Skip to content
V4-D09-C04
Iraq Vision 2045 · Door Nine: Iraq in the World
V4-D09-C04

Soft Power

From a civilisational inheritance to lasting attraction, trust and international partnerships

Data cutoff: 11 October 2026 · Version 1.0 · Strategic horizon: 2027–2045

Soft power is not a festival count or an image campaign. It is Iraq’s ability to generate voluntary interest, respect, trust and exchange through culture, the arts, education, sport, visitor experiences and institutional conduct, while protecting rights, heritage, creative freedom and service quality.

6 sitesOn UNESCO’s World Heritage List through 2026
14 elementsOf intangible heritage inscribed through 2025
5.155 millionGuests in accommodation establishments under published 2024 indicators; not all are international tourists
2027The year for establishing perception, satisfaction and inconsistent programme baselines

Chapter profile

Item Basis adopted
Code and location V4-D09-C04 | Volume Four | Door Nine, “Iraq in the World” | Chapter Four
Required themes Culture; education; art; sport; tourism; Iraq’s international image
Central question How can Iraq turn its civilisational assets, cultural, scientific and sporting production, and visitors’ experiences into lasting international respect, trust and partnerships without reducing them to propaganda or duplicating other chapters’ policies?
Baseline 2024 for available tourism data; 2025–2026 for UNESCO heritage, education and institutional developments; 2027 as the baseline year for unmeasured indicators
Chapter boundaries Defines the system of attraction, cultural, knowledge and sporting exchange, and reputation measurement. It does not replace education, artistic production or domestic tourism programmes, or detailed visa, road and hotel policies
Preceding connections V4-D09-C03, “Economic Diplomacy”; V4-D09-C02, “A Balanced Foreign Policy”; and the citizen, government, security and economy doors
Subsequent connection V4-D09-C05, “Iraq as a Regional Hub”, receives trust and cross-societal channels from this chapter without repeating the identity and cultural-exchange narrative

Table (1): Chapter reference profile.

This chapter receives a specific function from “Economic Diplomacy”: relationships and missions can identify investors or buyers and reduce market friction, but openness is not confined to trade. A book, professor, film, sports team or archaeological site can build lasting knowledge and trust before any deal. The reverse is also true: a great heritage does not justify claiming broad international trust where researchers, visitors and artists have limited access or poor service experiences.

The chapter therefore does not repeat export economics or negotiating authority settled earlier, nor reduce tourism to airports and hotels. It tests how culture, knowledge, sport, visitors and institutional reputation interact to create voluntary attraction. Diplomatic decisions and sovereign negotiation remain with competent authorities. Culture must not conceal rights crises or target foreign audiences with manufactured messages.

1. Contents and decision map

1. Chapter profile and bridge | 2. Contents and decision map

3. Executive summary | 4. Definitions and the scope of soft power

5. Constitutional and institutional framework | 6. Iraq’s baseline

7. Data gaps and causes of weak impact | 8. Heritage, antiquities and living culture

9. Education and scientific exchange | 10. Arts and cultural industries

11. Sport and societal diplomacy | 12. Tourism and the visitor’s impression

13. Iraq’s international image and digital media | 14. Human rights, diversity and non-governmental partners

15. Four applied Iraqi cases | 16. Transferable international comparisons

17. Reference scenario and alternatives | 18. Vision 2045 and the theory of change

19. Transformation phases, 2027–2045 | 20. Indicator and target dashboard

21. Consistent definitions and anti-manipulation safeguards | 22. Implementation package

23. Implementation and financing matrix | 24. Risk and safeguard register

25. Governance and evaluation mechanisms | 26. Chapter boundaries and handover

27. Gap and assumption register | 28. Notes and references

2. Executive summary

Iraq’s human and cultural resources cannot be reduced to photographs of ancient ruins: Mesopotamian civilisations, historic and religious cities, the marshes, arts, music, literature, cuisine, crafts, languages and social diversity. Possessing these assets is not an international outcome. Soft power depends on conserving them, interpreting them for audiences, facilitating access, respecting their creators and enabling real experiences that visitors, students, artists and researchers voluntarily share with others.

The strongest baseline uses varied units that cannot validly become one “national soft-power index”. Iraq has six UNESCO World Heritage sites, five cultural and one mixed, with continuing monitoring of some sites on the Danger List. Fourteen intangible heritage elements were inscribed through 2025, including multinational elements. Baghdad also joined the Creative Cities Network as a City of Literature in 2015. These are assets of recognition, conservation and networks; they do not automatically mean tourism, cultural exports or public trust rose by the same amount.12

Mosul demonstrates the possibility of moving from “removing war damage” to a credible urban story. In 2025, UNESCO documented completion of major religious and cultural landmark restoration, reconstruction of 124 heritage houses and renovation of 404 classrooms within a substantial international mobilisation. The example shows partnership’s strength when schools, crafts and residential neighbourhoods return alongside monuments. It does not permit neglect of maintenance costs, site safety or residents’ and craftspeople’s rights after the project ends.3

Education already has an instrument rather than merely a concept. In May 2026, the Ministry of Higher Education launched the fourth “Study in Iraq” cycle for 2026/2027 students through public and private Iraqi universities. In 2024, it reported 1,015 admitted students in the first cycle and more than 2,000 registrations for the next at that time. These figures cannot be directly compared with announced scholarships, registration forms or graduates. Admission, actual enrolment, attendance, graduation, satisfaction and subsequent alumni networks must be tracked separately.4

For tourism, the statistical authority provides series on hotels, guests and revenue, alongside a 2023 tourism expenditure survey. Guest counts and religious-event visits are not, by definition, international tourist counts. Large differences may arise from coverage, year and repeat visits. The vision begins with harmonised visitor measurement by residence, purpose, governorate, nationality and residence, overnight duration, spending and satisfaction, rather than adopting an attractive number and building campaigns around it.5

The proposed response is not a parallel promotional ministry, but a national portfolio coordinated by competent state bodies with governorates, universities, athletes, artists, museums, the private sector and diaspora. It safeguards human rights, diversity, creative freedom and truthful history, using evaluable instruments: site conservation, translation and distribution support, academic exchange, sporting-event standards, better visitor experiences, and a multilingual facts and content platform alongside independent overseas perception surveys.

A living cultural asset
Protection, freedom and quality
Access and exchange
An experience people trust
Voluntary circulation and partnerships

Figure (1): The proposed pathway from resources to non-coercive influence.

3. Definitions and chapter boundaries

Soft Power is the ability to influence others’ preferences through attraction, persuasion, legitimacy and voluntary exchange, rather than military coercion or buying decisions. Not every media instrument is soft power: a Public Diplomacy campaign may be activity with no effect, or a negative effect, where audiences distrust the source. Cultural diplomacy organising institutional exchange must be distinguished from cultural rights protecting creativity, cultural industries generating content and jobs, and tourism providing lived visitor experiences.

