Skip to content
POL-92

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme

Proposed bill · Digital State, Data, Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity

Disaster Risk Management and Continuity of the State and Vital Services Law

A national legislative framework shifting disaster management from a response after the event to an integrated system for understanding risks, prevention, early warning, preparedness, continuity of the state and vital services, and recovery, while preserving civil defence responsibilities and avoiding turning disaster management into exceptional emergency powers.

Document number
POL-92
Version
1.0
Publication/last updated
7 October 2026
Scope
Republic of Iraq

Executive summary

Iraq has an important legal foundation in Civil Defence Law No. (44) of 2013, which defines civil defence as measures to protect people and property and maintain operations in peace, war and disasters. It regulates early warning, evacuation, rescue, supporting services and the Higher Civil Defence Committee. However, this framework primarily addresses civil defence, response and safety; by itself, it does not constitute an integrated national system for managing systemic risks, continuity of state institutions and vital services, risk financing and recovery.[2][3]

Legislative developments show a continuing need to update the framework. On 23 August 2026, the Council of Representatives held the first reading of the first amendment bill to the Civil Defence Law. Its stated reasons focused on strengthening prevention, safety and firefighting and improving emergency intervention. Meanwhile, the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation had reached technical endorsement in late 2025, while the National Security Strategy 2025–2030 called for activating and updating the national disaster risk reduction strategy’s requirements.[4][6][7]

The draft addresses this gap through a complementary framework law, not an operational replacement for civil defence. It establishes a national council at prime-ministerial level for policy and cross-sector coordination, reorganises the existing National Centre for Disaster and Crisis Management as its executive secretariat and shared operational picture hub, and retains the Civil Defence Directorate as the principal response, rescue and firefighting agency within its remit. This separates national risk governance from specialised field operations.

The draft also places national multi-risk assessment, a risk register and risk maps at the heart of planning and investment. It establishes a multi-hazard early warning system and requires state institutions and vital-service operators to analyse business interruption impacts, set service-recovery times, provide alternatives and backup sites, and test continuity plans. This approach aligns with the Sendai Framework’s priorities, the ‘Early Warnings for All’ structure linking risk knowledge to monitoring, forecasting, warning dissemination and response preparedness, and international standards for continuity and incident management.[11][13][14][15]

The Law does not automatically create a state of emergency or grant exceptional powers over rights. Declaration of a state of emergency remains governed by Article (61/Ninth) of the Constitution. This Law operates under ordinary conditions and before, during and after disasters, seeking to make the state and services less vulnerable to disruption and better able to recover.[1]

Legislative gap

Gaps addressed by the Law
AreaCurrent positionLegislative response
National leadershipMultiple committees, cells and sectoral responsibilities, with the Civil Defence Law focused on the Ministry of Interior and response.A national council for policy and coordination and a national centre for the operational picture, with field command retained by the competent authority.
Understanding riskSectoral assessments and plans exist, but there is no comprehensive statutory obligation for a national register and periodic multi-risk updates.National assessment, register, maps, loss and damage records and unified methodologies.
Early warningThe Civil Defence Law recognises the principle, but a multi-hazard system requires roles, standards, channels and tests.An integrated national warning system from the scientific source to public response.
State continuityImplementation varies across sectors, with no general duty to analyse interruption impacts and recovery objectives.Require essential functions and vital services to have continuity plans, tests, premises and alternatives.
RecoveryOften managed after the event through separate decisions and allocations.Unified damage assessment, building back better, transparent reconstruction and post-disaster review.
FinancingDominance of post-event financing and inconsistent preventive funding.Emergency reserves, advance financing, a risk-financing strategy and auditing of exceptional expenditure.

Proposed legislative policy

The design rests on five rules. First, risk management begins before a disaster and is not confined to response. Second, it creates no parallel civil defence institution, but reorganises national coordination across sectors. Third, continuity of the state and vital services becomes a measurable, testable legal duty. Fourth, information, warnings and decisions are available to the public to the extent required for safety, with privacy and security protected. Fifth, financing proceeds through prevention, reserves, response and recovery, with full oversight of procurement and exceptions.

The draft clearly distinguishes between a disaster and a constitutional state of emergency. Most floods, fires, outages, epidemics and major incidents can be managed under ordinary legal powers without resorting to exceptional authority. This distinction protects rights and prevents expansion of the emergency concept while allowing lawful resource mobilisation and coordination.

Text of the draft Law

Statement of reasons

This Law is enacted to establish an integrated national disaster risk management framework connecting prevention, preparedness, early warning, response and recovery; ensure continuity of state institutions and vital services during disruption; prevent duplication of civil defence responsibilities; strengthen risk-informed planning and investment; unify coordination among federal and local authorities, the private sector and communities; protect people’s rights; and ensure transparency and accountability in disaster financing and reconstruction.

Explanatory memorandum

1. Why a framework law separate from the Civil Defence Law?

The Civil Defence Law performs an essential role in safety, firefighting, rescue, evacuation and supporting services; the amendment bill under parliamentary consideration in 2026 seeks to strengthen that role. Modern risk management, however, includes urban planning, public investment, data, warning and financing before an event, recovery and reconstruction afterwards, and continuity of electricity, water, telecommunications, health, payments and state functions. The draft therefore retains the Civil Defence Law while adding a governance and resilience layer that should not be assigned to a single field agency.[4][5]

2. Why a national council chaired by the Prime Minister?

A major disaster is not solely an interior, environmental or health matter. An electricity outage can disrupt water, communications and hospitals; flash floods can become transport, housing, health and supply crises; a digital attack can have extensive physical consequences. The draft therefore places policy and strategic coordination at a level of government capable of binding sectors, while retaining each competent authority’s technical response.

