Skip to content
POL-77

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed legislation · Health, social protection and family

Child Rights and Integrated Child Protection Law

A comprehensive federal framework securing every under-eighteen's rights and replacing fragmented responses with unified prevention, reporting, case management, alternative care and oversight, expressly addressing violence, exploitation, early marriage, child labour, digital environments and conflict.

Document number
POL-77
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

Iraq constitutionally protects families, motherhood and childhood. It has been party to the Convention on the Rights of the Child since 1994 and its Optional Protocols on armed-conflict involvement and sale/exploitation since 2008. It also has a Child Welfare Authority, national policy, data platform and institutions across Labour, Health, Education, Justice and Interior. Protection nevertheless remains scattered across old and specialised laws; the Child Protection Bill first read in Parliament on 6 November 2022 has not become effective law.

In 2026, government resumed drafting through an official joint committee. The appropriate legislative course is therefore to develop one comprehensive federal law rather than parallel legislation. This document supplies a complete model: a unified under-eighteen definition, binding best-interests, participation and non-discrimination rules, identity, health, education and family rights, and protection starting with prevention and family support and extending where necessary to judicial orders and reviewable alternative care.

No independent new bureaucracy is created. The existing Child Welfare Authority is reorganised, with an executive arm, local multidisciplinary units and national case management. Protection is distinguished from juvenile justice under a separate legislative file, and coordinated with health, disability, labour, trafficking and personal-status laws.

Two substantive reforms are proposed: a uniform ban on marriage under eighteen and ending treatment of violence against children as lawful discipline under Penal Code Article (41), paragraph (1). Explicit harmonisation with the Personal Status Law amended in 2025, the Jaafari Sharia Rulings Code and Penal Code is necessary for effective rights rather than declarations alone.

Contents

  1. Constitutional and legal context
  2. Legislative gap
  3. Proposed legislative policy
  4. Draft law Articles 1–92
  5. Explanatory reasons
  6. Explanatory memorandum
  7. Harmonisation with existing legislation
  8. Transition and implementation requirements
  9. Financial and implementation impact
  10. Safeguards and oversight
  11. International and comparative references
  12. Sources and references

Legislative gap

The core problem is fragmentation across juvenile welfare, penal, labour, anti-trafficking, health, education, disability, social-welfare and personal-status laws, with differing concepts, procedures and authorities. Child victims move between institutions without one case manager or shared protection plan; alternative care, reports, institutional oversight and data remain unevenly regulated.

Some conflicts require legislation, not instructions. Penal Code Article (41/1) still treats parental/teacher discipline as exercise of a right within religious, legal or customary limits. Personal Status Amendment Law No. (1) of 2025 introduced choice of Jaafari family rules, followed by the annexed code in 2025. Uniform protection from early marriage therefore requires explicit amendment of family provisions permitting different outcomes.

Children in conflict with the law differ from victims or at-risk children. Protection is separated from juvenile criminal justice; ‘homeless’ or ‘at risk’ labels shall not become alternative detention/punishment routes. Comprehensive juvenile-law reform remains in POL-78.

Proposed legislative policy

  • Rights and protection, not a parallel penal code: Define rights, obligations and institutions while leaving existing offences to penal, trafficking and labour law, with targeted amendments for direct gaps.
  • Strengthen existing institutions: Reorganise the Child Welfare Authority, adding an executive directorate and local units rather than an unnecessary independent authority.
  • Prevention before separation: Support families and address poverty/services first; separate only where risks cannot be managed less restrictively.
  • Family before institutional care: Safe relatives and alternative families precede shelters, with periodic review and exit plans.
  • One case-management system: One manager, written plan and shared referral routes reduce repeat interviews and fragmented responsibility.
  • Clear national childhood threshold: Eighteen uniformly governs rights, protection and marriage; minimum employment remains fifteen under labour-law conditions, with hazardous work prohibited until eighteen.
  • Proportionate digital protection: Privacy, safe design and exploitation reporting without comprehensive communications surveillance.

Explanatory reasons

This Law is proposed to secure constitutional and treaty child rights, unify fragmented safeguards, build integrated prevention/reporting/case management/family support/alternative care/oversight, protect against violence, neglect, exploitation, trafficking, child labour, early marriage, digital risks and armed conflict, constitutionally modernise the Child Welfare Authority, provide child-friendly victim/witness procedures and harmonise labour, penal, personal-status, health, education, disability and social-welfare legislation.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why a comprehensive law now?

