Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Bill · Security, Defence and Sovereignty
New Counter-Terrorism and Justice and Trial Safeguards Bill
A replacement federal law addressing terrorism through precise criminalization, graduated penalties and professional evidence-based investigation, while closing avenues for arbitrary detention, coerced confessions and liability based on kinship or presumed affiliation.
Executive Summary
The proposal rests on the State's constitutional duty to combat terrorism in all its forms and protect Iraqi territory from serving as a base, transit route or arena for terrorist activity. At the same time, it rests on constitutional rights to life, security, liberty and a fair trial, the prohibition of torture, and protection of freedom of expression and assembly. It therefore does not treat security and justice as conflicting goals: the most serious terrorism cases also require the strongest evidence and most disciplined procedures, so that actual offenders do not escape and innocent people are not punished.
Law No. (13) of 2005 remains the federal framework in force. It is a short law based on a broad definition, a list of acts and severe penalties. On 9 September 2026, the Council of Representatives completed the first reading of a new counter-terrorism bill comprising 23 articles, stating that its purpose was to unify and expand the relevant penal provisions to achieve deterrence. POL-25 offers a more detailed model: a composite definition requiring a serious act and terrorist intent; a clear distinction between killing, leadership, membership, recruitment, incitement and support; and separate rules for investigation, evidence, detention and appeal.
The drafting directly addresses key weaknesses revealed by Iraqi experience and international assessments: the breadth of the terrorism definition, excessive reliance on confessions, torture allegations, difficulties in early access to a lawyer, presumed liability of family members, cases involving children and returnees, and evidence originating in conflict areas. It also integrates requirements concerning counter-financing, foreign terrorist fighters, judicial cooperation and protection of witnesses and victims within Iraq's existing legal framework rather than creating parallel systems.
I — Constitutional and Legal Context
1. The Duty to Combat Terrorism and the Limits of Authority
Article (7) of the Constitution prohibits entities and approaches that adopt, prepare the ground for, promote or justify terrorism, and requires the State to combat it and protect its territory from serving as a base, transit route or arena for its activity. At the same time, Articles (15), (19), (37), (38) and (46) guarantee fundamental rights, judicial safeguards and the prohibition of torture, and require any regulation of freedoms to remain within limits that do not impair the essence of the right. A counter-terrorism law must therefore be effective, precise and enforceable without becoming an open-ended provision conflating terrorist violence with opposition, kinship or security suspicion.
2. Law No. (13) of 2005
Counter-Terrorism Law No. (13) of 2005 responded to an exceptional security situation. Its brief structure, however, combines a very broad definition of terrorism with diverse acts and attaches severe penalties to a wide range of contributions. In its concluding observations on Iraq in 2022, the United Nations Committee against Torture noted continued concern over the broad definition of terrorism and allegations concerning detention and trial safeguards in terrorism cases. New legislation offers a transition from a law serving an emergency function to modern criminal legislation distinguishing roles, consequences and evidence.
3. The Current Legislative Process
On 9 September 2026, the Security and Defence Committee concluded deliberations on a new bill and voted on it within the Committee. The Council of Representatives then completed the first reading of the Counter-Terrorism Bill. The Council's media department stated that it aimed to reduce terrorist offences and unify and expand the relevant penal provisions. Replacement of the old law is therefore a current legislative matter, not merely a deferred reform.
4. Intersecting Laws
Counter-terrorism law does not operate alone. Terrorism financing is regulated in detail by Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015; witness protection by Law No. (58) of 2017; criminal procedure by Criminal Procedure Code No. (23) of 1971; general rules on participation, attempt and penalties by Penal Code No. (111) of 1969; and juveniles by Juvenile Welfare Law No. (76) of 1983 pending its replacement. Counter-Terrorism Service Law No. (31) of 2016 regulates the competent executive institution. This draft therefore avoids duplicating existing institutions and powers and functions as a law of offences, procedures and safeguards.
5. International Obligations
Relevant Security Council resolutions, particularly resolution 1373 (2001), impose obligations to combat terrorism financing and bring terrorists to justice. Resolutions 2178 (2014) and 2396 (2017) add obligations concerning foreign terrorist fighters, travel, training and information exchange. These obligations are expressly accompanied by the requirement to respect human rights and international law, an approach also reflected in the process of preparing Iraq's National Counter-Terrorism Strategy 2026–2030.
II — The Legislative Gap
| Issue | Legislative need | Response in the Bill |
|---|---|---|
| Broad definition of terrorism | Distinguishing ordinary crime, terrorism and peaceful activity | Requiring a serious act + specific terrorist intent + an express exception for peaceful activity |
| Disproportionality between defendants' roles | Distinguishing the killer, leader, member, inciter and supporter | Separate offences and penalties, with mandatory individualized sentencing |
| Confessions and torture | Evidence-based rather than coercion-based investigation | Early access to a lawyer, medical examination, recording of questioning and exclusion of evidence extracted by torture |
| Secret intelligence | Using it without turning it into an untestable conviction | May initiate an investigation but shall not alone constitute decisive evidence |
| Families, children and returnees | Preventing liability based on association or locality | Individual responsibility and assessment of coercion, recruitment, trafficking and rehabilitation |
| Financing and listing | Avoiding duplication with Law 39 of 2015 | Structured referral to the financing and freezing regime with appeal safeguards |
| Cross-border threats | Travel, training and foreign evidence | Precise criminalization concerning foreign fighters and rules for cooperation and cross-border evidence |
III — Proposed Legislative Policy
- A permanent law, not an exceptional-emergency law: Offences are built on defined elements capable of proof before a court.
