Skip to content
POL-42

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Proposed legislation · Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Competition, Anti-Monopoly, Consumer Protection and Product Liability Law

A unified bill replacing the competition and consumer protection laws enacted in 2010 while preserving the existing Competition Council, modernising merger control and action against cartels and abuse of dominance, strengthening traditional and digital consumer protection, and establishing modern strict liability, safety and recall rules for defective products.

Document number
POL-42
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq
Document type
Proposed repeal-and-replacement legislation
Axis
Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Executive Summary

Since 2010, Iraq has had separate Competition and Anti-Monopoly Law No. (14) of 2010 and Consumer Protection Law No. (1) of 2010. By 2026, competition law was no longer institutionally inactive: the Competition and Anti-Monopoly Affairs Council operates under the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, receives complaints and merger and acquisition registrations electronically, investigates and monitors markets. In March 2026, the Iraqi Official Gazette also published Instructions No. (1) of 2026 facilitating implementation.

However, significant parts of current competition law still rely on rigid rules, notably a 50% control threshold for mergers and practices. The proposal replaces a single percentage with an economic test: does the transaction substantially lessen competition, and is actual dominance present considering shares, entry barriers, buyer power, data and network effects? Beneficial transactions are thus not blocked merely for a number, nor harmful ones exempt because arithmetic shares fall below a fixed threshold.

The proposal adds modern two-phase prior merger control, notification thresholds based on turnover, assets or transaction value rather than market share alone, leniency to uncover secret cartels, settlements, activity-linked fines and an express right to civil compensation once infringement is established.

Current consumer protection law established important rights and a Consumer Protection Council, but practical enforcement remains dispersed. In 2026, the Central Organisation for Standardisation and Quality Control conducts campaigns, testing and complaint response with the Ministries of Trade and Health and security bodies. The proposal therefore does not replace these technical bodies with the Consumer Council. It makes the Council a centre for complaints, commercial practices, contracts, compensation and coordination while food, medicine, standards and safety testing remains with specialists.

Digital consumer protection is modernised through total-price disclosure, trader identity, distance-contract withdrawal rights, prohibition of deceptive design patterns, transparency of paid rankings and reviews, control of automatic renewal and subscriptions, and security updates for connected devices. These matters were not central when the 2010 law was enacted.

For product safety, the proposal establishes a clear responsibility chain from producer and importer to distributor and platform according to role, with batch tracing, incident reporting and national recalls. A strict defective-product liability chapter complements this: injured persons need prove defect, harm and causation rather than manufacturer negligence, aided by presumptions where technical evidence is producer-controlled or scientific proof is difficult.

Products include digital components and software affecting product safety, drawing on recent comparative developments while keeping Iraqi rules independent and integrated with civil, standardisation, health and medicine laws. Absence of criminal or administrative fault does not bar civil compensation.

The framework in 2026

The Competition and Anti-Monopoly Affairs Council derives from Law No. (14) of 2010. Its official website confirms competition policymaking, complaint and practice investigations, merger registration, guidance and international cooperation. In 2026 it expanded institutionally, opened branches and conducted campaigns and investigations, alongside new implementation instructions.

Consumer Protection Law No. (1) of 2010 establishes consumer rights, supplier and advertiser duties, and a Consumer Protection Council. In practice, technical and market bodies shoulder much protection, led by the Central Organisation for Standardisation and Quality Control, the Ministries of Trade and Health and other regulators. In 2026, the Organisation documented campaigns covering food, textiles, standards, dates and labelling.

The issue is not absence of all safeguards, but fragmentation and gaps for the digital economy, strict product liability and collective compensation, alongside numerical competition tests failing to reflect modern economic analysis.

Legislative Gap

AreaGapTreatment
MergersStrong reliance on a 50% control threshold in the current framework.Prior notification, objective thresholds and a substantial-lessening-of-competition test.
CartelsExisting prohibition but detection tools need strengthening.Leniency, judicially authorised inspection, settlements and deterrent fines.
Digital consumersThe 2010 law predates today's platforms, subscriptions and deceptive interfaces.Distance rights, withdrawal, platform transparency and bans on deceptive patterns.
Product safetyPowers dispersed among technical bodies without a unified recall register.Coordinated tracing, reporting and recalls, preserving sectoral technical supervision.
Defective-product compensationPrimary reliance on general civil rules and defect warranties.Independent strict liability and presumptions suited to technical complexity.
Collective compensationWeak effective mechanisms for widespread small losses.Representative actions, mediation and collective refunds.

Legislative policy

The proposal combines competition and consumer protection in one law without merging institutions. Competition requires economic independence and merger and cartel investigations; consumer protection needs complaints, contracts, safety and compensation. The Competition Council remains, while the Consumer Council is reactivated and coordinated with technical bodies.