Soft power cannot be reduced to a good reputation with everyone. Foreign groups may respect Iraqi poetry while disagreeing with government policy; an independent film may succeed without official support; and an expensive sporting event may worsen perceptions if safety and services fail. Programme inputs, outputs and effects on voluntary willingness to visit, study, exchange or trust must therefore be separated. No single global ranking is conclusive because survey samples, weights, timing and geographical coverage affect it.

Concept Operational definition What it does not equal
Soft power Attraction and credibility generating cooperation, interest or trust without coercion Publication counts or promotional budgets
National reputation Documented patterns of perception among defined audiences, countries and periods Government satisfaction with its own message
Cultural diplomacy Long-term exchange among institutions, artists, students and audiences Ceremonial events alone
Creative industries Value added, employment and rights in content, arts, design and media Any entertainment activity without economic accounting
Tangible/intangible heritage A site or living practice with custodians, rights and conservation requirements An unrestricted marketing product
International tourist/accommodation guest A definition based on visit, duration, purpose and residence; a guest is an accommodation-establishment record Religious visit or entry-visa counts
Academic exchange Movement of students, researchers, programmes and cooperation with quality assurance and recognition Scholarships offered without enrolment and graduation
Sporting diplomacy Using competition and sporting exchange to generate relationships, participation and shared feeling A medal or tournament without civic impact

Table (2): Operational glossary

4. Constitutional and legal foundations and institutional map

Iraq’s Constitution establishes this field as a right and public service, not merely an international-relations tool. Article 34 addresses education, research and innovation; Article 35 supports cultural activities and institutions; Article 36 protects and encourages participation in sport. Rights and freedoms provisions require protection of dignity, expression, association and equality. The Constitution also defines federal foreign-policy functions and distributes local powers. “Iraq’s image” must therefore not justify restricting artists, subordinating universities or removing governorates’ cultural and tourism roles.6

Internationally, Iraq accepted UNESCO’s 1970 Convention against illicit trafficking in cultural property, became party to the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, and joined the 2005 Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. These obligations make heritage, diversity and community rights part of policy. Recovered artefacts, crafts and popular practices cannot be treated as promotional material detached from their custodians and context.7

The domestic system has multiple owners: the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Antiquities and competent authorities and sites; Higher Education and universities; Youth and Sport, federations and the Olympic Committee within their legal autonomy; Foreign Affairs and missions; governorates and regions; Transport, Interior and visa and crossing authorities; and the private sector and independent cultural institutions. Coordination does not mean creating a body dominating artistic, university or contracting decisions. It requires service-level agreements, referral mechanisms and transparent budgets, with a small coordinating council built on existing structures.

Function Original mandate holder Cross-institutional role Safeguard
Conserving sites and living heritage Antiquities bodies, communities, governorates and competent authorities Visitor, interpretation and translation plans and joint initiatives Community rights and maintenance and sustainability plans
Scholarships, students and researchers Higher Education, universities and quality bodies An information/exchange gateway and international alumni Academic accreditation, privacy and equal opportunity
Creativity and content Artists, publishers, producers and supporting bodies Translation, distribution, platforms and international participation Artistic freedom, copyright and grant transparency
Sporting events Competent sports bodies and organisers Twinning, media relations and responsible hosting Safety, fairness and non-politicisation of federations
Visitor experience Tourism authorities, sites, municipalities and service bodies Journey measurement and lawful facilitation abroad No misleading claims about safety or accessibility
International reputation Foreign Affairs coordinating with content and data bodies Consistent facts, multilingual answers and surveys No false propaganda or political-audience surveillance

Table (3): Proposed responsibility map—coordination does not remove implementation responsibility from its owner.

5. Iraq’s baseline: what numbers tell us and what remains unknown

The baseline has three layers. The first is an “asset stock”, such as World Heritage sites or inscribed intangible heritage elements: institutional recognition figures, not measures of foreign opinion. The second is a “flow of use”, such as hotel guests, exchange students or sporting-event attendance, tied to a period, coverage and source. The third is “long-term perception outcomes”, such as foreign audience trust, repeat visits or sustained research cooperation. No published, consistent Iraqi national series under the desired definitions exists for these, so it is established in the 2027 baseline year.

UNESCO lists six Iraqi World Heritage sites: Hatra, Ashur/Qal’at Sherqat, Samarra Archaeological City, Erbil Citadel, the Ahwar of Southern Iraq with their cultural sites and natural components, and Babylon. Inscription must not be read as permanent certification of a site’s safety. The 2026 World Heritage Committee decisions and conservation files include monitoring Ashur, Hatra and Samarra as sites on the World Heritage in Danger List. Success requires verified progress in conservation, management and safe visitor flows, not merely hurried efforts to add new sites.8

Published Iraqi headline tourism indicators for 2024 show approximately 1,531 hotels and accommodation complexes, around 5.155 million guests, and hotel revenues of roughly IQD 303.821 billion under the general table’s definitions. This differs markedly from 2023, so neither a “tourism collapse” nor “tourism growth” can be calculated before checking changes in scope, survey method, coverage and guest definitions in the detailed report. Accommodation guests remain distinct from international visitors and religious tourists who do not stay in hotels.9

In education, “Study in Iraq” announced in 2024 that its first cycle had 1,015 admitted students and its next had over two thousand registrations at the statement date. The ministry then announced more than 16 thousand available scholarships in the third cycle in 2025, and in 2026 reported programmes spanning 78 public and private universities. These figures represent different procedural stages—admissions, registrations, scholarships offered and participating universities. They cannot be added into “foreign students actually studying” without independent attendance and graduation records.1011

Indicator Value/event Year and unit Interpretation limit or gap
UNESCO World Heritage 6 sites: 5 cultural and 1 mixed Stock of inscriptions through 2026 Some sites are monitored as endangered; count is not conservation quality
UNESCO intangible heritage 14 inscribed elements Stock through 2025 Includes multinational files; does not measure continuity of practice
Baghdad as a Creative City City of Literature since 2015 Network membership Not representative of all Iraqi cities or exhibition counts
Hotels and accommodation complexes 1,531 establishments 2024; statistical authority Coverage verification and reconciliation with 2023 required
Guests at accommodation establishments 5.155 million guests 2024; thousand guests Not the number of unique international arrivals
Accommodation establishment revenue IQD 303.821 billion 2024; million dinars Hotel revenue, not “international tourist expenditure”
Study in Iraq programme 1 1,015 admitted students 2023/2024 edition; 2024 statement Administrative figure; enrolment and graduation data needed
Study in Iraq programme 2 More than 2,000 registered at the time of the statement 2024/2025 edition; 2024 statement Not a final count or a count of graduates
Announced scholarships More than 16,000 scholarship opportunities Third cycle, 2025/2026 An available scholarship is not an enrolled student
Fourth programme 2026/2027 launch; 78 universities included May 2026 statement An enrolment, quality and retention report is needed
External perceptual impact National baseline gap 2027 launch Audience/country sample, definitions and periodic confidence measures
Iraqi cultural output/employment Gap in unified sectoral accounts 2027 launch Do not use a global percentage as an Iraqi percentage

Table (4): Iraq’s composite baseline | UNESCO, the statistical authority, the Ministry of Higher Education and the Asian Football Confederation; years and units differ.