- Strong security begins with strong evidence: Video recording, forensic and digital evidence, chain of custody and early access to a lawyer reduce both impunity and wrongful convictions.
- No collective liability: No family, locality, sect or ethnic group bears an individual's crime.
- Distinguishing roles: The law does not equate a perpetrator of intentional killing with a person who played a secondary role or acted under coercion.
- Ordinary courts have jurisdiction: Specialization within ordinary courts, without establishing exceptional courts.
- Complementarity without duplication: Financing, witness protection, juveniles and regulation of the Counter-Terrorism Service remain governed by their respective laws.
- Preventing extremism does not mean criminalizing thought: Prevention and rehabilitation are civilian policies; criminalization begins only with the conduct and intent specified by law.
IV — Full Text of the Bill
In the name of the people
Based on the approval of the Council of Representatives and pursuant to the Constitution, and for the purpose of combating terrorism, protecting society and the rule of law, and guaranteeing a fair trial, the following Law has been enacted:
Chapter One — General Provisions
Article (1) — Definitions
For the purposes of this Law, the following terms shall have the meanings assigned to them: Terrorist Act: conduct criminalized under this Law when committed intentionally with terrorist intent. Terrorist Intent: the intent to seriously terrorize the population or a section thereof, compel an Iraqi public authority, foreign State or international organization to act or refrain from acting, or undermine or disable constitutional institutions through force or serious violence.
Terrorist Organization: an organized group of two or more persons, whatever its form or duration, whose purposes or activities include committing, preparing, directing or financing a terrorist act. Its status shall be established by judicial judgment or an effective listing under Article (55) of this Law. Material Support: funds, assets, weapons, explosives, shelter, transport, documents, communications or professional or technical services intentionally provided with knowledge that they will be used to commit a terrorist offence or enable a terrorist organization's criminal activity.
Foreign Terrorist Fighter: a person who travels to a State other than their State of residence or nationality for the purpose of perpetrating, planning, preparing or participating in a terrorist act, or providing or receiving terrorist training. Child: anyone under eighteen years of age. Victim: any person suffering direct physical, psychological or material harm as a result of a terrorist offence; in the event of death, this includes dependants or persons whom the injured person was legally responsible for maintaining.
Article (2) — Objectives of the Law
This Law aims to prevent and suppress terrorist offences; protect citizens' lives, the rule of law and constitutional institutions; unify penal provisions concerning terrorism; ensure proportionality in criminalization and punishment; secure fair and effective trials; protect victims and witnesses; and regulate national and international counter-terrorism cooperation in accordance with the Constitution and the Republic of Iraq's international obligations.
Article (3) — Scope
This Law shall apply to terrorist offences committed in the Republic of Iraq and offences falling within Iraqi jurisdiction under its Article (58), without prejudice to provisions affording greater protection to rights and freedoms or to special rules concerning juveniles and international crimes.
Article (4) — Legality and Strict Interpretation
An act shall constitute terrorism only where expressly prescribed by this Law and where its material and mental elements and terrorist intent are established. Penal provisions shall be interpreted strictly. Analogy in criminalization or punishment shall be prohibited, as shall presuming terrorist intent from social, religious, ethnic or political affiliation or kinship.
Article (5) — Protection of Lawful Activity
Expression of opinion, journalism, research, religious, trade union or political activity, protest, strikes, peaceful assembly and non-violent civil disobedience shall not in themselves constitute terrorism, even where they involve sharp criticism of the authorities, unless the conduct is intentionally accompanied by an act criminalized under this Law and all its elements are proven.
Article (6) — Non-Discrimination and Individual Responsibility
This Law shall apply without discrimination. Criminal responsibility shall be based on a person's own conduct and individual intent. No one shall be responsible for an act committed by a relative, spouse or member of their tribe, group or locality. No collective punitive or administrative measures shall be imposed on grounds of suspicion or presumed affiliation.
Article (7) — Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law
In applying this Law, all authorities shall comply with the Constitution and rights guaranteed by treaties in force for the Republic of Iraq. Counter-terrorism shall not be invoked to justify torture, enforced disappearance, extrajudicial killing, secret detention or arbitrary deprivation of liberty. International humanitarian law shall be observed wherever applicable to an armed conflict.
Article (8) — Relationship to International Crimes
Where the alleged conduct constitutes genocide, a crime against humanity, a war crime or another international crime punishable under Iraqi law in force, application of this Law shall not preclude investigation and prosecution under the more serious and precise legal characterization reflecting the nature of the crime and its victims' rights.
Chapter Two — Terrorist Offences
Article (9) — Core Terrorist Offence
A terrorist offence is committed by anyone who intentionally, with terrorist intent, commits any of the following: killing a person or causing serious bodily harm; taking hostages; using explosives, weapons or hazardous materials in a manner seriously endangering human life; causing serious destruction of a public facility, critical infrastructure, means of transport, or health, educational or religious facility where this could seriously endanger people's lives or security; or any serious violent act prescribed in an international counter-terrorism convention in force for Iraq.
