Skip to content
POL-45

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Proposed legislation · Economy, Finance, Investment and Employment

Modern Labour, Flexible Work, Remote Work and Platform Work Law

A framework supplementing current labour legislation to regulate modern work without allowing digital flexibility to circumvent wages, social security, safety, privacy and collective rights.

Document number
POL-45
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive Summary

Iraqi Labour Law No. (37) of 2015 remains effective and is broad and relatively modern in its basic structure: it covers all workers in Iraq except public officials appointed under civil-service legislation and armed forces, police and internal-security personnel; defines part-time work; and prioritises the relationship's reality, work and remuneration over contractual labels. It predates today's prevalence of hybrid work, delivery, transport and digital-service platforms and algorithmic management, and lacks comprehensive specific remote-work rules.

On 25 July 2026, parliament completed the first reading of the proposed first Labour Law amendment. During August and September, its Labour Committee continued discussions with the Ministry of Labour, International Labour Organization, unions and employers, stating that the amendment responds to emerging work patterns, modernises worker and wage concepts and protects working environments. POL-45 therefore proposes supplementary legislation capable of integration into that process rather than repealing the 2015 Law and rebuilding labour law from scratch.

The proposal addresses three connected gaps. First, flexible and part-time work, job sharing and flexible hours without reducing pay rates or shifting all demand volatility onto workers. Second, remote and hybrid work: contracts, equipment and costs, working time, the right to disconnect, home safety, privacy and information security. Third, platform work: factual classification of workers and independent professionals, registration and transparency, payments, social security, safety, algorithmic management, human review and challenges to account deactivation.

It draws on recent international developments. In June 2026, the International Labour Organization adopted Convention No. (193) on decent work in the platform economy, the first specific international standard in this field. It does not assume every platform worker is an employee; it requires correct factual classification and safeguards for wages or payments, social security, working conditions and algorithmic management. At this document's date, NORMLEX does not show Iraqi ratification, so the proposal uses it as guidance rather than an effective Iraqi obligation.

Social security does not start from nothing: Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023 expanded coverage to private, mixed and cooperative sectors, self-employed and informal workers. The Department now has a digital social-security system and voluntary-retirement route. The proposal therefore links subordinated platform workers to mandatory coverage and genuinely independent workers to their established routes, preventing platforms from shifting employer contributions onto workers.

Legislative Gap

The Gap Addressed by POL-45
IssueCurrent positionProposed Response
Remote workGeneral rules can accommodate it, but no comprehensive special framework addresses location, equipment, privacy and disconnection.Dedicated chapter on contracts, costs, safety, monitoring, information security and return to on-site work.
Flexible workPart-time work is recognised, but flexible hours, job sharing and variable scheduling lack detail.Recognised arrangements with equal pay and rights and scheduling and conversion rules.
Platform workArticle (13) permits factual classification, but platforms and automated decisions are not expressly regulated.Platform registration, factual classification tests, rebuttable presumptions where actual control exists, and basic protection even for genuine independents.
Algorithmic managementNo labour-specific transparency or human-review rules.Disclosure, data minimisation, sensitive-monitoring prohibitions, explanations, human review, and discrimination and risk testing.
Social securityLaw 18/2023 broadly covers informal and self-employed work.No diversion of dependent workers into voluntary insurance; platforms connect to the existing system.
Public officialsAlready excluded from labour legislation.Keep regimes separate while requiring government to prepare a distinct public-service flexible-work framework.

The objective is not to “make everyone an employee”. Genuine self-employment is lawful and important to the digital economy. The problem is that platforms can exercise employer-like control while contracts call workers “independent”. The proposal therefore prioritises facts and gives genuine independents basic transparency, payment, safety and privacy protection without automatically granting all employee rights.

Legislative design

The proposal supplements rather than replaces labour legislation. The 2015 Law already comprehensively addresses contracts, wages, time, women, young workers, safety, inspection, disputes and collective rights. Modern needs concern how these rights apply when workplaces are dispersed or algorithms manage tasks and income.

The design uses five tests: technological neutrality, allowing new models; label neutrality, prioritising facts; proportionality, avoiding large-platform technical burdens for small enterprises without reducing core rights; no new institution where the Ministry, labour courts and Social Security Department can absorb functions; and separation of public service from labour law, respecting existing structures.

Proposed Parliamentary Route: The text may be enacted as a standalone supplementary law or integrated into the current first-amendment proposal. Integration reduces fragmentation if that amendment reaches final drafting before POL-45 is introduced.

Text of the bill

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted because work is a constitutional right; Labour Law No. (37) of 2015 established advanced safeguards but predates current remote work, platforms and algorithmic management; modern arrangements need regulation expanding employment and investment without weakening wages, social security, safety, privacy or collective rights; the infrastructure under Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023 should be used; and comparative developments and the ILO's adoption in 2026 of the first platform-economy convention should be reflected.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why retain the current Labour Law?

Repeal would reopen approximately 174 articles on matters needing no reconstruction and create unnecessary legislative risk while parliament already discusses amendments. POL-45 preserves the 2015 Law's rights and adds specialised rules for arrangements not legislatively mature when it was issued.

