Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · Legislative Proposal · Security, Defence and Sovereignty
Border Security, Ports of Entry and Integrated Border Management Law
A federal framework that unifies responsibility for sovereignty along the border with management of official ports of entry, clearly separates border security command, customs, passport control and technical inspection, and then integrates their operations through joint on-site command, shared data and risk management, making borders more secure without treating every traveller or legitimate shipment as a suspected threat.
Executive Summary
The Constitution gives the federal authorities exclusive responsibility for national security policy, including establishing and managing armed forces to protect Iraq's borders. It also assigns customs policy, foreign trade policy, and the regulation of nationality and residence to the federal authorities. In practice, however, the border operates through several parallel institutions: the Border Forces Command protects the borderline and crossing routes; the Border Ports Authority, attached to the Council of Ministers, supervises and coordinates activity within ports of entry; and customs, passport control, health, agricultural, transport and security bodies each operate within their respective mandates.
The problem is not the absence of institutions, but the absence of a comprehensive law connecting the borderline, theofficial port of entry, andcrossing data within a single system. Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 addressed unified administration and supervision at ports of entry, but was not designed as a comprehensive border security law. The technological environment has also developed since then, with national customs and digital systems. This draft therefore proposes repealing Law No. (30) of 2016 and replacing it with a broader law, while retaining the Authority's legal personality, staff and assets, without creating a replacement bureaucracy.
The draft separates responsibilities to prevent conflicts: the border forces protect the borderline and the areas between ports; the Authority manages coordination and shared infrastructure within ports; customs makes customs decisions; passport control decides on entry and departure; and technical bodies make their own health, agricultural and standards decisions. It then brings these bodies together through a national council without separate administrative autonomy, joint command centres, unified operating procedures, an interoperability platform, and a decision log showing who did what, when and why.
The draft adopts risk management instead of universal inspection, prevents repeated data and document entry, and requires a digital trail for charges, seals, weighing, cameras and chain of custody. It also establishes specific integrity rules, rotation in sensitive posts, protected reporting and monitoring of internal collusion, while affirming travellers' legal safeguards, the right to complain, and lawful treatment of protection applicants, trafficking victims and children.
I — Constitutional and Legal Context
The draft is based on Article (109) of the Constitution, which requires the federal authorities to preserve Iraq's unity, integrity, independence and sovereignty, and Article (110), which gives them exclusive responsibility for national security policy and border protection, fiscal and customs policy, cross-border trade, and the regulation of nationality, naturalisation and residence. Border management is therefore not merely a local service, but a federal sovereign function in which security, financial, humanitarian and technical responsibilities intersect.
The existing institutional framework includes Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016, which established the Authority attached to the Council of Ministers and assigned it control, supervision and monitoring of the performance of agencies operating at ports, while ministry and police personnel remained on their original establishments. Instructions No. (3) of 2018 also regulate the Authority's units and functions. Customs Law No. (23) of 1984, as amended, remains the specific reference for customs procedures and enforcement, while passport and foreigners' residence laws govern aspects of the movement of persons.
A study published by the Supreme Judicial Council in 2025 showed that practical implementation raises detailed questions about seizure reports, repeat inspections, the status of judicial enforcement officers, and overlapping roles among the Authority, customs and police. This confirms the need for explicit allocation of responsibility and a unified chain of custody, rather than general enforcement powers for everyone working at a port of entry.
The digital environment has also developed since 2016. The Ministry of Finance describes the use of ASYCUDA and its connection to several bodies, and national platforms such as “Uboor” exist for certificates and international transport. The draft therefore rejects creating a new closed platform and makes interoperability between existing systems, and linking decisions and data to their lawful source, the default approach.
II — Proposed Legislative Policy
| Area | Proposed rule | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Borderline | The Border Forces Command is the principal operational body, with military support for threats exceeding the scope of law enforcement. | Prevent gaps in responsibility between ports of entry. |
| Official port of entry | The Border Ports Authority manages coordination, shared infrastructure and the command centre, without taking over the technical decisions of customs, passport control or health authorities. | On-site command without overlapping mandates. |
| Data | Interoperability between government systems, rather than a parallel database for every body. | Reduce paperwork and duplication and improve auditing. |
| Inspection | Risk management and targeting, using non-intrusive inspection before manual opening where appropriate. | Improve security and reduce crossing times. |
| The Region and Governorates | Preserve federal sovereign responsibilities, with implementation protocols, local services and data exchange. | Avoid institutional and local disputes. |
| Integrity | Official payment channels, individual accounts, cameras, measured staff rotation, unannounced audits and protected reporting. | Target opportunities for corruption within the process itself. |
III — Text of the Bill
In the name of the people
Presidency of the Republic
Pursuant to the enactment of the Council of Representatives under Article (61), paragraph (First), and Article (73), paragraph (Third), of the Constitution, the following law is issued:
Border Security, Ports of Entry and Integrated Border Management Law
Chapter One — Definitions, Objectives and General Principles
Article (1) — Definitions
For the purposes of this Law, the following terms shall have the meanings assigned to them: International borders: the land, river, maritime and air boundaries defining the territory of the Republic of Iraq under the Constitution, law and agreements in force. Border port of entry: an official location designated for the crossing of persons, goods or means of transport, including land and railway crossings, seaports and international airports. Border zone: an area designated for protection and surveillance purposes by regulation issued under this Law. Integrated border management: coordination of policies, operations and data among competent bodies to ensure security, sovereignty and facilitation of legitimate movement. The Authority: the Border Ports Authority. Border Command: the Border Forces Command within the Ministry of Interior, or the formation legally succeeding it. Body operating at a port of entry: any ministry or body not attached to a ministry exercising a statutory function within the port.
