Skip to content
POL-82

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme

Draft amending law · Health, Social Protection and Family

Draft First Amendment to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. (50) of 2017

Drug prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and control: developing the existing Law into a balanced system treating drug use as a health and judicial matter eligible for diversion, while directing enhanced deterrence and investigative tools towards organised trafficking, financing, borders and precursors.

Document number
POL-82
Version
1.0
Publication date
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive Summary

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. (50) of 2017 is the current federal basis for regulating narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors; establishing the High National Commission and competent directorate-general; criminalising trafficking and unlawful possession; and permitting treatment alternatives and confidential voluntary treatment. The Law remains in force, with periodic schedule updates through Ministry of Health notices, including updates published in 2023, 2024 and 2025.

The problem is not the absence of legislation, but prevention, treatment and rehabilitation provisions that remain limited relative to the enforcement system’s development. Data, treatment, justice, financial investigation and new psychoactive substances need greater precision. The current Law criminalises possession for personal use but permits courts to substitute treatment, while Article (40) protects voluntary treatment applicants from prosecution. This can be developed to make diversion clearer and more practicable without weakening trafficking prosecutions.

In the current legislative process, the Council of Representatives completed the first reading of a government first-amendment bill on 24 August 2026. Its Health and Counter-Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Committee announced continuing consideration and hearings on 10 and 15 September 2026. Parliament stated that the government proposal would establish land, air and sea border units, strengthen certain penalties and create a fund supporting enforcement and testing. POL-82 therefore offers an integrated first-amendment text within that process, adding prevention, treatment, aftercare, rights, data, financial investigation and centre oversight rather than a parallel law.

The proposal distinguishes functions: people using drugs or possessing them for personal use undergo assessment, treatment and judicial alternatives where trafficking intent is unproven; organised networks, financing, border corruption and exploitation of children face separate investigative, confiscation and enhanced-penalty measures. Availability of controlled medicines for medical purposes remains part of policy: preventing diversion must not prevent legitimate treatment.

Current Legislative Process

An earlier parliamentary-term amendment reached first reading on 16 August 2023 and second reading on 30 January 2024 but was not voted through. In the current term, Parliament completed first reading on 24 August 2026 of a new 23-article government bill titled ‘First Amendment to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. (50) of 2017’.

Parliament’s official announcement says the bill focuses on intensified enforcement, units in land, air and sea border areas, stronger penalties and an enforcement and testing support fund. The Health and Counter-Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Committee announced consideration of the articles on 10 September 2026 and held a hearing on 15 September with legal, security, health and expert participants.

The most effective parliamentary instrument is therefore an integrated alternative within the first-amendment bill itself. The articles below permit article-by-article comparison with the government’s final committee text when available, retaining announced border, funding and tougher-enforcement elements while adding necessary health and rights provisions.

Legislative Gap

Principal Gaps and Proposed Responses
AreaCurrent positionResponse
Use and personal possessionPersonal possession criminalised, with a court-ordered treatment alternative.Retain criminalisation as a fallback; make assessment and treatment diversion the default first-time response absent trafficking intent.
Voluntary treatmentProtection from prosecution with relatively fixed observation and admission periods.Broader protection for treatment-seeking, individual clinical plans and prevention of unnecessary treatment detention.
CentresPotential practical overlap between health, security and social rehabilitation.Medical decisions by Health, security by Interior, social rehabilitation by Labour, with unified private-sector licensing.
PreventionGeneral awareness and dispersed responsibilities.Evidence-based family, school, university, workplace and community prevention with effectiveness assessment.
DataMultiple regulatory and security databases.A national observatory using anonymised data and early warning, separating treatment and security records.
New substancesMinisterial notices can update schedules, but responses may lag emerging substances.Reasoned, time-limited interim control followed by final assessment and official publication.
TestingSeizure and testing are central to proof.Laboratory accreditation, chain of custody, no reliance solely on field tests, and retesting rights.
Organised traffickingPenalties, confiscation and international cooperation exist.Financial investigation, beneficial ownership, border corruption, judicially controlled delivery and child exploitation as an aggravating factor.
FinancingThe government bill announced a proposed fund.A Treasury fund under financial oversight with separate prevention, treatment, testing and enforcement headings, without detention-count incentives.