6. Causal diagnosis: why does a cultural asset fail to generate lasting influence?

The first obstacle is a gap in protection and access. A foreign researcher may know an Iraqi heritage site but be unable to find a database for research permits, a safe time to visit, or consistent information about laws, fees and services. If the site is at risk or lacks a visitor and conservation plan, extensive promotion may turn some of its appeal into a threat to its heritage. Carrying capacity, risk management and public services must therefore precede spending on a campaign.

The second obstacle is the separation of a product from its global access chain. An Iraqi creative practitioner may produce important work but lack editing, translation, distribution, rights management, publishing or access to cultural-market agents. A university professor may have valuable research, yet cooperation stops at a memorandum of understanding that creates no team, laboratory or joint course. A sporting victory may be exhausted in hours of celebration unless it becomes exchange programmes for young people, coaches and federations.

The third obstacle is a credibility gap: visual accounts of coexistence and heritage are stronger when visitors and participants encounter services and rules that respect dignity and diversity. Promoting a uniformly rosy image while ignoring real complaints or restricting criticism increases the risk of losing trust and makes messages less believable. “Iraq’s image” is therefore built through the quality of experience, not control over discourse.

A fourth, institutional obstacle is fragmented attribution and data. Cultural budgets overlap with tourism and antiquities, while data series fail to separate creative industries from general services; a festival audience is counted once by a governorate and again by a media agency. The solution does not require a surveillance system tracking individuals, but project definitions and mechanisms for attendance, satisfaction, impact and independent review using aggregated, anonymised data.

Significant asset
Weak conservation/production infrastructure
Limited access and translation
Inconsistent experience
Impact that evaporates

Figure (2): The causal bottleneck: a historic name alone does not build a network of voluntary respect

7. Heritage, antiquities and living culture: protection before display

Iraqi heritage serves multiple functions: an archive of knowledge about Mesopotamian civilisations, an educational and rights-related resource for society, a foundation for crafts, jobs and local services, and a bridge to communities around the world. Conservation cannot be judged solely by annual visitor numbers. Archaeological work requires defined site boundaries; management of encroachment, soil, climate, pollution, flooding and vandalism; and protection of objects, stores, records and visitor safety, consistent with UNESCO’s state-of-conservation observations. No site without a basic management plan should enter a broad international campaign that increases pressure on it.

The vision uses a “site–community–museum–content” pathway instead of building an isolated monument. The competent authority begins by assessing risks, rights and maintenance needs, then develops interpretation in appropriate languages and an evidence-based scholarly narrative. It trains guides, craftspeople and local accommodation providers, publishes information on safe and equitable access for persons with disabilities, and connects the site with schools, institutes, research centres and local associations. Religious practice, a craft or the marshes must not be depicted as a folkloric spectacle for sale without the community’s consent and benefit.

The recovery of looted antiquities requires a framework separate from promotional campaigns: a unified reference inventory of objects and manuscripts; files documenting ownership, provenance and photographs; criminal, customs, judicial and diplomatic cooperation; and a responsible disclosure system that protects investigations. This connects to the obligations and guidance of the 1970 UNESCO Convention. The number of objects returned in a particular year may change because of a single large case, so it cannot alone provide an absolute measure of the success of heritage protection policy.12

Asset/channel Precondition for promotion Expected output Harm safeguard
Archaeological site Conservation, safety, boundary and information-security plan Responsible visits, scholarly content and research cooperation Carrying-capacity threshold and suspension of admission when risk arises
Museums and collections Digital inventory and ownership/provenance rights Loans, exhibitions and restitution agreements Legal review and transport security/insurance
Intangible heritage Community consent, skill transmission and sensitive archiving Living creativity, participation and exchange No cultural appropriation/exploitation
Creative city A sustainable network of publishers and independent events Translation, exchange programmes and production Separate literary freedom from official discourse
Marshes and cultural landscapes Water, ecosystems and protection of residents’ livelihoods Environmental education and low-impact tourism Environmental limits and local community rights

Table (5): Heritage matrix: a campaign must not precede a conservation, rights and safety plan.

8. Education and scientific exchange: a network of trust for generations, not just a scholarship count

An international student can become a credible ambassador of experience if they receive quality education, care and recognition of their qualification, encounter a diverse university community, and later return to describe their experience voluntarily. The ministry should therefore not reward universities solely for the number of scholarships announced. The student journey includes fair publicity; admission, language and visa requirements; housing, insurance and services; teaching, laboratories and supervision; and then recognition, complaints, graduation and continued links with the university. Completion and satisfaction rates should be published by programme type and university in ways that protect individual privacy.

Science diplomacy grows from long-term research partnerships: joint projects, reciprocal peer-reviewed publication, laboratory training, short courses and solutions to shared Iraqi problems such as water, antiquities, medicine and digital heritage. An agreement with a foreign university should not count as productive cooperation before it generates work, training, academic recognition or documented publication. Student exchange also remains part of the quality of education and higher education addressed in the human-resources and science doors, while this chapter’s role concerns the external channel, trust, partnerships and a continuing alumni network.

External interest
Documented admission
Enrolment and care
Learning/graduation
Connected alumni
Subsequent partnership

Figure (3): The “Study in Iraq” impact chain: stages that cannot be reduced to scholarship numbers

9. Art, creativity and content: from individual production to global circulation

Foreign policy cannot “order” the production of a globally successful film or music that people love. Appeal emerges when writers, artists, publishers, designers, theatre practitioners and filmmakers have rights, skills, finance, distribution and fair competition that allow diverse styles, languages and criticism. The state’s role begins with copyright, transparency, contracts, education, training, exhibition spaces and easier travel and exchange, not with directing artistic content to serve a predetermined official image.

Good Iraqi work faces an access bottleneck: unclear translation rights, a local publisher without an overseas distributor, subtitling and dubbing costs, weak links with festivals, museums and agents, or difficulty transferring revenues. The vision therefore proposes a limited competitive fund for translation, rights and entry into creative markets, with public criteria, independent expert assessment and disclosure of beneficiaries and results. A grant must not become permanent product support without audience demand or quality.

A cultural product should be measured from multiple perspectives: quality, diversity, an overseas distribution programme, repeat demand, protected rights, revenues and professional critical recognition. An independent performance can have a major qualitative impact on a small foreign community. Purchased digital views or extensive media exposure therefore do not equal lasting “appreciation”. Access to production for women, young people, persons with disabilities and Iraq’s different languages is also a matter of justice and opportunity, not a publicity exercise.

