Skip to content
POL-04

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed legislation · State, Constitution, Justice, Rights and Governance

Political Parties, Political Finance and Electoral Campaigns Bill

A repeal-and-replacement bill reorganising the formation, governance and public and private financing of political parties, and consolidating campaign finance, expenditure, political advertising, disclosure, auditing and penalties within a framework that protects pluralism and prevents anonymous or foreign funding and the use of state resources.

Document number
POL-04
Version
1.0
Publication / last updated
5 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive Summary

The Bill proceeds from the fact that Political Parties Law No. (36) of 2015 remains the basis for federal party registration. The Commission's Department of Political Party and Organisation Affairs continues to apply it and maintain an extensive party register. However, the existing Law combines high formation thresholds, a substantial registration fee, financial oversight limited in its timing and technical capabilities, and campaign finance rules dispersed across the Political Parties Law, election law and Commission regulations. Moreover, in Decision 3/Federal/Media/2016, the Federal Supreme Court invalidated provisions including the university degree requirement for founders, the blanket liability of a party newspaper's editor-in-chief, and the formula distributing eighty per cent of the subsidy according to parliamentary seats. Comprehensive replacement is therefore more coherent than piecemeal amendments.

The Bill bases registration on objective conditions and clear deadlines, reduces the formation requirement to five hundred founders without a degree requirement or compulsory geographical distribution, and replaces the high fee with a service charge capped at administrative cost. It retains the Party Affairs Department within the Commission instead of establishing a new authority, transfers administrative appeals to the administrative judiciary, and confirms that a party may be dissolved only by judicial judgment on serious, specified grounds, never by administrative decision.

For funding, it restricts direct donations to Iraqi natural persons, with ceilings linked to the minimum wage. It prohibits foreign and anonymous funding, funding by legal persons and the use of state resources, and subjects large donations to banking channels and public disclosure. Iraqis residing abroad may donate their own money through a traceable channel without opening the door to funding by foreign governments or organisations. Financial oversight is also linked to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law without turning the Commission into a parallel financial agency.

The Bill redesigns public funding to avoid the constitutional defect in the former formula: fifty per cent is shared equally among qualifying parties, thirty per cent according to votes rather than seats, and twenty per cent to match small donations. It thereby combines a basic level of equal opportunity, recognition of actual popular support and encouragement of grassroots funding rather than dependence on a large donor.

For electoral campaigns, it establishes separate accounts, treasurers, periodic reports and final reports, and requires the Commission to set spending ceilings through a published methodology that considers voter numbers, inflation and media costs, subject to an absolute cap. It regulates independent expenditure, third parties, digital advertising and misleading synthetic content, prohibits the purchase of fake-account networks, the use of state resources and vote buying, and preserves freedom of political expression and peaceful criticism.

The core reform separates political opinion, which the state should not police, from political money, which must be traceable. Penalties therefore follow graduated, proportionate rules with a right to rectify errors. Dissolution and broad suspension require judicial judgment. Deliberate foreign funding, concealment of donors, misuse of public funds and armed formations are criminalised, but unintentional formal accounting errors do not attract detention.

Legislative Gaps and Reasons for Reform

Principal Gaps and Legislative Responses
AreaProblemProposed remedy
FormationA high founder threshold, substantial fees and paper-based procedures that may become a barrier to political association.Five hundred founders, direct government data exchange, a limited administrative fee and a reasoned decision within a defined period.
Effects of Federal Supreme Court JudgmentsJudicially invalidated provisions remain within the Law's original structure, including the degree requirement and seat-based subsidy formula.Replacement legislation removing invalidated provisions and establishing rules consistent with equality and the personal nature of punishment.
Private FundingWeak ceilings, traceability and differentiation between the true donor and an intermediary, together with corporate and external funding risks.Donations only from Iraqi natural persons, adjustable ceilings, bank accounts, and prohibitions on anonymous, foreign and legal-person funding.
Public FundingThe previous seat-based formula was invalidated because of its unfair effects on emerging parties.A combination of a basic equal share, vote share and small-donation matching.
CampaignsSpending, advertising and penalty rules dispersed across laws, regulations and periodically issued instructions.A permanent statutory chapter covering spending ceilings, electoral accounts, third parties, digital advertising and state resources.
TechnologyDigital advertising, targeting, synthetic content and fake networks are inadequately covered by the original Law.Identification of advertisement funders, an advertising library, labelling of realistic synthetic content and a prohibition on concealing the source of automated campaigning.
PenaltiesThe risk of broad penalties that fail to distinguish accounting errors from crimes, or the individual from the party.Graduation and proportionality, a right to rectify errors, dissolution only by judicial decision, and personal criminal liability.

