Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme
Proposed draft law · Education, Scientific Research, Culture, Youth and Sport
Antiquities, Heritage and Cultural Property Protection Law
Executive Summary
This file proposes repealing Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002 and replacing it with a modern, integrated federal law, rather than creating a parallel law. The existing Law provided an important foundation for protection, registration, excavation and criminalisation, but predates the 2005 Constitution and contains structures, language, procedures and financial penalties no longer adequate for a modern protection system. Nor does it fully reflect obligations that subsequently entered into force for Iraq, notably the 1999 Second Protocol to the Hague Convention, effective for Iraq on 6 July 2022, and the 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, effective for Iraq on 10 February 2024.
The proposal follows Article (113) of the Constitution, which regards antiquities, archaeological sites, heritage structures, manuscripts and coins as national treasures within federal competence, requiring their management in cooperation with regions and governorates. It also draws on Article (35) concerning support for cultural activities and institutions. It therefore creates no new authority, instead building on the existing State Board of Antiquities and Heritage, expanding its instruments and imposing clearer duties in digital inventory, transparency, coordination and preventive planning.
The proposed law shifts protection from a model heavily reliant on designation and punishment after damage to a preventive model: a national digital register, archaeological sensitivity maps, buffer zones adapted to each site, early project surveys, a chance-find system, conservation and restoration standards, adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, provenance checks before acquisition or transactions, and links between customs, police and museums. It adds separate regulation of underwater heritage and protects intangible heritage in a manner that respects its bearer communities without turning it into state property.
For armed conflict, the proposal integrates international obligations into general antiquities and heritage legislation rather than proliferating parallel legislation. This is consistent with the Judicial Supervision Commission’s published 2023 opinion recommending review of the draft cultural property protection law and integration of its provisions into the Antiquities and Heritage Law wherever possible. It also transfers criminal investigation and trial entirely to the judiciary, rather than granting cultural administrators criminal adjudication powers.
Constitutional and Legal Context
Legislative protection of Iraq’s antiquities is not a peripheral cultural choice; it is an express constitutional responsibility. Article (113) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq states that antiquities, archaeological sites, heritage structures, manuscripts and coins are national treasures falling within federal competence, to be managed in cooperation with regions and governorates under arrangements regulated by law. Article (35) also provides for state support of cultural activities and institutions commensurate with Iraq’s civilisational and cultural history.
The principal law in force is Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002, published in Iraqi Gazette Issue 3957 on 18 November 2002. It regulates definitions, registration, immovable sites, movable antiquities, heritage buildings, excavation, restitution and penalties. The Ministry of Justice documented its text in an official translation issued in 2022. The current Law requires, for example, inclusion of sites in registers and maps, antiquities authority approval for certain projects, protection of heritage buildings, regulation of excavation and efforts to recover stolen antiquities.
The international framework has changed since the Law was enacted. Iraq is a party to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its First Protocol, and acceded to the 1999 Second Protocol, which entered into force for Iraq on 6 July 2022. Iraq is also party to the 1970 UNESCO Convention concerning illicit import, export and transfer of ownership of cultural property, the 1972 World Heritage Convention and the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. The 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage has applied to Iraq since 10 February 2024.
In 2023, the Judicial Supervision Commission examined a separate draft law on protecting cultural property during armed conflict. It found considerable overlap between the legal interest protected and Law No. 55 of 2002 and proposed integrating wartime protection provisions and related offences into the existing Law, wherever possible, instead of creating parallel legislation. A recently published parliamentary plan expressly identified the inadequacy of legal coverage in keeping pace with international conventions and called for updating antiquities legislation and completing protection.
Legislative Gaps Addressed by the Proposal
| Area | Problem | Proposed response |
|---|---|---|
| Constitutional foundation | The Law predates the 2005 Constitution and is not structured around Article 113. | Establish federal competence and institutional cooperation with regions and governorates. |
| Registration | Heavy reliance on paper registers and fragmented procedures. | A national digital and geographical register linked to planning and property registration. |
| Buffer zones | Rigid restrictions, such as uniform distances, unsuitable for every site. | Protection zones based on assessment of risk, significance and cultural landscape. |
| Heritage buildings | Protection may conflict with usability, maintenance and the owner’s financial capacity. | Adaptive reuse, financial support, intervention standards and graduated restrictions. |
| Excavation | A need for updated rules on data, samples and capacity-building. | Data management plans, Iraqi training, publication deadlines and sample controls. |
| Illicit trafficking | Absence of a detailed due-diligence and provenance-record system. | Duties for dealers, museums and auction houses, and interconnected databases. |
| Underwater heritage | The old framework does not reflect the 2001 Convention, in force since 2024. | A dedicated chapter on in situ protection, prohibition of commercial exploitation and licensed excavation. |
| Armed conflict | International protections are dispersed and insufficiently translated into national measures. | Peacetime plans, enhanced protection and criminalisation of serious violations. |
| Criminal procedure | The old Law gave the head of the antiquities authority the powers of a misdemeanour judge for certain offences. | Reserve investigation and trial to the judiciary, with limited administrative enforcement. |
| Financial penalties | Fixed nominal amounts from 2002 have lost their deterrent effect. | Fines linked to value and damage within proportionate limits. |
Proposed Legislative Policy
The most suitable legislative option is a comprehensive repeal-and-replacement law. A partial amendment would not address the accumulated effects of outdated drafting, institutional change, new international obligations and technological change in documentation, e-commerce and smuggling, nor the gap in preventive protection. Conversely, no new national authority is needed, since the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage already performs the core function; its powers, procedures and oversight need modernisation.
