Patriotism as a Necessity, Not a Luxury
From Emotional Belonging to Public Responsibility
Executive Summary
The Iraqi patriotism intended in this Vision is neither an exclusive ethnic nationalism nor a political loyalty test, but a constitutional, civic and practical bond between Iraqis and their shared state. It guarantees individuals their rights, dignity and plural identities, while requiring respect for law, protection of public money, fulfilment of duties, acceptance of difference and participation in reforming the state. It permits criticism, opposition to and replacement of government, because government is a temporary authority, whereas the state is the framework of shared rights, institutions, sovereignty and public ownership. 1
The chapter addresses a gap that laws and projects alone cannot close: when a public job is treated as spoils, public money as ownerless, and law as optional, institutional capability becomes costly and fragile however high expenditure rises. But blaming citizens alone is the opposite error. The state generates belonging when it applies the law fairly, distributes services and opportunities equitably, protects rights and permits accountability. The greater an actor's power over decisions, force or public money, the greater their national responsibility.
Surveys show that Iraq's trust crisis is selective, not a wholesale rejection of the state. In 2021, satisfaction with government and services was low, while assessments of security and order were better. Perceptions of corruption and favouritism were high, and consideration of emigration was greater among young people. These findings do not directly measure “love of Iraq,” but the environment that strengthens or weakens patriotism: fair rules, service quality, equal opportunity and the ability to correct errors peacefully. 23
The Vision proposes a path beginning in 2027 with a national survey of trust, belonging and citizenship; civic education reform; codes of conduct; volunteering; and inter-governorate exchange programmes, followed by entrenching merit, professional public media and civic participation. By 2045, an inclusive Iraqi identity should provide the framework for managing differences, the state should be treated as shared property, and belonging should appear in legal compliance, protection of public money, acceptance of diversity, work and cooperation.
1. Why Is Patriotism Necessary?
The introductory part established three premises: Iraq possesses the assets of a major state; the problem lies in converting them into outcomes; and the required model is a capable, productive, orderly and fair state working towards 2045. This chapter moves from state design to the social and political condition that makes that design viable. Law does not enforce itself; the budget does not protect itself; and a public project cannot succeed when every actor treats it as a private share or an opportunity for evasion. 4
This does not mean replacing institutional reform with moral exhortation. Practical patriotism cannot remedy procurement corruption without oversight, improve education without curricula and teachers, or control weapons without a state. It does, however, determine whether rules and institutions face continuing resistance from society and elites or find a minimum of compliance, cooperation and defence of the public interest. It is therefore a necessity for state-building, not a cultural luxury.
2. An Operational Definition of Iraqi Patriotism
This definition combines four dimensions: belonging to a shared political community; commitment to fair constitutional rules; willingness to work, cooperate and bear legitimate costs; and a continuing right to hold government accountable. It is close to “constructive patriotism,” which attaches people to their country without immunizing authority from criticism, and differs from blind patriotism, which equates unconditional support with love of country. 5
Table 1: Patriotism and Related Concepts
| Concept | Relationship to Patriotism | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Citizenship | Legal membership, rights and duties; the foundation of patriotism | Nationality alone does not establish patriotic conduct. |
| Ethnic nationalism | A cultural or linguistic bond that can exist within Iraq | One ethnic identity must not be imposed on a multi-ethnic state. |
| Loyalty to the state and Constitution | The core commitment to a shared framework | Does not mean accepting every government practice. |
| Loyalty to a government or party | A temporary political choice open to change | Opposing the government is not betraying the state. |
| Religious, ethnic and local identities | Protected within the Constitution and federal unity | Rejected when they become an authority above the state or a means of excluding others. |
| Enthusiasm and propaganda | May use national symbols or motivate action | Insufficient without conduct, and do not give authority a monopoly over patriotism. |
Source: Iraqi Constitution and literature on constructive and constitutional patriotism 6 | Data year: 1989–2026 | Unit: conceptual distinction | Implication: Civic patriotism permits multiple identities and distinguishes the state from the government.
3. Patriotism in a Struggling State: A Reciprocal Compact
In a struggling state, citizens face a real contradiction: they are asked to respect a law not always applied equally, protect public money whose impact they cannot see, and trust institutions where they may encounter favouritism or obstruction. Duties not to cause harm and others' rights remain binding. Yet a state demanding loyalty without improving citizens' experience does not generate stable belonging; it may generate fear, hypocrisy or withdrawal.
Public trust is not a fixed psychological trait. The OECD framework connects it to institutional responsiveness, reliability, integrity, fairness, openness and problem-solving ability. The state therefore builds patriotism when rules are predictable, services fair, complaints heard and corruption costly. 7
4. Love of Country between Emotion and Action
Attachment to symbols, land and memory is a legitimate part of belonging, but does not answer the public-policy question: what does an individual do when personal interest conflicts with law? Will they refuse favouritism that grants them an advantage? Protect a facility that does not directly belong to them? Defend the rights of a different fellow citizen? Here patriotism moves from feeling to conduct.
