Skip to content
POL-59

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Legislative proposal · Energy, Infrastructure, Water, Environment and Urban Development

Social Housing, Informal Settlement Regularisation and Urban Renewal Law

Document number
POL-59
Version
1.0
Publication / update date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

The proposal establishes one legal system for three interrelated problems: insufficient affordable housing, expanding informal settlements and deteriorating existing neighbourhoods requiring renewal rather than wholesale demolition. It uses existing institutions—the National Housing Council, Housing Directorate, Iraqi Housing Fund, local authorities and property registration bodies—instead of creating a parallel apparatus. It also separates property rights from social eligibility: encroachment does not become title, while the state may not address urban poverty through arbitrary eviction or relocation to isolated, unserviced sites.

The law targets support by income, assets and housing need, offering social rental housing, rent-to-own, serviced land linked to construction finance, home improvement and progressive tenure regularisation. In informal settlements, upgrading comes first wherever sites are safe and capable of integration; resettlement applies to high-risk sites or those fundamentally conflicting with a public facility or private right. Urban renewal ties investment to protection against resident displacement, an affordable-housing share where public land or support is used, and compensation, return or priority safeguards in relocation.

Current baseline

Data and policies published during 2025–2026 have reshaped Iraq's housing picture. The 2024 census recorded approximately 46.1 million people, 70.2% urbanisation and an average household size of 5.77. The National Housing Policy 2025–2030 explains that the census alone does not measure the adequacy deficit because it counts unsuitable housing types; accounting for overcrowding and adequacy indicators, the policy estimated a gap of approximately 2.3 million units. Meanwhile, the updated 2021–2022 informal-settlement survey, officially published in 2023, remains an important spatial baseline: it recorded 4,679 settlements and approximately 3.725 million residents, with over one thousand settlements in Baghdad.

46.1 millionIraq's population in the 2024 census
70.2%Urban population share
Approximately 2.3 millionEstimated adequate-housing gap in the 2025–2030 policy
4,679Informal settlements in the 2021–2022 survey

The state has also entered a new implementation stage: it launched the National Housing Policy 2025–2030, the National Housing Council continued meeting in 2026, and preparation of the policy's implementation plan began. In August 2026 the Council of Representatives confirmed government work to allocate one million residential plots across fifteen governorates and address informal settlements after suitable housing alternatives are provided. These developments make legislation less about declaring general goals and more about unified rules on eligibility, land, financing, regularisation, eviction and renewal.

Legislative gap

For years, proposed legislation addressing residential encroachments centred on public land, rental or removal, while modern national housing policy expanded to finance, land, infrastructure, affordable housing and regularisation. Separating these issues creates dysfunction: removing encroachment without alternative housing recreates it; allocating unserviced land without construction finance can produce idle plots or unauthorised building; and renewal without safeguards can increase land values while displacing original residents to urban fringes.

The proposal creates a unified framework without turning legislation into a vast ministerial plan. It defines rights, powers, tenure and financing models, transparency, eviction and remedies, leaving project, unit and city numbers and annual costs to implementation plans and budgets supported by actual feasibility studies.

Proposed legislative policy

Problems and proposed legal instruments
ProblemLegislative instrument
Housing support not always linked to actual needA national needs register, points system and verification of income, assets and previous benefits.
Land allocation without construction or servicesLink serviced land to construction financing, deadlines and recovery of unused land.
Uniform treatment of informal settlementsThree categories: upgrading, conditional regularisation, and sites unsuitable for regularisation requiring resettlement.
Conflating housing and property rightsSeparate social assistance from ownership; occupancy certificates and services do not create title.
Eviction before alternatives are providedNotice, consultation and appeal, with actual alternatives for low-income households in programme-related clearance.
Urban renewal causing displacementResident protection, return priority, affordable housing and assessment of effects on rents and livelihoods.
Undisclosed public support for developersDisclose the value of land, exemptions and infrastructure and tie it to measurable affordability commitments.
Fragmented institutionsUse the National Council, Housing Directorate, Housing Fund and local authorities rather than a new apparatus.
Central principle: The law neither rewards encroachment nor uses poverty as a pretext for demolition. Social eligibility is assessed independently of tenure legality, and site regularisation independently of household economic capacity.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to provide an integrated framework translating adequate-housing rights into targeted, financed and accountable instruments; prevent land, lending, encroachment and renewal policies operating separately; protect property and public assets while addressing social need fairly; prioritise upgrading integrable informal settlements over mass demolition, with eviction and resettlement safeguards where regularisation is impossible; regulate social housing, affordable rental, serviced land and improvement finance; disclose public subsidy values; and prevent speculation and unlawful brokerage.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why combine social housing, informal settlements and urban renewal?