The proposal divides protection into connected layers: identifying and registering an asset; preventing risk before it materialises; regulating conservation and restoration; regulating the market, possession and excavation; international cooperation and restitution; preparedness for emergencies and armed conflict; and criminalisation and punishment as a last resort. This structure addresses a common problem in heritage laws: strong penalties on paper alongside weak maps, registers, planning and early warning.
The proposal also distinguishes tangible heritage, which may be subject to ownership, registration, possession and restitution, from intangible heritage as a living practice carried by communities and individuals. It therefore does not declare intangible heritage ‘state property’, but regulates inventory, safeguarding, participation and benefit-sharing in public investment.
Draft Law
Presidency of the Republic
On the basis of the enactment by the Council of Representatives and ratification by the President of the Republic, and pursuant to the Constitution, the following Law is enacted:
Chapter One — General Provisions and Definitions
Article (1) — Objectives
This Law aims to protect, conserve and manage antiquities, heritage and cultural property in the Republic of Iraq as national wealth and public memory; prevent their loss, disfigurement or illicit trafficking; ensure their documentation, preservation and availability for knowledge, research, education and responsible cultural tourism; and implement Iraq’s international obligations in this field.
Article (2) — Scope
This Law applies to antiquities, archaeological sites, heritage buildings and areas, manuscripts, coins, museum collections, movable and immovable cultural property and underwater cultural heritage, and to surveying, excavation, conservation, restoration, transactions, loans, import, export and restitution. Its provisions on intangible cultural heritage apply to inventory, safeguarding, intergenerational transmission and participation of bearer communities, without making living elements state-owned assets merely by listing them.
Article (3) — Definitions
The following terms have the meanings set out below:
- Ministry: the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Antiquities.
- Minister: the Minister of Culture, Tourism and Antiquities.
- Board: the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage or its lawful federal successor.
- Antiquity: any movable or immovable asset, part thereof, remains or material evidence of archaeological, historical or scientific value, regardless of material, including objects underground or underwater whose archaeological value is established under this Law.
- Archaeological site: a place containing antiquities, strata, remains or evidence of archaeological or historical value, whether designated or not, once its character is established through legal procedures.
- Heritage building or area: a building, urban fabric, market, street, neighbourhood or cultural landscape of historical, architectural, artistic, social or religious value designated under this Law.
- Cultural property: movable and immovable assets significant to archaeology, history, art, literature, science, religion or national memory, including public collections, documents, manuscripts and coins.
- Underwater cultural heritage: all traces of human existence of cultural, historical or archaeological character that have been wholly or partly underwater, periodically or continuously, for at least one hundred years.
- Intangible cultural heritage: practices, expressions, knowledge, skills and associated instruments and cultural spaces recognised by communities, groups or individuals as part of their cultural heritage, under the 2003 Convention.
- Provenance record: a documented chain of an object’s ownership, possession or transfer, its origin and the date it left its country or site.
- Provenance due diligence: reasonable procedures to verify lawful origin, ownership and export before acquisition, transfer, loan or trade.
Article (4) — Principles of Protection
Protection shall prioritise in situ conservation wherever possible, material and identity authenticity, minimal reversible intervention, documentation before and after intervention, respect for lawful property rights subject to necessary public-interest restrictions and fair compensation upon expropriation, access to non-sensitive information, participation of local authorities and affected communities, and prevention of protection being used as a pretext to erase Iraq’s cultural or historical diversity.
Article (5) — Federal Competence and Cooperation
Federal authorities shall exercise their constitutional competence over antiquities, archaeological sites, heritage structures, manuscripts and coins. These treasures shall be managed in cooperation with regions and governorates under Article (113) of the Constitution. Cooperation includes data exchange, protection planning, project review, emergency management and coordination of museums, stores and sites, without prejudice to the constitutional powers of each level of government.
Chapter Two — Inventory, Registration, Classification and Protection Planning
Article (6) — National Digital Register
The Board shall establish and manage a unified national digital register of antiquities, cultural property, sites, heritage buildings and areas, linked to geographical maps, property records and customs and international police databases where appropriate. The register shall have a public section and a restricted section protecting excavation sites, security data and sensitive ownership information.
Article (7) — Proactive Inventory
The Board shall maintain a periodic national survey programme identifying known and potential sites and archaeologically sensitive areas and updating maps before urban expansion and major infrastructure projects. Recognition of archaeological value shall not depend on prior publication where material evidence requiring interim protection emerges during works.