3. Why reorganise the existing Centre?

The legislative principle is to use existing capabilities before creating a new institution. Iraqi and international sources show an existing National Centre for Disaster and Crisis Management and moves to reorganise its roles. The Law therefore makes it the Council’s executive secretariat and common operational picture hub, leaving the Council of Ministers to determine its administrative affiliation in a way that prevents duplicate command.[18]

4. Continuity as an obligation, not a paper exercise

An ‘emergency plan’ kept in a file is insufficient. The draft requires business impact analysis, recovery times, minimum service levels, alternatives, backups, alternative premises, interdependency assessment and annual testing. This aligns with the approach underpinning international business continuity and incident management standards.[14][15]

5. Early warning

The draft adopts an ‘end-to-end’ multi-hazard system rather than merely sending messages. Effective warning depends on risk knowledge, monitoring, forecasting, understandable communication and then people’s and institutions’ ability to respond—the structure adopted by the Early Warnings for All initiative.[13]

6. Compound risks and the Iraqi context

International literature on Iraq emphasises that risks do not operate in isolation: drought, floods, pollution, conflict effects, displacement and weak services can interact and amplify impacts. The Law therefore requires assessment of interdependencies and compound and cascading risks, not merely a list of separate hazards.[12][17]

Transitional provisions and implementation requirements

The Law does not assume a large administrative apparatus will be created on day one. During the first six months, priority should be given to reorganising the existing Centre, identifying overlapping committees, adopting a risk methodology and classifying vital services. Public entities complete continuity plans and risk registers during the first year, after which continuity tests and drills enter a regular annual cycle.

Proposed implementation stages
PeriodRequirement
0–3 monthsEstablish the Council, identify overlapping committees and centres, and begin reorganising the National Centre.
0–6 monthsTransitional plan, incident and alert-level standards, and risk-register methodology.
6–12 monthsFirst national assessment, classification of vital services, public-entity continuity plans and first national drill.
12–18 monthsVital-service operator compliance, activation of preparedness indicators, and completion of links between governorates and the Centre.
After 18 monthsAnnual audit and testing cycle, updated risk maps, and integration of risk findings into budgeting and investment.

Financial and implementation impact

No published database permits an accurate national implementation cost without broad assumptions; the draft therefore avoids a financial figure with false precision. Costs fall into five groups: development of the National Centre and operations room; national warning and communications infrastructure; data, maps and assessments; greater resilience of vital services, premises and backup systems; and exercises and training.

These should not all be counted as new expenditure: much already exists within civil defence, ministries, operations centres, sectoral bodies and modernisation projects. The first requirement is to inventory and reuse existing resources, then fund demonstrated gaps. The Law also requires a financial approach reducing reliance on emergency spending after damage occurs, consistent with disaster risk financing and resilience principles.[11]

Fiscal rule: Before including any major expansion of equipment, buildings or platforms, the Council of Ministers shall provide a five-year establishment and operating cost estimate distinguishing new costs from those covered by reallocating existing resources, specifying the funding source and budget impact.

International standards and comparisons

The draft adopts the Sendai Framework’s fundamental principles: understanding disaster risk, strengthening risk governance, investing in risk reduction and improving preparedness and building back better in recovery. It also adopts the internationally recognised four-part multi-hazard early warning structure: risk knowledge, monitoring and forecasting, warning dissemination, and preparedness to respond.[11][13]

For continuity of the state and services, the design draws on ISO 22301’s approach to protecting an organisation’s ability to continue delivering products and services at acceptable levels during disruption, and ISO 22320’s clarity of roles, responsibilities, resource management and cooperation during incidents. The Law does not copy these standards verbatim, but translates them into functional obligations applicable in Iraq.[14][15]

The draft also aligns with international efforts to integrate climate risks, displacement and service interdependencies, reflected in UNDRR and IOM work in Iraq and the United Nations Cooperation Framework 2025–2029, which includes climate and disaster resilience among its strategic priorities.[10][16]

Sources and references

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq of 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives
  2. Ministry of Justice — issue publishing Civil Defence Law No. (44) of 2013
  3. Civil Defence Law No. (44) of 2013 — Iraqi Local Governance Law Library
  4. Council of Representatives — first reading of the first amendment bill to the Civil Defence Law, 23 August 2026
  5. Council of Representatives — Research Department observations on the Civil Defence Law amendment bill
  6. Ministry of Justice — technical endorsement workshop for the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation, 18 November 2025
  7. Iraqi National Security Strategy ‘Iraq First’ 2025–2030
  8. National Strategy for Environmental Protection and Improvement in Iraq 2024–2030 — UNDP
  9. Iraq National Development Plan 2024–2028 — Ministry of Planning/UNDP
  10. United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework for Iraq 2025–2029, published 2026
  11. UNDRR — Developing National Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies
  12. UNDRR Global Assessment Report — Iraq in fragile and complex risk contexts
  13. WMO — Early Warnings for All and the four pillars of multi-hazard early warning systems
  14. ISO 22301:2019 — Business continuity management systems
  15. ISO 22320:2018 — Emergency management — Guidelines for incident management
  16. IOM — Iraq Crisis Response Plan 2025, disaster risk reduction
  17. World Bank — Iraq Country Climate and Development Report
  18. United Nations in Iraq — Activities and roles of the security sector in support of climate and environmental security in Iraq

Ali Zuweid’s Political Programme · POL-92 · Version 1.0 · 7 October 2026

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.