Table 2: From Patriotic Emotion to Patriotic Conduct
| Level | Expression | Observable Example | What It Establishes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotion | Pride, symbols and memory | Raising the flag or responding to an occasion | An emotional orientation, but insufficient by itself. |
| Identity | Defining oneself within an Iraqi political community | Choosing Iraqi identity as an inclusive framework | Acceptance of shared membership. |
| Norm | Treating law, equality and public money as obligations | Rejecting bribery and discrimination even when widespread | A general ethical rule exists. |
| Conduct | Daily action serving the public interest | Doing work well, paying a fee, protecting a facility | Turning belonging into an outcome. |
| Commitment | Continuing action beyond crises and special occasions | Regular volunteering or professional commitment | Consistency of conduct. |
| Legitimate sacrifice | Bearing limited, fairly distributed costs | Volunteer time, tax compliance or public service | Willingness to bear shared responsibility. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: qualitative behavioural scale | Implication: The real test begins with costs, not the intensity of rhetoric.
Sacrifice is patriotic when it is lawful, proportionate, limited in purpose and duration, fairly distributed and subject to oversight. It becomes exploitation when vulnerable people are asked to bear chronic failure, elites exempt themselves, or it is used to glorify violence, hide corruption or silence criticism.
5. Patriotism as a Condition for State-Building
Institutions need a degree of trust, cooperation and compliance; otherwise, every transaction becomes more costly and reliance on intermediaries and private protection grows. When public jobs become spoils, public money ownerless, law optional, and the state weaker than narrower loyalties, capability erodes even with abundant resources. Conversely, people cannot be asked to trust an unfair institution: performance creates trust, trust lowers the cost of governance, and the ability to perform improves.
Figure 1: The Negative Cycle of Lost Trust and Practical Patriotism
| Negative Cycle | Transmission Mechanism | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Weak justice and services | Repeated experience that rules do not protect everyone | Declining trust. |
| Declining trust | Seeking protection and resources through party, sect or tribe | Narrower loyalties gain strength. |
| Stronger narrower loyalties | Treating the state as an arena for division rather than shared property | Weaker protection of public money. |
| Weak shared ownership | Bribery, favouritism, evasion, vandalism and non-compliance | Weaker institutions and greater corruption. |
| Weaker institutions | Worse services and wider gaps | Further loss of trust. |
Source: Iraq Vision theory of change 2045 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: qualitative causal relationship | Implication: Weak patriotism is both a consequence and a cause.
Figure 2: The Positive Cycle of Building Trust and Capability
| Positive Cycle | Transmission Mechanism | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Justice, equality and reliable services | Demonstrating that law and rules work | Public trust. |
| Public trust | Willingness to cooperate, comply and participate | Practical national belonging. |
| Practical belonging | Protecting public money, rejecting favouritism and working together | Stronger institutions. |
| Stronger institutions | Lower transaction costs and better services and projects | Better outcomes. |
| Better outcomes | Stronger state legitimacy and shared ownership | Deeper trust and patriotism. |
Source: Iraq Vision theory of change 2045 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: qualitative causal relationship | Implication: Patriotism is not simply taught; it accumulates through experiences of justice and outcomes.
6. The Difference between Patriotism and Slogans
Table 3: Testing Genuine Patriotism against Slogan-Based Patriotism
| Test | Practical Patriotism | Slogan-Based Patriotism |
|---|---|---|
| Law | Applies it even when it limits personal interests and seeks changes through lawful means. | Exempts oneself and one's associates. |
| Public money | Treats it as shared property and rejects waste. | Considers it “government money” or spoils. |
| State and party | Puts the Constitution and public institution first when interests conflict. | Puts the party, leader or group first. |
| Accountability and criticism | Discloses, accepts responsibility for outcomes and protects peaceful opposition. | Uses patriotism as immunity and brands protesters traitors. |
| Corruption | Rejects illegitimate gain even when personally benefiting. | Condemns opponents' corruption while protecting that of associates. |
| Sovereignty and diversity | Rejects interference by a consistent standard and protects the rights of those who differ. | Selectively accepts interference and reserves patriotism for one's own group. |
| Outcomes | Turns words into service, commitment or reform. | Occasions and symbols without impact. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: behavioural standards | Implication: Consistency when costs arise matters more than the intensity of rhetoric.
7. The State as a Producer of Patriotism
The Constitution establishes an independent, sovereign federal state; ethnic, religious and sectarian diversity; equality before the law; and equal opportunity. These principles are not a symbolic preamble: they are the compact of civic patriotism. Every gap between the text and daily experience reduces trust, while every equal application of law and services turns the Constitution into tangible belonging. 8
The state produces patriotism through twelve interconnected paths: equality before the law, fair services, equal opportunity, protected rights, respect for dignity, anti-corruption, merit in recruitment, representation of diversity, protection of all citizens, effective sovereignty, inclusive institutions, and independent complaint and accountability channels. A state demanding patriotism without fulfilling these conditions may generate temporary obedience or political hypocrisy, not deeply rooted belonging.