UNESCO’s Culture|2030 framework includes indicators for the cultural economy, cultural employment, trade in cultural goods and services, cultural education, participation and artistic freedom; these provide a methodological starting point. The global economic shares of cultural industries must not be projected onto Iraqi output, because activity, accounting and establishment classifications differ. The vision proposes experimental cultural and creative activity accounts with the statistical authority, using international classifications and beginning with definitions of establishments, workers, products and intellectual property rights.13

Value-chain link Legitimate support Good indicator Failure signal
Skill formation Artistic and technical training and open laboratories Qualified output and transition to the market Many workshops with no subsequent production
Copyright and contracts Transparent licence templates and legal assistance Valid contracts and fair collection of revenues Unlicensed content or exploitation
Translation and localisation Competitive grants, language review and subtitling Publications and independent distribution platforms Translations stored without an audience
Festivals Logistics, competition and jury accreditation Screening/distribution contracts and repeat invitations Delegation photographs without actual access
Digital platforms Transparent promotion, market data and analytics A sustained audience and verifiable revenues Paid or fake views

Table (6): The international arts value chain | Performance criteria and safeguards for the independence of cultural production.

10. Sport: community diplomacy without politicising victory

Sport provides direct encounters that transcend language and division in most societies, but it is not an automatic certificate of moral standing for any state. Iraq can use hosting competitions and exchanges involving youth, women, persons with disabilities, referees and coaches to create spaces for cooperation and shared feeling. However, the independence of sports federations under their rules, participants’ rights and spectator safety must be protected. Discrimination, violence, doping and fraud must be combated, and the national team must not become a platform for settling political disputes.

Basra 2023 offers an important case of hosting a regional event and the national team winning the twenty-fifth Gulf Cup, a fact documented by the Asian Football Confederation. The implementation lesson is not to turn every sporting success into a demand for another huge competition, but to conduct a cost–benefit analysis before hosting: stadium, transport, ticketing, accommodation and emergency capacity; effects on local schools and clubs; a post-tournament budget; visitor and media experience; and everyone’s safety. Where these conditions are absent, small, repeated events are preferable to a large project that stalls after the occasion.14

International sports programmes should connect to joint training pathways and twinning agreements between clubs, universities and youth centres, opening safe and equitable opportunities for individual sports, women’s sport and sport for persons with disabilities. Impact is measured through continuing participants, partnerships lasting a year or more, accredited training, spectator conduct and independent assessment of attendance, security and organisation; it is not confined to medal counts or guest photographs.

11. Tourism: human experience and the credibility of place

Religious, archaeological, cultural, environmental, rural and urban tourism serve different markets and distinct service pathways. The state must not describe millions attending a religious occasion as millions of “international tourists”, or assume every visitor stays overnight or spends in a particular governorate. Nor should it disregard millions of visitors because some travel for religion rather than leisure. The system classifies visits by usual residence, nationality, destination, purpose, length of stay, overnight stays and expenditure, following the International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2008, while separating domestic and inbound visits, day trips and repeat visitors.15

Improving the visitor experience starts before arrival, with truthful information about open sites, seasons, prices, access routes, visit conditions and services. It extends to border crossings, transport, road safety, signs, service-provider conduct, insurance, cleanliness, toilets, connectivity, assistance for persons with disabilities and complaints. Campaigns must not conceal weaknesses; they should connect publicity to a service plan that reviews complaints, addresses their causes and clarifies visitor rights and site protection.

Geographical focus does not mean “visit everything in one trip”, but limited itineraries that begin ready and maintainable: Basra and the marshes within water and environmental capacity; Baghdad, literature and museums; Babylon and historic cities; Mosul and its diverse heritage; Najaf and Karbala under crowd-service rules; and Erbil and the region’s other governorates through institutional coordination. Each itinerary is implemented with communities, the private sector, security bodies and professional organisations. Agencies must not sell promises of access to a closed or dangerous site.

The test of a destination’s success does not begin with ticket numbers alone. It uses post-trip visitor satisfaction, repeat visits documented through an independent sample, complaints resolved within a deadline, verified average additional local spending, local employment shares, sites with effective conservation plans and an environmental safety indicator. An ecological itinerary must not seek the largest possible number of visitors if the site’s capacity is lower. Under pressure, regulated quotas and appropriately timed seasonal visits are preferable to numerical growth.

Realistic promise before travel
Clear entry and arrival
Safe, respectful experience
Complaint resolution
Independent evaluation
Voluntary return/recommendation

Figure (4): The visitor journey: actual quality underpins the account visitors carry into the world

12. Iraq’s international image: reputation as a testable outcome, not a single narrative

An international image is not a large billboard. People perceive other countries through travel, relatives, students, shops, art, sport, news and official institutions. Channels differ by country, age, language, diaspora and motivation: a company seeking legal data does not respond to the same messages as a student interested in a scholarship or a reader seeking a novel. They must not all be measured by a single social-engagement indicator.

The state can create a “multilingual Iraqi facts library” containing up-to-date reference information about heritage, study programmes, events, museums, services, visas and general risks, with original links, licensed images, contact details and update dates. It should not replace independent journalism or turn facts into a vehicle for deception. Credibility requires publishing corrections and responding to errors, and referring journalists and researchers to specialised authorities rather than managing a single answer to every question.

Iraqi communities abroad are a two-way connection resource. They can contribute translation, exchange, guidance, twinning, grants and events, but their members must not automatically be treated as government representatives, have their political data collected or be subjected to pressure. Partnership should rest on individuals’ choice and the initiatives of professional and cultural institutions, respecting different views and freedom to integrate in their countries of residence.

The vision proposes an “international perception survey” in 2027 across selected markets and audiences likely to visit, study or cooperate culturally, with a defined, public sample, a consistent questionnaire and a record of open-ended responses. It measures accurate knowledge of Iraq, trust in information, willingness to visit or study under stated conditions, and negative perceptions whose causes can be addressed. Repeat surveys must not cover only favourable markets; the sample should combine neighbouring countries, target markets and contexts of criticism or sensitive perceptions.

Documented fact
Multilingual access
Independent experience
Audience evaluation
Correction/improvement
Trust over time

Figure (5): Sustainable reputation: truthful information and experience come before paid media reach

13. Rights, diversity and non-governmental partners

Culture cannot be a source of appeal if its bearers lose the freedom to participate in defining its meaning. Iraq’s soft power rests on religious, ethnic, linguistic, regional and artistic diversity and the history of its different cities. This is a sensitive asset that requires avoiding the reduction of identity to one colour or official story. The proposed design ensures participation by local community representatives, universities, independent institutions, researchers, unions, the private sector and youth centres as appropriate to each programme, while preventing participation from being used to display token consent.

Freedom of artistic expression, academic research and diverse narrative sources contribute to the state’s credibility. The vision does not require every work to promote institutional performance; a critical film or literary work may present a more human and appealing image than a celebratory advertisement. Artistic juries should therefore be separate from official communications management, with transparent grant criteria, independent appeals, respect for intellectual property and artists’ right to choose lawful partners and methods.

Cooperation with the diaspora, missions and foreign universities should use the minimum personal data required under the law. Beneficiary lists or photographs of children must not be published without an appropriate basis and consent. Events must follow standards for non-discrimination, accessibility and prevention of harassment and exploitation, and protect antiquities against unlawful excavation and sale. No company or institution may receive a monopoly over “Iraq’s image” or use public heritage for exclusive commercial purposes without competition and clear rules.