Article (8) — Designation of Protected Sites or Buildings
The Minister shall designate an archaeological site, heritage building or area on a reasoned technical recommendation from the Board. The decision shall specify the property or site, boundaries, protection level, buffer zone and principal restrictions. Relevant parties, local authorities and property registration bodies shall be notified, and the decision published in the Iraqi Gazette and on the Board’s electronic platform.
Article (9) — Right to Object and Appeal
An owner, holder of a right in rem or local authority may object to an independent ministerial committee within thirty days of notification. The committee’s decision may be challenged before the administrative courts. Appeal shall not suspend urgent protective measures where delay would expose the cultural asset to serious risk, provided the measures are proportionate and reasoned.
Article (10) — Buffer and Protection Zones
Each site’s or building’s buffer zone shall be determined according to its significance, sensitivity and surrounding urban environment; no rigid uniform distance shall apply to all cases. Planning controls shall specify heights, uses, colours, advertisements, excavation, vibration, pollution sources and other matters necessary to preserve the site’s integrity and visual setting.
Article (11) — Links to Urban Planning and Property Registration
Sites and buffer zones shall be incorporated into master plans, land uses and property registration maps. The Board shall provide updated data layers to the Baghdad Mayoralty, municipalities, governorates and planning bodies. No building, clearance or change-of-use permit within a protected area may be granted without competent authority approval, within a procedural period not exceeding thirty working days from a complete application.
Article (12) — Three-dimensional Documentation and Archiving
The Board shall establish standards for digital photography, laser scanning, three-dimensional modelling, original-file preservation and backups for priority sites and objects. Digital documentation is not a substitute for physical conservation but a tool for protection, research, restitution and post-disaster rehabilitation.
Chapter Three — Protection of Sites, Immovable Antiquities and Heritage Buildings
Article (13) — Prohibition of Damage and Unauthorised Alteration
Demolition, removal, disfigurement, dismantling, burial, burning, uprooting or alteration of an archaeological site, heritage building or part thereof is prohibited, as are excavation, construction, installation of services or extraction of materials within the protected area without a licence. The prohibition includes acts altering archaeological context or separating architectural elements from their location.
Article (14) — Maintenance Duties of Owners and Possessors
The owner or possessor of a heritage building shall reasonably maintain it, prevent deliberate deterioration and notify the competent body of serious risks. The Board shall issue technical guidance on intervention levels. An owner may not be required to undertake works beyond their financial capacity without support, a grant, a concessional loan or public contribution proportionate to the public benefit.
Article (15) — Conservation and Restoration
Restoration shall follow an approved plan prepared by qualified specialists, covering condition documentation, material diagnosis, intervention method, risk treatment and subsequent maintenance. Unnecessary replacement of original elements or creation of an imagined historical appearance without scientific evidence is prohibited.
Article (16) — Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings
A heritage building’s use may change if the new use is compatible with its significance, authenticity and structural integrity and does not require removal of essential elements or harmful loads or services. Decisions shall prioritise preservation of heritage value and building sustainability, rather than retaining a historical function that is no longer viable.
Article (17) — Support and Incentives
Grants, concessional loans, exemptions or facilities may be allocated for approved conservation works, prioritising threatened buildings and sites benefiting the public. Assistance shall be linked to a maintenance agreement, inspection rights and recovery of support in case of misuse.
Article (18) — Expropriation and Rights in Rem
Property of exceptional significance may be expropriated where less restrictive protection is infeasible or its survival faces a serious threat, under the Expropriation Law and with fair compensation. Easements for protection, access, views or maintenance may be created where necessary, with compensation for particular damage arising from them under the law.
Article (19) — Public and Private Projects
Public and private bodies shall integrate antiquities and heritage protection from feasibility and design stages. The implementing body shall bear the cost of preventive archaeological surveys or rescue excavation necessitated by its project, within an agreed timetable that shall not be used to obstruct the project without justification.
Article (20) — Chance Finds
Upon discovery of an antiquity, structure, buried deposit or significant stratum during excavation or construction, work shall immediately cease at the find and within the necessary safety zone. The nearest police station and the Board or antiquities inspectorate shall be notified within twenty-four hours. The Board shall inspect within seventy-two hours where circumstances permit and make an initial decision to resume work, extend protection or conduct rescue excavation.
Article (21) — Compensation for Exceptional Suspension
Where a final protection decision deprives a licensed, good-faith project of a lawful benefit beyond ordinary general restrictions, compensation shall be considered under general rules and the Expropriation Law. No compensation is due for stopping unlicensed work or for harm resulting from concealment of archaeological information known to the project owner.
Chapter Four — Movable Antiquities and Cultural Property, Museums and Collections
Article (22) — Public Ownership of Excavated Antiquities
Antiquities discovered through organised excavation or chance finds within the Republic of Iraq are public assets dedicated to cultural benefit, unless legally established as lawful private cultural property registered before this Law enters into force. Discovery does not confer ownership on the finder.