The 2022 initiative reached first reading but had limited structure and was not enacted. Government's 2026 return to comprehensive drafting indicates institutional agreement on need. This version builds a protection chain from prevention to follow-up rather than merely listing rights, assigning who receives, assesses, separates, reviews care and supervises providers.

2. Best interests are substantive

Decision-makers must document balanced factors, hear children and consider less intrusive alternatives. Best interests become reviewable standards rather than generic justification for any decision.

3. Distinguishing poverty from neglect

Removing children because families are poor is a dangerous protection error. Poverty alone is expressly not neglect; social protection, housing, education, treatment and family support come first. Separation requires abuse or risks unmanageable through less restrictive services.

4. Alternative care

The system shifts from lengthy institutional reliance towards safe extended/alternative families without changing parentage or identity. Every institutionalised child requires an exit plan and review. Organisation, training and phased financing are needed beyond legislation alone.

5. Marriage under eighteen

A unified childhood definition loses meaning if marriage is exempt. Eighteen becomes the uniform minimum, with conflicting provisions amended within a year. This explicitly involves Personal Status Law No. (188) of 1959, amended by Law No. (1) of 2025, and the annexed Jaafari Code, preserving pre-amendment children's civil rights without burdening them for previous legislation.

6. Discipline and violence

Constitutional family/school violence prohibitions conflict with customary-discipline permission. The proposal expressly removes Penal Code Article (41/1) justification for children, while distinguishing minor cases suited to preventive family intervention from serious/repeated abuse requiring accountability.

7. Juvenile-justice boundaries

Accused children are not merely protection cases. Social care bypassing criminal safeguards can produce indefinite detention. This Law addresses general rights, protection, victims and witnesses; dedicated juvenile legislation governs investigations, trials, measures, rehabilitation and detention.

8. Child Welfare Authority

Existing structures receive a technical secretariat, executive directorate and local units instead of a new supreme council. This lowers establishment costs and addresses weak implementation powers, case pathways, data and oversight rather than missing institutional names.

Harmonisation with existing legislation

Relevant laws and systems
Legislation/areaRelationshipRequired legislative action
Iraqi Constitution of 2005Family, childhood, equality, dignity, health and education provisions.Foundation for interpretation, proportionality and competence allocation.
Penal Code No. (111) of 1969, as amendedArticle (41/1) includes child-discipline justification.Exclude violent child discipline from justification; review sexual-exploitation/violence offences in POL-14.
Personal Status Law No. (188) of 1959, amended by Law No. (1) of 2025, and annexed Jaafari CodeMarriage, custody, maintenance and minor guardianship.Align marriage minimum at 18, best interests, participation and non-violence.
Juvenile Welfare Law No. (76) of 1983, as amendedCurrently combines protection aspects with juvenile justice.Move juvenile justice to POL-78; stop using homelessness/risk as substitute punishment.
Labour Law No. (37) of 2015Minimum working age, inspection and hazardous work.Unify referrals with ILO 138 and 182 and connect inspection to protection services.
Anti-Trafficking Law No. (28) of 2012Victim protection and criminalisation of exploitation.Child-specific referrals and non-punishment for directly exploitation-caused conduct.
Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Special Needs Law No. (38) of 2013, as amendedDisabled children's rights and services.Consistent accommodation and no institutionalisation solely for disability.
Education, health and social-protection lawsEssential services and early detection.Safeguarding, reporting, referral and proportionate sharing policies.
Proposed Domestic Violence Prevention LawOverlaps with protection orders and family violence.Unify orders and prevent duplication while retaining child-specific guarantees.

Transition and implementation requirements

Implementation requires organised transition rather than immediate commencement of every duty. The first six months reorganise the Authority and issue case-management, reporting, helpline, alternative-care and licensing guidance. Within a year, conflicting-law review, care-home licensing/correction and review of institutionalised children begin. Local units expand over eighteen months according to population, risk and resources.

Core transitional periods
PeriodObligation
From publicationViolence/exploitation/identification prohibitions and reporting/complaints within existing institutions.
180 daysAuthority reorganisation, core regulations/instructions and case-management/helpline protocols.
12 monthsHarmonisation amendments, care-home compliance, alternative-family systems and workforce standards.
18 monthsBasic protection units and unified referrals in every governorate.
36 monthsComprehensive government implementation, cost, outcome and gap report to Parliament.