Domestic cultural rights should be protected before seeking external standing. Programmes confined to the capital do not represent the whole population, and translation that ignores local languages fails to introduce the world to Iraq’s diversity. Each programme should therefore adopt a published criterion for representation of governorates and groups based on quality, feasibility and implementation capacity, measuring actual access rather than merely names on a committee.

14. Lessons from four Iraqi cases: testing programme design

15.1 Mosul: UNESCO documented the completion of rehabilitation of major landmarks and extensive international investment exceeding USD 115 million since the launch of the Revive the Spirit of Mosul initiative in 2018, including rehabilitation of 124 historic houses and 404 classrooms. The project encompassed Islamic and Christian heritage, local communities and restoration skills. The transferable lesson is not the funding amount, but the combination of heritage, the city, people and everyday function. A token miniature version in another city cannot reproduce the effect without residents, ownership and maintenance.16

15.4 “Study in Iraq”: the programme represents the beginning of an existing international academic network. It should underpin a student-journey record from interest through registration, graduation and subsequent contact, with multilingual satisfaction surveys at participating universities. Ambitions to expand numbers must not reduce education and service quality for Iraqi or incoming students. The difference between scholarships offered, used and cancelled places should be published rather than combining them under a single “beneficiary” label.1718

Case Established asset Replicable mechanism What must not be inferred
Reviving Mosul Restoration of landmarks, houses and classrooms, and cultural revival Integration of community, heritage, education and international partners That any restoration automatically increases external trust
Baghdad/literature UNESCO network membership since 2015 City diplomacy, translation exchange and writers’ programmes That membership alone produces a cultural or financial return
Basra/Gulf Cup Documented hosting and championship victory in 2023 Proportionate hosting, sporting exchange and visitor evaluation That all attendees are international tourists or represent net income
Study in Iraq Government programme since 2023/24, with its fourth cycle in 2026 Volunteer alumni, partnerships and quality assurance That offered scholarships equal actual graduates

Table (7): Four Iraqi cases: mechanisms, limits and outcomes requiring independent evidence.

15. International comparison: transfer the mechanism, not the scale or rhetoric

Finland offers a model of country-image governance rather than imposing a single narrative. The Finland Promotion Board provides open multilingual materials and tools and periodic reports on external perceptions based on surveys, media monitoring and missions’ experience. The useful mechanism for Iraq is a unified, correctable facts repository, linking communication to perception research and assessment of annual changes. This does not assume that Finnish public-trust issues, resources or administrative arrangements resemble Iraq’s.19

The British Council’s 2024 study of soft power and cultural relations across several countries shows cultural roles moving closer to foreign and economic policy, with an increasing need for coordination and domestic benefit. The relevant lesson is to protect the connection between diplomacy and public value without replacing human exchange with official campaigns or using culture to suppress differences.20

Comparative reference Practical mechanism Experimental Iraqi application Limit to transfer
Finland A library of materials and a country narrative supported by periodic image surveys Multilingual Iraq library + three-region survey in 2027 Do not assume identical institutional trust
Japan Foundation An exchange institution operating through multi-year programmes and reports A network of existing cultural and university centres, followed by partnerships Do not create a huge apparatus from the outset
British Council Critical assessment of the interaction between culture, trust and policy Independent performance evaluation and clear limits to attribution Culture must not be subordinated to a publicity decision
UNESCO Culture|2030 framework 22 indicators across multiple dimensions Select a small, available and reliable set in 2027 Do not project global percentages onto Iraq

Table (8): Methodological comparison: replicate tools and evaluation rules, not institutions on a scale unsuited to Iraq’s circumstances.

16. The reference scenario and alternatives: what if institutions do not change?

The second pathway, “realistic reform”, is the adopted one. In 2027–2030 it focuses on five conditions: data and rights; conservation and visitor-experience projects at a limited number of sites; universities and alumni networks; governed translation and distribution grants; and independent image measurement. Resources are reallocated towards programmes that have endured, attracted satisfied participants and closed real gaps. The outcome is gradual improvement in access, partnerships, responsible local spending and the quality of reputation, not an assumed leap in international rankings.

Pathway Decisive assumption Potential qualitative outcome Warning/transition signals
Reference case without reform Separate activities and programmes without an indicator or data owner Occasional appeal; persistent access and conservation gaps Repeated campaigns without progress in conservation, satisfaction or participation
Realistic reform Existing coordination + a unified baseline + transparent incentives Gradual progress in exchange, satisfaction, participation and partnerships Improved service quality and continuing programme contracts
Conditional acceleration Local capabilities, multi-year financing and greater trust Faster expansion verifiable through unified indicators Cumulative alumni retention, distribution of works and repeat visits

Table (9): Policy scenarios, not numerical forecasts: data gaps must not be filled with undisclosed expert estimates.

17. Iraq’s image in 2045 and the theory of change

In 2045 Iraq will have the “capacity for presence” if it becomes known through multiple experiences and institutions rather than a single event. Researchers can visit conserved sites and access published archives and clear rights; readers encounter professionally translated Iraqi works; international students study in reliable programmes and leave with enduring connections; athletes take part in safe events; and visitors see cooperating cultural cities and living crafts that respect their practitioners. International impact then arises from the choices of individuals, universities, organisers and cultural buyers themselves.

The theory of change has seven links: first, local institutions protect rights and assets; second, authentic, high-quality products and services; third, external access through appropriate languages and channels; fourth, safe real-world experience; fifth, independent evaluation and trust; sixth, repeated partnerships and exchange; and seventh, reinvestment of income and reputation in protecting assets and skills. No missing link can automatically be replaced by a media campaign or an official visit.

Rights and conservation Diverse professional production External access channel Actual experience Demonstrated trust Exchange and partnerships Learning and sustainability

Figure (6): Theory of change to 2045: appeal is tested in the recipient’s experience, not the sender’s message

18. Transformation stages, 2027–2045, and transition conditions

The first year, 2027, does not assume Iraq is building cultural and university institutions from scratch. Reforms begin with an inventory of existing programmes, sites and cooperation networks; designation of data owners; selection of five pilot destinations or itineraries based on conservation and service readiness rather than political representation; the first perception survey in target markets; and a standardised report on scholarships, accommodation guests, cultural events and sporting impact. No large promotional budget is assigned to a site before responsibility for visitor safety is established.

The 2028–2030 period is a “proof of capability” stage: launching an auditable register of cultural sites and visitor-service points; a competitive translation and distribution programme; alumni networks and housing, satisfaction and graduation indicators for incoming students; independent evaluation of at least two sporting/cultural events annually within the sample; and linking creative-city experiments to publishers and universities rather than a slogan. Expansion is tied to effective results demonstrated in public annual reports.

Period Expected institutional output Transition gate
2027 Inventory of assets, programmes and data owners; design of perception and tourism surveys Approve definitions and coverage before publishing quantitative targets
2028–2030 5 pilot itineraries, a translation-grant framework, an alumni programme and evaluation reports Verify conservation, services and actual independent participation
2031–2035 Expand viable partnerships to new governorates and institutions Actual partnership continuity for 3 years, not merely signatures
2036–2040 Recurring international networks and geographical and sectoral evaluation rounds Measurable improvement across multiple audiences and pathways
2041–2045 Financing, conservation and sustainability; voluntary trust and partnerships independent of a campaign Institutional external evaluation, correction and termination of weak activities

Table (10): Vision implementation stages, a strategic proposal conditional on the 2027 baseline.