Article (23) — Lawful Private Possession
Manuscripts, coins, heritage materials and private collections with proven lawful provenance may be retained and registered under this Law. Their owner shall receive a digital document recording description, photograph, identity and registration number. Registration does not acknowledge ownership of an object later shown to have been stolen or illicitly excavated or exported.
Article (24) — Disposal and Transfer
Registered cultural property may not be sold, gifted, pledged or transferred without notifying the Board and updating its provenance record. The Board has a time-limited pre-emption right where the property has exceptional national significance, at fair value determined by an independent committee subject to objection.
Article (25) — Public and Private Museums
Public and private museums shall comply with security, conservation, environmental, documentation, inventory and emergency-planning standards. Licensing a private museum requires disclosure of collections’ ownership and provenance. Display of objects of unknown provenance is prohibited where serious indications suggest looting or illicit export.
Article (26) — Periodic Collection Inventories
Museums and government stores shall periodically reconcile physical and digital collection records, separating custody, inventory and approval functions wherever possible. Any loss or tampering shall immediately be reported to the judiciary, police and Board, and the object’s details entered into relevant national and international databases.
Article (27) — Loans and Temporary Exhibitions
Cultural property may be loaned or temporarily displayed inside or outside Iraq by a decision based on assessment of conservation, security, insurance and cultural and diplomatic interests. A contract shall specify loan duration, immunity from seizure wherever legally possible, and transport and return conditions. A loan may not transfer ownership or extinguish Iraq’s right to restitution.
Article (28) — Copies, Models and Imaging
Copies, models, images and digital reproductions may be produced for scientific, educational, cultural or commercial purposes under a transparent licensing system that protects originals from damage and prevents misrepresentation. Physical copies must be clearly marked to distinguish them from originals. Non-commercial photography at sites and museums may be prohibited only for published conservation, security or lawful-rights reasons.
Chapter Five — Excavation, Scientific Research and Archaeological Data
Article (29) — Responsibility for Excavation
The Board shall undertake archaeological excavation and may license qualified Iraqi and foreign universities, centres and missions through scientific competition or cooperation agreements. Any unlicensed excavation seeking antiquities is prohibited, including use of detection or survey equipment for non-scientific purposes in archaeological areas.
Article (30) — Licensing Conditions
A licence application requires a clear research plan, qualified team, demonstrated funding, immediate conservation plan for finds, data and sample management system, Iraqi training and participation programme, safety and security measures, and an undertaking to deposit records and preliminary and final findings.
Article (31) — Rights of Iraqi Personnel and Capacity-building
Foreign missions shall meaningfully involve Iraqi specialists and students in fieldwork, analysis and publication, and transfer agreed skills, equipment and knowledge, respecting scientific authorship rules and not excluding Iraqi researchers from results they materially helped produce.
Article (32) — Scientific Ownership and Data
Archaeological finds remain public property. Original records, photographs, maps, models and excavation data form part of the national scientific archive, while researchers’ publication and authorship rights are preserved. Contracts shall establish reasonable preliminary publication deadlines that do not become perpetual monopolies over information.
Article (33) — Samples and Analysis Outside Iraq
Archaeological, biological or geological samples may leave Iraq for analysis only under a licence specifying type, quantity, purpose, analysis location, deadline for return of recoverable material, and delivery of raw data and results. Destruction beyond scientific necessity is prohibited.
Article (34) — Suspension or Revocation of a Licence
The Board may temporarily stop work where conservation or safety is threatened or licence conditions are breached. The team shall remedy the breach within a reasonable period. A licence may be revoked by reasoned decision after hearing the licensee where breaches are serious or repeated, without prejudice to civil or criminal liability.
Chapter Six — Underwater Cultural Heritage
Article (35) — Principle of In Situ Protection
Preserving underwater cultural heritage in its original location shall be the first option before any intervention is authorised, unless recovery or excavation is shown to be necessary for protection, research or public benefit under scientific standards.
Article (36) — Prohibition of Commercial Exploitation
Commercial exploitation of underwater cultural heritage through sale, purchase, barter or dispersal of collections is prohibited. This does not prevent responsible tourism or educational services that neither damage the site nor turn heritage into a traded commodity.
Article (37) — Reporting and Maritime and River Licensing
Anyone finding indications of underwater heritage during diving, fishing, port works, dredging or surveying shall notify the Board and the competent maritime or river authority. Recovery, sampling or movement of objects is permitted only under a specialised archaeological licence.
Article (38) — International Standards and Cooperation
Fieldwork shall follow the Rules in the Annex to the 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, in force for Iraq. The Ministry shall coordinate with competent bodies where another state, a state vessel or aircraft, or an area subject to special international cooperation rules is involved.
Chapter Seven — Intangible Cultural Heritage and Bearer Communities
Article (39) — Community Participation in Inventories
In cooperation with communities, groups and individuals who bear the heritage, the Ministry shall prepare updated lists and inventories of intangible cultural heritage elements. No element may be listed or presented in a manner that strips it of its meaning for the community or discloses secret or sacred knowledge contrary to the community’s legitimate wishes.