Proposed Legislative Policy

1. Security and health are complementary pathways

Deterrence targets illicit markets, networks, finance, corruption and violence; substance-use disorder is treated as a health condition absent trafficking evidence. Courts retain a role, shifting part of their response from short-lived custodial effects to measurable, reviewable measures.

2. Treatment follows assessment rather than one template

Not everyone who uses drugs needs residential placement, and compulsory admission should not be the default. Assessment determines the appropriate level of care, with movement between outpatient, residential and aftercare services. Relapse calls for reassessment; it is not itself evidence of moral failure or grounds for imprisonment.

3. Data protection enables treatment-seeking

Fear that a treatment applicant’s name will reach an employer or security database discourages early access. Treatment files are therefore separated from enforcement and licensing records, while anonymised data support research and strategy.

4. Prevention is measured by outcomes

Awareness alone is not prevention policy. The system begins with families, schools, mental health, school dropout and life skills, funding programmes through assessable results rather than campaign scale or printed-material counts.

5. Enforcement targets networks and money

Expanded border units matter but need intelligence analysis, financial investigation, laboratories, chain of custody and international judicial cooperation. The proposal adds these tools under judicial oversight and protection of good-faith third parties.

6. Regulation does not obstruct lawful medicines

Substances are controlled for legitimate reasons, yet many are essential medicines. The Law therefore requires Health to monitor shortages and ensure medical availability alongside preventing diversion.

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to develop the national response to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in line with expanding trafficking patterns and emerging new psychoactive substances; strengthen border, testing, financial-investigation and international-cooperation capacities; complete the preventive, treatment and rehabilitation aspects of the current Law; provide effective judicial alternatives for people using drugs and possessing them for personal use while intensifying action against organised networks, child exploitation and corruption; protect treatment confidentiality and patients’ rights, regulate centres and improve service quality; and ensure the availability of controlled medicines for legitimate medical purposes.

Explanatory memorandum

Relationship to the current Law

The amendment preserves the institutional structure established by Law 50 of 2017 rather than replacing it with new bodies. The High National Commission remains within the Ministry of Health, the General Directorate remains within the Ministry of Interior, and schedules and licences continue. The additions are a clearer division between treatment, rehabilitation and drug control; a technical secretariat and observatory; and legal standards for confidentiality, treatment diversion, centres, testing and financial investigation.

Treatment diversion

Article (39) of the current Law already provides a basis for this pathway, but its application depends on judicial decisions and treatment infrastructure that may differ across governorates. The new wording makes clinical assessment central and treats imprisonment for a first offence without trafficking intent as a fallback after a measure fails or cannot be implemented. This does not prevent punishment for trafficking or a separate offence.

Voluntary treatment

The protection originally provided by Article (40) is expanded to make it more practical: a person need not enter a residential institution for a fixed period to benefit from immunity, but instead receives care appropriate to their condition. Statements made during treatment are not used to prove previous use, an important element in building trust in the service.

Centres affiliated with the Ministry of Interior

Recent years have seen rehabilitation centres associated with Ministry of Interior efforts alongside the Ministry of Health’s statutory treatment responsibility. The draft does not require existing facilities to close, but separates authority: security and administration belong to the institution operating the facility, while clinical decisions, protocols and licensing belong to the Ministry of Health. This prevents conflicting roles and ensures a single health standard.

Drugs as organised crime

Security impact depends on reaching a network’s leadership, money, warehouses and links to borders and corruption, rather than increasing punishment of the person using drugs. The new measures therefore concern financial investigation, beneficial ownership, controlled delivery and documented testing, kept entirely separate from treatment and health data.

