Skip to content
POL-22

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Proposed legislation · Security, Defence and Sovereignty

Iraqi Armed Forces Bill — Structure, Service, Command, Promotions and Reserves

POL-22Version 1.05 October 2026Republic of Iraq

Executive Summary

This bill addresses a structural gap in Iraqi military legislation by bringing the fundamental rules on the organisation of the armed forces, command, service, promotion and reserves together in modern national legislation. Parts of the Ministry of Defence's organisation would otherwise remain based on transitional arrangements dating to 2004, while Military Service and Retirement Law No. (3) of 2010, as amended, remains the principal reference for service and retirement matters. The bill draws a clearer distinction between civilian defence administration and professional military command, shifts promotion from near-automatic seniority to merit within a funded establishment, creates an organised reserve capable of mobilisation, and strengthens digital records, grievances and safeguards against political interference and fictitious payroll entries.

The bill does not automatically introduce conscription. It leaves national service to separate legislation should the Council of Representatives decide to regulate it under Article (9/Second) of the Constitution. It also preserves existing pension rights during transition and prevents conflict with any ongoing amendment to the Military Service and Retirement Law.

Legislative Gap

The problem is not a lack of provisions concerning military personnel, but their fragmentation across the Constitution in force, service and retirement legislation, transitional orders, and accumulated regulations and instructions. Fundamental issues—including the command structure, separation of civilian and military functions within the Ministry, personnel planning, merit standards, rotation of commanders, digital records and reserves—therefore require a more unified and coherent legislative framework.

A partial amendment to the 2010 Law can correct particular provisions but cannot alone resolve the problem of Order 67 of 2004 or provide comprehensive national legislation for the armed forces as a constitutional institution. The bill therefore distinguishes the law governing the military institution from detailed financial and pension rules, which may remain in the Service and Retirement Law or later legislation.

Proposed legislative policy

Foundations of the legislative design
AreaProposed rule
CommandA single lawful chain of command, with party-based or parallel channels prohibited.
PersonnelA funded establishment and five-year plan linking personnel numbers to missions and resources.
PromotionsVacancy + qualifications + performance + integrity + auditable merit-based selection.
ReservesReady, specialist and general reserves, digitally registered and subject to lawful training and call-up.
RightsService and grievance safeguards, healthcare and protection against retaliation and harassment.
OversightPersonnel and payroll auditing, an annual report to the Council of Representatives, and an inspectorate independent of the body being examined.
Legislative transitionGradual replacement of Order 67 by a national law, retaining existing pension and rights provisions until amended.

Explanatory memorandum

Why separate legislation for the armed forces?

The Military Service and Retirement Law addresses individual military personnel's status, rights and obligations. It is not a complete substitute for institutional legislation defining structure, command, force planning, reserves and oversight. Continued reliance for organisational purposes on an order issued under a transitional authority in 2004 is also inconsistent with the need to ground the Ministry of Defence and armed forces in the permanent constitutional framework.

Promotion: from time served to merit

The bill does not eliminate the value of seniority, but prevents length of service alone from becoming an automatic entitlement to rank. Rank entails authority, responsibility and an establishment position, and therefore depends on a vacancy, qualifications, performance, integrity and leadership ability. This is balanced by the right to challenge decisions and transparent selection criteria.

Reserves instead of permanent expansion

The bill establishes an organised reserve because full reliance on a large permanent force raises salary and pension costs and reduces mobilisation flexibility. The reserve begins with former military personnel and critical skills, supported by periodic training, compensation and protection of civilian employment. The bill does not confuse reserves with national service; the latter requires separate legislation if adopted.

Digitalisation and integrity

The unified electronic record is not a secondary administrative measure. It is the foundation for preventing duplication and fictitious payroll entries, documenting courses, appraisals, injuries and promotions, and grounding personnel decisions in auditable information.

Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements

RequirementMaximum period after entry into forcePrincipal body
Issue the principal organisational regulations12 monthsCouncil of Ministers / Ministry of Defence
Identify transitional-period orders and legislation and repeal conflicting provisions12 monthsGeneral Secretariat of the Council of Ministers / Ministry of Defence
Implement merit-based promotion and electronic records12 monthsMinistry of Defence
Review establishments and surplus ranks18 monthsMinistry of Defence / Ministry of Finance
Establish and classify the reserve register12 monthsMinistry of Defence

Financial and Implementation Implications

The bill assumes no increase in armed forces numbers and sets no fixed numerical personnel target. A reliable total cost cannot therefore be provided before the establishment and five-year plan are approved. The direct financial impact centres on upgrading human resources management, creating the reserve register, periodic training, promotion and grievance committees, and stronger auditing. Implementation costs can be reduced by reusing and connecting existing digital and administrative structures instead of creating parallel bodies.

The bill requires the government to accompany any expansion of permanent forces or reserves with a five-year estimate covering salaries, equipment, training, healthcare and pensions. This is more disciplined than legislating personnel numbers without stating their sustainable cost.

Brief International Comparison

Many democratic military systems distinguish institutional military legislation from detailed service rules, with defined chains of command, promotion boards, organised reserves, grievance mechanisms and civilian oversight. The bill draws on these general principles in the legislation of the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, without copying models unsuited to Iraq's constitutional system.

Sources and references

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005, particularly Articles (9), (78), (99), (109) and (110): Iraqi Council of Representatives.
  2. Military Service and Retirement Law No. (3) of 2010, as amended; First Amendment No. (41) of 2013, Iraqi Gazette issue 4294.
  3. Parliamentary Security and Defence Committee, 8 September 2026: completion of the review and committee vote on the proposed Second Amendment to the Military Service and Retirement Law, in preparation for submission to the presiding board of the Council of Representatives: Iraqi Council of Representatives.
  4. Parliamentary Security and Defence Committee, 27 July 2026: discussion of the proposed Second Amendment attended by Ministry of Defence officials responsible for service, budgeting, officers, other ranks and retirement.
  5. Coalition Provisional Authority Order No. (67) of 2004 concerning the Ministry of Defence, archived official historical text: CPA Order 67.
  6. Research Department of the Iraqi Council of Representatives, 17 February 2026, “Study of Coalition Provisional Authority Order 67 of 2004: Iraqi Ministry of Defence Law”.
  7. International Committee of the Red Cross, customary and treaty-based standards on command responsibility, military discipline, legal advisers and respect for international humanitarian law.
  8. NATO Building Integrity framework and democratic civil-military governance principles, used only as comparative governance references and not as binding law on Iraq.
  9. United Kingdom Armed Forces Act 2006; United States Code, Title 10; Australian Defence Act 1903 — comparative references for personnel systems, command, reserve structures and service law.

Accessed and updated: 5 October 2026. External links provide legal and institutional documentation and do not form part of the text of the bill's articles.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.