The law also distinguishes competition protection from price control. Competitive markets do not make every price rise unlawful, and the Competition Council is not a price-setting body. Intervention concerns cartels, dominance abuse or harmful mergers; sector or crisis price regulation needs a separate legal basis and impact review.

Product liability does not replace contractual warranties: buyers of defective appliances may seek repair without personal injury. Where defects cause injury or damage other property, strict liability operates independently of sale contracts and proof of producer negligence.

Draft Competition, Anti-Monopoly, Consumer Protection and Product Liability Law

Proposed promulgation formula: In the name of the people, Presidency of the Republic: pursuant to approval by the Council of Representatives and ratification by the President of the Republic, and under the Constitution, the following Law is issued.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to modernise competition and consumer-protection legislation in light of evolving markets, mergers, platforms, electronic commerce and products with digital components; strengthen the Competition and Anti-Monopoly Affairs Council's independence and effectiveness; activate consumer-protection mechanisms in coordination with existing technical bodies; prevent cartel agreements and abuse of dominance and control economic concentrations; provide clear contractual, advertising, guarantee and distance-commerce rights; and regulate product safety, recalls, strict liability and collective redress.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why replace the two laws of 2010?

Both laws laid important foundations. Modernising competition alone would leave digital consumer protection and product liability outside reform, while modernising consumer protection alone would retain the old merger test. A unified law enables a modern “market law” while keeping enforcement institutions separate by jurisdiction.

2. Why not abolish the existing Competition Council?

The Council has become an operational institution providing services, investigations and instructions in 2026. Creating a new authority would waste institutional development. The same Council therefore continues, with only its powers and procedures modernised.

3. Why not rely on a 50% share?

Market share is an important indicator, not the conclusion. An undertaking with a lower share may have substantial power through entry barriers, networks or data; a transaction exceeding 50% may operate in a wider market or generate major efficiencies. The modern test focuses on actual or potential competitive harm.

4. Consumer Council and Technical Bodies

Standardisation, health and medicines require specialist laboratories and technical expertise that should not be transferred to a complaints council. The Consumer Council therefore focuses on commercial conduct, contracts, rights, coordination and compensation, while dangerous products remain supervised by the competent technical authority.

5. Strict Product Liability

When a defective product causes injury, proving manufacturer fault may be harder than proving that the product was unsafe. The draft therefore separates “defect” from “negligence”, makes producers liable subject to defined defences, and permits judicial presumptions where science is complex or evidence is controlled by one party.

6. Software and Cybersecurity

A modern vehicle, device or medical system may become dangerous because of software or a security update, not merely a mechanical component. Liability therefore covers digital components connected to product safety, especially where updates keep products under manufacturer control.

7. Withdrawal Rights

Distance contracts prevent traditional inspection of goods. The draft therefore generally provides a 14-day period, with exceptions for personalised and perishable goods, digital content and services performed with express consent.

8. Collective Redress

Each consumer may lose too little to justify individual proceedings while aggregate unlawful gains are substantial. Representative actions address that gap under judicial supervision of funding and settlement and safeguards against double recovery.

Competition and Mergers

The proposal transforms competition regulation from a list of prohibitions into a complete enforcement framework: prohibiting serious agreements, analysing other agreements, preventing abuse of dominance, prior merger control, judicially authorised inspections, cartel-detection leniency, commitments and remedies, and fines linked to Iraqi market activity.

It also adds competition assessment of legislation and regulations. Monopoly sometimes results from a government decision limiting licence numbers or unnecessarily requiring a single business model. The Council can suggest less restrictive alternatives achieving the same objective, consistent with the OECD Competition Assessment Toolkit.

Consumer Protection and Digital Commerce

The proposal defines consumers primarily as natural persons acting for personal or family purposes, closer to modern consumer protection than extending the concept to all legal persons. Small businesses remain protected by competition, contract and other commercial rules.

In digital commerce, the law moves rights from “reading lengthy terms” into transaction design: final prices are visible, purchase buttons disclose payment obligations, cancellation is no harder than subscription, and paid reviews and rankings must be disclosed. It also prohibits deceptive interfaces deliberately making refusal or exit harder than acceptance.

Product Safety and Liability

The proposal separates two functions: market safety before harm and compensation afterwards. Safety relies on traceability, monitoring, reporting, recalls and coordination with the Central Organization and health authorities. Civil liability arises when a defective product causes harm, even without a prior administrative infringement finding.

The framework draws on recent comparative product-liability developments, including European Directive 2024/2853, which broadened product concepts, evidence and presumptions in technological settings. It does not copy the European Union system or implementation dates, but uses legal reasoning addressing software, updates and injured persons' difficulty accessing technical evidence.

Enforcement and Redress

The law combines public and private enforcement. The Competition and Consumer Councils stop infringements and impose administrative measures, while individuals retain judicial compensation rights. Government fines do not replace the rights of those overcharged by cartels or injured by defective products.