The national strategy

In 2026, the United Nations in Iraq reported that, at the end of 2024, the government adopted the ‘National Strategy for Combating Drugs in Iraq 2025–2030’, involving 33 ministries, security agencies and other institutions. The draft treats it as the current implementation plan, while making future strategies a periodic obligation involving evaluation, funding and reporting to Parliament rather than merely an administrative document.

Treatment and prevention standards

The treatment provisions draw on the principles in the World Health Organization and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s ‘International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders’, which emphasise effective, evidence-based and ethical treatment responsive to different groups’ needs. Prevention likewise draws on the joint international standards, which focus on families, schools, communities and risk and protective factors rather than relying solely on fear-based messages.

Alignment with existing legislation

Legislative alignment matrix
Legislation/areaRelationshipAction
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. (50) of 2017The principal Law.Remains in force and is read together with this amendment as one law.
Penal Code No. (111) of 1969 and the Criminal Procedure CodeGeneral rules governing offences, investigation and trial.Apply where no special provision exists; judicial alternatives follow procedural requirements.
Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing LawTracing network proceeds and transfers.Coordinate financial investigations and avoid creating a parallel confiscation system.
Public Health Law and draft POL-72Prevention, surveillance and public health.Integrate the observatory and early warning with the national health system.
Patients’ Rights and Medical Liability Law / POL-74Consent, confidentiality, quality and complaints.Apply the general rules with additional safeguards specific to treatment of substance-use disorders.
Mental Health Law / POL-76Involuntary admission and co-occurring mental-health conditions.Treatment detention is not permitted outside health and judicial safeguards.
Child rights and juvenile justice / POL-77 and POL-78Children in conflict with the law or in need of protection.Prohibit placing children in adult centres and prioritise treatment, education and family support over unnecessary punishment.
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Law / POL-79Accessibility and reasonable accommodation.Require all centres to provide accessible, non-discriminatory services.
Personal Data Protection / POL-85 upon enactmentHealth and security records.Align access, retention, erasure and audit rules with the general data law.

Transitional provisions and implementation requirements

Commencement programme
Time from publicationAction
ImmediateApply confidentiality, non-discrimination and protection for voluntary treatment requests; maintain existing institutions and licences.
0–3 monthsEstablish the technical secretariat and observatory and assign teams to prepare instructions and protocols.
Up to 6 monthsIssue standards for treatment, licensing, treatment diversion, laboratory testing, overdose and data protection.
6–12 monthsLaunch the licensing and regulatory tracking platform, accredit testing laboratories and bring public and private centres into compliance.
Up to 18 monthsProvide every governorate with a clear treatment referral pathway and begin unified annual reporting and early warning.
AnnuallyReport to the Council of Ministers and Council of Representatives on implementation, expenditure, outcomes and gaps.

Patients’ right to treatment must not be suspended pending completion of the platform or instructions. Where a transitional procedure conflicts with confidentiality or health safety, the more protective rule shall apply until instructions are issued.

Financial and implementation impact

Establishing the technical secretariat and observatory, accrediting laboratories, linking databases, expanding treatment networks and training staff will incur costs. The available public sources do not permit a single reliable estimate: bed numbers, service users, staffing and actual infrastructure differ across governorates, and no unified financial baseline enabling accurate calculation had been published by the date this document was prepared.

The draft therefore ties expenditure to a funded plan within the strategy and budget, using the support fund as an additional tool rather than a substitute for core appropriations. It requires the Fund to be divided into specified expenditure headings to prevent security spending from absorbing prevention and treatment resources, or vice versa, with auditing by the Board of Supreme Audit.

Some establishment costs can be reduced by using existing institutions: the High National Commission, General Directorate, health directorates, forensic-medicine and pharmaceutical-control laboratories, rehabilitation centres and Ministry of Labour services. New investment focuses on gaps: treatment staff, quality, information, advanced testing, early warning and aftercare.

Treatment diversion may reduce imprisonment costs for low-risk cases, but automatic savings are not assumed: real treatment funding must accompany it. Impact shall be measured over three years through indicators of treatment entry, plan completion, return to education and work, relapse, reoffending and pressure on detention facilities.

