar/post/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%86-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%84-1832-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%83%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B9%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-2025-12-07-09
  10. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette, issue 4491: Government Scholarships, Fellowships and Financial Assistance Regulation No. (3) of 2018
    The existing overseas government scholarship, fellowship and financial assistance framework, excluded from repeal under the bill.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4491.pdf
  11. National Education Strategy in Iraq 2022–2031 — Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
    A reference for equitable educational access and support policies for groups with less access.
    https://dirasat.mohesr.gov.iq/assets/documents/files/National-Strategy-Education.pdf
  12. UNESCO GEM Education Profiles – Financing for equity in higher education: Iraq, updated 2026
    Identifies the national strategy's objective of expanding scholarships for disadvantaged groups and the absence of a unified, stand-alone equity-based assistance pathway.
    https://gem-report-education-profiles.unesco.org/northern-africa-and-western-asia/iraq/_financing-for-equity-in-higher-education.html
  13. UNESCO – 2026 GEM Report country case study: Iraq
    Recent analysis of access and equity in Iraqi education.
    https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2026-gem-report-country-case-studies/iraq
  14. OHCHR – Girls’ Right to Education in Iraq
    Presents the international and national framework for educational rights and non-discrimination in Iraq.
    https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/IQ/GirlsRightEducation_EN.pdf
  15. OHCHR Treaty Body Database – Iraq
    Documents Iraq's accession to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and other relevant human rights conventions.
    https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/countries.aspx?CountryCode=IRQ
  16. Ministry of Finance — In-year reports, 2026
    A reference for in-year financial monitoring and the need to show support and loan obligations in public accounts.
    https://www.mof.gov.iq/In-Year-Reports-2026

Iraqi legislation and government sources establish the legal position and existing programmes; United Nations and UNESCO sources explain equity and educational rights principles. No international source replaces Iraqi constitutional or legislative text.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.