8. The Responsibility of Citizens and Elites
Table 4: National Responsibility Is Proportionate to Power
| Actor | Minimum National Obligation | Greater Responsibility Arising from Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Citizen | Avoid harm, respect legitimate law, protect public facilities and participate. | Report wrongdoing, volunteer and seek accountability according to capacity. |
| Public employee | Impartiality, service, and protection of records, money and working time. | Refuse unlawful orders and disclose conflicts of interest. |
| Political official | The Constitution, transparency and public interest. | Accept responsibility for outcomes, prevent conflicts of interest and put the state before the party. |
| Member of Parliament | Legislation, oversight and representation. | Reject division of posts and resources outside the law. |
| Judge and officer | Independence, or loyalty to the Constitution and lawful chain of command. | Protect rights, resist interference and avoid partisanship. |
| Businessperson | Compliance, taxes and fair work. | Reject financing of influence, monopoly and corruption. |
| Journalist, religious leader and academic | Accuracy, non-incitement and respect for truth. | Correct misinformation, protect diversity and avoid rationalizing abuses of authority. |
| Party and activist | Peaceful competition and respect for results. | Reject unlawful weapons and foreign financing and put the state before the organization. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: allocation of responsibilities | Implication: Decision-makers bear greater national obligations than citizens with limited influence.
9. Iraq's Baseline for Trust, Belonging and Conduct
There is currently no regular official Iraqi indicator measuring civic patriotism as a combination of identity, trust, conduct and acceptance of rules. The chapter therefore uses probability-based surveys with published methodologies and states their limitations explicitly. The latest methodological framework is the Arab Barometer's 2024 wave: 2,408 in-person interviews across 17 governorates using a stratified probability sample. The detailed values used here, however, come from the 2019 and 2021 reports pending full extraction of the 2024 data. 9
Table 5: Baseline of Trust, Belonging and National Conduct in Iraq
| Indicator | Value | Year / Sample | Meaning and Limits of Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| High trust in government | 22% | 2021; telephone; 1,016 | Low trust in performance; does not mean weak attachment to the country. |
| Satisfaction with government | 24% | 2021; 1,016 | A tangible outcomes gap. |
| Satisfaction with education / health | 17% / 26% | 2021; 1,016 | Weak experiences of institutions that develop citizens and deliver services. |
| Positive assessment of security and order | 52% | 2021; 1,016 | Trust varies by sector rather than being uniform. |
| Corruption is widespread to a large extent | 68% | 2021; 1,016 | A strong perception of absent integrity; not a judicial measure. |
| Large and medium extent combined | 88% | 2021; 1,016 | Widespread perception of corruption. |
| Government is combating corruption | 27% | 2021; 1,016 | Low confidence in reform. |
| Considered emigrating / young people | 37% / 48% | 2021; 1,016 | Intentions, not actual migration; reveals a weak outlook for the future. |
| Favouritism is common in recruitment | 94% | 2019; in person; 2,461 | Belief that formal rules are insufficient. |
| Bribery is necessary for better education / healthcare | 53% / 56% | 2019; 2,461 | Unequal access. |
| Democracy is best despite its flaws | 75% | 2019; 2,461 | Demand for a democratic system despite weak implementation. |
| Freedom of expression / protest is guaranteed | 32% / 27% | 2021; 1,016 | A constraint on constructive patriotism and channels for correction. |
| Reported participation in the 2025 elections | Approximately 56% of registered voters | Administrative results | Distinguish eligible voters, registered voters and actual voters. |
Source: Arab Barometer 2019 and 2021; election reports 2025 101112 | Data year: 2019–2025 | Unit: percentage of respondents | Implication: These indicators describe the environment producing patriotism, not a direct measure of love of country.
The figures point in four directions: trust varies with institutional performance; favouritism and bribery weaken the belief that compliance produces fair outcomes; young people's intention to emigrate reveals a weak compact about the future; and protecting expression and protest keeps criticism within a project to reform the state rather than allowing it to become withdrawal or confrontation.
10. Disparities within Iraq
No governorate, ethnicity or sect may be classified as inherently less patriotic. Differences in trust and belonging are explained through security, fair services, discrimination, employment opportunities, experiences of violence and displacement, and how the state is represented. The 2027 survey should therefore oversample young people, conflict areas, returnees and Iraqis abroad, and publish weighted findings by governorate, urban / rural location, sex, education and income.