Article (10) — Attacks on Infrastructure and Essential Services
Anyone who intentionally, with terrorist intent, destroys, disables or forcibly seizes electricity, water, oil and gas, communications, transport, banking or hospital facilities, State digital systems or other critical infrastructure in a manner threatening the population's life or safety or causing serious widespread disruption shall be punishable under this Law.
Article (11) — Hostage-Taking and Terrorist Kidnapping
Kidnapping or detention of a person shall constitute a terrorist offence where accompanied by a threat to kill, injure or continue detaining that person in order to compel a State, international organization or natural or legal person to act or refrain from acting, or to achieve another terrorist purpose.
Article (12) — Attacks on Transport, Aviation and Navigation
Where accompanied by terrorist intent, unlawful seizure of an aircraft, ship, train or public transport vehicle, endangering its safety or that of its passengers, or a serious attack on an airport, port or transport terminal shall constitute a terrorist offence, with due regard to international conventions in force for the Republic of Iraq.
Article (13) — Hazardous Materials and Weapons of Mass Destruction
Anyone intentionally using, with terrorist intent, a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapon, toxic or radioactive material, or a device designed to cause mass casualties shall be punishable by life imprisonment. The penalty prescribed in Article (27) shall apply where the act causes a person's death with direct intent to take life.
Article (14) — Establishing and Leading a Terrorist Organization
Anyone who creates, establishes, organizes or leads a terrorist organization, or holds a leadership position in it with knowledge of its nature and purposes, shall be punishable. Leadership shall not be established by social, religious or political standing alone, but through evidence of actual authority to direct or plan terrorist activity or manage its resources.
Article (15) — Membership and Participation
Anyone intentionally joining a terrorist organization with knowledge of its nature and actually participating in its criminal activity shall be punishable. Kinship, residence in an area formerly controlled by a terrorist organization, compulsory civilian work, incidental presence or contact that does not provide criminal support shall not suffice for criminal responsibility.
Article (16) — Recruitment
Anyone recruiting or attempting to recruit a person to join a terrorist organization, commit a terrorist offence or receive terrorist training shall be punishable. The offence shall be aggravated where the target is a child, a person with an intellectual disability, or someone whose economic need, dependency, displacement or detention the offender exploited.
Article (17) — Terrorist Training
Anyone providing or receiving, with terrorist intent, training in making explosives, using weapons, concealment, communications, technical intrusion or other skills, knowing that they are intended for committing a terrorist offence, shall be punishable. This shall not include lawful military, professional, academic or journalistic training unless the specific criminal intent is established.
Article (18) — Travel for Terrorist Purposes
Anyone travelling or attempting to travel outside their State of residence or nationality to commit, plan, prepare or participate in a terrorist offence, or provide or receive terrorist training, shall be punishable. Anyone financing, organizing or facilitating such travel with knowledge of its terrorist purpose shall also be punishable.
Article (19) — Direct Public Incitement
Anyone publicly, directly and intentionally calling for the commission of a specific terrorist offence or a specific type of terrorist offence shall be punishable where, considering its content, context and audience, the call creates a real risk of the offence occurring. This Article shall not apply to news reporting, documentation, research, discussion or mere expression of opinion without such intent and risk.
Article (20) — Propaganda and Promotion Leading to Criminal Support
Subject to Article (7) of the Constitution, anyone intentionally producing, managing or distributing propaganda for a terrorist organization shall be punishable where it is accompanied by a practical call for recruitment, fundraising, provision of services or execution of terrorist acts. Content limited to abstract glorification or justification shall be addressed through non-criminal measures prescribed by laws in force unless the elements of incitement or support under this Law are established.
Article (21) — Provision of Material Support
Anyone intentionally providing material support to a terrorist organization or to a person for the commission of a terrorist offence, with knowledge of the criminal purpose, shall be punishable. Criminalization shall not include emergency medical services, legal defence or impartial humanitarian assistance provided under international and Iraqi law without intent to support terrorist activity.
Article (22) — Harbouring and Concealment
Anyone intentionally concealing a person known to have committed a terrorist offence to prevent their arrest or trial, or providing shelter, documents or means of escape for that purpose, shall be punishable. A relative shall not be liable merely for failing to report where no material assistance was provided and the relative had no knowledge of an imminent terrorist threat, without prejudice to other offences in force.
Article (23) — Failure to Prevent an Imminent Terrorist Threat
Anyone having certain knowledge of a specific and imminent plan to commit a terrorist offence threatening human life, who can notify the competent authorities without serious danger to themselves or others but intentionally fails to do so, shall be punishable by detention. Exceptions shall apply to matters protected by defence rights, legal professional privilege or professional confidentiality, and where reporting would expose the person or a family member to serious danger that cannot be averted.
Article (24) — Terrorism Financing
Terrorism financing and the collection, provision, freezing and confiscation of funds and assets shall be governed by Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015 and related laws. Financing offences shall be independent of whether a terrorist act actually occurs, provided the intent or knowledge required by law is established.
Article (25) — Planning, Preparation and Attempt
Attempts to commit terrorist offences and preparatory acts going beyond mere thought to specific material steps demonstrating intent to commit a terrorist offence shall be punishable under this Law and the Penal Code. Possession of knowledge or access to information shall not in itself be criminalized unless accompanied by preparatory conduct and proven terrorist intent.
