Skip to content
POL-76

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed draft law · Health, Social Protection and the Family

Mental Health and Protection of Patients' Rights

A modern legislative framework replacing Mental Health Law No. (1) of 2005, making voluntary and community care and informed consent the system's foundation, with judicial and professional safeguards for exceptional restrictions, and regulation of mental health professions, quality, oversight and financing.

Document number
POL-76
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

Iraq has had a standalone mental health law since 2005, establishing a national authority and regulating involuntary admission and forensic mental healthcare. Its structure nevertheless remains heavily focused on detention, dangerousness and closed units rather than community care, supported decision-making, informed consent, rehabilitation, recovery and modern professional regulation. During the sixth parliamentary term, the issue returned to the legislative process: on 6 May 2026, the Council of Representatives completed the first reading of a new 41-article mental health bill, following an earlier draft that reached a second reading in September 2024 without completing enactment.

This document offers a comprehensive replacement law that can contribute to refining the ongoing legislation rather than creating a parallel law. It replaces Law No. (1) of 2005 with a system grounded in voluntary care, informed consent, decision support, privacy, complaints and second opinions, and integration into primary care, general hospitals and community services. Psychiatric diagnosis alone shall not justify loss of legal capacity or liberty.

For crises involving serious and imminent risk, the document distinguishes emergency assessment, temporary protective admission and treatment. It establishes short time limits, independent medical opinions, early judicial review, access to counsel and challenge, and periodic review. It prohibits seclusion and restraint as punishment or responses to understaffing, establishing a national register and a pathway to reduce these interventions.

Workforce shortages are addressed through national professional definitions, integrating qualified psychology, counselling and social work graduates within clear scopes of practice, and needs mapping and flexible incentives linked to scarcity, location and workload rather than rigid statutory financial entitlements. Financing is linked to universal health coverage and expansion of community care and services in underserved areas.

Legislative gap

Principal gaps addressed
AreaExisting legislative positionProposed response
Service modelThe 2005 law clearly emphasises residential institutions, closed units, detained patients and accused persons.Primary and community care and general hospitals become the normal pathway, with specialised institutions reserved for genuine need.
Consent and decisionsNo detailed modern framework for informed consent, decision support and advance directives.Express recognition of consent, supported decisions, advance directives, second opinions and record access.
Restriction of libertyCurrent law permits compulsory admission based on dangerousness and relatively long periods.Link restrictions to serious, imminent risk, objective facts, less restrictive alternatives and early, periodic judicial review.
Involuntary treatmentInsufficient distinction between admission and treatment decisions.Complete separation, with specific authorisation for non-consensual intervention under strict necessity.
Seclusion and restraintNo detailed modern recording and reduction system.Prohibit punitive or administrative use; establish strict controls, a national register and a gradual reduction plan.
WorkforceProfessional classifications do not comprehensively encompass mental health specialisms.National scopes of practice, licensing and training pathways, and needs-based incentives.
OversightPredominantly administrative authority and monitoring committees.Independent review committees linked to the judiciary, oversight visits, complaints and public aggregate data.
FinancingNo clear legislative framework for parity of mental health coverage within financial protection.Link mental health to insurance and basic coverage, prioritising community care and underserved areas.

The latest available World Health Organization data for Iraq show a reported standalone mental health law since 2005 and plan since 2017, with significant operational elements achieved in primary-care integration. Workforce density remains limited: Iraq reported approximately 0.3 psychiatrists, 1.8 mental health nurses and 0.2 psychologists per hundred thousand people, totalling about 2.3 mental health workers per hundred thousand. Legislative reform must therefore address workforce and service distribution, not rights and procedures alone.

Legislative policy

The proposal adopts repeal and replacement of Mental Health Law No. (1) of 2005, building on the parliamentary process underway in 2026. It creates no new financially independent authority; instead, it retains a national council within the Ministry of Health and adds independent review committees linked to the judiciary to ensure impartiality when liberty is restricted.

  • Voluntary, community-based care is the default, with specialised services expanded within general hospitals and primary care.
  • Diagnosis does not mean loss of capacity or automatically justify detention.
  • Exceptional restrictions require serious, imminent risk and objective facts, not disability alone.
  • Admission and treatment are separate decisions: temporary need for a safe setting does not confer open-ended treatment authority.
  • Seclusion and restraint are not tools for managing understaffing; they require recording, review and reduction plans.
  • Financing and incentives remain flexible, linked to need and budgets, avoiding rigid statutory percentages that may become unsustainable or inequitable across professions and locations.
  • Clear professional regulation for psychology, counselling and social work graduates, protecting patients from unlicensed practice or exploitation.
  • Oversight, aggregate data, unannounced visits and complaints are integral to the Law itself.