Article (40) — Safeguarding Measures
Safeguarding measures include supporting intergenerational transmission of skills, voluntary documentation, non-formal education, protection of the social environments necessary for continued practice, and support for artisans, practitioners and community initiatives. Living heritage may not be frozen into a rigid form that prevents its natural evolution.
Article (41) — Fair Economic Benefit
Where a public body or government-funded project commercially uses an element of intangible heritage, a fair share of benefits shall be allocated to the relevant community or practitioners, respecting their names and right to object to serious distortion. This Article does not affect applicable intellectual property rules.
Chapter Eight — Preventing Illicit Trafficking, Import, Export and Restitution
Article (42) — Prohibition of Unauthorised Export
Permanent removal of an antiquity or protected cultural property from Iraq is prohibited except where expressly permitted by law and following technical examination. Temporary removal for study, restoration or exhibition may be authorised by a licence specifying destination, duration, insurance and return conditions.
Article (43) — Lawful Import
Foreign cultural property shall not be admitted where reasonable grounds suggest it was stolen, looted or exported contrary to the law of its country of origin. The importer shall provide provenance and export documents where required. Authorities may provisionally seize the object and notify the Board, judicial authorities and state concerned.
Article (44) — Duties of Dealers and Auction Houses
Licensed cultural-object dealers and auction operators shall establish seller and buyer identities, retain provenance records, photographs and documents for at least ten years, check available stolen-object databases, and refuse and report a transaction under the law where serious suspicion arises.
Article (45) — Prohibition on Public Institutions Acquiring Objects of Uncertain Provenance
A museum, university or public institution may not purchase or accept a donated object presenting provenance risks without a written examination demonstrating due diligence. The acquisition decision and object’s origin shall be published insofar as this does not jeopardise investigations or security.
Article (46) — Recovery of Iraqi Property
The Ministry and Board, in coordination with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, judicial authorities and security bodies, shall prepare restitution files and claims for Iraqi cultural property that was stolen, looted or illicitly exported, using the 1970 UNESCO Convention and other instruments, bilateral agreements and diplomatic and judicial channels.
Article (47) — Return of Foreign Property
Iraqi courts shall determine applications for return of foreign cultural property under applicable treaties, Iraqi laws and principles of good faith and due diligence. Reciprocity shall not be applied to legitimise possession proven to derive from internationally prohibited theft or looting.
Article (48) — Customs and Police Cooperation
Customs, police and the Board shall establish a joint contact point for document verification, exchange of object images and risk lists, and initial-identification training, linking procedures to relevant international systems where lawful and technically feasible.
Chapter Nine — Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict, Emergencies and Disasters
Article (49) — Peacetime Measures
The Ministry and Board, in coordination with the Ministries of Defence and Interior, civil defence and local authorities, shall prepare advance cultural property protection plans covering inventories, backups, fire and flood protection, collection evacuation, identification of safe shelters, and training of personnel and relevant forces.
Article (50) — Respect for Cultural Property
Directing hostilities against cultural property or using it in a manner that makes it a military objective is prohibited, subject strictly to exceptions permitted by the 1954 Hague Convention and its Second Protocol only where the conditions of imperative military necessity are met, under the decision, rank and procedures specified in military regulations consistent with the Convention.
Article (51) — Enhanced Protection and the Distinctive Emblem
The Board shall prepare lists of property eligible for special or enhanced protection under international instruments and coordinate registration, use of the distinctive emblem and prevention of its misuse. Absence of the emblem does not remove protection afforded by international law or this Law.
Article (52) — Occupation and Internal Conflicts
Iraqi authorities, within their remit, shall prevent looting, theft, vandalism and unlawful appropriation in conflict-affected territories and take feasible measures to preserve cultural institutions. Protection also applies in non-international armed conflicts under applicable international rules.
Article (53) — Emergency Registers and Business Continuity
Priority museums, stores and sites shall maintain encrypted emergency records and off-site backups, contact lists, evacuation routes and basic emergency salvage supplies. Plans shall be periodically tested through exercises that do not endanger collections.
Chapter Ten — Governance, Oversight and Financing
Article (54) — Responsibilities of the Board
The Board shall manage the national register, surveys, excavation, licensing, conservation and restoration; supervise its museums and stores; prepare restitution files; coordinate with governorates and regions; issue technical guidance; and publish an annual report on the state of heritage, risks, achievements and expenditure.
Article (55) — Heritage Advisory Council
A non-executive advisory council shall be established within the Ministry, including specialists in archaeology, architecture, restoration, museums, law, history, environment and digitalisation, and representatives of relevant governorates and communities. It shall advise on classification criteria, policies and major projects, without replacing the Board or exercising executive powers.
Article (56) — Independent Technical Committees
Technical committees shall be formed as needed for classification, valuation, restoration and objections, with due regard to expertise and conflicts of interest. A person who prepared a project or benefits financially from it may not vote on a technical decision concerning it.
