Skip to content
POL-60

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Proposed legislation · Energy, infrastructure, water, environment and urban development

Public Transport, Urban Mobility and Road Safety Law

Document number
POL-60
Version
1.0
Publication/update date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

The proposal establishes a unified legislative framework for public transport, urban mobility and road safety without adding a new federal body above existing institutions. It retains the General Traffic Directorate, Central Traffic Committee, State Company for Private Transport Management, public operators and local authorities, while clarifying their respective responsibilities and integration: urban network planning is local; standards, interoperability and national coordination are federal; traffic-rule enforcement remains under the Traffic Law; and road and public-transport safety become measurable shared responsibilities.

The Law prioritises services, not merely vehicle purchases. It requires demand-based mobility plans, operating contracts with regularity, safety and accessibility indicators, integrated ticketing and data, and realistic regulation of taxis, platforms, minibuses and tuk-tuks, with gradual transition for existing operators. Walking, cycling, parking, speed management and road-safety audits become part of one system, without duplicating fines or creating digital traffic offences outside the Traffic Law.

Current baseline

Official data show a persistent safety burden beyond urban congestion. In 2025, Iraq recorded 11,948 traffic accidents, resulting in 2,351 deaths and 11,564 injuries according to the Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority report based on Ministry of Interior data. Deaths declined from 2024, but human losses remain substantial, requiring systematic risk management rather than reactive responses.

11,948Recorded traffic accidents in 2025
2,351Recorded deaths in 2025
11,564Recorded injuries in 2025
21.5 per 100 thousandWHO estimated road-death rate in Iraq for 2021

The World Health Organization's Iraq profile highlights the distinction between reported deaths and epidemiological estimates: 5,563 reported deaths in 2021 versus an estimated 9,344, a rate of 21.5 per hundred thousand people. The proposal treats this difference as a reason to harmonise accident, death and injury definitions and link police, health and statistical data, rather than as a contradiction.

An existing operational institutional system cannot be disregarded: Traffic Law No. (8) of 2019 established a Central Traffic Committee and assigned traffic management to traffic police; the State Company for Private Transport Management regulates private passenger transport; and the State Company for Passenger and Delegation Transport operates a public fleet. In 2026, the Traffic Directorate expanded annual vehicle inspections and preparations for intelligent traffic systems. The Law therefore addresses integration and accountability gaps rather than assuming an institutional vacuum.

Legislative gap

Iraq has transport and traffic institutions, roads, public buses and private transport, but responsibilities are split among planning, operations, traffic and municipalities. No unified framework links service levels to contracts, requires data and ticket interoperability, transitions informal transport, integrates walking, cycling and parking into transport policy, or connects safety audits with serious-injury data.

Digital enforcement modernisation alone is insufficient. The General Traffic Directorate explained in 2026 that changing fines requires legislation, confirming the need to distinguish technology from legal authority. Cameras or platforms cannot create penalties: technology detects and records; offences, penalties and objection rights derive from law.

Proposed legislative policy

Problem and legal instrument
ProblemProposed treatment
Fragmented competencesUse existing institutions with clear allocation among local planning, transport regulation, traffic, roads, health and environment.
Focus on purchasing buses rather than servicesContracts specifying routes, frequency, reliability, safety, accessibility and auditable data.
Disorganised routes and small-scale transportGradually integrate existing operators through plannable contracts and permits rather than abruptly removing livelihoods.
Apps outside the transport systemPlatform licensing, verification and insurance duties, trip records, data protection and transparent pricing.
Congestion addressed only through road expansionPrioritise mass transit, parking and demand management, land-use integration, walking and cycling.
Safety relying solely on punishmentSafe System approach: design, speed, vehicles, behaviour, post-crash response and unified data.
Closed digitisationInteroperability, non-personal open data and prevention of vendor data lock-in.
Opaque fare subsidiesSeparate social and low-demand-route subsidies from commercial fares and disclose them in budgets or contracts.

Explanatory reasons

This Law is proposed to establish integrated public transport, urban mobility and road safety; improve access to work, education, health and services; increase bus, private-transport, taxi and platform efficiency; organise federal/local relationships; connect transport and urban planning; protect pedestrians, cyclists and vulnerable groups; develop data-based safety; and ensure fare, subsidy, contract and technology transparency, reducing deaths, serious injuries, congestion and waste while improving reliability.

General explanatory memorandum

Why a framework law?

Urban transport is not constitutionally an exclusive federal competence. The proposal therefore avoids centralising route and parking details. National authorities set safety, interoperability and transparency standards; local authorities retain daily network decisions in coordination with traffic and transport bodies.

Why no new safety authority?

The Traffic Law already established a Central Traffic Committee chaired by the Interior Ministry's Deputy Minister for Police Affairs, including transport and roads bodies, Baghdad Municipality and the Director-General of Traffic. Another body would increase fragmentation. The proposal instead assigns strategy and data coordination to this committee, inviting health, planning and environmental bodies as relevant.

Private transport and platforms

Private transport is a substantial part of passenger services. The proposal recognises the existing State Company for Private Transport Management but connects permits to local network plans. Digital platforms bear responsibility proportionate to their real influence over drivers, fares and trips, rather than being treated as software detached from transport.

Safety: from offences to systems

2025 data show continuing substantial deaths and injuries. Traffic penalties are necessary but insufficient: roads, speed, crossings, vehicle quality, driver hours and ambulance response are also legal and operational factors. The proposal therefore adopts a Safe System while retaining principal offences and fines in traffic legislation.