Reasons for enactment

To modernise Iraq's mental health legal framework, protecting dignity and healthcare rights; strengthen voluntary care, informed consent, supported decisions, privacy and non-discrimination; progressively shift services towards primary and community care and general hospitals; regulate professions and develop workforce, quality and oversight; establish strict judicial and professional safeguards for exceptional liberty or treatment restrictions; align with the Constitution and applicable international obligations; and repeal and replace Mental Health Law No. (1) of 2005 with a more comprehensive modern framework, this Law is enacted.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why replacement rather than partial amendment?

The 2005 law served an important purpose but was built around voluntary and involuntary patient categories, closed units and accused or convicted patients. It gave insufficient space to today's needs for community care, informed consent, supported decisions, professional regulation and independent oversight. Scattered amendments would leave an outdated structure, inconsistent terminology and disconnected procedures; repeal and replacement are clearer and less conflicting.

2. Liberty and treatment are separate decisions

A central change is that temporarily retaining someone in a safe environment on specific evidence of serious, imminent risk does not automatically authorise any treatment. Consent and decision support must continue; any exceptional override of refusal needs narrow, specific and reviewable authority. This separation reduces the risk of mental health treatment becoming a detention or administrative control tool.

3. A realistic response to human rights standards

World Health Organization and UN Human Rights Office guidance calls for ending coercive practices and moving towards free consent and community care. The proposal adopts this direction structurally while establishing clear Iraqi procedures for extreme crises involving serious, imminent danger, with early judicial review, medical independence, defence rights and the shortest possible duration. The aim is to narrow and supervise exceptions rather than leave them in a grey area.

4. Workforce

Mental health expertise extends beyond psychiatrists. Modern care needs specialist nurses, clinical psychologists, psychotherapists, counsellors, social workers and rehabilitation professionals. The proposal creates legal routes for qualified practitioners within clear classifications, while distinguishing general academic training from authority for independent diagnosis or treatment, which requires licensing and supervision.

5. Incentives without rigid financial commitments

Parliamentary proposals circulating in 2026 emphasised substantial incentives for mental health workers. This proposal recognises shortages and retention difficulties but makes allowances adjustable according to scarcity, location, workload and budget rather than one fixed percentage for all years. Incentives can thus rise in the most underserved areas or change with need without repeatedly amending the Law.

6. Mental health in communities, not only hospitals

WHO data show that Iraq has achieved meaningful primary-care integration, but workforce density remains low. The Law therefore directs funding and expansion towards primary care, community services and post-discharge follow-up, preventing psychiatric hospitals from being the sole entry point or permanent residence because of poverty or lack of housing.

Alignment with existing legislation

Legislation and files requiring implementation coordination
Legislation or areaRelationship to the proposalRequired action
Mental Health Law No. (1) of 2005Regulates the same subject.Repeal upon the new Law's commencement, temporarily retaining compatible instructions.
Public Health Law No. (89) of 1981, as amendedGeneral health, prevention and institutional framework.Align terminology, references and instructions without regulatory duplication.
Health Insurance Law No. (22) of 2020Financial protection and benefit packages.Include essential mental health services and apply coverage parity.
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Special Needs Law No. (38) of 2013, amended by Law No. (11) of 2024Rights and inclusion of persons with psychosocial disabilities.Harmonise definitions, guarantee reasonable accommodation and avoid duplicated support programmes.
Penal Code and Criminal Procedure LawCriminal responsibility, forensic assessment and judicial measures.Review references, powers and time limits consistently with new safeguards.
Health professions and higher education lawsLicensing and classification of mental health professions.Issue national professional classifications and licensing, training and supervision pathways.
Electoral, civil capacity and public employment lawsSome provisions may contain broad restrictions tied to capacity or mental health status.Independent legislative review to remove diagnosis-only restrictions and replace them with specific functional criteria.

Transitional provisions and implementation requirements

Commencement requires an organised transition, not merely publication. Within the first one hundred and eighty days, regulations and instructions must address review committees, emergency assessment, records, restrictive interventions, professional licensing, quality, inspection and advance directives. Within one year, a national community-care transition and long-stay reassessment plan, workforce map and professional classifications and scopes must be approved.

Key transitional periods
PeriodObligation
30 daysReview all existing involuntary admissions under the new safeguards.
180 daysIssue core regulations and instructions and begin review committee operations.
12 monthsAlign institutions and approve the community transition plan, workforce map and professional classifications.
24 monthsExtend restrictive-intervention and serious-incident registers to all governorates and begin annual comparisons.
36 monthsIndependently assess legislative and implementation effects on long-term admission, seclusion, restraint and community coverage.

