Skip to content
POL-81

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme

Proposed legislative package · Health, Social Protection and Family

Pension, Social Security and Social Insurance Reform and System Integration Law

A federal framework connecting existing pension systems without hastily merging their assets, protecting accrued rights, aggregating public- and private-sector service, and reforming future parameters, governance, investment and indexation on an accountable actuarial basis.

Document number
POL-81
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

Iraqi pension reform starts from an existing framework. Unified Pension Law No. (9) of 2014, as amended, mainly governs state employees and public-sector personnel. The State Employees Pension Fund receives 10% employee and 15% state contributions, with periodic actuarial examination and some public–private service-transfer rules. Workers’ Pension and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023 significantly expanded coverage of the private sector, informal work and voluntary pensions, adding unemployment, maternity and health insurance branches alongside pensions and employment injuries, and requiring digitalisation and actuarial assessment every three years.

The systems still differ in eligibility, retirement age, earnings bases, financing, minima and administration. Service-transfer mechanisms exist but do not provide a seamless mixed-career system. The joint IMF, ILO and World Bank 2024 analysis described substantial fragmentation and inequity, finding that different sectoral rules weaken labour mobility and increase public pension fiscal pressure. In 2025, the IMF again called for public pension reform and closer alignment with private-sector rules.

POL-81 therefore does not propose repealing Law 18 of 2023 or immediately merging the workers’ and state funds. A single integration and reform law would establish common insurance-record, service-totalisation, inter-fund settlement, sustainability and governance rules, then specifically amend the unified pension and workers’ social security laws. Parametric reform applies to future service while preserving entitlements built through previous service, so sustainability does not confiscate existing rights.

Legislative gap

Gaps addressed by POL-81
IssueCurrent positionProposed response
Mixed careersScattered transfer provisions, conditions and financial differentials complicate movement.Automatic totalisation with each fund bearing its share and institutions settling between themselves, rather than burdening workers.
Rights where employers defaultWorkers’ law generally links service recognition to paid contributions and allows workers to sue employers.Recognise proven employment and make contribution debt an employer liability rather than a worker penalty.
Sectoral inequalityWide differences in entitlement age, earnings bases, minima and increases.Gradual convergence of future rules while protecting previous rights and avoiding immediate merger.
State fund sustainabilityRelatively generous formula, retirement at 60 and a short earnings reference period; independent studies warn of growing fiscal pressure.2% accrual for new service, progressively broader reference earnings, age 63 for new entrants and transparent indexation.
InflationState-system adjustments have historically relied on separate decisions and allowances.General annual inflation-linked indexation instead of selective grants.
InvestmentInvestment powers exist, but risk, conflict and disclosure standards need stronger legislation.Written investment policy, a risk committee, restrictions on related-party dealings, audit and disclosure.
DataSeparate systems and databases.Linked insurance records using national identification, with correction rights and annual statements.

Proposed legislative policy

Policy has four levels. First, protect existing pensions and every entitlement component earned through previous service. Second, make rights portable through totalisation and inter-fund settlement, without requiring citizens to repurchase their working lives. Third, gradually reform future state-system rules, including new-entrant age, accrual and reference earnings, retaining modern Law 18 rules unless a specific problem warrants change. Fourth, establish common financial and actuarial governance prohibiting unfunded privileges and disclosing treasury support.

Immediate unification is not assumed to be the solution. Funds differ in insured populations, contribution rates, branches and risks; merger may transfer liabilities and create hidden losses. Integration therefore begins with rights, data and settlement, leaving institutional or financial merger to separate legislation after reliable actuarial accounts become available.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to realise constitutional protection in old age, disability, death and unemployment; preserve pensions across public–private movement; reduce inequality without harming accrued rights; address State Fund sustainability; strengthen rather than repeal Workers’ Law No. (18) of 2023; and regulate records, settlement, indexation, governance and investment transparently and actuarially.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why not merge the funds immediately?