Article (57) — Transparency and Public Data
The Ministry and Board shall publish lists of designated sites, classification decisions, licensing procedures, contract and grant summaries, annual reports and recovery and loss statistics, withholding sensitive coordinates and security, investigation and private information.
Article (58) — Sources of Financing
Antiquities and heritage protection shall be financed through public budget allocations, statutory fees, visitor and service revenues, grants and gifts accepted under law, and court-awarded compensation. Relevant revenues shall be prioritised for conservation, security, documentation, maintenance and training. Revenue generation does not justify overriding protection standards.
Article (59) — Heritage Rescue Fund
The budget law or existing financial mechanisms may allocate an account or financing window for urgent restoration and salvage after disasters and conflict, subject to oversight, audit and published expenditure. This Article does not create a new independent administrative entity.
Chapter Eleven — Offences and Penalties
Article (60) — General Principles of Punishment
Penalties in this Chapter apply without prejudice to a harsher penalty under another law. The severity of harm, cultural significance, offender’s intent and capacity, repetition and benefit obtained shall be considered. Confiscation, removal of encroachments, reinstatement or payment of restoration costs shall be supplementary measures wherever legally and technically feasible.
Article (61) — Theft of Antiquities and Cultural Property
Anyone stealing an antiquity or registered cultural property from a museum, store, site or public institution shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than seven and no more than fifteen years and a fine of no less than twice and no more than six times its assessed value. Being an employee entrusted with custody or guarding is an aggravating circumstance.
Article (62) — Smuggling and Unlawful Removal
Anyone removing or attempting to remove an antiquity from Iraq unlawfully shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than seven and no more than fifteen years and a fine of no less than three and no more than ten times its assessed value. For non-archaeological heritage property, the penalty shall be reduced according to the seriousness of the act and cultural significance, but shall not fall below detention, a fine and confiscation.
Article (63) — Unlawful Excavation and Looting
Anyone undertaking unlicensed digging or excavation to find antiquities, or appropriating finds resulting from it, shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than five and no more than ten years and a fine proportionate to the damage. The fine shall be doubled where heavy equipment or an organised network is used, or the act destroys an archaeological context that cannot be restored.
Article (64) — Destruction, Demolition and Disfigurement
Anyone intentionally destroying, demolishing or disfiguring a protected archaeological or heritage site, building or element shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than three and no more than ten years and a fine of at least twice the cost of damage and restoration. Where damage results from gross negligence during a licensed project, the penalty shall be detention or a fine, with an obligation to remedy damage and pay compensation as appropriate.
Article (65) — Illicit Trade and Forgery
Anyone knowingly trading in stolen or unlawfully excavated or exported antiquities or cultural property shall be punished by imprisonment for no more than ten years, a fine and confiscation of seized items. Anyone making or selling an imitation as an original with intent to defraud shall be punished by detention and a fine, with confiscation of tools and materials used.
Article (66) — Offences During Armed Conflict
Anyone intentionally committing a serious violation that the Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention requires to be criminalised shall be punished by life or fixed-term imprisonment according to the act’s seriousness. These include attacking cultural property under enhanced protection; using it or its immediate surroundings to support military action contrary to protection conditions; or extensive destruction, appropriation, theft or systematic looting of cultural property. Jurisdictional provisions required by applicable treaties and Iraqi laws shall apply.
Article (67) — Liability of Legal Persons
Where an offence is committed in the name or interest of a private legal person as a result of a decision or gross negligence by its management, it shall incur the fines and measures prescribed in the Penal Code and related laws, including suspension of activity or licence revocation where appropriate, without exempting the responsible natural person.
Article (68) — Judicial Competence and Investigative Safeguards
Competent investigative and judicial authorities alone shall investigate and try offences under this Law. Inspection and protection officers designated by law or judicial decision shall have enforcement powers within prescribed limits; neither the Board nor its chair shall have criminal adjudication powers. Searches, seizures and entry into private premises shall be subject to constitutional and judicial safeguards.
Chapter Twelve — Transitional and Final Provisions
Article (69) — Alignment of Registers and Classifications
Valid registrations, designations, licences and decisions under Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002 shall remain effective until amended or replaced under this Law. Within twenty-four months, the Ministry shall convert paper records into the national digital register and review priority classifications, without withdrawing protection merely because of administrative delay.
Article (70) — Instructions and Regulations
The Council of Ministers or Minister, each within its remit, shall issue regulations and instructions necessary to implement this Law within twelve months of publication, particularly on the national register, classification, buffer zones, provenance due diligence, private museums, excavation, underwater heritage, loans, temporary export and emergencies.
Article (71) — Repeal of the Previous Law
Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002 is repealed from this Law’s entry into force. Regulations and instructions issued under it remain effective insofar as they do not conflict with this Law, until replaced.
Article (72) — Commencement
This Law enters into force ninety days after publication in the Iraqi Gazette, except provisions requiring implementing regulations, which shall apply when those regulations are issued or the prescribed issuance period expires, whichever is earlier. Core protection rules shall apply from commencement.