Financial and implementation impact

Principal costs are social workers, helpline, case systems, training, inspection, family-based care support and psychological/legal response improvements. Existing Authority, platform and ministerial structures reduce startup costs compared with independent institutions.

Unified public data cannot precisely estimate required researchers, local-unit costs or institutional-to-family transitions. Labour must therefore model costs during regulation-making using child/population counts, violence cases, distances, care facilities, caseloads and professional vacancies, submitting the model with budgets rather than arbitrary amounts liable to become obsolete.

Fiscal priority: Prevention, family support, case management and family-based care should precede new residential institutions, since extra institutional beds alone do not address separation, violence and exploitation causes.

Safeguards and oversight

Three levels apply: judicial review for separation, protection orders or material restrictions; administrative/professional provider oversight; and public accountability through data, reports and independent complaints. Institutions shall not be the sole recipients/investigators of children's complaints against themselves.

Core compliance indicators
IndicatorPurpose
Share of serious-risk reports assessed within prescribed timeMeasure response speed.
Share of cases with managers and written plansPrevent fragmented responsibility.
Average institutional stay and exits to safe familiesMeasure transition from long-term institutions to family care.
Share of schools/licensed institutions implementing safeguards and complaintsMeasure institutional prevention.
Share of material decisions documenting views and best interestsMeasure decision quality.
Number/pattern of substantiated identity-disclosure or retaliation complaintsMeasure privacy and safety.
Protection re-entry within 12 months of case closureMeasure sustained protection rather than file closure alone.

International and comparative references

The framework follows the Child Rights Convention's four principles: non-discrimination, best interests, survival/development and respect for views. Labour provisions draw on ILO Conventions No. (138) and No. (182); conflict provisions on the Optional Protocol on armed-conflict involvement; and sexual-exploitation/sale provisions on the corresponding Optional Protocol.

Modern systems use multidisciplinary case management, reduced institutionalisation, child-friendly reporting, controlled sharing and independent representation in conflicts. These are adapted to Iraqi institutions, avoiding an imported independent agency where an existing national body can improve, or judicial powers for protection staff contrary to constitutional arrangements.

Sources and references

  1. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005Constitutional equality, family, childhood, non-violence, social/health security, education and competence foundations.
  2. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Fifth term, first legislative-year achievements reportRecords the 14-article Child Protection Bill's first reading on 6 November 2022.
  3. Ministry of Justice — Juvenile Reform Directorate participation in drafting child-protection legislation, 2 May 2026Recent evidence of renewed comprehensive drafting by a committee established through official orders and calls for completion/submission.
  4. National Child Data Platform — Child Welfare AuthorityOfficial account of the Authority's origins and existing role.
  5. National Child Data Platform — Launch, 13 July 2023Documents links to national protection policy, early-childhood development strategy and the Authority.
  6. National Child Data Platform — National Child Protection PolicyNational prevention, protection, rehabilitation and reintegration approach.
  7. UNICEF Iraq — Child ProtectionReference on protection-system challenges, violence/exploitation, civil documents, psychosocial support and strong legal/institutional frameworks.
  8. UNICEF — Iraq Country Programme Document 2025–2029Addresses national policy, the Authority, social-workforce development and national/local protection structures.
  9. United Nations Treaty Collection — Convention on the Rights of the ChildIraq acceded on 15 June 1994; legal status and declarations are registered with the depositary.
  10. UN Treaty Collection — Iraq accession to the Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflictIraq acceded on 24 June 2008.
  11. UN Treaty Collection — Iraq accession to the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornographyIraq acceded on 24 June 2008.
  12. ILO NORMLEX — Ratifications for IraqMinimum Age Convention 138 has applied to Iraq since 1985, and Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention 182 since 2001.
  13. Ministry of Justice — Publication of Personal Status Amendment Law No. (1) of 2025Recent legal framework requiring alignment with best interests and minimum marriage age.
  14. Ministry of Justice — Publication of the Jaafari Shia Personal Status Sharia Rulings Code, 9 October 2025Necessary reference for minor/family legislative alignment.
  15. Supreme Judicial Council — Legal study of Penal Code Article (41), 2025Discussion of child-discipline justification and need for reinterpretation/update.

POL-77 · Child Rights and Integrated Child Protection Law · Version 1.0 · 7 October 2026

This document is proposed legislation within Ali Zuweid's Political Programme, and is not enacted law.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.