Article (26) — Criminal Participation
An instigator, perpetrator, indirect perpetrator and accomplice shall each be responsible according to their role, intent and actual contribution, under the Penal Code and this Law. The penalty shall not automatically be the same for someone who planned or carried out a lethal act and someone who played a secondary role. The degree of participation shall be considered in sentencing.
Chapter Three — Penalties and Responsibility
Article (27) — Terrorist Killing and the Most Severe Penalty
Anyone intentionally committing a terrorist offence with direct intent to take human life, resulting in a person's death, shall be punishable by death. Where death results without proof of direct intent to kill, the penalty shall be life imprisonment. The death penalty shall not apply to mere membership, financing, harbouring, incitement or support unless direct intent and participation in the lethal offence are established under the rules of criminal participation as prescribed by law.
Article (28) — Penalties for Serious Terrorist Offences
Anyone committing an offence under Articles (9) to (13) shall be punishable by life imprisonment where Article (27) does not apply and the act causes serious bodily harm to several persons, hostage-taking, widespread destruction of critical infrastructure or extreme collective danger. In other serious cases, the penalty shall be imprisonment for not less than fifteen years and not more than twenty-five years.
Article (29) — Penalty for Leading an Organization
A founder or leader of a terrorist organization, or a person managing its military wing, operations or financing, shall be punishable by life imprisonment where responsibility for directing serious terrorist activity is established, and by imprisonment for not less than fifteen years otherwise. Article (27) shall apply where criminal responsibility for a specific terrorist killing is established.
Article (30) — Penalties for Membership, Recruitment, Training and Travel
The offence under Article (15) shall be punishable by imprisonment for seven to fifteen years; the offences under Articles (16) and (17) by imprisonment for ten to fifteen years; and the offence under Article (18) by imprisonment for five to ten years. The penalty shall be aggravated within the upper limit where recruitment targets a child.
Article (31) — Penalties for Incitement, Support and Concealment
Incitement under Article (19) shall be punishable by imprisonment for five to ten years; material support under Article (21) by imprisonment for seven to fifteen years; and harbouring and concealment under Article (22) by imprisonment for three to seven years, unless the conduct constitutes participation in a more serious offence.
Article (32) — Criminal Liability of Legal Persons
Where a terrorist offence is committed in the name or interest of a private legal person, or using its resources, as a result of a management decision or serious breach of oversight duties, it may be sentenced to a fine, confiscation, suspension of activity or dissolution according to the gravity of the act, without prejudice to natural persons' criminal liability. Dissolution shall not apply to parties or associations except under constitutional safeguards and procedures and the laws governing them.
Article (33) — Aggravating Circumstances
The following shall constitute aggravating circumstances: targeting children, health, educational or religious facilities, or heritage sites; using materials causing mass harm; exploiting an official or security position; committing a transnational offence; using a child in its execution; or committing the offence for sectarian, ethnic or religious motives with the intention of spreading terror, cleansing or collective revenge.
Article (34) — Voluntary Abandonment and Effective Cooperation
The court may reduce the penalty where, before harm occurs, the offender voluntarily abandons the act and provides reliable information to the authorities that prevents a terrorist offence, saves lives, dismantles a cell or recovers dangerous materials, provided the offender has not committed killing, torture, rape or an international crime. Cooperation after an offence occurs shall not automatically exempt a person from responsibility.
Article (35) — Confiscation and Protection of Good-Faith Third Parties
The court shall order confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds and assets derived from a terrorist offence or directly intended for its commission, protecting the rights of good-faith third parties and their right to object and appeal. Confiscation shall not extend to property of the convicted person's family or co-owners merely by reason of kinship or joint ownership unless the property's connection to the offence is established in accordance with the law.
Article (36) — Individualized Sentencing
In determining the penalty, the court shall consider the gravity of the outcome, the defendant's role, degree of intent, use of violence, age and circumstances, whether the defendant was subjected to coercion, human trafficking or exploitation, and any cooperation with justice. The judgment shall state the reasons for the selected penalty and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Chapter Four — Investigation, Trial and Justice Safeguards
Article (37) — Jurisdiction of Ordinary Courts
Investigating courts, criminal courts and other courts competent by law shall have jurisdiction over terrorism offences. Exceptional courts shall not be established to try persons accused of them. Within the ordinary judiciary, the Supreme Judicial Council may designate panels or judges with specialized training while guaranteeing independence and normal judicial allocation of cases.
Article (38) — Arrest Warrants and Urgent Cases
No person may be arrested, searched or detained except under a reasoned judicial order, other than in flagrante delicto and cases expressly permitted by the Criminal Procedure Code. An arrested person shall be brought before the investigating judge without delay and no later than twenty-four hours after deprivation of liberty, calculated from the moment of actual arrest.
Article (39) — Deprivation-of-Liberty Register and Family Notification
The arrested person's identity, time, place and reason for arrest, arresting body, place of detention and any subsequent transfer shall be recorded immediately. A person chosen by the arrested person shall be informed of their whereabouts without delay, unless a judge orders a limited, reasoned postponement for an exceptional investigative necessity. This shall not prevent the place of detention from being registered with the judicial authority.
Article (40) — Right of Defence from the Outset
The accused shall have the right to legal assistance from the first questioning and throughout investigation and trial, and to consult privately with counsel subject to reasonable security rules. If unable to appoint a lawyer, the court shall assign competent counsel at State expense before any substantive questioning. A waiver of counsel shall be recognized only if express, voluntary, documented and made in the presence of a judge.
