Skip to content
POL-69

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Legislative proposal · Education, Scientific Research, Culture, Youth and Sport

Sports Governance, Federations, Facilities and Community Sport Law

Document numberPOL-69
Version1.0
Publication and update date
ScopeRepublic of Iraq

Executive summary

Iraqi sports regulation contains overlapping legal layers of different ages and institutional philosophies: Ministry of Youth and Sport Law No. (25) of 2011, Iraqi National Paralympic Committee Law No. (65) of 2017, Iraqi National Olympic Committee Law No. (29) of 2019, and National Sports Federations Law No. (24) of 2021. Meanwhile, Sports Clubs Law No. (18) of 1986 remains an outdated framework insufficiently reflecting modern professional sport, sports companies, broadcasting rights, investment, governance, athlete protection and facility management. This fragmentation is reflected in government work since 2023 on a unified sports-law draft and its renewed parliamentary discussion on 10 September 2026.

The proposal does not abolish Olympic-movement autonomy or return sport to direct government administration. It establishes a framework clearly separating technical sporting decisions, retained by federations, committees and clubs under international rules; public money, facilities, safety and rights, subject to Iraqi law and public oversight; and community sport, whose accessibility the state and governorates must expand under Article (36) of the Constitution.

The proposal preserves specialised Olympic, Paralympic and national-federation laws while replacing the old clubs law with a modern non-profit framework. Clubs may establish sports companies for professional and commercial activity, separating accounts and protecting club assets and membership. Minimum standards cover elections, conflicts of interest, ethics and audit committees, athlete representation and financial disclosure, avoiding government intervention in election outcomes or national-team selection.

Public financing shifts from unconditional grants to support linked to clear programmes and auditable data. Sporting results remain one assessment element, alongside age-group development, women, disability sport, community participation, integrity, transparency and financial sustainability. Public money may not cover commercial debts arising from undisciplined contracts without reform and accountability plans.

Sports facilities are treated as public assets with lifecycles, not construction projects ending at stadium inauguration. The proposal creates a national condition register, requires operating and maintenance plans before new construction, establishes electronic booking, disability access and shared school and university use, and regulates investment contracts so facilities do not become commercial properties stripped of their public function. This directly addresses maintenance, investment and administrative-detachment issues discussed by Parliament with governorates in September 2026.

The proposal adds modern athlete-protection and competition-integrity provisions: written contracts, insurance, independent medical care, child protection, anti-harassment safeguards, image and data rights, anti-doping under the convention ratified by Iraq, and prevention of match manipulation and insider-information betting. It expands community, school, university, women's and disability sport, making access and usage measurement part of public planning.

Legislative gap

First — Multiple laws with different philosophies: Some laws are recent and linked directly to international systems, while club regulation dates to 1986. Unified governance, financing and facility rules must be built without undermining federation and committee autonomy.

Second — Funding without a unified accountability framework: Federations, clubs and national teams need public support, but legislation must distinguish sporting performance, age-group development, community sport and asset maintenance, requiring audited accounts, material-contract disclosure and conflict-of-interest reporting.

Third — Old clubs facing a new sports economy: A modern club may operate a professional team, broadcasting and sponsorship rights, ticketing, shops and an academy, and need a commercial company. The old law inadequately separates non-profit personality from commerce or protects membership and sporting assets when investors enter.

Fourth — Facilities without lifecycle management: Construction without legally required operating, maintenance and long-term financing plans leads to stalled or deteriorating facilities after opening. Investment can become de facto privatisation unless core sporting functions, prices, access and asset return are specified.

Fifth — Weak integrated athlete protection: Sports laws need clear contractual, insurance, health, privacy, minor-protection, anti-harassment, grievance and career-transition rights, complementing federation rules rather than leaving athletes between sports and labour law.

Sixth — Community sport marginalised in legislation: National teams and major stadiums alone do not fulfil the constitutional right. Neighbourhoods, schools, universities, women, persons with disabilities and rural areas must enter planning, financing and access measurement.

Seventh — Competition integrity: Digital betting, inside information, match manipulation and doping developments require coordination among sports, oversight and law-enforcement bodies while preserving sports disciplinary procedures' character.

