Skip to content
POL-43

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Proposed legislation · Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Investment, Special Economic Zones and Business Facilitation Law

Rebuilding Iraq's investment framework through a single law that streamlines procedures, makes the single window a binding digital service, regulates special economic zones and replaces unmeasured general exemptions with incentives linked to performance and development.

Document number
POL-43
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive Summary

Investment Law No. (13) of 2006, as amended by Laws No. (2) of 2010 and No. (50) of 2015, remains the principal federal investment framework. During 2024, Regulation No. (8) of 2024 introduced the second amendment to Investment Regulation No. (2) of 2009, while the National Investment Commission continued operating through its Single Window and Investor Services Department. Administrative development has not, however, eliminated overlapping authorities, multiple approvals or the unclear distinction between “the right to conduct an activity” and “obtaining an investment privilege”.

In 2026, amendment of the law entered an active legislative process. The Council of Ministers approved preparation of a third amendment addressing issues including authority to conclude investment contracts and certain agricultural-investment matters. The Council of Representatives' Investment and Development Committee then held an extensive workshop on 6 October 2026 to develop the Investment Law, emphasising the need for an integrated system defining responsibilities, shortening procedures and protecting the rights of the State, investors and citizens.

This proposal moves beyond another partial amendment towards comprehensive replacement legislation. It retains the National Commission, investment commissions and single window but redefines their role: lawful investment requires no “investment licence” merely to enter the market; an investment certificate becomes an optional instrument for specified facilitation services and incentives. It also establishes a special-economic-zone framework without forcibly merging zones with free zones or industrial cities, and prohibits tax or customs exemptions merely because of zone status.

The central idea is that the best investment environment is measured not by the length of its exemption list but by a project's ability to know rules in advance, submit data once, track applications digitally, obtain land with sound legal status, receive decisions by known deadlines and appeal errors. Taxes, labour, environment, competition, anti-money laundering and public-fund protection remain general rules from which zones and investors are exempt only by clear legislation.

Legislative Gap

Problem and Proposed Response
AreaPractical GapResponse in POL-43
Market entryConfusion between investment, investment licensing and incentives.Freedom to invest in lawful activities, with an optional certificate solely for facilitation and incentives.
Single windowCollects correspondence without always ensuring delegated agency representatives or once-only data submission.Unified national portal, authorised representatives, tracking numbers, published deadlines and the “once-only data” principle.
LicensingNumerous conditions and varying risks across activities.Low/medium/high risk classification, elimination of duplication, and no restrictions imposed through unpublished correspondence.
LandOverlapping ownership and allocation, with insufficient advance information about legal status and services.Verified land map, competitive allocation as the rule, performance contracts and recovery of land from stalled projects.
IncentivesHistorical focus on lengthy exemptions without continuous measurement of cost and additionality.Performance-linked incentives, cost disclosure and no tax or customs exemption without statutory authority.
Economic zonesFree zones, industrial cities and investment zones exist without a unified federal framework for the modern SEZ concept.Clear rules for establishment, developers, operators, services, governance and measurement while retaining existing laws.
State and investor protectionLegal certainty is needed without freezing the State's regulatory powers.Property, transfer and appeal rights and disciplined arbitration, alongside an explicit right to regulate and no automatic consent to international arbitration.

Proposed Legislative Design

The proposal separates three layers often conflated in practice: establishing a business, sectoral licensing and investment certification. Company formation is governed by company law and the companies register; sectoral licensing protects health, safety, the financial system or State resources; investment certification provides access to statutory facilitation services and incentives. This separation reduces any body's ability to turn “investment encouragement” into general permission to participate in the economy.

The proposal also rejects universal deemed approval. Deemed approval may help low-risk activities but becomes dangerous in environmental, health, banking or critical-infrastructure matters. It is therefore allowed only where regulations specify it following risk assessment, while deadlines, administrative challenge rights and administrative accountability apply generally to all services.

Special economic zones are treated as production and services platforms rather than primarily tax-exemption instruments. Success depends on location, infrastructure, services, skills and links to suppliers and markets. Any preferential tax or customs treatment remains subject to express legislation, consistent with Article (28) of the Constitution and fiscal discipline.

The proposal preserves Iraq's flexibility in investment dispute resolution. Iraq has been an ICSID Convention contracting State since 17 December 2015, but membership does not automatically constitute consent to submit every dispute to the Centre. Consent to international arbitration must therefore derive from an effective treaty, valid contract or express legislation.