Article (2) — Objectives of the Law
This Law aims to protect the sovereignty of the Republic of Iraq and the integrity of its borders; prevent unlawful crossings, smuggling, organised crime, terrorism and human trafficking; unify operational management of ports of entry; ensure implementation of federal customs and security policy; facilitate legitimate movement of persons and goods; reduce duplication and paperwork; improve integrity and transparency; protect travellers' rights; and strengthen federal cooperation and cooperation with the Region, governorates and neighbouring states in accordance with the Constitution.
Article (3) — Federal Responsibilities
Protecting international borders; formulating and implementing national security policy; customs and foreign trade policy; and regulating nationality, residence and cross-border movement are federal responsibilities exercised under the Constitution. No local or regional body may establish an international port of entry, change its status, or impose a sovereign or customs measure inconsistent with federal law. Implementation shall involve institutional coordination with regional and governorate authorities wherever necessary.
Article (4) — Unified Sovereignty and Multiple Responsibilities
Integrated management does not mean merging all bodies into a single agency or removing their technical mandates. Customs retains responsibility for customs procedures, security bodies for their respective mandates, and health, agricultural, environmental and regulatory bodies for theirs, provided that they operate within a unified operational model, mandatory data exchange and coordinated on-site command under this Law.
Article (5) — Principles of Integrated Management
Border management shall be based on legality, unified sovereign decision-making, risk management, intelligence-led selective inspection, data exchange, documented procedures, separation of security and service channels where possible, restrictions proportionate to risk, non-discrimination, protection of privacy, continuity of legitimate trade, financial and administrative oversight, and accountability for decisions.
Article (6) — Prohibition of Unofficial Ports and Crossings
Persons, goods and means of transport are prohibited from crossing international borders outside official ports of entry, except where the law permits military operations, rescue, emergencies or official missions under a documented order from the competent authority. The authorities shall close smuggling routes and unofficial crossings and shall not convert realities on the ground into legal recognition of them.
Article (7) — Rights and Freedoms
Border security measures shall preserve human dignity, detention and investigation safeguards, children's rights, the rights of persons with disabilities, and the principle of non-refoulement where applicable under Iraq's obligations. Border security requirements may not be used as a pretext for collective punishment or discrimination based on identity, origin or affiliation.
Chapter Two — Institutional Structure and Allocation of Responsibilities
Article (8) — National Council for Integrated Border Management
A National Council for Integrated Border Management shall be formed, chaired by the Prime Minister or an authorised representative and comprising the ministers and heads of relevant federal bodies. The Council shall have no separate legal personality and shall not establish a parallel apparatus; its technical secretariat shall be located within the Border Ports Authority. The Council shall adopt national border policy, allocate responsibilities, resolve operational conflicts, and approve emergency and interoperability plans.
Article (9) — Council Membership
The Council shall include representatives of appropriate rank from the Ministries of Interior, Finance, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Transport, Health, Agriculture, Trade and Planning, the Iraqi National Intelligence Service, the National Security Service, the Border Ports Authority and competent oversight bodies. A representative of the Kurdistan Region, the governorate concerned or any specialist body may be invited when a matter within its mandate is considered, without prejudice to the constitutional distribution of powers.
Article (10) — Council Functions
The Council shall approve the national integrated border management strategy, the responsibility matrix, criteria for opening and closing ports, readiness levels, data exchange policy, infrastructure investment priorities, the risk management framework, plans to combat smuggling and unlawful crossings, performance indicators, and coordination mechanisms with neighbouring states.
Article (11) — Border Ports Authority
The Border Ports Authority shall continue as a federal authority attached to the Council of Ministers, possessing legal personality and administrative and financial independence within the law. It shall serve as the body responsible for administration, coordination and institutional operations within official ports of entry, without replacing customs, police, judicial or technical inspection authorities.
Article (12) — Authority Functions
The Authority shall manage shared port infrastructure; organise vehicle and traveller flows; monitor bodies' compliance with unified operating procedures; operate the joint command centre; identify violations; manage attendance and restricted-area access records; collect performance indicators; ensure electronic connectivity between bodies; and report to the Council of Ministers and oversight bodies.