Financial and implementation impact

Costs mainly arise from expanding community and primary-care teams, workforce development and incentives, and improved oversight and digital infrastructure. Public sources lack sufficient detail for precise national costs by governorate and specialism; the proposal therefore avoids falsely precise totals. It requires Ministry costing within implementation plans and budgets based on population, disease burden, beds and institutions, staffing shortages, distances, medicine costs and long-stay admission volumes.

Some new costs can be offset by redirecting expenditure from unnecessary long stays to community care and follow-up, using existing primary-care and general hospital buildings, integrating training into continuing medical education and unifying data systems. Professional incentives use a flexible Council of Ministers scale within available resources rather than high fixed statutory percentages.

Funding rule: Any expansion of beds or closed facilities must demonstrate that a less costly, less restrictive community service or general hospital unit cannot achieve the objective.

Safeguards and oversight

Protection relies on multiple oversight routes: courts for liberty restrictions or exceptional treatment, independent review committees, health inspections, Public Prosecution and human rights bodies within their powers, complaints and annual aggregate reporting. This prevents oversight being confined to the service provider itself.

Legislative compliance indicators, not a separate development plan
IndicatorWhat it measures
Share of exceptional admissions judicially reviewed within the legal deadlineRespect for liberty and procedural safeguards.
Seclusion and restraint rate per thousand inpatient daysSuccess in reducing restrictive practices.
Share of patients with documented discharge and follow-up plansCare continuity and reduced relapse.
Time to specialist appointments in governoratesEquitable distribution and access.
Psychiatrist, psychologist and specialist nurse density per hundred thousandWorkforce gaps.
Share of mental health expenditure directed to primary and community careProgress towards community rather than institutional care.
Share of complaints resolved within deadlinesEffective accountability and redress.

Comparative and international references

Drafting draws on the modern international approach linking mental health legislation to health, dignity, autonomy and community care. WHO and UN Human Rights Office guidance of 2023 recommends free consent as the basis for intervention, reduced coercion, community services, decision support, oversight and remedies. WHO policy and planning guidance of 2025 provides a framework for governance, financing, workforce and cross-sector integration.

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Iraq joined in 2013, rejects equating psychosocial disability with loss of capacity or liberty and promotes support, inclusion and equal healthcare. The proposal applies these principles within Iraq's constitutional structure, keeping exceptional restrictions subject to judicial oversight, serious and imminent risk and demonstrated necessity.

Sources and references

  1. Supreme Judicial Council — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005Provisions on equality, liberty, privacy, dignity, healthcare and distribution of powers.
  2. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Iraqi ConstitutionA parallel official constitutional reference, including Article (114/Fifth) on general health policy.
  3. Mental Health Law No. (1) of 2005 — Circulating legislative textIraqi Official Gazette, issue 3992, 12 February 2005. Used to identify the existing structure and provisions, with the Law's existence and continuity checked against recent sources.
  4. Iraqi Council of Representatives — First reading of the mental health bill completed, 6 May 2026Establishes the current legislative process and its general purpose.
  5. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Decisions and recommendations of sitting (23), 6 May 2026Official record of the first reading in the sixth electoral term.
  6. Council of Representatives archive — Mental health bill in the fifth termFirst reading on 11 September 2023 and second reading on 1 September 2024, with no recorded final vote or publication of a new law.
  7. WHO Mental Health Atlas 2024 — Iraq Country ProfileLatest country profile available at publication on Iraqi mental health governance, financing, workforce and services.
  8. WHO & OHCHR — Mental health, human rights and legislation: guidance and practice (2023)Reference for human rights, community care, consent, reducing coercion and oversight.
  9. WHO — Guidance on mental health policy and strategic action plans, Module 3 (2025)Reference for governance, implementation, evaluation and person-centred policies.
  10. United Nations Treaty Collection — Iraq accession to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesIraq acceded on 20 March 2013.
  11. Ministry of Justice — Publication of Law No. (11) of 2024, First Amendment to the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Special Needs Law No. (38) of 2013Iraqi Official Gazette, issue 4778, 3 June 2024.
  12. Ministry of Justice — Law No. (20) of 2021 amending Public Health Law No. (89) of 1981Reference for the Public Health Law's continuity and amendment.
  13. Ministry of Justice — Updating amounts in the Public Health Law, 2026Recent evidence of the continuing general public health legal framework.

POL-76 · Mental Health and Protection of Patients' Rights · Version 1.0 · 7 October 2026

This document is a proposed draft law within Ali Zuweid's Political Programme, and is not enacted legislation.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.