Table 6: Disparities and Measurement Gaps
| Dimension | Available Evidence | Gap | Measurement Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governorates | Stratified design in 2024 | No unified published trust and belonging dashboard | Analyse microdata and publish weighted results. |
| Urban and rural areas | General survey coverage | Insufficient indicators on conduct and public money | A separate stratum in the 2027 survey. |
| Age | Emigration intentions higher among young people | Weak age-disaggregated identity and volunteering data | An expanded youth sample. |
| Sex, education and income | Limited cross-tabulation in reports | Insufficient analysis of state experience and belonging | Multivariate analysis. |
| Conflict, displacement and return | Scattered local studies | Some camps excluded from the 2024 survey | An additional sample and comparison over time. |
| Public / private sector | Employment data available | No trust dashboard by income source | Add sector and dependence on the state. |
| Inside Iraq and abroad | Scattered migration and consular data | No diaspora survey | Regular survey of Iraqis abroad. |
Source: Review of survey methodologies and data gaps | Data year: 2026 | Unit: gap / action | Implication: Explain differences institutionally and socially, not as inherent characteristics or identities.
11. The Historical Trajectory of Iraqi Patriotism
Iraqi patriotism did not develop along a single path. Schools, the army, public service and cities built a shared sphere, but coups, authoritarianism, wars and sanctions sometimes turned institutions of integration into instruments of control. After 2003, the Constitution broadened recognition of diversity, while quota-based allocation entrenched networks dividing the state in practice. The fight against terrorism and civic protest showed the possibility of Iraqi solidarity across divisions when connected to protecting society or rejecting corruption and subordination. 13
Table 7: History as an Explanation of Present Trust
| Period | Instrument of Integration | Source of Fracture | Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1921–1958 | The state, education, army and administration | Uneven representation and incomplete integration | Shared institutions need legitimacy and fairness. |
| 1958–2003 | The republic and welfare, followed by centralized mobilization | Coups, personalized rule, repression, wars and sanctions | Forced integration does not create sustainable trust. |
| 2003–2014 | The Constitution, elections and representation of communities | Quota allocation, sectarian violence and multiple centres of power | Recognition of diversity is insufficient without a shared state. |
| 2014–2017 | Defending territory and society against ISIS | Displacement, human costs, and questions of weapons and justice | Shared experience builds solidarity when governed by law. |
| 2018–2026 | Civic protest and relative stability | Repression, party interests and interference | Young people seek patriotism expressed through sovereignty, integrity and outcomes. |
Source: Literature on Iraqi history and state-building 14 | Data year: 1921–2026 | Unit: historical period | Implication: Belonging is shaped through institutions and shared experience, not a fixed origin.
12. Civic Education, Media and Inclusive Institutions
What is needed is not a subject glorifying authority, but civic education teaching Iraqis how the state works and how to change it lawfully. It covers the Constitution and institutions, rights and duties, Iraq's plural history, public money and budgets, law and redress, dialogue, participation, information verification, volunteering, resisting hatred, and digital and environmental responsibility.
Table 8: Patriotic Indoctrination versus Civic Education
| Field | Patriotic Indoctrination | Modern Civic Education |
|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heroic narratives, symbols and a single official image. | Constitution, institutions, plural history, rights and duties. |
| Learning method | Memorization and repetition. | Discussion, evidence, simulations and solving local problems. |
| Approach to error | Hide it to protect reputation. | Expose and correct it, and protect the whistleblower. |
| Those who differ | Forced assimilation or suspicion. | Equal members whose rights are part of patriotism. |
| Participation | Obedience and attendance at occasions. | Voting, volunteering, seeking redress and peaceful accountability. |
| Outcome | Superficial compliance that can change. | Civic capability and measurable conduct. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045; comparative civic education experiences 15 | Data year: 2026 | Unit: methodological comparison | Implication: Civic education independent of government is a condition for preventing propaganda.
Roles are distributed: schools build knowledge and practice; universities train students in dialogue and service; public media provide reliable information rather than propaganda; culture, sport and museums create shared memory; the army and police embody impartiality and lawful service; parties teach peaceful competition; and civil society connects belonging to solving real problems.
13. International Lessons for Building Identity and Trust
Table 9: International Lessons for Building National Identity and Public Trust
| Case | Useful Mechanism | Outcome / Limitation | Lesson for Iraq |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany after 1945 | Independent civic education, a democratic Constitution, dismantling authoritarianism and the rule of law. | Democratic stability through a long and costly process. | Create a civic education institution independent of government and party. |
| South Africa | A rights-based Constitution, truth and reconciliation, and a negotiated transition. | Avoided large-scale war, but profound inequality persisted. | No reconciliation without truth, victims' rights and social justice. |
| Indonesia | Unity in diversity, decentralization, a shared language and institutions. | Management of extensive diversity, with tensions and an official identity open to politicization. | An inclusive identity that does not erase ethnicities, religions or the federal system. |
| Finland / Nordic countries | Fair services, transparency, education and trustworthy municipalities. | High trust; a different resource and institutional context. | Trust results from fair daily experience, not a media campaign. |
| Bosnia | Rigid post-war power-sharing. | Stopped violence but entrenched divisions and vetoes. | Transitional representation must not become permanent quotas in every institution. |
Source: Official sources and comparative literature 1617 | Data year: 1945–2026 | Unit: transferable mechanism | Implication: Transfer institutional and justice principles, not a state's image or exclusive identity.