Text of the bill

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to modernise investment's legal environment after two decades of Investment Law No. (13) of 2006 and accumulated amendments and regulations; clarify business establishment, sectoral licensing and certification; make the single window a binding digital service; prevent repeated government-data requests; establish clear special-economic-zone rules without affecting free-zone and industrial-city legislation; link incentives to viability and impact rather than automatic entitlement; and protect property and investment while preserving State regulation and public funds, labour, environment, competition and security.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why replacement rather than a third amendment?

The 2006 Law played an important role, creating a national investment institution and governorate commissions and establishing guarantees, incentives and a single window. Successive amendments nevertheless layered additions onto a structure designed for different economic and administrative circumstances. The government's 2026 announcement of a third amendment and parliament's legislative workshop on 6 October 2026 make this an appropriate moment to examine the entire framework rather than individual provisions.

Replacement does not abolish institutions or existing contracts. The proposal retains the National Commission, governorate commissions and acquired rights under clearer legislation, allowing six months for transition and regulations. This prevents legal gaps and loss of exemptions already earned by previously licensed projects.

2. From “investment licence” to “investment certificate”

Lawful economic activity should not need general licensing above sectoral licences. A software company, for example, needs lawful formation and tax and labour compliance, but not necessarily an “investment licence”. A pharmaceutical factory requires technical licensing because of health impacts, not because the State grants investor status. The draft therefore separates market-entry rights from requests for privileges or facilitation.

The proposed certificate creates neither monopoly nor exemption from law. It establishes eligibility for coordinated procedures, land, incentives or zone access. This lets the State focus facilitation resources on impactful projects without making investment commissions mandatory gateways for all economic activity.

3. Business Facilitation as a Legal Duty

Digitalisation alone is insufficient while each authority requests the same document. The proposal adopts once-only data submission, a national licensing register, published fees and deadlines, and prohibition of unpublished conditions. Bodies must redesign licensing by risk: registration or notification for low risk, defined approval for medium risk and express licensing for high risk.

This builds on existing platforms: the Companies Registration Department already has an electronic portal and single window, the Ur portal provides company services, and the National Commission has a Single Window Department. The task is to connect these legally and digitally rather than replace them with a fourth platform.

4. Land: From Hidden Incentive to Measurable Public Asset

Land is a key project input but also public property or a protected private right. Investment opportunities must therefore be preceded by a digital map of ownership, use, planning, services and any disputes. Competitive public-property allocation is the rule where multiple capable investors exist, with performance contracts preventing land retention without implementation.

The draft retains the constitutional framework for non-Iraqi property ownership: non-Iraqis generally cannot own immovables except through statutory exceptions. It preserves the residential-investment exception with safeguards against speculation and demographic change, while making lease, musataha or long-term usufruct the rule for non-residential projects unless special legislation applies.

5. Incentives: Public Cost for Additional Impact

Current law grants licensed projects ten-year tax and fee exemptions in specified cases, with extensions linked to Iraqi participation. Understandable during initial investment attraction, this model does not always distinguish projects needing incentives from those proceeding anyway. Unmeasured exemptions may reduce revenue without increasing net investment.

The new proposal therefore grants no automatic tax holiday. Tax and customs incentives require legislation and inclusion in incentive-cost accounts. The Law instead enables non-tax incentives, competitive grants, training, land and services, requiring performance agreements and proportionate recovery where support is received but material commitments are not fulfilled.

6. Special Economic Zones

Iraq has a free-zone regime and industrial-city legislation, while current investment law permits investment zones. Modern special economic zones are broader: geographical areas combining infrastructure, services, licensing, logistics and supplier connections, whether industrial, logistics, technology, agri-food or mixed-use.

The draft prohibits creating zones merely because land exists or to grant exemptions. It requires demand, location, competitive advantage, financing and service studies, separates regulators from commercial developers and evaluates performance every two years. Zones are not automatically outside customs territory; tax, labour, environment, anti-money-laundering and competition rules remain effective.

7. Investment Protection without Freezing the State

The draft protects property, return transfers, accounts, insurance and intellectual property and provides administrative challenges, courts and contractual arbitration. It rejects turning investment guarantees into immunity from general legislation. Investment contracts cannot prevent updates to health, environment, labour, competition and security rules. In major cases, contracts may address specific financial effects of new legislation where lawful, without comprehensively “freezing” the legal system.

It also distinguishes Iraq's ICSID Convention membership from consent to the Centre's jurisdiction in a particular dispute. This protects both parties: investors know the source of consent in advance and the State avoids unintended arbitration obligations.