19. Indicator dashboard and targets: measuring capability and impact

The indicators below are **proposed policy targets**, not statistical forecasts or legally established outcomes. Denominators, coverage and baselines are established in 2027. Stage percentages may be recalibrated during the first methodological review, provided that the decision record is published and measurement rules are not changed silently. Every percentage must be accompanied by its value and underlying count, and a target for pilot governorates must not be converted into a judgement about Iraq as a whole.

Code/indicator 2027 - baseline 2030 2035 2040 2045
S01 Effective conservation plans for priority sites Inventory of a fixed sample 50% 75% 90% 100%
S02 Intangible heritage elements with updated community safeguarding plans Inventory of 14 elements/their files 50% 70% 85% 100%
S03 Pilot sites with accessibility and satisfaction data and visitor management Define 5 itineraries 5 10 16 20
S04 Visitor complaints resolved within the announced deadline Unified service survey 60% 80% 90% 95%
S05 Visitor satisfaction with services in the independent sample 2027 sample survey ≥75% ≥82% ≥86% ≥90%
S06 Incoming students continuing into the following year Administrative-record baseline Improvement of +5 points +10 points +13 points +15 points
S07 University partnerships producing a project or actual exchange Project/university identifier ×1.3 ×1.8 ×2.4 ×3.0
S08 Iraqi works with verifiable international translation/distribution Inventory of contracts and distribution ×1.5 ×2.2 ×3.0 ×4.0
S09 International sporting/cultural programmes with published evaluations Inventory of sampled events 50% 75% 90% 100%
S10 Accurate knowledge of Iraq in external samples Independent survey of fixed markets +2 points +5 points +8 points +10 points
S11 Annual reports completed with open evidence List of approved programmes 70% 85% 95% 100%

Table (11): Proposed 2027–2045 targets | Percentages refer to the approved programme, sites or sample, and multiples to the audited 2027 baseline; all are subject to testing and approval.

20. Indicator definitions and safeguards against manipulation

S01 = the number of sites predetermined in the priority list that pass an independent review of management, conservation, safety and maintenance-budget plans ÷ the total number of sites on that same list. The denominator changes only in an announced cycle. A plan is not “effective” merely because a PDF exists if it lacks a responsible official, maintenance expenditure, a safety decision and a visitor plan. World Heritage state-of-conservation reports are reviewed separately as an external verification source.

S02 measures the presence of a living safeguarding plan prepared with the communities concerned, verifying recent skill/practice transmission and decision-making by its bearers; UNESCO inscription alone is not a safeguarding plan. S03 counts an itinerary as ready when sites, services, accessibility and visit conditions, contact information and objection procedures are published and tested with a visitor sample; this differs from “opening a road or building”.

S04 = legitimate complaints closed with the complainant’s consent or an approved reason within the announced deadline ÷ accepted complaints during a reference period. Appeal rates and reopening outcomes are published to prevent cases from being closed only on paper. S05 = visitors reporting positive satisfaction on a fixed scale ÷ eligible respondents in a random post-visit sample, with a documented minimum sample, margin of error and response rate.

S06 measures students in an international programme who enrolled and continued into the next academic year under the same identifier; it excludes announced but unused scholarships. S07 verifies at least one scientific/exchange contract, publication or training activity documented by both parties during the year, not the signing of a memorandum. S08 verifies an international sale, distribution, exhibition or documented translated publication with a clear rights agreement, excluding translation contracts without publication or presentation.

S09 = events within the predetermined national plan with actual budgets and published performance, safety, satisfaction and participation evaluations ÷ the number of planned events. S10 keeps the knowledge question, countries, core groups, sampling, weights and survey timing consistent; it reports the margin of error and prohibits comparison of an open social-media questionnaire with a probability survey. S11 combines output, financial and conflict-of-interest reporting, beneficiary-experience data and external verification for each programme; it does not mean simply publishing a media announcement.

Allocations and activities
Quality and accessibility
Use and participation
Enduring relationship
Perceived trust measured in a sample

Figure (7): Measurement pyramid: activity, quality and impact must not be combined into one cosmetic figure

21. Implementation programme package: ten initiatives starting with existing capacity

Programme SP-01 — Cultural accounts and the international impact observatory. Led by the statistical authority in coordination with the ministries responsible for culture, tourism, antiquities, higher education, foreign affairs and sport, and the governorates. It begins in 2027 with an inventory of cultural, tourism, artistic and sporting data and definitions, then publishes a multi-level dashboard with open methodological data, linking every target to a denominator, year, unit and responsible party. No new platform is created before testing connections to what agencies already produce.

Programme SP-02 — Living heritage and safe-site itineraries. It starts with 5 pilot itineraries across different settings, selected professionally and with community consent, then expands gradually after checking conservation, carrying capacity, residents’ rights and antiquities protection. Outputs include multilingual site information, safety plans, accredited guides, a complaints system and limited support for site-related crafts. Financial disbursements are linked not only to attendance but also to a site-condition indicator.

Programme SP-04 — The “Study in Iraq” and international alumni network. Implemented by the Ministry of Higher Education and qualified universities through their existing programmes, it connects actual registration to quality requirements for accommodation, teaching and services, then launches an optional alumni network, research partnerships, twinning and short-term projects. It begins by auditing programme names and stages without redefining announced scholarships as enrolled students.

Programme SP-06 — Sport as a bridge of trust. It selects medium-sized events and exchanges based on readiness, cost and sporting security, supporting young people, coaches, women’s sport and persons with disabilities. Before hosting, it requires a file covering spectator flows, accommodation, transport, safety, maintenance and subsequent facility use, and prohibits opaque fees to partners or agents.

Programme SP-09 — International perception observatory and independent evaluation. Implemented by an evaluation unit involving universities, statistical bodies and independent experts under consistent sampling rules and defined geographical areas, with a published periodic survey methodology and qualitative and quantitative indicator report. It prohibits selecting only the most sympathetic groups, and survey findings must not justify forcing content creators into a single government narrative.

Programme SP-10 — Protection of heritage in circulation and digital memory. Based on inventories, digitisation, protection of community and individual rights, tracking looted-antiquities files and international legal coordination under applicable rules, with priorities for conservation and digital risks affecting images and documents. It connects museums, universities and conservation experts without disclosing sensitive data or property exposed to theft.

22. Implementation, financing and dependencies matrix

Three operating-cost categories are used before a proper feasibility study: (L) relatively low, implemented mainly by reallocating administrative work or existing resources; (M) medium, requiring programme expenditure, procurement, training and monitoring; and (H) high, involving conservation or infrastructure works that may require capital investment and quality review. These letters do not specify a final budget. Each programme is costed in dinars after a detailed scope, alternatives, financing and implications for subsequent years are established; no national total unsupported by invoices or market prices should be announced.