Proposed legislative policy

The Bill adopts five interconnected legislative choices. The first is facilitating entry into politics without dispensing with seriousness: founder and fee thresholds are lowered, while verifiable documents, a programme, internal rules and financial rules remain required. The second is neutrality towards lawful ideas: the Commission does not judge the substance of a party's economic, social or foreign policy, but verifies legality, democracy and peaceful conduct.

The third is the risk-based financial transparency. Small donations retain public privacy while remaining known to the regulator; larger amounts move through the banking system, and donor identities are published above a clear threshold. Direct corporate funding is prohibited rather than attempting to trace chains of legal persons and contracts that may be used to buy influence, while non-partisan civic activity and independent media expression remain permitted.

The fourth is balanced public funding. Complete equality among hundreds of parties regardless of activity may waste money, while heavy reliance on seats entrenches established forces. Funding is therefore divided between an equal share for serious parties, a vote-related share and a small-donation matching share, connecting public money to both pluralism and popular support.

The fifth is keeping party regulation separate from security and judicial functions. No new political court or financial investigation agency is established within the Commission. Administrative disputes go to the administrative judiciary, crimes to the criminal judiciary, suspicious transactions to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Office, and electoral appeals to the competent judicial panel under the election law.

Statement of reasons

To protect constitutional freedom to establish and join political parties; consolidate pluralism and peaceful transfer of power; remove disproportionate formation restrictions; implement the binding effects of constitutional judgments concerning the Political Parties Law; regulate public and private funding sources and prevent foreign and anonymous money and use of state resources; consolidate campaign finance, political expenditure, digital advertising and third-party rules; and strengthen disclosure, audit and accountability while safeguarding defence rights, review and proportionate penalties, this Law is enacted.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why Replacement Rather than Partial Amendment?

The existing Law played an important foundational role after 2015, but was drafted before current developments in digital payments, targeted advertising and third-party expenditure, and before the present electoral Commission structure settled. The Federal Supreme Court also invalidated some provisions, while additional layers of campaign and penalty regulations emerged. Comprehensive replacement legislation is therefore clearer than successive amendments leaving readers and regulators to navigate conflicting or dispersed texts.

2. Formation Threshold and Fee

The current Law required two thousand founders, and the Party Affairs Department's current page lists fees and services under which registration alone costs twenty-five million dinars, in addition to other charges. No democratic necessity justifies making freedom of association depend on substantial financial capacity. The Bill chooses five hundred founders as a reasonable indication of seriousness, prohibits a university degree requirement in line with the principle established by the Federal Supreme Court, and confines the fee to actual administrative cost.

3. Federal and Regional Jurisdiction

Given Iraq's federal structure and constitutional allocation of powers, the Bill distinguishes a party participating in federal elections from an organisation whose activities are confined to a region. Valid regional registration is preserved, but participation in federal elections requires federal recognition and compliance with national finance and campaign rules. Federal law thereby neither extinguishes the region's regulatory domain nor permits an oversight vacuum in federal elections.

4. Parties and Weapons

The criterion is an organisational and operational relationship with armed force, not previous political affiliation or social identity. The Bill prohibits a party from commanding or funding a security formation, or managing weapons stores, camps or an independent protection force. Conversely, it does not automatically attribute an institution's conduct to the party of every person who formerly served in a security institution. This distinction is necessary to protect state neutrality and prevent punishment based on presumed affiliation.