Proposed legislative policy

  • A unified framework law: Preserve modern specialised laws where possible, establish shared principles and replace the old clubs law.
  • Sporting autonomy with public accountability: No government intervention in technical selection or elections, and no immunity from law or public-money oversight.
  • Governance as a funding condition: Accounts, auditing, conflicts of interest, integrity and transparency become conditions for continued public support.
  • Non-profit clubs with professional opportunities: Allow separate sports companies while protecting club assets and members' rights.
  • Maintenance before construction: No public sports project without lifecycle costs and operating plans; no investment without protection of sporting functions.
  • Sport for all: Funding and planning measure community participation, women, disability sport and age groups alongside medals.
  • Athlete protection: Contracts, insurance, medicine, child protection, harassment, data and grievances become statutory rather than voluntary matters.
  • Modern integrity: Address doping, manipulation and unlawful betting through a national system linked to international commitments.

Draft law

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to modernise Iraqi sports legislation and unify governance, financing and integrity principles; protect sporting autonomy while subjecting public money, safety and rights to law; replace outdated club regulation with a modern professional-sport framework; regulate facility management, investment and maintenance; protect athletes and minors and combat doping and manipulation; and expand community, school, women's and disability sport in fulfilment of the constitutional right.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why preserve Olympic Committee and federation laws?

Sport differs from other administrative sectors because international recognition depends on national committees' and federations' independence from government in technical decisions and elections. Repealing specialised laws and rebuilding bodies within one government law could needlessly conflict with international systems. The proposal preserves modern laws issued between 2017 and 2021 while adding general public-finance, safety, integrity, rights and facility rules—legitimate state responsibilities.

2. Why replace the 1986 clubs law?

The clubs law predates modern professionalism, media markets, broadcasting rights, sports companies, digital data and contemporary governance by approximately four decades. Modern clubs need non-profit social identities alongside professional teams conducting commerce. Separate sports companies allow manageable accounts, contracts and investment without indirectly privatising clubs themselves.

3. Where does sporting autonomy end and state authority begin?

Technical team selection, playing rules, calendars, technical officiating and recognised internal elections belong to sporting autonomy. Bribery, corruption, assault, employment contracts, taxes, public money, facility safety, children's rights and data protection are general-law matters that autonomy cannot shield from oversight. This distinction is the proposal's backbone.

4. Public funding does not make federations government property

Public support gives the Ministry no right to select presidents, coaches or team line-ups. It does entitle the state to trace expenditure, require audited accounts and verify integrity. Governance conditions therefore increase disclosure and auditing as public support rises.

5. Why no fixed budget percentage for sport?

Parliamentary bodies discussed governorate sector allocations in September 2026, but a permanent statutory percentage may produce spending unrelated to actual need. The proposal favours population, facility gaps, participation, maintenance and community-sport-based allocation, disclosing budgets and spending instead of making the percentage itself the objective.

6. Facilities have lifespans and operating costs

The issue is more than stadium numbers. A large facility without a maintenance budget or operating model may close or deteriorate. Asset-management plans become conditions for significant public projects, and maintaining used facilities precedes new construction where benefits are greater and costs lower.

7. Investment need not mean losing public facilities

Investment can finance maintenance, services and revenue, but contracts must protect sporting time and space and specify prices, obligations and asset return. Selling naming rights or operating shops differs from turning public stadiums into closed commercial developments. The law permits the former and restricts the latter.

8. From elite to community sport

International victories matter but do not alone measure performance under Article (36). Measurement must also cover access to safe walking, play and training spaces and participation by girls, persons with disabilities, children and rural communities. Community sport therefore becomes integral to financing and planning.

9. Athlete protection is governance

Good systems require more than transparent accounts and valid elections: players must be able to complain without retaliation, obtain independent treatment, avoid forced returns after concussion, and be protected from exploitation as minors in academies. Physical and psychological safeguarding therefore forms part of accreditation and funding conditions.

10. Anti-doping and manipulation

Iraq is party to UNESCO's International Convention against Doping in Sport. Competition manipulation has also become a distinct global regulatory field. The proposal does not adopt treaties Iraq has not joined, but draws on cooperation practices between sport and law enforcement and prohibits betting and inside information from undermining match integrity.

Governance model and state–sports movement relationship

Proposed jurisdictional boundaries
AreaSports bodyPublic authority
Playing rules and technical selectionPrimary competenceIntervention only for safety and general law
Sports electionsInternally managed under law and international rulesLegal oversight without imposing results
Public moneyManagement within designated purposesFunding, audit and recovery for breaches
Employment contractsConclusion and performance of sports contractsLabour law and competent courts where applicable
Public facilitiesUse and operation under contracts or agreementsOwnership, planning, safety, maintenance and oversight
Doping and integrityApplication of sporting rulesInternational obligations, law enforcement and coordination

Clubs and professional sport model

The proposal treats clubs as non-profit social and sporting institutions, not inherently joint-stock companies. They may establish companies managing professional teams, sponsorship, ticketing, shops and media rights. Separation protects membership, identity and assets from indirect takeover and gives investors clear contracts, companies and governance rather than ambiguous ownership of community institutions.