Programme/output Lead agency and partners Time horizon Cost category/financing Funding or suspension condition
SP-01 Cultural accounts and data Statistical authority/culture authorities and universities 2027–2030 L; existing statistical allocation Data dictionary and annual coverage review
SP-02 5 heritage/visitor itineraries Culture and antiquities/governorates and environment authorities 2027–2045 M/H; conservation budget and conditional partnerships Site plan and lifecycle cost before promotion
SP-03 Translation and distribution Culture authorities/publishers and independent panels 2028–2045 M; public competitive grants Rights and distribution contract and conflict-of-interest declaration
SP-04 International students and alumni Higher education/universities 2027–2045 M; programme and university budgets Minimum quality, retention, service and complaints standards
SP-05 Diaspora partnerships Foreign affairs/cultural institutions 2028–2045 L/M; partnerships and joint projects Data consent and beneficiary independence
SP-06 International sport Sport authorities and independent federations/governorates 2028–2045 M/H; an approved programme for each event Feasible maintenance, safety and post-event use
SP-07 Visitor experience Tourism/interior, transport and municipalities 2027–2045 M; services and procedural improvements Satisfaction measurement, complaint resolution and agency coordination
SP-08 Multilingual facts and heritage Culture and foreign affairs/custodian bodies 2027–2035 L; sources and content services Original sources, licences and public corrections
SP-09 International perception evaluation Independent evaluator/universities and statistical authority 2027–2045 L/M; commissioned studies Fixed sample and published scholarly report
SP-10 Heritage inventory and rights Antiquities/museums and competent foreign affairs bodies 2027–2045 M/H; prioritised protection and digitisation Data security, documentation and preservation of ownership

Table (12): Programme management matrix | Costs remain qualitative until a feasibility study and approved allocation exist; outputs are measurable.

23. Risk register and safeguards: how can soft power avoid causing harm?

A soft-power policy does not succeed if it increases appeal momentarily but weakens heritage conservation or artistic freedom, or misleads guests about safety that is unavailable. Each programme therefore has stop and escalation thresholds and a source review before campaigning, with clear responsibility. General risks are presented administratively, while site-security details and data about students, individuals and antiquities are protected for safety and privacy.

Risk Early warning signal Owner and response Institutional safeguard
Commodifying a fragile site Increasing visitor pressure or emerging deterioration Site manager reduces admissions and reassesses Conservation plan before the campaign and an ecological tourism limit
Untruthful publicity Increasing complaints/corrections from independent sources Publishing body corrects the information and displays the update date Facts library, links and content review
Politicising culture and universities Requiring loyalty or excluding critical voices Independent panel, appeals and suspension of biased support Funding criteria that protect freedom of expression
Corruption in translation/event support Repeated awards to connected parties or contracts without distribution Procurement oversight, conflict-of-interest controls and cancellation Peer-reviewed assessment and published contracts
Misuse of student/diaspora data Circulation of individual lists without authorisation University/foreign affairs authorities halt processing Consent, data minimisation and privacy review
Oversized sports hosting Cost overruns/delayed maintenance/security shortcomings Responsible sporting body reviews hosting feasibility Quality gate and lifecycle budget
Misleading tourist statistics Duplicate visitor counting and conflation of guests/delegations Statistical authority corrects the series definition Published denominator and prohibition on adding incompatible series
Ignoring community diversity Objections from heritage-bearing communities Cultural body renews consultation and reviews use rights Meaningful participation and protection of narrative ownership
Excessive dependence on an external donor Grant suspension/changed conditions or content direction Implementing body reviews the sustainability model No reliance on unsecured permanent operating finance
Security/climate shock Safety warning or environmental/site damage Competent authority suspends promotion/visits Digital alternative plans and a legitimate compensation mechanism

Table (13): Proposed risk register | Reviewed quarterly in pilot programmes and annually after stabilisation.

24. Governance and independent evaluation: from indicator to decision

The soft-power system needs a coordinator, not a new authority monopolising culture: a small official steering committee or government coordination process within the existing structure, including culture, higher education, tourism, foreign affairs, sport, statistics and professional and independent representatives when needed. Its mandate is to inventory objectives and dependencies and coordinate indicators, not censor artistic or teaching content. Each agency owns its project, financing and contracts, while shared obstacles are escalated to the Council of Ministers or competent authorities under the law.

Implementation teams meet every three months around a limited list of services and projects: site conservation status, visitor satisfaction, distributed translations, actual university partnerships, evaluated sporting programmes and publication of reliable data. The report presents “what was done, what stalled, what stopped, and why”, alongside a baseline, approved budget, expenditure and progress. A programme is not rated successful merely for exhausting its allocation.

Cultural programmes involving significant expenditure undergo independent review every two years, with before-and-after evaluation of hosting or international campaigns where a suitable sample and comparison group can be designed. When causal attribution cannot be established, the report says “associated with”, not “caused”. Perception indicators are presented alongside statistical confidence and external context. Sensitive heritage sites undergo periodic review by independent conservation experts even when visitor numbers rise.

Budget and programme
Independent measurement
Quarterly review
Continue/correct/stop decision
Update the baseline and publish

Figure (8): Governance cycle: every indicator leads to a decision and an accountable party, not a decorative dashboard

25. Chapter boundaries, conclusion and bridge to Iraq as a regional hub

The chapter covered the six official pathways: culture, education, art, sport, tourism and Iraq’s international image, redefining them as a network of trust, exchange and testable outcomes. It left to other volumes detailed general and higher education reform; protection of artistic employment and investment and industry rules; administration of state visas, roads, energy and hotels; security and constitutional powers; and investment, trade and economic diplomacy mechanisms. It proposed no new ministry and set no comprehensive financial value without a feasibility study.

“Iraq as a Regional Hub” in V4-D09-C05 receives three conclusions: first, Iraq possesses stories, communities and institutions capable of communicating beyond its borders; second, trust and cultural, scientific and sporting relations can support the appeal of cities, corridors and partnerships without replacing the requirements of transport, security, energy and industry; and third, reasonable regional leadership rests on actually serving others, not declaring geographical centrality or presumed cultural influence.

26. Gap and assumption register and closure plan

Gap or assumption Required source/closure method Responsible agency Decision date
Break in hotel comparability between 2023/2024 Survey reports, descriptive tables, coverage and governorates Statistical authority Audit in 2027
International arrivals rather than accommodation guests Carefully designed linkage of border/hotel data under IRTS 2008 Statistics, tourism and interior authorities 2027–2028
Cultural expenditure, value added and employment Experimental cultural accounts and classification of establishments and services Statistics and culture authorities 2027–2029
Sites with funded management plans Inventory of sites, conservation status, permits and maintenance Antiquities authorities and governorates 2027
Transmission of intangible heritage skills Community plan, secure documentation and skill-transmission activities Culture authorities and communities 2027–2028
Attending international students and graduates Annual registration, retention, graduation and satisfaction database Higher education authorities and universities 2027
International distribution of cultural works Rights and translation contracts and independent sales/exhibitions Producers/publishers and grant-making bodies 2027–2028
Iraq’s external image Independent multi-market, multi-audience survey with a published sample Independent evaluator/foreign affairs authorities 2027
Programme costs and benefits Programme memoranda, options appraisal and lifecycle financing Ministry/finance and competent authorities Before each approval

Table (14): A gap register that must not be filled with guesswork; published administrative sources are not always sufficient to calculate national impact.