5. Why Prohibit Donations by Legal Persons?

Funding from companies and entities makes the true interested party harder to identify, particularly where state contractors or overlapping ownership networks are involved. The Bill chooses a simpler channel: direct donations come from identified individual citizens within a ceiling, while companies and organisations may continue lawful civic and media activities without transferring money to campaigns. This closes a common route for circumvention through front companies.

6. Iraqis Abroad and Foreign Funding

Foreign funding from states, non-Iraqi persons and overseas entities is prohibited, but an Iraqi citizen living abroad is not treated as foreign merely because of residence. They may donate personal funds through a verifiable banking channel, provided they do not act for a foreign entity. The rule balances citizens' rights with the risk of foreign influence.

7. Public Funding after the Federal Supreme Court Decision

The central constitutional objection to the 2015 formula concerned allocating eighty per cent of the subsidy according to seats, entrenching large parties with public funds. The Bill does not merely reproduce that formula at a lower percentage; it changes its logic. Half the amount provides an equal base for qualifying parties, thirty per cent follows votes as a direct measure of popular support, and twenty per cent matches small donations to encourage a broad funding base. The percentages remain in the Law itself so that an executive body cannot change the rules of competition through instructions.

8. Spending Ceilings

Instead of fixing an amount eroded by inflation, or multiplying it by candidate numbers to produce an enormous ceiling, the Law specifies the calculation elements and requires the Commission to publish the methodology and data and conduct public consultation 180 days beforehand. It requires an absolute cap and a decreasing coefficient for shared expenditure. Ceilings can thus be updated without becoming standardless discretionary powers.

9. Independent Expenditure and Third Parties

Restrictions on parties and candidates may become merely formal if a third party can spend without limits or disclosure in coordination with them. The Bill therefore distinguishes personal expression and independent journalism, which fall outside ordinary financial oversight, from substantial paid expenditure intended to influence an election. Where coordination is established, spending is added to the campaign account; where it is genuinely independent, the spender becomes subject to disclosure above a reasonable threshold.

10. Digital Advertising and Synthetic Content

The Bill does not prohibit generative or editing technologies. It targets deception about the funder's identity and realistic depictions of real individuals. It requires identification of the advertisement's payer, notices on synthetic material that could falsely suggest an act or statement, and prohibitions on impersonating electoral authorities or purchasing fake networks to conceal the source. This is narrower and more enforceable than a vague ban on “misinformation” that could be misused against opposition.

11. Penalties and Dissolution

The Bill establishes that ordinary accounting errors are addressed through correction and proportionate fines, while deliberate crimes go to the courts. Dissolution is not an administrative tool: it is a last resort for cases such as armed formations, terrorism, actual foreign control or repeated serious foreign funding after judgment. It also prohibits collective punishment of an entire party for an individual's act that the organisation did not endorse.

Alignment with Existing Legislation

Legislation and Regulations Requiring Alignment
ReferenceAction
Political Parties Law No. 36 of 2015Repeal and replacement, preserving legal personalities, valid legal effects and final judicial decisions.
Independent High Electoral Commission Law No. 31 of 2019, as amendedRetain the Commission and Party Affairs Department, aligning the Department's powers and appeal routes with the new Law.
Applicable Election Law and Campaign RegulationsKeep voting, nomination, results and electoral appeals within election law, transferring general, permanent financial rules to this Law.
Law No. 32 of 2016 Prohibiting the Ba'ath Party and Racist, Terrorist and Takfiri Entities, Parties and ActivitiesRetain and apply it within its scope without creating a parallel or broader definition of prohibited organisations.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. 39 of 2015Refer suspicious transactions and due diligence to the competent financial system, without granting the Commission the Anti-Money Laundering Office's powers.
Integrity, Penal, Weapons and Public Employment LawsApply the more severe penalty and relevant employment restrictions and prevent duplicate criminalisation.

Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements

Within 90 days: Update registration forms, abolish fees and services inconsistent with the Law, and establish a unified electronic application process.

Within 180 days: Issue the accounting and finance guide, campaign spending-ceiling regulations, digital disclosure rules, independent expenditure register and open-data rules.