Costs and funding

No arbitrary national modernisation figure is set, because reorganising routes, buying fleets, BRT, urban rail and metros differ radically in cost. Demand, lifecycle, operating and maintenance assessments precede commitments; social and operating subsidies are disclosed rather than concealed in operator losses.

Active mobility and parking

Walking begins and ends most public-transport journeys, while parked cars occupy public space. Public transport cannot improve amid broken pavement continuity, unsafe crossings and unregulated free parking in the busiest locations. The proposal gives local authorities legal tools within their powers.

Digitisation without supplier monopoly

Iraq has introduced intelligent traffic services and is expanding digital monitoring. The proposal establishes interoperability, data portability and lawful punitive decisions, permitting modernisation without locking networks to one supplier for many years.

Harmonisation with existing legislation and institutions

Boundaries with the existing system
ReferenceRetained responsibilitiesPOL-60 additions
Traffic Law No. 8 of 2019Drivers, driving licences, vehicle registration, offences, traffic and enforcement.Connects safety to planning, infrastructure, services and data without duplicating penalties.
Central Traffic Committee / Article 46Coordination, operational improvement and safety.Serves as the national safety-strategy platform instead of a new authority.
Public Roads Law No. 35 of 2002, as amendedPublic roads and the responsible body's competences.Integrates public-transport requirements and safety audits into urban planning where applicable.
State Company for Private Transport ManagementRegulates and supervises private passenger transport under its founding instrument.Connects operations to local network plans and data/service standards.
Public passenger-transport companiesPublic fleet and service operations.Subjects services to indicators and transparent contracts without removing operator ownership.
Governorates, Baghdad Municipality and municipalitiesLocal competences, planning and services under the Constitution and laws.Provides mobility-plan, route, parking, walking, cycling and demand-management tools.

Transition and implementation requirements

Initial legislative and implementation milestones
PeriodRequirement
Within 6 monthsDesignate local urban-transport focal bodies and inventory existing routes, permits, contracts and digital systems.
Within 12 monthsIssue service/data standards, review safety strategy and establish the official baseline.
Within 18 monthsPolice, health and statistical data-linkage protocol and private-transport/platform transition plans in major cities.
New contractsIndicator, interoperability, data and lifecycle-cost requirements apply immediately after standards are issued.
Existing contracts and systemsContinue until expiry or lawful amendment, with mandatory safety requirements effective within specified periods.

Financial and implementation impact

The financial impact has two components. Organisational measures can largely reorganise existing functions: network plans, contract standards, data linkage, performance audits and expanded Central Traffic Committee work. Investment may be substantial if government purchases fleets or builds BRT, urban rail or stations, but is not an automatic obligation created by this Law.

Financial decision method
ItemCosts consideredDecision rule
FleetPurchase/lease, energy, maintenance, spare parts, lifespan and residual value.Lifecycle costs and service capacity, not vehicle price alone.
InfrastructureCorridors, stations, depots, signals and accessibility works.Demand, safety, benefits and alternatives analysis.
OperationsDrivers, energy, maintenance, management, ticketing and supervision.Multi-year service contract and clear funding source.
Social subsidyVerifiable discounted or free trips.Explicit appropriation rather than unfunded operator burdens.
DigitisationPlatform, connectivity, maintenance, licences and migration.Open standards and prevention of supplier data lock-in.
SafetyAudits, hazardous-site improvements, crossings, lighting and traffic calming.Prioritise expected death and serious-injury reductions.

The proposal thus avoids repeating unsupported old estimates or turning legislation into a project list. Major investment remains subject to budgets, feasibility studies, contracting law and oversight.

Relevant international standards

The proposal draws on the Safe System approach of the Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030, recognising human error and shared responsibility across speed, roads, vehicles, behaviour and response. It also uses sustainable urban-planning principles linking access to public transport, walking, cycling and land use rather than measuring success by car speed alone.

These standards do not transplant foreign institutions into Iraq. Their legislative adaptation is deliberate: the existing Central Traffic Committee coordinates safety; local authorities plan networks; the Transport Ministry sets the shared framework; and traffic legislation retains driver, vehicle and penalty rules.

Sources and references

  1. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, especially Articles 14–16, 110, 114 and 115.
  2. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Official Gazette issue 4550, containing Traffic Law No. (8) of 2019.
  3. Iraqi Official Gazette — Published Traffic Law No. (8) of 2019.
  4. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Session 18, 10 September 2026, second reading of the draft First Amendment to the Traffic Law.
  5. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — Recorded Traffic Accident Statistics for 2025.
  6. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — Principal transport-sector and traffic-accident indicators.
  7. Iraqi News Agency — General Traffic Directorate announces approaching intelligent-traffic-system launch, 16 May 2026.
  8. Iraqi News Agency — Annual vehicle roadworthiness and safety inspection, 9 April 2026.
  9. Roads and Bridges Directorate — Public Roads Law No. 35 of 2002 and First Amendment No. 5 of 2013.
  10. Roads and Bridges Directorate — Consolidating references to the Public Roads Law and amendment, 15 December 2025.
  11. State Company for Private Transport Management — Official website, private-transport services and national taxi.
  12. Iraqi Official Gazette — State Company for Private Transport Management founding statement in issue 4802.
  13. Iraqi News Agency — State Company for Passenger and Delegation Transport operates 250 buses for the 2026 transport plan.
  14. World Health Organization — Iraq profile in the Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023.
  15. World Health Organization — Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030.
  16. UN-Habitat — Urban Issues in Iraq: Urban Mobility.
  17. World Bank — GFDT Annual Report 2025, Baghdad congestion and urban-mobility assessment.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.