Documentation notes

  1. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Iraq State Party Profile (R01), six sites; and the World Heritage Committee’s 2026 decisions on endangered sites (R02).↩︎

  2. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage, Iraq country listing (R03), fourteen inscribed elements through 2025, including shared elements; UNESCO Creative Cities Network, Baghdad (R04).↩︎

  3. UNESCO, Revive the Spirit of Mosul (R05), and the announcement of the inauguration of rehabilitated landmarks in September 2025 (R06): more than USD 115 million mobilised, 124 historic houses and 404 classrooms, alongside cultural and education projects.↩︎

  4. Ministry of Higher Education, “Study in Iraq” programme statements for 2024 and 2026 (R09 and R15). The figures concern different admission, registration and launch-cycle stages, not a series of enrolled students who graduated.↩︎

  5. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority, tourism statistics indicators table for 2020–2024 (R07), and the list of hotel survey and tourism expenditure reports (R08). Guest numbers do not equal international tourist numbers.↩︎

  6. Iraqi Council of Representatives, Constitution of the Republic of Iraq 2005, Articles 34, 35, 36 and 38 and federal/local competences (R13).↩︎

  7. UNESCO, Iraq Ratified Conventions (R14); the 2005 Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, with Iraq’s accession date of 21 July 2013 (R15).↩︎

  8. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Iraq State Party Profile (R01), six sites; and the World Heritage Committee’s 2026 decisions on endangered sites (R02).↩︎

  9. Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority, tourism statistics indicators table for 2020–2024 (R07), and the list of hotel survey and tourism expenditure reports (R08). Guest numbers do not equal international tourist numbers.↩︎

  10. Ministry of Higher Education, “Study in Iraq” programme statements for 2024 and 2026 (R09 and R15). The figures concern different admission, registration and launch-cycle stages, not a series of enrolled students who graduated.↩︎

  11. Ministry of Higher Education, third “Study in Iraq” cycle, 2025/26, more than 16,000 announced scholarships (R10); fourth-cycle statement on 4 May 2026 (R11).↩︎

  12. UNESCO, Basic Texts of the 1970 Convention, second edition 2026 (R16), and the record of Iraq’s cultural convention obligations (R14).↩︎

  13. UNESCO Culture|2030 Indicators (R17), 22 indicators across four dimensions; UNESCO Global Cultural Policies report (R23). Global percentages are not Iraqi values.↩︎

  14. Asian Football Confederation, Iraq’s victory in the twenty-fifth Gulf Cup in Basra on 19 January 2023, statement dated 20 January (R12).↩︎

  15. UN Tourism, International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2008 (IRTS 2008), R18. Distinguishing accommodation guests, visitors, international tourists, overnight stays and expenditure.↩︎

  16. UNESCO, Revive the Spirit of Mosul (R05), and the announcement of the inauguration of rehabilitated landmarks in September 2025 (R06): more than USD 115 million mobilised, 124 historic houses and 404 classrooms, alongside cultural and education projects.↩︎

  17. Ministry of Higher Education, “Study in Iraq” programme statements for 2024 and 2026 (R09 and R15). The figures concern different admission, registration and launch-cycle stages, not a series of enrolled students who graduated.↩︎

  18. Ministry of Higher Education, third “Study in Iraq” cycle, 2025/26, more than 16,000 announced scholarships (R10); fourth-cycle statement on 4 May 2026 (R11).↩︎

  19. Finland Promotion Board, Finland Toolbox (R19 and R24): multilingual materials and the annual review of Finland’s image abroad.↩︎

  20. British Council, MacDonald & Murray (2024), Soft Power at a Turning Point, Comparative Analysis (R22).↩︎

External references and sources

  1. R01 — UNESCO World Heritage Centre — Iraq, State Party Profile; list of sites and conservation decisions, accessed October 2026. Source
  2. R02 — UNESCO World Heritage Committee, 2026, Decisions and State of Conservation; World Heritage Committee 48; the cases of Ashur, Hatra and Samarra. Source
  3. R03 — UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage — Iraq; register of inscribed elements, 2025/2026. Source
  4. R04 — UNESCO Creative Cities Network — Baghdad; City of Literature since 2015. Source
  5. R05 — UNESCO — Revive the Spirit of Mosul; restoration, houses, schools and community programmes through 2025. Source
  6. R06 — UNESCO — Iraq PM Inaugurates Rehabilitated Mosul Landmarks; 16 September 2025; landmarks and partnerships. Source
  7. R07 — Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority, tourism statistics indicators; 2020–2024 table for hotels, guests and revenues. Source
  8. R08 — Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority, tourism reports; hotel surveys for 2015–2024 and tourism expenditure for 2019 and 2023. Source
  9. R09 — Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Study in Iraq First/Second Edition; April 2024 statement on admitted and registered students. Source
  10. R10 — Ministry of Higher Education, Study in Iraq Third Edition; April 2025; more than 16 thousand announced scholarships. Source
  11. R11 — Ministry of Higher Education, Study in Iraq Fourth Edition; May 2026; fourth cycle and participating universities. Source
  12. R12 — Asian Football Confederation (AFC), Iraq’s Gulf Cup 25 victory; 20 January 2023; the final in Basra. Source
  13. R13 — Iraqi Council of Representatives, Constitution of the Republic of Iraq 2005; Articles 34, 35, 36 and 38 and competences. Source
  14. R14 — UNESCO, Iraq — International Conventions Ratified; heritage conventions of 1970, 2003 and 2005. Source
  15. R15 — UNESCO, Convention for Diversity of Cultural Expressions; Iraq’s accession on 21 July 2013. Source
  16. R16 — UNESCO, 1970 Convention Basic Texts (2026); combating illicit trafficking in cultural property. Source
  17. R17 — UNESCO, Culture|2030 Indicators; 22 indicators across four dimensions; an international framework, not an Iraqi baseline. Source
  18. R18 — UN Tourism, International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2008; methodology for visits, purpose, overnight stays and expenditure. Source
  19. R19 — Finland Promotion Board, Finland Toolbox and Country Image; country-image materials and surveys, 2025–2026. Source
  20. R20 — Finland Promotion Board, About Finland Toolbox; licensed multilingual promotional materials. Source
  21. R21 — Japan Foundation — Annual Report FY2024/2025; arts, education, exchange and institutions. Source
  22. R22 — British Council, Soft Power at a Turning Point; comparative review of cultural relations; July 2024. Source
  23. R23 — UNESCO, Culture | Global Report; methodology for culture’s contribution to development, 2026. Source
Iraq Vision 2045 · Door Nine: Iraq in the World · Chapter FourPrepared by: Ali Zuweid

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.