It distinguishes legal registration from sporting licensing. Registration confers legal personality; professional-league participation requires additional federation conditions such as financial sustainability, grounds, youth development, contracts and safety. Small community clubs can therefore remain lightly regulated without premier-league requirements.

Facility management, investment and maintenance

Public-facility investment decisions
StageLegal and financial question
Before the projectIs there a genuine gap, and is repairing an existing asset preferable to new construction?
DesignHave lifecycle, maintenance, accessibility and safety costs been included?
ContractingIs competition public, value for money clear and commitments measurable?
OperationAre sporting functions, prices and community access preserved?
OversightAre revenues, maintenance, performance indicators and incidents published and reviewed?
Contract endWill the asset return in operable condition without hidden state liabilities?

Existing government electronic booking demonstrates that facility digitisation is practical. The proposal extends it to a national register and transparent bookings where infrastructure exists, without requiring technology in small local facilities where system costs exceed benefits.

Community sport and equal access

Community sport serves a different purpose from elite sport: movement, health, belonging and safe, low-cost activity. Governorate success is measured by proximity to sporting spaces, opening hours, use by women, children and persons with disabilities, and the share of genuinely usable facilities, alongside international-stadium numbers.

This complements the international right of persons with disabilities to access sporting activities and facilities and participate in mainstream and disability-specific sport. The proposal requires accessibility in new and renovated public facilities rather than relying only on separate Paralympic buildings, while retaining specialised Paralympic infrastructure where needed.

Integrity and anti-doping

Iraq ratified the International Convention against Doping in Sport in 2013, and its National Sports Federations Law refers to the World Anti-Doping Code. The proposal therefore ensures sufficient functional independence between test-selection and results-management bodies and those funding teams or selecting athletes, making education integral to national programmes.

Match manipulation requires distinguishing sporting violations from crime. Federations may discipline athletes for betting or manipulation under their rules, while police and courts address bribery, blackmail, money laundering or unlawful activities where their elements exist. Lawful information exchange creates no parallel criminal-investigation system.

Legislative transition

The transition neither re-establishes the sports movement nor requires immediate elections. It begins by inventorying statutes, clubs, facilities, public contracts and funding sources, followed by alignment within up to eighteen months. Repeal of the old clubs law coincides with readiness of the new registration system to avoid a legal vacuum.

  1. Months 0–6: Prepare core register, funding, facility and athlete-protection regulations.
  2. Months 6–12: Transfer club registers, launch the facility register and publish financing, audit and conflict rules.
  3. Months 12–18: Align statutes and contracts and complete major-facility management plans.
  4. After 18 months: Review whether specific provisions of the 2017, 2019 and 2021 laws need technical amendments to prevent conflict.

This pathway is especially relevant because a government unified sports-law draft remained under discussion in 2026. If enacted first, the texts must be consolidated rather than creating parallel laws.

Financial and operational impact

Reliable national facility and community-sport costs require updated inventories of assets, condition, maintenance expenditure and contracts—precisely why the national register is proposed. The proposal sets neither an aggregate figure nor a fixed budget percentage.

The largest new costs involve facility inventories and asset management, safety and access improvements, insurance and medical care, digital systems and community programmes. Waste may decline by prioritising maintenance over unjustified construction, improving investment contracts and directing funding towards compliant governance rather than unconditional spending.

Budgets must distinguish four categories: sports-body support, facility operations and maintenance, community sport and talent programmes, and new capital projects. Combining them can make increased expenditure appear to support sport even when entirely absorbed by new facilities, leaving nothing for maintenance or participation.

Financing approach: Allocation rests on actual need, participation, facility gaps, maintenance, geographic fairness and governance. The proposal does not recommend a permanent fixed governorate or national budget percentage without assessing fiscal capacity and annual priorities.

Relevant international standards

Olympic-movement good-governance principles combine autonomy in rules, structures and elections free from external influence with duties of governance, integrity, transparency and accountability. The proposal explicitly adopts autonomous sporting decisions with full legal responsibility for finance, rights and safety.

UNESCO's anti-doping convention binds Iraq and grounds the anti-doping provisions. The Macolin Convention on competition manipulation is used solely comparatively as an advanced coordination model for authorities and sports bodies, without claiming Iraqi membership.