Article (41) — Right to Silence and Freedom from Self-Incrimination
Before questioning, the accused shall be informed in understandable terms of the right to remain silent and not to be compelled to confess or testify against themselves. Silence alone shall not be treated as evidence of guilt. Threats, unlawful promises and psychological or physical pressure to induce speech shall be prohibited.
Article (42) — Independent Medical Examination
Every detainee shall have the right to a medical examination on admission to a detention facility and upon their own request or that of counsel or the investigating judge. Examination shall preserve confidentiality and professional independence. Where indications of torture or ill-treatment appear, the physician shall duly document them and notify the Public Prosecution and competent judge for investigation and protective action.
Article (43) — Audio-Visual Recording of Questioning
Where technically available, questioning in terrorism cases shall be recorded in sound and image from beginning to end, and the recording retained in a secure, verifiable record. Recording shall become mandatory in central investigation centres within a transitional period not exceeding twelve months from this Law's entry into force. Recording shall not substitute for counsel's presence or judicial oversight.
Article (44) — Prohibition of Secret Detention
No person may be detained in a place not legally recognized or not registered with the judicial authority and competent oversight bodies. Every security body shall transfer a detainee to an official detention facility within statutory periods. A judge or the Public Prosecution shall not be prevented from learning the person's whereabouts or verifying detention conditions.
Article (45) — Pre-Trial Detention and Periodic Review
Pre-trial detention is an exceptional measure, not a punishment. A judge may order it where there is substantial evidence and a real risk of flight, interference with evidence, influence on witnesses or commission of a serious offence. The judge shall periodically review continued detention through a reasoned decision and release the accused or substitute another measure when its grounds cease, subject to the periods prescribed by the Criminal Procedure Code.
Article (46) — Inadmissibility of Evidence Extracted through Torture
No statement, confession or information proven, or seriously suspected on substantial grounds, to have been extracted through torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment shall be admitted, except to establish the violation against its perpetrator. Where the accused makes a serious allegation of torture, the court shall suspend reliance on the challenged statement and conduct a prompt, independent investigation. The prosecution shall prove that a confession was voluntary before it is relied upon.
Article (47) — Intelligence and Evidence of Guilt
Intelligence may provide grounds for initiating an investigation or seeking judicial authorization, but shall not alone suffice for conviction unless presented as evidence capable of being tested before the court with respect for defence rights. Secret evidence whose substance has not been disclosed to the defence shall not be the sole or decisive basis for conviction.
Article (48) — Witnesses and Informants
Witnesses, Experts, Informants and Victims Protection Law No. (58) of 2017 shall apply. Where a real danger exists, the court may protect a witness's identity or manner of appearance, provided the defence has an effective means of challenging the reliability of the testimony and anonymous testimony is not the sole or decisive basis for conviction.
Article (49) — Searches and Seizure of Items
Warrants to search homes, devices or vehicles and seize funds, documents or data shall be judicially controlled and subject to necessity, proportionality and specificity. A record of seized items and their chain of custody shall be prepared and a copy delivered to the person concerned or their representative, subject to urgent situations prescribed by law and subsequent judicial oversight.
Article (50) — Communications Interception and Technical Surveillance
Private communications interception, location tracking, covert access to data or installation of technical surveillance devices shall require reasoned judicial authorization specifying the person, place or account, purpose, duration and scope of data. The initial period shall be thirty days, renewable by a new judicial decision where necessity continues. Data unrelated to the offence shall be destroyed once the legal need for them ends.
Article (51) — Digital Evidence
Digital evidence shall be collected, preserved and examined through procedures ensuring integrity, authenticity, chain of custody and technical reviewability. The defence shall have the right to request an independent examination where authenticity or extraction methods are seriously contested, with protection for personal data unrelated to the proceedings.
Article (52) — Special Investigative Techniques
With judicial authorization and where less intrusive methods are unavailable, undercover operations, controlled deliveries, human sources or extended surveillance may be used to uncover terrorist offences. A law enforcement officer or source shall not induce a person to commit an offence for which that person had no genuine predisposition. The court shall assess the effect of unlawful entrapment on evidence and liability.
Article (53) — Evidence from Conflict Areas or Abroad
Documents, digital materials and physical evidence from conflict areas or a foreign State may be admitted if their source, integrity and chain of custody can reasonably be verified and the defence has a genuine opportunity to challenge them. Describing a source as intelligence or military shall not exempt the evidence from judicial review of legality and reliability.
Article (54) — Public Trial and Right of Appeal
Terrorism trials shall be public before an independent and impartial judiciary. Only the portion necessary to protect a witness, child or legitimate secret may be closed, by reasoned decision and to the narrowest extent. The accused shall have the right to know the charge and material evidence, question witnesses, call defence witnesses, receive interpretation and appeal the judgment under the law. Death sentences shall be subject to mandatory cassation review and all additional safeguards prescribed by law.