Institutional and Operational Transition

First 180 days: Prepare regulations, inventory economic licences, prepare the negative list, unify service standards, catalogue existing incentives and costs, and plan national-portal integration with company, tax, customs, labour and property registers.
First year: Move investment-certificate applications and basic services onto a unified digital process, publish the land map, adopt unified tracking numbers and issue the first public report on service times, incentives and stalled projects.
Second and third years: Expand database integration, apply once-only data submission to the most-used services, evaluate existing or proposed special economic zones and review licences addressing no clear public risk.

The Law does not assume all bodies become digital overnight. Integration is phased, but a legal rule prevents merely recreating paper procedures on screen and requires every service to have a published legal basis, requirements, deadline and challenge process.

Financial and Implementation Implications

Establishment costs: Primarily integration of existing systems, national-portal development, cleansing licence and land records, staff training and information security. The proposal invents no financial figure unsupported by a technical study; bodies must prepare three-year costs before contracting for systems.

Annual costs: Relate to digital infrastructure operation, investor services, inspection and evaluation. A substantial share may be absorbed within existing bodies' and systems' budgets rather than creating a new institution.

Special economic zones: The Treasury does not automatically bear their costs. Each zone has a separate study and financing arrangement defining State, developer and external-infrastructure shares. Establishment requires identified funding and land and service costs.

Revenue and incentives: The proposal reduces hidden tax-expenditure risks by granting no new automatic exemptions. Every financial advantage becomes measurable and publishable, allowing legislators to compare forgone revenue with realised investment, jobs and exports.

Comparative Reference Framework

The design aligns with UNCTAD's Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development, combining openness, stability and transparency with the State's right to regulate and investment's contribution to development. It also reflects modern facilitation through transparency, digital portals and inter-agency cooperation rather than relying solely on investor protection after disputes arise.

UNCTAD's experience indicates that special-economic-zone success depends not solely on exemptions but on governance, infrastructure, services, skills and domestic linkages. Excessively transferring existing companies into zone regimes or granting broad tax support may undermine fiscal sustainability without additional investment. Every zone therefore requires feasibility studies, performance indicators and periodic review.

International PrincipleApplication in the Proposal
Clear and stable proceduresLicensing register, published requirements, deadlines, challenge rights and unified tracking numbers.
Balanced rights and obligationsProperty and transfer protection alongside labour, environmental, competition and tax compliance.
State's right to regulateExpress provision preventing privileges from becoming immunity from general non-discriminatory rules.
Digital investment facilitationNational portal, once-only data and linked government registers.
Development-linked SEZsFeasibility before establishment, supplier linkages, training, biennial evaluation and no automatic exemption attached to status.
Clear dispute resolutionAdministrative challenges, courts, mediation and arbitration by express agreement; ICSID membership is not general consent.

Sources and references

  1. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Constitution of the Republic of IraqConstitutional basis for property, investment, the economy and institutional powers.
  2. Ministry of Justice — Investment Law No. (13) of 2006 and AmendmentsOfficial text published in the Iraqi Legislation Guide.
  3. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette, Issue 4800 of 2024Contains Regulation No. (8) of 2024, the second amendment to Investment Regulation No. (2) of 2009.
  4. National Investment Commission — Single Window DepartmentCurrent investor-service, approval and land-allocation functions.
  5. National Investment Commission — Policies and LawsRelevant investment and commercial laws and regulations.
  6. Ministry of Trade — Companies Registration Department, Registrar of CompaniesElectronic company-registration portal and related services.
  7. Companies Registration Department — Electronic Services, Enquiries and Single Window
  8. Ministry of Justice — Industrial Cities Law No. (2) of 2019
  9. Ministry of Industry and Minerals — Industrial Cities AuthorityInstitutional position and existing industrial projects.
  10. National Investment Commission — Investor GuideIncludes an overview of free zones and the current investment framework.
  11. Council of Representatives — Opening a Legislative Process to Develop the Investment Law, 6 October 2026
  12. Iraqi News Agency — Council of Ministers Decisions on Preparing the Third Investment Law Amendment, 2026
  13. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes — Republic of IraqICSID Convention entry into force for Iraq on 17 December 2015.
  14. UNCTAD — Investment Laws Navigator: Iraq
  15. UNCTAD — Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development
  16. UNCTAD — Special Economic Zone Policy Lessons
  17. UNCTAD — A Practical Guide to Investment Laws
  18. World Bank Group — IraqEconomic context, diversification and private-sector development opportunities.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · POL-43 · Version 1.0 · 7 October 2026

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.