Administrative or financial merger is not an end in itself. Funding rules, branches and insured risks differ; pooling reserves and liabilities before evaluation may conceal unintended cross-subsidies. Functional integration therefore combines records, totalisation, simplified payments and settlement while each fund bears its share.

2. Protecting rights while reforming

Accrual and earnings-base changes apply to new service while preserving previous value. This distinguishes future reform from rewriting the past. Existing pensioners face no downward recalculation; current employees retain protected components and earn new components for subsequent years.

3. Why 2% for new service?

The joint IMF, ILO and World Bank analysis proposed reducing accrual from 2.5% to 2% within a package covering reference earnings, age and minima. The draft applies this rate only to new service with an 80% reference-earnings ceiling, preserving prior accrual.

4. Retirement age

The unified law’s first amendment reduced mandatory retirement to 60. This proposal sets 63 for first-time public entrants after commencement, leaving existing employees unchanged. This softens transition and improves long-term sustainability. Age is not automatically linked to life expectancy; future changes require law and a public study.

5. Private sector and Law 18 of 2023

The modern workers’ law is broader than its predecessor, so rewriting it entirely serves no purpose. Amendments target integration: protection against employer default, removal of rigid voluntary-entry age limits, totalisation and settlement instead of burdensome transfers, and coverage of new work patterns. Unemployment, maternity, occupational injury and health insurance branches remain.

6. Minimum pensions and indexation

Minimum pensions fulfil social as well as insurance functions. If the state raises them above contribution-funded levels, the treasury must transparently finance the difference. Purchasing power should be protected through general indexation, not seasonal grants and unequal allowances reproducing disparities.

7. Investment

Pension funds are not government-project financing vehicles. Investment is acceptable where independently assessed and appropriate for return, risk and liquidity. The draft therefore prohibits political allocation and addresses conflicts, custody and disclosure.

Alignment with existing legislation

Alignment matrix
LegislationRelationshipAction
Unified Pension Law No. (9) of 2014, as amendedPrincipal state-employee scheme.Specific assessment, age, service, future-benefit and governance amendments; other provisions retained.
First Amendment Law No. (26) of 2019Changed retirement age, benefits and other provisions.Effects preserved for current staff and prior rights; new age applies only to new entrants.
Workers’ Pension and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023Governs private, informal and voluntary coverage and insurance branches.Retained, amending only default protection, age conditions, service transfer and necessary integration provisions.
Labour Law No. (37) of 2015 and its modernised replacement upon amendmentEstablishes employment, wages and employer obligations.Use labour and inspection data to prove service and recover employer debts.
Social Protection LawNon-contributory poverty and vulnerability benefits.Coordinate low-pension supplementation from the budget, not fund social obligations from insurance assets.
Health Insurance LawHealthcare coverage.Prevent duplicate contributions for the same basic package and coordinate workers’ health insurance.
Legislation on martyrs, victims, political prisoners and other groupsState-funded compensatory benefits.Separate accounting from contributory insurance, continuing under governing laws unless independently amended.

Transitional provisions and implementation requirements

Transition timetable
PeriodAction
0–3 monthsEstablish the Council, preserve existing rights and issue temporary instructions preventing service-transfer refusal solely because funds differ.
Up to 6 monthsInventory databases, shared fields and arrears; adopt national-number and insurance-record standards.
6–12 monthsPilot unified statements and correction rules; issue inter-fund settlement regulations.
12–24 monthsImplement totalisation and unified payments for mixed careers and begin the state scheme’s future-service formula.
24–36 monthsComplete tax, labour and identity links; publish the first joint actuarial report and evaluate labour-market impacts.

Transition must address accounting and technology before interfaces. Pensioners should not visit offices to prove information already held by the state, and funds should not move to one database at once. Systems shall run in parallel until reconciliation and settlement succeed.