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities requires parties to promote mainstream and disability-specific sports participation and access to sporting and recreational venues. Accessibility is therefore a core facility and programme standard rather than an optional service.

Sources and references

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
    Constitutional foundation for sport, equality and public rights.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A/
  2. Ministry of Justice — Instructions implementing Ministry of Youth and Sport Law No. (25) of 2011, Iraqi Gazette 4681
    Official reference establishing current law and the organisation of youth and sports forums and activities.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4681.pdf
  3. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi National Olympic Committee Law No. (29) of 2019
    Official reference for the specialised Olympic Committee law.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.6373/
  4. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette No. 4632: National Sports Federations Law No. (24) of 2021
    Official federation-law text requiring adherence to the Olympic Charter, World Anti-Doping Code and good-governance principles.
    https://www.moj.gov.iq/upload/pdf/4632.pdf
  5. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette No. 4449: Iraqi National Paralympic Committee Law No. (65) of 2017
    Official reference documenting enactment of the Paralympic Committee law.
    https://moj.gov.iq/view.3226/
  6. Sports Clubs Law No. (18) of 1986 — Iraqi legislation database
    Legal reference for the existing old clubs framework, used to identify the need for modern replacement.
    https://dijlex.com/iq/ar/legislation/sports-clubs-law-1986
  7. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Labour Committee discusses the unified sports-law draft, 10 September 2026
    Latest available official documentation of continuing draft discussion, covering facilities, federations, clubs and school sport.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/blog/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%85%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B9-%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D9%88/
  8. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Governorate youth and sports financing and facilities, 22 September 2026
    Documents funding, stadium, club and facility maintenance challenges and governorate allocation monitoring.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/en/2026/09/22/parliamentary-labor-committee-hosts-heads-of-youth-and-sports-committees-in-provincial-councils/
  9. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Facility management, investment and administrative detachment, 23 September 2026
    Documents the need for unified transparent investment rules and clear ministry–governorate responsibilities.
    https://iq.parliament.iq/en/2026/09/23/parliamentary-labor-committee-hosts-provincial-youth-and-sports-directorate-heads/
  10. Ur Government Portal — Sports-facility booking in Baghdad and governorates
    Documents an existing digital Ministry stadium, hall and facility booking service that can be expanded.
    https://ur.gov.iq/index/show-eservice/51650/10037/org
  11. National Investment Commission — Youth and sports investment opportunities
    Examples of sports facilities and projects offered for investment, showing the importance of operating, investment and maintenance law.
    https://investpromo.gov.iq/all-province-youth-and-sport-sector/
  12. UNESCO – International Convention against Doping in Sport
    Iraq ratified the convention on 21 January 2013; it is the intergovernmental anti-doping foundation.
    https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/international-convention-against-doping-sport
  13. WADA – Anti-Doping Testing Figures / National Olympic Committee of Iraq
    Reference showing Iraqi-body activity in anti-doping systems and international testing reports.
    https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/2023_anti_doping_testing_figures_en_0.pdf
  14. International Olympic Committee – Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance within the Olympic Movement
    Recent reference on autonomy, elections, integrity, transparency and accountability within the Olympic movement.
    https://library.olympics.com/cnomar/digitalCollection/DigitalCollectionAttachmentDownloadHandler.ashx?documentId=3156418&parentDocumentId=3156416&skipCopyright=true&skipWatermark=true
  15. AFC – Statutes of the Iraqi Football Association
    Iraqi practical example of governance, discipline, integrity and dispute resolution within a federation belonging to an international system.
    https://assets.the-afc.com/downloads/member-associations/Statutes__Electoral_Codes/Iraq/Statutes-English.pdf
  16. United Nations – Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Article 30
    Reference for disability rights in mainstream and specialised sport and facility access.
    https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/article-30-participation-in-cultural-life-recreation-leisure-and-sport.html
  17. Council of Europe – Macolin Convention on Manipulation of Sports Competitions
    Comparative reference on competition integrity and authority–sports coordination against manipulation, without assuming Iraq is a party.
    https://www.coe.int/en/web/sport/macolin
  18. Council of Europe – Conventions on anti-doping and safety, security and service at sports events
    Comparative reference for integrated spectator safety, security and service and anti-doping.
    https://www.coe.int/en/web/sport/conventions

The document uses the Constitution, Iraqi legislation and government and parliamentary sources to establish legal status; international governance, integrity, anti-doping and accessibility sources provide comparison and professional-standard interpretation.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.