Representative actions enable accredited associations to stop practices or seek collective refunds, subject to court oversight of interests, funding and settlement to prevent litigation becoming a business or an instrument of unlawful pressure.

Legislative alignment

FrameworkTreatment
Competition and Anti-Monopoly Law No. (14) of 2010Repeal and replacement while retaining the same Competition Affairs Council.
Instructions No. (1) of 2026 Facilitating Implementation of the Competition LawTransitional continuation insofar as consistent until replacement.
Consumer Protection Law No. (1) of 2010Repeal and replacement, with a modernised Consumer Protection Council.
Law of the Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control and StandardsRemains the reference for technical testing, standards, calibration and quality control.
Civil CodeRemains the reference for general liability and compensation; the product-liability Chapter provides special rules for defective products.
Electronic Signature and Electronic Transactions LawComplements digital commerce and requires a harmonisation review within one year.
Health, Food, Medicines, Telecommunications and Banking LawsTake precedence in sectoral safety and technical regulation and complement general consumer rights.

Financial and Implementation Implications

Competition reform requires no new institution because the Competition Affairs Council is already operating. Additional costs concern industrial-economics expertise, data analysis, merger review, leniency and case-management systems.

Consumer-protection costs depend on the Consumer Protection Council's actual institutional position at implementation. The law permits continuity if constituted, or formation within the originally prescribed structure, avoiding transfer of laboratories and technical oversight from existing bodies. Technology costs include the complaints portal, recall register and inter-agency connections.

No artificial financial estimate is assigned to compensation or benefits. Economic effects emerge through lower cartel margins, prevention of harmful mergers, greater trading confidence, reduced product harm and cheaper small disputes; these require subsequent measurement using actual data.

Transition and Implementation

The proposal preserves continuity of the Competition Council, the 2026 instructions and open cases, allowing six months for merger-notification thresholds rather than suspending oversight during transition. It also gives the Consumer Council and technical bodies time to develop the complaints portal and recall register.

Strict product liability is not retrospective for products marketed before its provisions take effect, since changing liability grounds after an event affects legal positions. New procedures, portals and evidentiary methods apply under transitional rules where no acquired right is affected.

International Standards Relevant to Iraq

The United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection, updated by General Assembly Resolution 70/186, establish principles of safety, information, economic-interest protection, access to redress, dispute resolution and electronic commerce, leaving each country to design institutions suited to its circumstances.

The OECD Competition Assessment Toolkit provides a method for examining regulatory restrictions on supplier numbers, competitive ability and incentives, relevant to Iraq as economic reform and the private sector expand. European Directive 2024/2853 provides a recent product-liability comparison addressing digital products and evidential difficulties, without binding Iraq.

Sources and references

  1. Ministry of Justice — Competition and Anti-Monopoly Law No. (14) of 2010Official reference for the current law establishing the competition and anti-monopoly framework.
  2. Competition and Anti-Monopoly Affairs Council — About the CouncilDocuments the Council's continuity and functions concerning practices, mergers, cooperation and annual reporting.
  3. Competition and Anti-Monopoly Affairs Council — Electronic ServicesDocuments electronic submission of merger and acquisition registration applications and complaints in 2026.
  4. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette Issue 4863, dated 30/3/2026Documents Instructions No. (1) of 2026 facilitating implementation of Competition and Anti-Monopoly Law No. (14) of 2010.
  5. Competition Affairs Council — Investigation and Monitoring Activities in 2026Documents actual Council investigations, inspections and monitoring of markets and mergers during 2026.
  6. Ministry of Trade — Consumer Protection Law No. (1) of 2010Government text of the Consumer Protection Law defining consumers, suppliers and advertisers and establishing the Consumer Protection Council.
  7. Ministry of Justice — Legislation Index: Consumer Protection LawOfficial source confirming continued publication of Consumer Protection Law No. (1) of 2010 among Iraqi legislation.
  8. Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control — Consumer Protection Campaigns, 6/10/2026Documents continuing oversight of goods' fitness and conformity and coordination between the Organization, Ministries of Trade and Health, and security bodies.
  9. Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control — Imported Goods Test Results, 11/5/2026Recent example of the Organization's role in conformity testing, labelling and market product safety.
  10. United Nations/UNCTAD — United Nations Guidelines for Consumer ProtectionInternational reference for consumer rights, safety, information, redress, dispute resolution and electronic commerce.
  11. OECD — Competition Assessment ToolkitReference for assessing government restrictions on competition and choosing less restrictive alternatives achieving public objectives.
  12. European Union — Directive (EU) 2024/2853 on Liability for Defective ProductsRecent comparative reference for strict liability for defective products and software, and evidence and presumptions in technical cases.
  13. UNCTAD — United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection, official textOfficial text of the revised principles adopted by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 70/186 of 2015.

Proposed legislation within Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Prepared by

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.