Statement of Reasons
To modernise the legislative framework protecting Iraq’s antiquities, heritage and cultural property in accordance with the 2005 Constitution and applicable international conventions; unify protection rules in peacetime and armed conflict; protect underwater cultural heritage; develop digital inventories, preventive planning and prevention of illicit trafficking; establish clearer safeguards for ownership, judicial procedures, restoration, excavation and museums; and replace unsuitable penalties and procedures, this Law is enacted.
General Explanatory Memorandum
1. Why repeal and replace rather than make a limited amendment?
Law No. 55 of 2002 is not devoid of substance. Many core instruments are sound in principle: registration, preventing harmful disposal, regulating excavation, protecting heritage buildings and recovering antiquities. Scattered amendments, however, would leave a pre-2005 constitutional structure, outdated definitions, procedures inconsistent with modern separation of administration and judiciary, nominal financial penalties and international protection gaps. The proposal therefore preserves useful functions and redrafts them in a unified law.
2. Why is no new authority created?
A parallel body would duplicate costs and create jurisdictional disputes with the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage, its inspectorates, museums and heritage departments. The main problem is not the absence of an institution’s name but the need for a unified national register, modern controls, integration with planning, customs, the judiciary and police, and measurable procedures. The proposal therefore retains the Board and makes the advisory council non-executive.
3. Protecting private ownership without sacrificing heritage
Experience with heritage buildings shows that designation alone is insufficient. If an owner is prohibited from demolition or alteration, classification must be documented, published and open to objection and appeal, with support instruments, adaptive reuse and controlled technical exceptions. Fair protection is more sustainable than protection that turns a building into an abandoned financial burden.
4. Why remove rigid distances around sites?
The current Law imposes fixed-distance restrictions in some cases. Yet an open desert site, an archaeological mound within a city and a heritage house on a historic street do not all need the same perimeter. The proposal therefore adopts assessment-based buffer zones, offering greater legal and planning precision and reducing unnecessary conflict with properties and projects.
5. Prevention before punishment
A bulldozer destroys archaeological context in minutes, and punishment cannot restore the order of the strata. The proposal therefore prioritises sensitivity maps, integration of heritage into planning, preventive surveys, chance-find procedures and assigning rescue-excavation costs to the project necessitating them where fair and proportionate.
6. The market and provenance records
Preventing smuggling goes beyond borders. If an object of unknown provenance can enter an auction, museum or collection without questions, demand for looted objects persists. The proposal therefore requires reasonable provenance due diligence, record retention and checks against stolen-object databases, without presuming that every old object is unlawful.
7. Underwater heritage
Since the 2001 Convention entered into force for Iraq on 10 February 2024, domestic law needs to translate its core principles into practice: priority for in situ conservation, prohibition of commercial exploitation based on selling and dispersing objects, scientific licensing, international cooperation, and regulation of finds in rivers, territorial waters, dredging and port projects.
8. Armed conflict is not separate from heritage law
Wartime protection begins in peacetime: inventories, evacuation plans, data backups, training, identification of property eligible for enhanced protection, and coordination with armed forces and civil defence. The proposal therefore incorporates these obligations into the same Law, consistent with the judicial opinion published in 2023 to avoid parallel legislation protecting the same interest.
9. The judiciary, not the administration, imposes punishment
The proposal transfers all criminal investigation and adjudication powers to competent judicial bodies. Antiquities inspectors may exercise legally defined enforcement powers, but the administrative body suffering harm or implementing the law should not itself issue criminal judgments. This provides greater constitutional clarity and stronger trial safeguards.
10. Intangible heritage
The 2003 international Convention, to which Iraq acceded, treats living heritage as practices, knowledge and skills transmitted within communities. The proposal therefore avoids ‘appropriating’ cultural elements and prioritises participation, intergenerational transmission, respect for secret knowledge and benefit-sharing when a public body uses an element commercially.
Alignment with Existing Legislation
| Instrument or area | Effect of the proposal |
|---|---|
| Antiquities and Heritage Law No. 55 of 2002 | Full repeal and replacement, with valid decisions and registrations continuing transitionally. |
| Expropriation Law No. 12 of 1981, as amended | Remains the reference for expropriation and compensation, with recourse limited to necessity. |
| Penal Code No. 111 of 1969, as amended | Its general rules apply unless specifically provided otherwise; the proposal grants no judicial powers to administrators. |
| Urban planning, municipal and property registration laws | Regulations and instructions must link maps, buffer zones and protection annotations to permits and property registers. |
| Customs Law and border legislation | Require implementing procedures for provenance information, provisional seizure and cooperation with the Board. |
| Legislation governing the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Antiquities and the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage | Terminology and subsidiary structures shall be amended where conflicting, without creating a parallel body. |
| Cultural Property Protection During Conflict Law — if its draft remains pending | Its substantive provisions shall be incorporated into this proposal, avoiding duplication unless a specific need for separate legislation exists. |
Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements
The priority in the first two years is to turn existing protection into an implementable system, rather than construct new administrative buildings. The Law proposes a transition programme specified in its text and regulations, maintaining previous protection and preventing any site from losing it through delayed digitalisation.