Financial and implementation impact

No single reform-cost figure is given because effects depend on contributors’ ages, wages, careers, returns and compliance. Combining data does not combine liabilities. Actuarial assessment therefore precedes contribution changes or unfunded increases.

The principal establishment cost is interoperability, insurance records and electronic settlement. Existing pension, social security and national identity infrastructure can reduce technical and administrative costs. Future-service parametric changes are expected to lower long-term liabilities compared with unchanged rules, but must not reduce existing pensions.

A joint IMF, ILO and World Bank report in 2024 identified growing State Fund imbalances. The IMF’s 2025 report cited estimates that reserves might be exhausted by the end of 2027 without reform, with increasing budget support. These are projections, not substitutes for national actuarial assessment; periodic updated accounts are therefore required rather than legislation built around one fixed figure.

Social increases to minima and low-pension supplements remain possible, but financing is separated: amounts exceeding insured value must appear as treasury transfers, preventing opaque charges on new contributors for general social policy.

Safeguards and oversight

  • No reduction of existing pensions or previous-service components.
  • Annual insurance statements and data-correction rights.
  • No lost service because employers fail to contribute.
  • Separate State and Workers’ Fund assets; merger only by law.
  • Independent actuarial assessment every three years with published summaries.
  • All treasury support shown in budgets and fund accounts.
  • Investment governance preventing conflicts and political use of assets.
  • Reasoned decisions, administrative objections and judicial appeals.
  • Protection of pay, disability and survivor data against use outside lawful purposes.

International and comparative references

Iraq ratified ILO Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention No. (102) on 22 March 2023. It covers core protection branches and principles of sound administration, adequacy and rights. The draft translates them into separation of contributory benefits and social support, challenge rights, sustainability and data rules.

In April 2024, the IMF, ILO and World Bank jointly analysed Iraq’s fragmented, unequal pension system and the need for comprehensive reform. Options included gradual age increases, lower accrual, broader reference earnings, ceilings, inflation indexation and sectoral convergence. POL-81 follows this direction with two significant policy and legal adjustments: protection of all prior service and no merger of the modern Workers’ Fund into the State Fund before actuarial assessment and separate legislation.

Totalisation, used to coordinate social security across countries and schemes, combines eligibility periods while leaving each institution responsible for its share. It is more suitable than requiring citizens to transfer all funds whenever they change sectors.

Sources and references

  1. Supreme Judicial Council — Constitution of the Republic of Iraq 2005Article (30) on social and health security, old age, sickness, disability and unemployment.
  2. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4566) of 2019Documents publication of Law No. (26) of 2019, the first amendment to Unified Pension Law No. (9) of 2014.
  3. University of Al-Qadisiyah — consolidated Unified Pension Law No. (9) of 2014 and amendmentTextual reference for the Authority, Fund, contributions, service, eligibility, formula, transfer and first amendment.
  4. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4734) of 2023Documents publication of Workers’ Pension and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023.
  5. Iraqi Legislation Database — Workers’ Pension and Social Security Law No. (18) of 2023Available text on contributions, branches, voluntary pensions, service, digitalisation and actuarial assessment.
  6. United Nations in Iraq / ILO — Iraq’s ratification of Convention 102Documents deposit of ratification on 22 March 2023 and the Convention’s social-security significance.
  7. IMF / ILO / World Bank — Toward an Inclusive, Equitable, and Sustainable National Pension System in Iraq (2024)Joint assessment of Iraqi pension fragmentation, sustainability, equity, labour mobility and reform options.
  8. ILO — published joint study of Iraq’s pension systemAdditional reference for the same tripartite study and inclusion and sustainability principles.
  9. IMF — Iraq 2025 Article IV ConsultationLatest published assessment used here on public pension reform, private-sector alignment and fiscal-support risks.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme — A proposed bill within the Health, Social Protection and Family axis. It is not an enacted law unless constitutional enactment and publication procedures are completed.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.