Chapter Five — Listing, Victims, Cooperation and Rehabilitation
Article (55) — Listing of Terrorist Organizations and Appeals
A mechanism shall be established within the competent judiciary to list entities where substantial evidence shows that they are terrorist organizations. The Public Prosecution or competent body shall submit an evidence-supported application. A reasoned judicial decision shall specify its effects and duration. Any interested person may appeal, seek periodic review and request delisting where the grounds cease. Security Council lists binding on Iraq shall be implemented under the law, with a domestic procedure to challenge mistaken identity and request delisting through the competent international mechanisms.
Article (56) — Asset Freezing and Management
Procedures for freezing terrorist assets and terrorism financing funds shall apply under Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015 and binding resolutions. The person concerned shall be notified whenever possible without prejudicing the investigation and enabled to object and seek exemptions for permitted basic and legal expenses. Temporary freezing shall not become final confiscation except under a judgment or legal basis authorizing it.
Article (57) — Victim Protection and Rights
The State shall guarantee victims treatment preserving dignity, security and privacy, inform them of the stages of proceedings to the extent compatible with the investigation, and enable them to claim compensation and civil rights. Applicable laws on compensation for affected persons, female survivors and victims shall apply. A judgment concerning a terrorist offence shall not preclude investigation of mass killing, enslavement, sexual violence, disappearance or other crimes committed against victims.
Article (58) — Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Iraqi courts shall have jurisdiction over offences under this Law committed abroad where the offender is Iraqi; the offence targets the Republic of Iraq, one of its citizens or missions, or means of transport registered in Iraq; or the accused is present in Iraq, extradition is unavailable and an applicable treaty or legal rule requires prosecution. Rules on jurisdiction, immunities and the prohibition of double jeopardy shall be observed in accordance with the law.
Article (59) — Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance
Iraqi authorities shall cooperate in extradition, mutual legal assistance, exchange of evidence and information, and recovery of proceeds under the Constitution, laws, treaties in force and reciprocity. The political nature of an offence shall not justify refusing cooperation where the elements of a terrorist offence are established. Extradition shall not be permitted where substantial grounds exist to believe the person would face torture, enforced disappearance or a trial denying fundamental safeguards, unless reliable and sufficient legal guarantees are provided in accordance with the law.
Article (60) — Children in Terrorism Cases
A child shall be subject to the Juvenile Welfare Law and the most protective applicable rules. The child's best interests and rights to education, rehabilitation and reintegration shall be primary considerations. A child shall not be held responsible merely because a parent is associated with a terrorist organization or because the child resided in an area under its control. Possible recruitment, trafficking or coercion must be examined before treating the child as an offender. The death penalty and any punishment offering no realistic prospect of release shall be prohibited for anyone under eighteen at the time of the offence.
Article (61) — Women, Family Members and Returnees
Responsibility shall rest on proven individual conduct. A spouse, relative or companion of a person accused of terrorism may not be detained or tried merely because of family relationship, companionship or presence in a conflict area. Returnee cases shall be screened on the basis of individual evidence and specific risks. Persons against whom there is insufficient evidence of an offence may be offered voluntary civilian rehabilitation and support programmes under the law, not disguised punitive measures.
Article (62) — Rehabilitation in Correctional Institutions
The Ministry of Justice, in coordination with the competent bodies, shall establish programmes based on individual risk and needs assessments for persons convicted of terrorism offences. These shall include education, psychological, vocational and intellectual support, prevention of recruitment in prisons and preparation for return to society. Participation or non-participation in an intellectual programme shall not impair freedom of belief or result in a non-judicial extension of the sentence.
Article (63) — Release, Follow-Up and Reintegration
After completion of a sentence or upon conditional release under the law, competent bodies may provide follow-up and reintegration programmes proportionate to risk, including social, vocational and psychological support. Restrictions on movement, communication or work after completion of a sentence shall require a law and a time-limited, appealable judicial decision based on a serious security necessity.
Article (64) — Data Protection and Prevention of Discriminatory Profiling
Personal data in terrorism cases shall be processed for a lawful purpose and only to the extent necessary, protected from unauthorized access and subject to specified retention periods. Religion, sect, nationality, ethnicity, locality or political opinion shall not be treated as independent evidence of terrorist risk or the sole basis for security targeting.
Article (65) — National Coordination
The competent national counter-terrorism committee, within the existing government structure, shall coordinate national policy and information exchange among relevant security, intelligence and judicial bodies without prejudice to judicial independence or each body's jurisdiction. This Law shall create no new security force or investigative power parallel to agencies established by law.
Article (66) — Reports, Statistics and Oversight
Subject to legitimate confidentiality, the competent executive bodies shall publish annual aggregate statistics on investigations, referrals, judgments, acquittals, detention periods, ill-treatment complaints, financial measures and rehabilitation programmes. The Prime Minister or an authorized representative shall submit an annual report to the Council of Representatives on implementation of national counter-terrorism policy without interfering in pending cases or disclosing operational secrets.
Article (67) — Professional Training
Competent bodies shall train judges, prosecutors, investigators, officers and detention personnel in evidence-based investigation, preservation of crime scenes and digital evidence, non-coercive investigative interviewing, human rights, child and victim protection, counter-financing and international cooperation, reducing reliance on confessions as the central evidence.
Article (68) — Prevention of Violent Extremism Leading to Terrorism
The State shall support early prevention, social cohesion, education, rehabilitation and measures against violent recruitment under the national strategy. Civilian measures shall remain separate from criminalization and shall not restrict freedom of thought, belief or lawful political opposition. Describing a person as at risk of radicalization shall not create criminal liability or a criminal record.