Within 12 months: Bring existing parties into compliance, complete disclosure of assets, debts and related entities, and implement periodic leadership elections according to internal-rule deadlines.

180 days before any new campaign: Publish the spending-ceiling methodology and applicable amounts so that the rule does not change during competition.

Financial and Implementation Implications

The Law does not require a new authority, court or financial agency. Its financial impact therefore centres on upgrading electronic systems, auditing, data analysis and training. Most functions can be performed within the existing Party Affairs Department, Board of Commissioners, Federal Board of Supreme Audit and Anti-Money Laundering Office, using organised data exchange rather than parallel institutions.

Public funding is an optional annual fiscal commitment determined by the Budget Law. The Bill fixes neither a lump sum nor a budget percentage, avoiding an open-ended obligation. If the state allocates funding, the Law specifies only its distribution and oversight. The draft budget should include a statement of the proposed amount, number of eligible parties, average share and matching effects before the vote.

Moving to searchable disclosure requires initial investment in a data portal and secure banking links, but reduces manual audit costs and enables risk-based oversight. The Commission's annual report shall identify operating costs, report and violation numbers, and recovered amounts, allowing assessment of whether the oversight structure delivers real public value.

Relevant International Standards

The Bill rests on the principle that parties are an extension of freedom of association and political participation. United Nations Human Rights Committee General Comment No. (25) confirms that freedom to organise in political parties is an essential element of Article (25) of the International Covenant, and that expression, assembly and association rights are necessary for effective participation. Registration and dissolution restrictions must therefore be specific, necessary and proportionate, rather than tools for licensing political ideas acceptable to the Government.

The joint Venice Commission and OSCE/ODIHR Guidelines on Political Party Regulation provide a framework balancing party freedom with democracy, transparency and funding requirements. The Bill applies this approach selectively to Iraq's circumstances: an independent regulator, judicial oversight, published funding rules and dissolution only as a last resort.

Iraq also acceded to the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 17 March 2008. Article (7/3) calls on states to consider enhancing transparency in the financing of candidatures and political parties. The Bill translates that into bank accounts, identification of actual donors, public reports and coordination with the anti-money laundering system, rather than a statement of transparency in principle alone.

Sources and references

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
  2. Iraqi Official Gazette, Issue 4383 — Political Parties Law No. 36 of 2015
  3. Ministry of Justice — Announcement of Issue 4383 containing Political Parties Law No. 36 of 2015
  4. Ministry of Justice — Political Parties Law No. 36 of 2015 among Laws Published in 2026
  5. Independent High Electoral Commission — Department of Political Party and Organisation Affairs, Licensed Parties List and Registration Procedures
  6. Independent High Electoral Commission — Regulations and Instructions for the Iraqi Council of Representatives Elections, 2025
  7. Independent High Electoral Commission — Electoral Campaigns and Penal Provisions Guide for the Council of Representatives Elections, 2025
  8. Independent High Electoral Commission — Party Affairs Department Activities in September 2026
  9. Independent High Electoral Commission — 2023 Report on Registration of 295 Parties and Monitoring of Congresses and Compliance
  10. Federal Supreme Court — Analytical Index of Court Judgments and Decisions
  11. University of Baghdad Legal Study Documenting Federal Supreme Court Decisions 3/Federal/Media/2016 and 67/Federal/Media/2016 concerning the Political Parties Law
  12. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette, Issue 4420, Law No. 32 of 2016 Prohibiting the Ba'ath Party and Racist, Terrorist and Takfiri Entities, Parties and Activities
  13. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette, Issue 4387, Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. 39 of 2015
  14. Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Office — Legislation in Force
  15. United Nations — Iraq's Accession to the United Nations Convention against Corruption on 17 March 2008
  16. United Nations Human Rights Committee — General Comment No. 25 on Participation in Public Affairs and Electoral Rights
  17. Venice Commission and OSCE/ODIHR — Joint Guidelines on Political Party Regulation, 2020
  18. International IDEA — Political Finance Database: Iraq

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · POL-04

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.