14. A Vision for Iraqi Patriotism in 2045
The 2045 horizon does not mean waiting twenty years. Results start with measuring the baseline and changing curricula, codes and programmes. Slower shifts in trust, conduct and institutions follow. Movement between phases depends on achieved capability and outcomes, not elapsed time alone.
Table 10: Transformation Phases 2027–2045
| Phase | Purpose | Decisive Actions | Outcomes and Transition Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027–2030: Building the Baseline | Measure the problem and establish working instruments. | National survey; civic education reform; codes of conduct; volunteering and youth exchange; combating hatred; improving fairness in selected services. | A published baseline, tested curricula, redress channels and service-fairness indicators. |
| 2031–2035: Inclusive Institutions | Entrench merit, participation and trust in rules. | Recruitment and service reform; professional public media; inter-governorate programmes; broader civic participation. | Greater compliance and trust, and nationwide civic education and code coverage. |
| 2036–2040: Deepening Patriotic Conduct | Turn programmes into stable culture and practice. | Reduce opportunities for favouritism; expand volunteering; measure discrimination; support memory and reconciliation; public accountability. | Lower acceptance of corruption, greater cooperation and trust, and declining exclusionary rhetoric. |
| 2041–2045: Consolidating Civic Patriotism | Make shared ownership and law the normal state of affairs. | Consolidate independent institutions, update indicators, and sustain exchange, volunteering and public media. | A stable inclusive Iraqi identity, acceptance of pluralism, and greater trust, cooperation and public discipline. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2027–2045 | Unit: implementation phase | Implication: Early outcomes are institutional; longer-term outcomes are cultural and behavioural.
The Logic of Transition between Phases
The state does not scale programmes before testing them, finalize trust targets before a foundational survey, or demand greater citizen compliance without observable improvements in legal and service fairness. Each phase's gate requires reliable data, a clear lead body, continuing financing, rights protection and independent evaluation.
15. Indicators and Targets
Indicators fall into three groups: documented values usable provisionally; older values requiring updates; and indicators without a national Iraqi baseline, to be established in the 2027 survey. The following targets are proposed, not official, and will be reviewed after extracting the 2024 Arab Barometer data and completing the foundational survey. 18
Table 11A: Target Dashboard 2030–2045
| Indicator | Baseline | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust in government | 22% high trust; 2021 | 30% | 38% | 46% | 55% |
| Belief that government is combating corruption | 27%; 2021 | 38% | 50% | 60% | 70% |
| Considering emigration | 37%; young people 48%; 2021 | ≤32% / ≤40% | ≤27% / ≤34% | ≤22% / ≤28% | ≤18% / ≤22% |
| Belief that recruitment favouritism is widespread | 94%; 2019 | ≤80% | ≤65% | ≤50% | ≤35% |
| Guaranteed freedom of expression / protest | 32% / 27%; 2021 | 45% / 40% | 58% / 52% | 68% / 63% | 75% / 72% |
| Iraqi identity as the primary identity | To be established in 2027 | +5 points | +10 points | +15 points | +20 points from baseline |
| Trust among citizens | To be established in 2027 | +5 points | +10 points | +15 points | +20 points |
| Annual volunteering participation | To be established in 2027 | 15% | 25% | 35% | 45% |
| Viewing public money as shared property | To be established in 2027 | +10 points | +18 points | +25 points | +30 points |
| Acceptance of diversity and equality | To be established in 2027 | +5 points | +10 points | +15 points | +20 points |
| Schools implementing the civic curriculum | Administrative baseline in 2027 | 30% | 70% | 100% | Complete periodic updating |
| Institutions with effective codes of conduct | Administrative baseline in 2027 | 40% | 75% | 100% | Annual compliance audit |
Source: Baselines from Arab Barometer; proposed targets 19 | Data year: 2019–2045 | Unit: percentage of respondents / coverage | Confidence is medium for targets with a baseline, and low before the 2027 survey for new indicators.
Table 11B: Measurement Governance
| Indicator / Group | Definition and Measurement | Source and Body | Frequency / Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trust, identity, migration and diversity | Stable standardized questions with national and governorate-level analysis. | Statistics Authority and Ministry of Planning, with an independent scientific council. | Every two years; medium after 2027. |
| Corruption, favouritism and public money | Attitudes and behavioural scenarios, not only direct moral questions. | National survey + Commission of Integrity and complaint data. | Annual / every two years; medium. |
| Volunteering and participation | Actual participation during 12 months and recorded hours. | Ministry of Youth / Labour and an independent national platform. | Annual; medium to high. |
| Civic education and codes | Implementation coverage with quality audits, not merely formal adoption. | Education, Higher Education, Public Service Council, Board of Supreme Audit. | Annual; high administratively. |
| Hate speech and discrimination | Transparent monitoring with a legal definition and human review. | High Commission for Human Rights, universities and the independent media authority. | Quarterly / annual; medium. |
Source: Proposed national survey design 2027 | Data year: 2027–2045 | Unit: measurement system | Do not publish identity-based rankings that stigmatize governorates or groups; publish differences with their institutional explanations.