- Within 6 months: form register-alignment teams, identify sensitive data and issue a protocol for chance finds and urgent projects.
- Within 12 months: issue regulations on classification, buffer zones, private museums, trade, loans, excavation and underwater heritage.
- Within 18 months: launch the public national-register portal and pilot links to property registration and municipalities in priority governorates.
- Within 24 months: digitise core records and complete physical reconciliation of the highest-risk stores and museums.
- Continuously: maintain emergency plans, conflict and disaster protection training, restitution lists and updated stolen-object data.
Financial and Implementation Impact
The proposal creates no new authority or ministry, so costs are concentrated in digitalisation, inventory, conservation, security, training and interoperability more than salaries and organisational structures. Insufficient recent published data exist for a reliable total national cost, so the proposal avoids a falsely precise figure.
Before the first implementation financial year, the Ministry of Culture, with the Ministries of Finance and Planning, must prepare establishment and operating costs, broken down into the national-register platform and cybersecurity; digitisation of records and images; survey and documentation equipment; improvements to stores and museums; restoration and rescue teams; customs and police links; training; and emergency plans. Connectivity can be phased, beginning with the Iraq Museum, central stores and highest-risk sites.
Some conservation may be financed from revenues, fees, international grants and accepted gifts. Fundamentally, however, protecting national wealth is a public budget obligation, and sites must not be pushed into excessive tourism exploitation to finance their protection.
Safeguards and Compliance Indicators
- Proportion of designated sites and buildings with digital boundaries and documented buffer zones.
- Proportion of museum and store holdings physically inventoried and linked to a number, photograph and provenance record.
- Average time to determine restoration applications and work permits within protected areas.
- Number of chance finds addressed within prescribed deadlines without unjustified disruption.
- Proportion of missions depositing records, data and reports on time.
- Number of restitution files opened and objects recovered annually, with non-sensitive data published.
- Proportion of priority museums and sites with a tested emergency plan.
- Number of violations and offences referred to courts and their outcomes, without treating case counts alone as a measure of success.
- Time taken to update property and municipal records after a site or building is designated for protection.
- Public bodies’ compliance with preventive surveys before major projects.
Useful International Comparisons
The proposal does not copy any single country’s law, but draws on international principles established by conventions Iraq has joined. From the 1970 Convention it takes prevention of illicit trafficking and cooperation in restitution; from the 1972 Convention, protection and sustainable management of sites of outstanding universal value; from the 2003 Convention, community participation in safeguarding intangible heritage; from the 2001 Convention, priority for in situ preservation of underwater heritage and prohibition of its commercial exploitation; and from the 1954 Hague Convention and Second Protocol, peacetime obligations, enhanced protection and criminalisation of serious violations.
As a comparative reference not binding on Iraq, the proposal also draws on provenance due diligence developed in international practice and the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, without treating Iraq as a party unless it accedes through a separate procedure.
Sources and References
- Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives. In particular Articles (35) and (113).Iraqi Constitution — official source
- Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002 — Ministry of Justice / Iraqi Gazette. Official translated version published by the Ministry of Justice.Antiquities and Heritage Law — Ministry of Justice PDF
- Antiquities and Heritage Law No. (55) of 2002 — WIPO Lex.https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ar/legislation/details/10998
- Judicial Supervision Commission — Study of the Draft Cultural Property Protection Law, 70/Studies/2023.https://www.sjc.iq/view.71789/
- Iraqi Council of Representatives — Research Materials and Human Rights Legislative Plans Addressing Antiquities and Heritage.https://iq.parliament.iq/
- UNESCO — Iraq: Conventions ratified. Iraq’s status under cultural conventions, including 1970, 1954, the Second Protocol, 2003 and 2001.https://www.unesco.org/en/countries/iq/conventions
- UNESCO World Heritage Centre — Iraq. Status under the 1972 Convention and listed Iraqi sites.https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/iq
- UNESCO — Iraq and the 1999 Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention. Deposit of the instrument of accession on 6 April 2022 and entry into force on 6 July 2022.https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/iraq-accedes-1999-second-protocol-hague-convention-1954-protection-cultural-property-event-armed
- UNESCO — Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. Entry into force for Iraq on 10 February 2024, following deposit of its instrument of ratification on 10 November 2023.https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-protection-underwater-cultural-heritage
- UNESCO — Iraq, Intangible Cultural Heritage. Iraq’s ratification of the 2003 Convention on 6 January 2010.https://ich.unesco.org/en/state/iraq-IQ
- UNESCO — 1970 Convention on illicit trafficking in cultural property.https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-means-prohibiting-and-preventing-illicit-import-export-and-transfer-ownership-cultural
- UNIDROIT — 1995 Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects. A comparative reference for due diligence and restitution, without treating Iraq as a party.https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/cultural-property/1995-convention/
All references to existing legislation and international conventions were rechecked through this document’s update date. The draft law’s articles do not contain inline source references, to preserve proper legislative drafting.