They are links within one land and housing market. Households unable to buy or rent formal housing may build informally; clearing settlements without alternatives transfers the problem elsewhere; and renewing deteriorated neighbourhoods without resident protection may improve buildings while causing economic displacement. Legislative integration does not merge implementation, but ensures decisions in one track are tested for their effects on the other two.

2. Why create no new fund or authority?

Iraq already has the National Housing Council, Housing Directorate, Iraqi Housing Fund, ministries, municipalities and property registration bodies. The need is to define roles, data, decision processes and financing, not add bureaucracy. The proposal therefore creates programme accounting accounts within the existing Fund where needed and uses multidisciplinary local teams instead of a new federal authority.

3. Social eligibility is independent of land status

This distinction is crucial. One public-land occupant may be poor and lack alternatives; another may be wealthy or own another home. The first needs a social solution despite lacking ownership; the second deserves no free subsidy merely for encroaching. Conversely, private landowners may bear no responsibility for the housing problem and cannot be made to finance it. Three questions must remain separate: who owns the land, whether the site can be regularised, and how much support the household deserves.

4. In-situ upgrading first

The proposal follows modern international and Iraqi approaches preferring improvements where sites are safe and serviceable, since wholesale clearance often costs more socially and financially. Upgrading is not unconditional: utility corridors, dangerous sites, unresolvable private rights or public-facility needs may prevent it. In such cases the law regulates resettlement rather than pretending every settlement can be retained.

5. Urban renewal does not mean demolition

Renewal begins with repairing buildings, services and public spaces and reusing vacant assets. Where extensive redevelopment is necessary, the proposal requires baseline studies, resident participation and displacement protection, offering affordable housing, return and land-readjustment tools. The objective is better neighbourhoods rather than replacement residents.

6. Subsidies are costs that must be measured

Free or discounted land, infrastructure connections, government guarantees and subsidised loans are all public expenditure even without direct cash payments. The proposal therefore requires subsidy measurement and disclosure, enabling fair comparisons: a seemingly cheaper unit may consume more costly public land and infrastructure than an alternative.

Alignment with existing legislation

Relationship with existing laws and institutions
ReferenceStatusProposed alignment
Iraqi Constitution 2005Equality, property, public-asset protection, adequate housing and distribution of responsibilities.Prevents automatic ownership through encroachment while protecting social eligibility and fair procedures.
Iraqi Housing Fund Law No. 32 of 2011An existing, functioning financing institution.Remains effective, with expanded financing windows and targeting through later amendments where needed.
Amended State Asset Sale and Lease Law No. 21 of 2013Regulates disposal of public assets.Applies absent specific provisions; public-land subsidies are valued rather than presumed free.
Amended Investment Law No. 13 of 2006Framework for investment and housing projects.Links developer public benefits to affordable-housing shares or equivalent contractual contributions.
Amended Real Estate Registration Law No. 43 of 1971Reference for rights in rem and registration.Regularisation maps and beneficiary registers do not become titles outside property registration.
Social Protection Law No. 11 of 2014An existing social-targeting basis.Its data are one of several sources; housing eligibility is not confined to network beneficiaries.
Urban planning, building codes and environmental legislationRegulate land suitability, building and safety.Regularisation does not waive planning or safety; it establishes transition to enforceable legal status.

Transition and implementation requirements

Core implementation timetable
Period after commencementRequirement
3 monthsEstablish governance, designate federal and local contact points and begin protecting existing list rankings.
6 monthsIssue initial eligibility standards, the informal-settlement classification framework and digital transition plan.
12 monthsLaunch the national housing-needs register initially and update priority-site baselines.
18 monthsBegin financed local regularisation plans linked to water, sewerage, energy and road plans.
24 monthsPublish the first national report measuring subsidy costs and actual outcomes rather than announcements.
36 monthsComplete independent first-cycle evaluation and propose necessary legislative amendments.
Transition principle: Existing loans and projects continue while the new system is prepared; platform changes do not erase household seniority. Once unified eligibility criteria are complete, no new support window shall open under old rules.