16. Proposed Programmes and Policies
Patriotism is not built through isolated festivals, but through a package changing institutional experience, civic knowledge and interaction among Iraqis. Cost categories are qualitative to avoid inventing appropriations without detailed studies: low, below US$5 million; medium, US$5–25 million; high, US$25–100 million; and transformational, above US$100 million over the programme cycle. 20
Table 12: National Programme Package
| Programme | Problem and Objective | Lead and Partners | Period / Cost / Financing | Success Indicator and Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Survey of Trust and Belonging | No baseline; build a regular composite indicator. | Statistics Authority and Ministry of Planning; universities and scientific council. | 2027, then every two years; low; budget and technical assistance. | Published weighted data; politicization risk addressed through methodological independence. |
| Civic and Patriotic Education | Rote-based curricula; teach the Constitution, rights and collective action. | Ministry of Education; Higher Education and Culture. | 2027–2035; medium; budget. | Actual implementation and learning assessment; risk of becoming propaganda. |
| Volunteering and Community Service | Weak organized participation; connect belonging to problem-solving. | Youth and Sports; Labour, governorates and civil society. | 2027–2045; medium; budget and partnerships. | Documented participation hours; risk of exploitation or coercion. |
| Public Money Protection Charter | Weak shared ownership; make waste costly conduct. | Council of Ministers and Commission of Integrity; financial oversight. | 2027–2030; low; budget. | Complaints, disclosure and fewer violations; risk of formalism. |
| Public Service Code of Conduct | Partisanship, favouritism and conflicts of interest; establish impartiality. | Federal Public Service Council; ministries and Commission of Integrity. | 2027–2032; low / medium. | Compliance audits and sanctions; risk of selective enforcement. |
| Youth and Student Exchange | Limited contact between governorates; build shared Iraqi experience. | Education, Higher Education and Youth; governorates. | 2028–2040; medium. | Participants and changing attitudes; risk of unbalanced representation. |
| National Memory and Reconciliation | Contested memories and legacies of violence; truth, recognition and victims' rights. | Presidency / Council of Representatives through legislation; Culture and Justice. | 2028–2038; high. | Documentation and victim participation; risk of amnesty without justice. |
| Combating Hate Speech | Incitement and misinformation; prevention, monitoring and proportionate accountability. | High Commission for Human Rights; judiciary, media and education. | 2027–2045; medium. | Reduced documented incitement; risk of restricting expression. |
| Professional Public Media | Confusion between public media and propaganda; an independent information service. | An independent authority established by law; media network and universities. | 2028–2035; high. | Public trust and diverse representation; risk of government control. |
| Iraqis Abroad | Disconnected talent and diaspora; participation, investment and national service. | Foreign Affairs, Migration and Planning; universities and private sector. | 2028–2045; medium. | Networks, projects and temporary return; risk of favouritism. |
| Twinned Governorates | Weak local cooperation; joint projects between governorates. | High Commission for Coordination among Governorates; local governments. | 2029–2045; medium. | Joint projects and staff exchanges; risk of symbolism. |
| Integrity and Service Awards | Few positive incentives; recognize verifiable outcomes. | Council of Ministers, Board of Supreme Audit and civil society. | 2028–2045; low. | Independent selection and published impact; risk of becoming propaganda. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2027–2045 | Unit: programme / cost category | Implication: Programmes complement justice and service reforms; they do not replace them.
17. Implementation Matrix
The package requires a small coordination centre within Iraq Vision 2045, while implementation ownership remains with the competent body. The phrase “relevant bodies” must not substitute for responsibility: each programme has an accountable lead, indicator, deadline and risk register.
Table 13: National Implementation Matrix
| Action | Type / Lead | Partners | Start–Completion | Cost / Financing | Indicator and Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adopt a national framework for civic patriotism and measurement | Institutional; Council of Ministers / Ministry of Planning | Education, Human Rights, Public Service Council | 2027–2028 | Low; budget | Published framework; scientific committee preventing politicization. |
| Conduct the foundational survey and publish data | Statistical; Statistics Authority | Universities, governorates and an independent council | 2027, then regularly | Low; budget and technical assistance | Representative sample and open data; external audit. |
| Pilot the civic education curriculum | Educational; Ministry of Education | Higher Education, Culture and civil society | 2027–2029 | Medium; budget | Pre- and post-assessment; rights review. |
| Roll out the curriculum and train teachers | Implementation; Ministry of Education | Directorates and universities | 2030–2036 | High; budget | School coverage and learning quality; phased implementation. |
| Launch the volunteering and service platform | Technical / social; Ministry of Youth | Labour, governorates and organizations | 2027–2029 | Medium; budget and partnerships | Documented hours; protection against coercion and exploitation. |
| Adopt the public service code | Regulatory; Federal Public Service Council | Integrity, audit bodies and ministries | 2027–2029 | Low; budget | Conflicts of interest and complaints; uniform sanctions. |
| Inter-governorate exchange programme | Educational / social; Education and Higher Education | Youth and governorates | 2028–2035 | Medium; budget and partnerships | Participant diversity and changing attitudes; fair geographic allocation. |
| Law on public media independence | Legislative; Council of Representatives | Media authority, media network and universities | 2028–2031 | Low legislative cost; high development cost | Independent board and editorial charter; transparent financing. |
| Strategy on hatred and misinformation | Rights / technical; High Commission for Human Rights | Judiciary, Communications and Education | 2027–2030 | Medium | Monitoring, education and accountability; a narrow definition protecting expression. |
| Memory and reconciliation programme | Legislative / institutional; Presidency and Justice | Culture, victims and governorates | 2028–2038 | High; budget and international assistance | Documentation and victims' rights; no blanket amnesty. |
| Network of Iraqis abroad | Diplomatic / development; Foreign Affairs | Migration, Planning and universities | 2028–2032 | Medium | Experts and projects; a transparent, non-partisan platform. |
| Public annual evaluation system | Oversight; Ministry of Planning and Board of Supreme Audit | Lead bodies and universities | 2028–2045 | Low | Annual report and independent review; financing linked to performance. |
Source: Prepared by the Iraq Vision team 2045 | Data year: 2027–2045 | Unit: implementation action | Cost categories are qualitative; final appropriations depend on studies and programme design.