Chapter Six — Final and Transitional Provisions
Article (69) — Application of General Rules
Penal Code No. (111) of 1969, Criminal Procedure Code No. (23) of 1971, Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015, Witnesses, Experts, Informants and Victims Protection Law No. (58) of 2017, and applicable juvenile and victim laws shall govern matters not specifically addressed in this Law, insofar as they do not conflict with it.
Article (70) — Repeal of the Previous Law
Counter-Terrorism Law No. (13) of 2005 shall be repealed from this Law's entry into force. Valid procedures taken under it shall retain their effects unless inconsistent with a safeguard under this Law that is more favourable to the accused.
Article (71) — Pending Cases and the More Favourable Law
Courts shall continue hearing cases instituted before this Law's entry into force. The law more favourable to the accused shall apply to prior acts under general principles. A final judgment shall not be reopened except through statutory appeal and retrial procedures. The Public Prosecution shall review the legal characterization of cases based on mere membership, family relationship or a contested confession to ensure compliance with the new elements of offences and safeguards.
Article (72) — Transitional Periods
The Supreme Judicial Council, Ministries of Interior and Justice and competent security bodies shall, each within its jurisdiction, complete detention registration forms, questioning recording arrangements, digital evidence procedures and training programmes within twelve months of publication. Incomplete equipment shall not suspend the fundamental rights and safeguards in this Law.
Article (73) — Regulations and Instructions
The Council of Ministers, ministries and competent bodies may issue regulations and instructions to facilitate implementation within one hundred and eighty days of publication. These shall not create an offence or penalty, expand the definition of terrorism or diminish the trial and detention safeguards prescribed herein.
Article (74) — Commencement
This Law shall enter into force ninety days after publication in the Official Gazette, except provisions guaranteeing safeguards for arrest, detention, defence and prevention of torture, which shall apply from publication where more favourable to the accused or more protective of a right.
V — Reasons for Enactment
More than two decades having passed since enactment of Counter-Terrorism Law No. (13) of 2005; terrorist methods, financing, travel, digital recruitment and cross-border evidence having evolved; and there being a need for a more precise definition distinguishing terrorist offences from ordinary crimes and peaceful activity, for responsibility and penalties proportionate to role, outcome and intent, for evidence-based investigation and exclusion of torture and secret detention, for protection of defence rights, victims and witnesses, and for alignment with the Constitution, relevant Iraqi laws and international obligations in force, this Law has been enacted.
VI — Explanatory Memorandum
1. Why Replacement Rather than Partial Amendment?
The problem with the current law lies not in a single article but in its entire structure: a broad definition, an undifferentiated list of acts, penalties insufficiently distinguishing roles, and the absence of a comprehensive procedural chapter for terrorism cases. A series of scattered amendments would therefore leave the same basic structure intact. The new law rebuilds the framework from definition through entry into force.
2. Defining Terrorism
The proposal requires two concurrent elements: a serious act specified by law and specific terrorist intent. This prevents any violence, damage or speech from automatically becoming “terrorism” and leaves ordinary crimes to the Penal Code. It also expressly excludes political, journalistic, religious and trade union activity and peaceful assembly unless they become criminalized conduct whose elements are established.
3. Punishment and Individualized Responsibility
The proposal retains the most severe penalties for a terrorist offence committed with direct intent to take life and resulting in death. It rejects automatically extending the maximum penalty to membership, harbouring, financing or incitement without proof of participation and intent connected to the lethal act. This is the central shift from broad liability to proportionate individual responsibility.
4. Investigation and Trial
The law's most important security investment is improving evidence: registering detention, early access to a lawyer, medical examinations, video recording of questioning, regulation of digital evidence, judicial control of technical surveillance, and preventing secret evidence from being the sole basis of conviction. These rules do not obstruct investigation; they reduce challenges and subsequent collapse of cases, and strengthen courts' ability to distinguish actual offenders from the innocent.
5. Women, Children and Families
The proposal expressly separates an offence from family relationships. A spouse, child or relative does not become an accused person through blood relationship or companionship. Cases involving children and returnees require examination of forced recruitment, trafficking, coercion, age and actual role, while keeping civilian rehabilitation separate from criminal responsibility.
6. Prevention and Rehabilitation
The law does not turn “extremism”, as an idea or indicator, into a crime. Prevention of violent extremism leading to terrorism takes place through education, social cohesion, local action and rehabilitation programmes. Criminal law begins when material conduct matches a clear criminal definition.
VII — Harmonization with Existing Legislation
| Legislation | Relationship to the Bill |
|---|---|
| Counter-Terrorism Law No. (13) of 2005 | Fully repealed and replaced upon entry into force of the new law. |
| Penal Code No. (111) of 1969 | Rules on attempt, participation and general principles remain in force where there is no special provision. |
| Criminal Procedure Code No. (23) of 1971 | Remains the general procedural framework, supplemented by safeguards specific to terrorism cases. |
| Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015 | Remains the specialized authority for financing and freezing; the proposal prevents duplication of penalties. |
| Counter-Terrorism Service Law No. (31) of 2016, as amended | The law does not change the Service's institutional structure or leadership; it regulates offences and procedures. |
| Witness Protection Law No. (58) of 2017 | Applies to terrorism cases, with an added rule prohibiting decisive reliance on anonymous testimony. |
| Juvenile Welfare Law No. (76) of 1983, as amended | Remains the special legal framework for children pending replacement by a newer law. |
| Laws on Compensation for Victims of Terrorist Operations and Female Survivors | Victims' rights remain independent and are not exhausted by the criminal judgment against the offender. |
VIII — Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements
First-Year Priority: Equip questioning rooms in central facilities with video recording; unify the deprivation-of-liberty register; establish a digital evidence protocol; train investigators, prosecutors and judges; and review pending cases substantially dependent on a contested confession or a loosely defined characterization of membership.