Financial and operational impact

The proposal gives no fixed total cost for solving the housing crisis because costs vary radically with the instrument mix: state-built units, serviced land, subsidised loans, social rental or existing-neighbourhood upgrading. The official baseline itself distinguishes numerical shortage from inadequate housing. The law therefore prescribes a financial methodology instead of a falsely precise political number.

Financial-impact estimation method
ItemCosts to includeControl instrument
New unitLand + infrastructure + construction + management + transport and services.Lifecycle cost and alternative comparison.
Serviced landLand value + networks + roads + financing for uncompleted construction.Do not count plot allocation as completion before construction.
In-situ upgradingReplanning + networks + limited compensation + registration.Compare upgrading and resettlement costs for each site.
ResettlementAlternative unit + land + transport + livelihood loss + demolition and land reuse.Social and financial plans before eviction.
Financial supportInterest/cost differential, guarantees, discounts and default risks.Disclose subsidy net present value in programme budgets.
Urban renewalPublic investment and resulting property-value increases.Lawfully capture part of the increase for services and affordable housing.

This methodology enables Parliament to review annual and multi-year appropriations based on households actually assisted and each pathway's cost, instead of committing large sums in advance without data or identified sites.

Relevant international standards

The proposal follows the practical substance of adequate-housing rights as interpreted by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: housing means more than a roof and involves tenure security, services, adequacy, affordability and location. It also draws on eviction safeguards stressing that forced removal is not a routine development instrument and that alternatives, consultation and lawful procedures are essential where relocation becomes necessary.

From UN-Habitat's informal-settlement approach it adopts progressive tenure security that does not always require immediate title, service improvements alongside rather than after planning, and community participation in solutions. It also draws on area-based renewal integrating housing, services, livelihoods, transport and environment rather than isolated demolition projects.

These standards do not replace Iraqi law. Property, registration, expropriation and public assets remain subject to the Constitution and national legislation. International instruments strengthen safeguards and institutional design efficiency only.

Sources and references

  1. Supreme Judicial Council — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq 2005, especially equality, property, housing and distribution-of-powers provisions.
  2. United Nations in Iraq — Iraq National Housing Policy 2025–2030.
  3. United Nations in Iraq — Launch of the National Housing Policy 2025–2030.
  4. Ministry of Planning — Updated survey locating informal settlements in Iraq 2021–2022.
  5. Ministry of Planning — Updated national informal-settlement programme roadmap and draft residential-encroachment measures.
  6. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — 2024 census, population, urbanisation and household-size indicators.
  7. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Session of 23 August 2026 on allocating one million plots and addressing informal settlements.
  8. General Directorate of Municipalities — Twenty-sixth National Housing Council meeting, 19 January 2026.
  9. General Directorate of Municipalities — National Housing Policy 2025–2030 implementation-plan workshop, 8 September 2026.
  10. Housing Directorate — Official website, responsibilities and housing policy.
  11. Iraqi Housing Fund — Official website.
  12. Iraqi Housing Fund — Electronic application platform for 2026.
  13. Ministry of Justice — Social Protection Law No. 11 of 2014.
  14. Ministry of Justice — State Asset Sale and Lease Law No. 21 of 2013, as amended.
  15. Ministry of Justice — Investment Law No. 13 of 2006, as amended.
  16. Ministry of Justice — Updated draft amendment of Real Estate Registration Law No. 43 of 1971, 2025.
  17. Ministry of Justice — Cooperation with UN-Habitat on property registration and land rights, 7 July 2026.
  18. UN-Habitat — Iraq Urban Research and Capacity Development and the regularisation roadmap.
  19. UN-Habitat — Housing and Slum Upgrading in Iraq.
  20. UN-Habitat — Slum Upgrading: tenure, services, participation and resilience.
  21. UN-Habitat — Security of Tenure: forced eviction is not a sustainable solution.
  22. OHCHR — General Comment No. 4: The right to adequate housing.
  23. OHCHR — General Comment No. 7: Forced evictions.
  24. United Nations Treaty Collection — Iraq ratification of the ICESCR.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.