Skip to content
POL-07

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed legislation · State, Constitution, Justice, Rights and Governance

Federal Civil Service and Public Employment Bill

A unified, modern framework for managing federal public employment, based on merit, impartiality and equal opportunity, linking recruitment, classification, performance, development and discipline to the state's actual needs.

Document number
POL-07
Version
1.0
Publication / last updated
5 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq · Federal

Executive Summary

Iraqi public employment is currently governed by accumulated layers: Civil Service Law No. (24) of 1960, as amended; State and Public Sector Employees Discipline Law No. (14) of 1991, as amended; State and Public Sector Employees Salaries Law No. (22) of 2008, as amended; special service laws; and separate decisions and instructions. These layers make employee and job management less coherent and impede transition to skills-, outcomes- and data-based human resources management.

The Bill proposes a comprehensive federal law placing the “job”, rather than merely the “grade”, at the centre. Every job is linked to a description, competencies, funding source and identifier. Auditable open competition becomes the default for appointment; partisan allocation of professional posts is prohibited. Performance, promotion, mobility, development and hybrid work are regulated, and discipline is rebuilt around legality, proportionality, defence rights and appeal.

The Bill does not presume salary scales can be changed administratively. It retains the applicable salaries law during transition and requires separate legislative alignment based on job evaluation and fiscal impact. It preserves the Federal Public Service Council's constitutional role under Article (107) and prevents the new Law from becoming a pretext for parallel structures or retrospective interference with constitutional independence or acquired employment rights.

Second — Legislative Gap

The problem is not simply one old law, but fragmentation of the employee lifecycle among several enactments, confusion of grade with job, weak links among staffing, job descriptions, performance and budgets, numerous special rules, uneven recruitment and appraisal procedures, and continued reliance on paper files or databases unable to communicate. This obstructs genuine workforce planning, identification of surpluses and shortages, and assessment of jobs' relative value.

Reform must also extend beyond central recruitment. The Federal Public Service Council now plays an actual appointment role; government appointments published during 2025 relied on its decisions and provisions of Law 24 of 1960. What is needed is one legal chain: planning, approving and advertising a job; selecting, developing, appraising, promoting and holding its occupant accountable; then ending service, with an auditable digital record at every stage.

Third — Proposed Legislative Policy

  • Replace the 1960 Civil Service Law with modern legislation and integrate discipline rather than retain a separate disciplinary law.
  • Retain the salaries law temporarily to avoid extensive fiscal change without approved schedules and costings, requiring an alignment bill within one year.
  • Preserve Federal Public Service Council independence and link the federal recruitment platform and register to its constitutional powers.
  • Make job descriptions, competencies and job evaluation the basis for recruitment, promotion and mobility rather than qualifications and seniority alone.
  • Limit acting appointments and open-ended assignments, subjecting professional leadership to competition and performance assessment.
  • Bring hybrid work, performance management, electronic personnel files and unified job identifiers within the Law, with privacy and human-review safeguards.

Fifth — Explanatory Memorandum

1. From an “Employee Law” to a “Job System”

The Bill does more than rewrite old appointment conditions. It moves administration from qualifications, grades and rigid staffing to purpose-defined jobs with descriptions and competencies. Modern government needs digital, analytical and regulatory skills not captured by qualifications alone, and the capacity to move and develop employees according to actual ability.

2. Merit and Fair Recruitment

Open advertisement, job-related testing, structured interviews, conflicts of interest and published results form one chain. Improper intercession and quota allocation are treated as merit violations, not merely general ethical problems. Merit is not equated with academic testing: different jobs require different assessment tools.

3. Protecting Employees and Administration

Effective administration needs to address poor performance and misconduct while preventing transfers, appraisals and penalties from becoming retaliation. The Bill separates unsatisfactory performance from discipline, requires written reasons, defence rights and judicial appeal, and protects good-faith professional opinion.

4. Pay

Salary reform is a separate fiscal and legislative matter requiring cost modelling for every scenario. The Bill introduces no new amounts or uncosted increases. It creates technical foundations for later fair reform: job evaluation, occupational families and unified data comparing relative work value rather than accumulating allowances and exceptions.

Sixth — Alignment with Existing Legislation

LegislationRequired actionReason
Civil Service Law 24/1960Phased repeal and replacementThe new Law regulates the complete service lifecycle
State and Public Sector Employees Discipline Law 14/1991Repeal upon disciplinary chapter commencementPrevent parallel systems of penalties and safeguards
State and Public Sector Employees Salaries Law 22/2008Amendment or replacement within 12 monthsLink pay to job evaluation with fiscal impact assessment
Federal Public Service Council Law 4/2009Limited alignment where neededDefine interfaces of powers, platform and register without impairing independence
Special Service LawsReview within 18 monthsPrevent unjustified exceptions while preserving genuine professional needs

Seventh — Financial and Implementation Effects

Total fiscal impact cannot be reliably estimated before unified data exist on employees, jobs, vacancies, allowances and classification; the Bill therefore gives no falsely precise figure. Initial direct effects concern developing or unifying digital systems, preparing descriptions and competency frameworks, training and converting records. Reusing Council, Ministry of Finance and government infrastructure rather than parallel platforms can reduce costs.

Any salary or allowance change requires a separate fiscal impact study covering baseline-year costs, five-year transition costs, benefiting and adversely affected groups, inflation, sustainability and financing. Enactment alone does not activate a new pay scale.

Eighth — Transition and Implementation Requirements

  1. Within 6 months: adopt standard job-description and identifier models and a data-cleaning plan.
  2. Within 12 months: operate a core federal register, link funded jobs to it and submit salary-alignment legislation.
  3. Within 18 months: review special service laws and issue unified disciplinary and recruitment regulations.
  4. Within 24 months: complete critical and leadership job descriptions and apply the new performance system.
  5. Within 36 months: integrate staffing, payroll, employees, jobs, retirement and recruitment within statutory data-protection limits.

Ninth — Relevant International Standards

Iraq is party to International Labour Organization Conventions No. (100) on equal remuneration and No. (111) on discrimination in employment and occupation, both in force for Iraq. These support equality, non-discrimination and equal pay for work of equal value. The United Nations Convention against Corruption's public-sector provisions likewise support recruitment and promotion based on efficiency, transparency and objective criteria.

The Bill copies no particular country's model. It draws on common modern civil service practices: separation of political and professional roles, open advertising, competency frameworks, outcomes-based appraisal, mobility and digitalisation with review safeguards.

Tenth — Sources and References

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives. Official source.
  2. Federal Public Service Council Law No. (4) of 2009 — Federal Public Service Council. Text published by the Council.
  3. Civil Service Law No. (24) of 1960, as amended — Applicable civil service framework still cited by state bodies for appointments through 2025.
  4. State and Public Sector Employees Discipline Law No. (14) of 1991, as amended — Applicable disciplinary system.
  5. State and Public Sector Employees Salaries Law No. (22) of 2008, as amended — Ministry of Justice/Iraqi Official Gazette. Law page.
  6. Council of Representatives — Minutes of the 6 November 2022 Session, first reading of the Federal Civil Service Bill. Minutes.
  7. Council of Representatives — Minutes of the 28 February 2024 Session, recording subsequent withdrawal of the government bill. Minutes.
  8. Ministry of Justice — 2025 Appointments under Federal Public Service Council Decisions and Law 24 of 1960. Announcement of 1 June 2025.
  9. International Labour Organization — Iraq's Convention Status, including C100 and C111. NORMLEX.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · POL-07

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.