The law requires no new security authority. Implementation is distributed among the Supreme Judicial Council, Public Prosecution, Ministries of Interior and Justice, competent agencies and existing financial bodies. Joint information-sharing instructions should prevent any body from retaining decisive data without timely conversion into lawful judicial evidence.
IX — Financial and Implementation Impact
The law's financial impact is moderate and concentrated on procedural quality rather than creating institutions. The main costs are recording equipment for questioning, secure digital records, expanded legal assistance, independent medical examinations, training for investigators, judges and experts, witness protection and upgraded digital evidence capabilities.
Available public data do not allow an exact financial estimate without an inventory of investigation centres, questioning rooms, annual cases and digital storage capacity. The law therefore requires executive bodies to prepare a detailed financial estimate during the next budget cycle, distinguishing establishment costs, operating costs and existing resources that can be reused.
X — Safeguards and Compliance Indicators
A counter-terrorism law's success is not measured solely by convictions. Appropriate legislative indicators reveal the quality of the whole system: the proportion of detainees brought before a judge within the statutory period; the proportion of recorded questioning sessions; access to counsel from the outset; pre-trial detention duration; the proportion of cases supported by physical or digital evidence independent of confessions; torture allegations independently investigated; acquittals and releases; listing orders judicially reviewed; use of witness protection programmes; and reoffending rates after rehabilitation. Figures should be published in aggregate form protecting operational and personal confidentiality.
XI — Sources and References
- Iraqi Constitution — Iraqi Council of Representatives — https://iq.parliament.iq/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A/
Articles 7, 15, 19, 37, 38, 46 and other relevant constitutional safeguards. - Ministry of Justice — Counter-Terrorism Law No. (13) of 2005 — https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.6698/
The federal law in force that this proposal seeks to repeal and replace. - Council of Representatives — First Reading of the Counter-Terrorism Bill, 9 September 2026 — https://iq.parliament.iq/blog/199516/
The Council announced completion of the first reading of a new bill aimed at unifying penal provisions and expanding the scope of countering terrorist offences. - Council of Representatives — Security and Defence Committee Discusses the Counter-Terrorism Bill — https://iq.parliament.iq/blog/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%8A-%D9%82/
The Committee voted on the bill internally in preparation for legislative procedures. - Ministry of Justice — Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law No. (39) of 2015 — https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.1955/
The existing framework for terrorism financing and financial freezing. - Supreme Judicial Council — Terrorist Assets Freezing Committee — https://www.sjc.iq/view.68052/
Explains the relationship between counter-terrorism law, anti-money laundering and terrorism financing law, and attachment and confiscation procedures. - Ministry of Justice — Witnesses, Experts, Informants and Victims Protection Law No. (58) of 2017 — https://www.moj.gov.iq/view.3194/
The national framework for protecting participants in criminal and terrorism proceedings. - Supreme Judicial Council — Children's Rights under the Juvenile Welfare Law — https://www.sjc.iq/view.3502/
A reference for juvenile-specific rules under Law No. (76) of 1983. - Supreme Judicial Council — Standardization of Legal and Judicial Terminology — https://www.sjc.iq/view.71801/
Presents definitions and provisions from Law No. (13) of 2005 and highlights the breadth of its current structure. - United Nations Committee against Torture — Concluding Observations on Iraq, 2022 — https://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=pGXCo8HBKyqwe1FExwYMzLouDfP8XH1Yca2IMT%2FG%2FAAAeaB08Zej%2BVohjJlKB8NlOFfLwlrHfYkf7X%2Fdm33Q3A%3D%3D
Noted the broad definition of terrorism and concerns regarding trial and detention safeguards in terrorism cases. - United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism — Promoting Human Rights in Counter-Terrorism Efforts in Iraq — https://iraq.un.org/ar/297197-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B2-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%88%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AC%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82-%D9%85%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%A8
Training in Iraq on human-rights-compliant investigative techniques. - Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee — Legal Issues — https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ctc/ar/content/legal-issues
Resolution 1373 and subsequent resolutions on effective criminalization and foreign terrorist fighters. - Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee — Foreign Terrorist Fighters — https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ctc/ar/content/foreign-terrorist-fighters
A reference for obligations concerning travel, training, rehabilitation and reintegration. - Security Council — Resolution 2396 (2017) — https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/sres23962017
Border and information cooperation, prosecution, rehabilitation and reintegration. - International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law — Supporting Iraq's Counter-Terrorism Strategy 2026–2030 — https://theiij.org/event/iij-ct-phare-and-euam-iraq-advance-iraqs-2026-2030-counter-terrorism-strategy/
Documents work with Iraqi bodies on a strategy based on the rule of law and human rights.
POL-25 · Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Security, Defence and Sovereignty