Financing
Foundational actions are financed from the federal budget under planning, statistics, education and public service, redirecting expenditure on scattered campaigns and events towards measurable programmes. International technical assistance can support survey, curriculum and platform design without transferring ownership of data or decisions. Public media, memory initiatives and extensive exchanges require multi-year cost plans and safeguards against expanding operating commitments.
18. Constitutional and Rights Safeguards
These boundaries are enforced through judicial oversight, rights review, independent measurement and public media, published methodologies and a right of appeal. Patriotism imposed by coercion replaces shared ownership with fear.
19. Risks and Conditions for Success
Table 14: Risk Matrix
| Risk | Likelihood / Impact | Warning Indicator | Responsible Body | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propaganda and electoral use | High / high | Seasonal slogans or partisan distribution of benefits. | Council of Ministers and the Commission | Independent measurement and media; prohibition of propaganda and partisan financing. |
| Branding opponents traitors | High / high | Accusations about loyalty instead of discussing facts. | Judiciary and Human Rights | A narrow legal definition and protection of expression and protest. |
| Corruption and unfair services | High / high | Persistent favouritism, complaints and gaps. | Council of Ministers and Integrity | Connect programmes to service reform, transparency and accountability. |
| Rote curricula and weak representation of diversity | Medium / high | Memorization, personalization and absent groups or governorates. | Ministry of Education and Planning | Independent review, pilots and transparent geographic representation. |
| Hate speech and misinformation | High / high | Escalating organized incitement or digital campaigns. | Human Rights, judiciary and media | Independent monitoring, media literacy and proportionate sanctions. |
| Foreign interference | High / high | Secret financing or selective sovereignty. | Sovereign bodies and judiciary | Financial disclosure and consistent application of law. |
| Loss of youth trust | High / high | Rising emigration intentions and falling participation. | Youth, Labour and Planning | Tangible opportunities, participation in design and independent evaluation. |
| Resistance from vested interests and absent data | High / high | Obstructed merit-based appointments, delayed publication or changed methodology. | Prime Minister's Office, Parliament and Statistics Authority | Gradual legislation, open data, scientific council and external audit. |
Source: Prepared by the Vision team | Data year: 2026 | Unit: qualitative assessment | Success depends on state fairness and elite conduct.
20. Conclusion
Patriotism cannot be imposed through slogans or built through occasions alone, and it does not mean loyalty to government. It exempts neither the state from justice nor citizens from duty. Stable patriotism develops when Iraqis feel that the state belongs to them and protects them, and treat it as shared property requiring care; when they know the law protects those who differ as it protects them, services and opportunities need no intermediary, and criticism can correct authority without destroying the state.
The chapter therefore proposes an institutional transition, not an emotional campaign: from declared patriotism to institutional patriotism—equally applied law; public money owned by all Iraqis; impartial public service; elites bearing greater costs and responsibility; independent civic education; and indicators measuring trust, conduct and justice. This is the social structure Iraq Vision 2045 needs to become enduring capability rather than a document.
Consolidated References
1. Iraq Vision 2045 Operational Manual, version 1.0; and the introductory-part and Part One chapter cards.
2. Iraq Vision 2045, chapters V1-D00-C01, V1-D00-C02 and V1-D00-C03, final versions 1.0, 2026.
3. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005, particularly Articles 1, 3, 14, 16 and 18 and provisions concerning rights and institutions.
4. Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2021 (Wave VI), telephone survey, n=1,016, March 2021.
5. Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2019 (Wave V), face-to-face survey, n=2,461, December 2018–January 2019.