Safeguards and oversight

  • Reasoned judicial orders for special investigative techniques and asset attachment.
  • Confirmatory laboratory testing, chain of custody and the right to retesting in disputes.
  • Quantity alone must not constitute conclusive proof of trafficking intent.
  • Separate treatment records from enforcement and investigation databases.
  • Treatment confidentiality and no use of help-seeking as grounds for prosecuting personal use.
  • Individual treatment plans and informed consent, with strict controls on any involuntary treatment.
  • Protect children, women, persons with disabilities and people with co-occurring mental-health conditions.
  • Inspect and license public and private centres, with an independent complaints mechanism.
  • Audit and publish Fund expenditure and prohibit rewards linked to confiscated asset values or detainee numbers.
  • A public annual report balancing health, justice, security and financial indicators.

International reference frameworks

Iraq’s international control system relates to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended, the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 and the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988. United Nations records show Iraq’s participation in the amended Single Convention since 1978, accession to the Psychotropic Substances Convention on 17 May 1976 and accession to the 1988 Convention on 22 July 1998.

These conventions do not reduce the response to punishment: they establish substance controls and international cooperation while recognising medical and scientific uses. Modern treatment and prevention draw on the joint World Health Organization and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime standards, which call for evidence-based, ethical treatment and an integrated prevention system throughout the life course.

The amendment also responds to changes in Iraq’s and the region’s drug markets. The UNODC report on trafficking dynamics in Iraq and the Middle East highlighted the growth of amphetamine-type stimulants and captagon and the need for sustained national, regional and international cooperation. Meanwhile, the United Nations in Iraq affirmed in 2026 that treatment, rehabilitation and prevention form part of the national strategy alongside drug-control capacity building.

Sources and references

  1. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4446) of 2017Documents publication of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. (50) of 2017.
  2. Pharmaceutical Laws Guide — text of Law No. (50) of 2017Textual reference for the published Law, used to verify its article structure, definitions, treatment and licensing provisions.
  3. Council of Representatives — first reading of the first amendment bill, 24 August 2026Documents the first reading and the bill’s announced directions: border divisions, tougher penalties for certain offences and a support fund for drug control and testing.
  4. Council of Representatives — hearing on amendment of the Law, 15 September 2026Documents continued development of the bill with the participation of committees and legal, security and health authorities.
  5. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4737) of 2023Ministry of Health Statement No. (238) of 2023 adding substances to the Law’s schedules.
  6. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4804) of 2024Statement No. (348) of 2024 on adding substances to the psychotropic substances schedule.
  7. Ministry of Justice — Iraqi Gazette issue (4849) of 2025Statement No. (347) of 2025 adding substances to schedules under Law 50 of 2017.
  8. United Nations in Iraq / UNODC — 2026Documents the National Drug Control Strategy 2025–2030, cooperation and capacity building.
  9. UNODC — Drug Trafficking Dynamics across Iraq and the Middle EastAnalysis of trafficking trends focusing on Iraq for 2019–2023.
  10. WHO / UNODC — International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders, 2020Reference for organising evidence-based, ethical treatment responsive to groups with specific needs.
  11. UNODC / WHO — International Standards on Drug Use Prevention, 2018Reference for a prevention system based on risk and protective factors and family, school and community interventions.
  12. United Nations Treaty Collection — Single Convention on Narcotic DrugsDocuments Iraq’s participation in the Single Convention as amended.
  13. United Nations Treaty Collection — Convention on Psychotropic SubstancesDocuments Iraq’s accession on 17 May 1976.
  14. United Nations Treaty Collection — 1988 Convention against Illicit TrafficDocuments Iraq’s accession on 22 July 1998.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme — A proposed bill within the Health, Social Protection and Family axis. It is not an enacted law and does not replace an existing government bill unless adopted by the Council of Representatives through the constitutional legislative and publication procedures.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.