2. Why not directly include public officials?

Labour Law Article (3) excludes officials appointed under civil-service or special legislation. Including them would mix different appointment, discipline, pay and retirement regimes. The proposal requires a separate flexible public-service framework within one year, potentially adapting the same principles to public facilities.

3. How are employees distinguished from independents?

The proposal follows existing Article (13): courts examine actual work and pay, not paperwork alone. It adds platform-specific price control, task allocation, ratings, sanctions and account cancellation. A single minor factor such as ratings does not convert independents into employees.

4. Why extend some rights to genuine independents?

Independent platform workers may not receive employee-style paid leave or minimum wages, but still need advance remuneration information, payment, account-closure reasons and protection against sensitive monitoring and violence. These are basic digital-market rights that do not themselves change contractual status.

5. Algorithmic Management

The proposal does not ban AI or automated task allocation. Workers must know systems are used; platforms must avoid unrelated data collection; and no one should be dismissed or lose income through decisions nobody can explain or review. Restricted judicial and regulatory access protects trade secrets without publishing algorithms.

6. Flexibility and Working Time

Flexibility does not eliminate time limits. Required availability effectively preventing free use of time enters the working-time test. Merely opening an app with genuine refusal and departure freedom does not automatically create paid hours.

7. Social Security

POL-45 creates no new fund. Dependent workers receive mandatory coverage under Law 18/2023; genuine independents use informal-work and voluntary-retirement routes. “Formal independence” cannot shift employer contributions onto workers.

Financial and Implementation Implications

The Law requires no new authority or fund. Implementation principally uses the Ministry of Labour, inspectors, labour courts, Workers' Retirement and Social Security Department and the “Daman” digital system.

Start-up costs cover the platform register, contracts and portal, training inspectors, judges and specialists on records and algorithms, and linking registration to social security. Operating costs concern digital oversight, complaint support and risk-based audits.

No arbitrary financial figure is supplied without a government inventory of platforms, workers and required Ministry systems. Implementation policy requires a three-year cost estimate before final instructions, separating reuse of existing systems from new development.

Potential private-sector impact: Initial contract, record and policy compliance costs are balanced by clearer models, fewer classification and pay disputes and wider access to skills across governorates. Simplified technical compliance limits small-enterprise burdens without reducing core rights.

Comparative and International Reference Framework

International Labour Organization — Convention 193 of 2026: Broadly defines platforms and workers, requires factual classification and protects payment, social security, engagement and work conditions and automated management. POL-45 uses this modern structure without claiming Iraqi ratification.

European Union — Directive 2024/2831: Provides advanced automated-monitoring and decision transparency, restricts sensitive data and grants explanation and human-review rights. The proposal adopts transparency and proportionality reasoning rather than European institutional structures.

Jordan — Flexible Work Regulation No. 44 of 2024: A regional example of specialised flexibility regulation rather than informal practice, useful for Iraqi request, conversion and flexible-hours models.

United Arab Emirates — Federal Decree-Law 33 of 2021 and Implementing Regulation: Recognises full-time, part-time, temporary, flexible, remote and job-sharing private-sector models, showing that varied contracts can be recognised without dismantling core labour legislation.

Egypt — Labour Law No. 14 of 2025: Introduced modern arrangements including remote and flexible work in a new law. Implementation in 2026 indicates digital-transition regulation with rights protection. Iraq can learn without replacing its 2015 Law merely to imitate legislation.

Sources and references

  1. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005Rights, equality, privacy, work and social security.
  2. Iraqi Legislation Database — Labour Law No. (37) of 2015Status: in force; scope, definitions and core labour-law structure.
  3. Council of Representatives — Session of 25 July 2026First reading of the proposed first Labour Law amendment.
  4. Council of Representatives — Dialogue on Labour Law Amendment, 3 September 2026Overview of modernisation, emerging work patterns and tripartite dialogue.
  5. Ministry of Justice — Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023Expanded coverage, informal work and self-employment.
  6. Workers' Retirement and Social Security Department — Daman Digital SystemDigital services for enterprises, informal work and voluntary retirement.
  7. Ministry of Justice — Instructions No. (1) of 2026 on Recruitment, Employment and Licensing of Foreign Workers.
  8. International Labour Organization — Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention No. 193 of 2026Definitions, classification, payment, social security and platform-worker protection.
  9. ILO NORMLEX — Iraqi RatificationsRatified conventions, including freedom of association, equality and social security; no Iraqi ratification of Convention 193 appears by this document's date.
  10. International Labour Organization — Iraq Decent Work Programme 2026–2029National tripartite framework for labour markets, protection and private-sector development.
  11. European Union — Directive (EU) 2024/2831 on Improving Working Conditions in Platform WorkClassification, algorithmic management, data and human review.
  12. ILO NATLEX — Jordan, Flexible Work Regulation No. 44 of 2024.
  13. UAE Legislation Portal — Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 on Regulation of Labour RelationsWork models and implementing regulation covering flexible, remote and job-sharing arrangements.
  14. Egyptian Ministry of Labour — Labour Law No. 14 of 2025Regulation of modern, flexible and remote work.
  15. Iraqi Ministry of Justice — Review of Laws Including Personal Data Protection, 16 August 2026Helps assess the absence of comprehensive effective general data legislation at preparation.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · POL-45 · Version 1.0 · 7 October 2026

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.