6. Arab Barometer, Wave VIII Technical Report: Iraq, n=2,408, fieldwork May–July 2024.
7. OECD, Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions.
8. Schatz, Staub & Lavine (1999), “Blind versus Constructive Patriotism,” Political Psychology.
9. Kosterman & Feshbach (1989), “Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes,” Political Psychology.
10. Müller, Jan-Werner (2007), Constitutional Patriotism, Princeton University Press.
11. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Germany: mission and civic-education activities.
12. South Africa, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995; Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
13. Constitution of Indonesia and official materials on unity in diversity and decentralization.
14. Tripp, Charles, A History of Iraq; Bashkin, Orit, The Other Iraq; Davis, Eric, Memories of State.
15. Dodge, Toby, Iraq: From War to a New Authoritarianism; Haddad, Fanar, Sectarianism in Iraq.
16. Reuters and Associated Press reporting on Iraq’s 2025 parliamentary election turnout; to be replaced by final IHEC tables.
Footnotes and Detailed References
Iraq Vision 2045: Operational Manual, version 1.0; and chapters V1-D00-C01, “Why Great Iraq?”, V1-D00-C02, “Iraq's Real Problem,” and V1-D00-C03, “The Meaning of the Great Iraq Project,” final versions 1.0, 2026.↩︎
Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2021 (Wave VI): representative telephone survey, sample 1,016, March 2021, margin of error approximately ±3 percentage points.↩︎
Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2019 (Wave V): in-person interviews, national sample 2,461, 24 December 2018–27 January 2019, margin of error approximately ±2 percentage points.↩︎
Iraq Vision 2045: Operational Manual, version 1.0; and chapters V1-D00-C01, “Why Great Iraq?”, V1-D00-C02, “Iraq's Real Problem,” and V1-D00-C03, “The Meaning of the Great Iraq Project,” final versions 1.0, 2026.↩︎
Schatz, Staub & Lavine (1999), “On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind versus Constructive Patriotism”; Kosterman & Feshbach (1989); Jan-Werner Müller (2007), Constitutional Patriotism.↩︎
Schatz, Staub & Lavine (1999), “On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind versus Constructive Patriotism”; Kosterman & Feshbach (1989); Jan-Werner Müller (2007), Constitutional Patriotism.↩︎
OECD, Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions: responsiveness, reliability, integrity, fairness, openness, and capacity to address complex challenges.↩︎
Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005, particularly Articles 1, 3, 14, 16 and 18, and provisions concerning equality, rights and the structure of the federal state.↩︎
Arab Barometer, Wave VIII Technical Report: Iraq: fieldwork from 13 May to 19 July 2024, stratified probability sample of 2,408 across 17 governorates, response rate 58%, excluding Duhok, Halabja and displaced people in camps.↩︎
Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2021 (Wave VI): representative telephone survey, sample 1,016, March 2021, margin of error approximately ±3 percentage points.↩︎
Arab Barometer, Iraq Country Report 2019 (Wave V): in-person interviews, national sample 2,461, 24 December 2018–27 January 2019, margin of error approximately ±2 percentage points.↩︎
Reuters and Associated Press reports on Iraq's 2025 Council of Representatives elections. The reported percentage of registered voters is used provisionally and must be replaced by the Independent High Electoral Commission's final statistical tables, clearly distinguishing eligible, registered and actual voters as denominators.↩︎
For historical context: Charles Tripp, A History of Iraq; Orit Bashkin, The Other Iraq; Eric Davis, Memories of State; Toby Dodge, Iraq: From War to a New Authoritarianism; Fanar Haddad, Sectarianism in Iraq.↩︎
For historical context: Charles Tripp, A History of Iraq; Orit Bashkin, The Other Iraq; Eric Davis, Memories of State; Toby Dodge, Iraq: From War to a New Authoritarianism; Fanar Haddad, Sectarianism in Iraq.↩︎
Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Germany: the Federal Agency for Civic Education's mission and relative independence. This experience is used to identify an institutional mechanism, not to replicate its content or political model.↩︎
The comparison draws on materials from Germany's Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung; South Africa's Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995 and Truth and Reconciliation Commission materials; the Indonesian Constitution and literature on “Unity in Diversity”; and literature on trust in Nordic countries and post-war arrangements in Bosnia.↩︎
Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Germany: the Federal Agency for Civic Education's mission and relative independence. This experience is used to identify an institutional mechanism, not to replicate its content or political model.↩︎
All 2030–2045 targets and cost categories in this chapter are planning proposals by the Iraq Vision 2045 team, not official government targets or appropriations. New indicators will be established in the 2027 national foundational survey and reviewed after the 2024 data are updated.↩︎
All 2030–2045 targets and cost categories in this chapter are planning proposals by the Iraq Vision 2045 team, not official government targets or appropriations. New indicators will be established in the 2027 national foundational survey and reviewed after the 2024 data are updated.↩︎
All 2030–2045 targets and cost categories in this chapter are planning proposals by the Iraq Vision 2045 team, not official government targets or appropriations. New indicators will be established in the 2027 national foundational survey and reviewed after the 2024 data are updated.↩︎