Article (13) — Head of the Authority
The Authority shall be headed by an official of special grade appointed under the Constitution and law on the basis of competence, experience and integrity, responsible for administration and institutional operations, without intervening in other bodies' technical decisions. The internal regulations shall determine the Authority's structure, staffing establishment and units specialising in operational security, data, integrity and infrastructure.
Article (14) — Border Forces Command
The Border Forces Command within the Ministry of Interior shall protect the borderline and areas between official ports of entry, combat infiltration and cross-border smuggling, and monitor land, river and water routes within its mandate. It shall coordinate with the armed forces and other agencies through joint plans for threats exceeding its capabilities or falling within national defence.
Article (15) — Customs
The General Commission of Customs shall exercise its responsibilities for valuation, tariffs, origin, declarations, release, investigation and customs enforcement under customs and financial legislation. It shall comply with the shared data system and risk management and shall not repeat inspections without a documented lawful reason.
Article (16) — Passports and Residence
The competent body within the Ministry of Interior shall verify travel documents, visas, residence status, and decisions prohibiting or permitting entry and departure in accordance with the law. Its procedures shall be electronically connected to the port platform, respecting data protection rules and preventing disclosure of sensitive data to unauthorised persons.
Article (17) — Technical Bodies
Health, agricultural, veterinary, environmental, standards, security and other bodies shall perform their technical functions at ports in accordance with the law. They shall operate through a unified referral system specifying when inspection is required, who performs it, the maximum time allowed and acceptable documents. Additional approvals not provided for by a law or regulation in force are prohibited.
Article (18) — Governorates
Governorates shall, within their mandates, provide services outside the port's sovereign operational perimeter, including local roads, municipal services and development of surrounding areas. They shall not exercise federal passport, customs or border security functions. The Authority shall conclude service protocols with them specifying responsibilities, funding and maintenance.
Article (19) — Kurdistan Region
Operational arrangements at ports within the Kurdistan Region shall be governed by implementation agreements between the federal government and the regional government, ensuring uniform federal standards for sovereignty, security, customs, residence and foreign trade, real-time data exchange, and auditing of revenue and procedures, while respecting the Region's constitutional responsibilities for its internal affairs.
Chapter Three — Opening, Classification and Management of Ports of Entry
Article (20) — Establishing a Port or Changing Its Status
No international port of entry may be established, permanently closed, or have its type, operating hours or permitted crossing category changed except by a Council of Ministers decision, upon the National Council's recommendation and following security, financial, logistical and technical studies, taking the views of the governorate or Region concerned where appropriate.
Article (21) — Classification of Ports
Ports shall be classified as land, railway, maritime or air ports, and may be classified by function as ports for persons and goods or for specialised or seasonal commercial movement. Their classification, operating hours and available services shall be published. An unauthorised category may not pass except under a reasoned emergency decision.
Article (22) — Minimum Readiness
A port shall not open to the public unless it meets requirements for security, safety, passport control, customs, communications, backup power, basic inspection, a holding area, safe separation of inbound and outbound movements, an electronic registration system and an emergency plan. Phased operation under published restrictions may be permitted where risks meet acceptance criteria.
Article (23) — On-site Management
The port director shall head the operational coordination centre and shall not have authority to cancel a technical decision issued by a competent body. The director may organise the spatial and temporal sequence of procedures, request the attendance of the competent official, document obstruction, and refer violations to the Head of the Authority and the official's parent body.
Article (24) — Joint Command Centre
A joint command centre shall be established at each major port, comprising permanent or on-call representatives of the principal bodies. It shall monitor queues, incidents, alerts, inspection results, cameras and system continuity. All exceptional decisions shall be timestamped and their issuers identified.
Article (25) — Unified Operating Procedures
In coordination with competent bodies, the Authority shall adopt unified operating procedures for each type of port, specifying sequencing, handover points, responsibility for each decision, service levels, escalation cases and communication channels. Local instructions inconsistent with them are prohibited except in an urgent security situation, with the reason and duration documented.
Article (26) — Movement Channels
Where possible, traveller routes shall be separated from freight, entry from exit, private vehicles from commercial vehicles, and dangerous consignments from general freight. A fast lane may be established for trusted operators or frequent travellers under published criteria that do not compromise risk-based inspection.
Article (27) — Operating Hours
Port operating hours shall reflect traffic volumes, agreements with the state on the other side, and the capacity of Iraqi bodies. The operating hours of bodies within the port shall be aligned so that it does not remain open while a body required for release is unavailable. Changes shall be published with reasonable advance notice unless they are urgent.
Article (28) — Temporary Closure
On a security recommendation, the Prime Minister or an authorised representative may temporarily close a port or restrict movement during war, unrest, an epidemic, a disaster or a grave threat. If an immediate decision cannot be obtained, the port director may suspend movement for hours to the extent necessary, provided that the competent bodies are notified and the decision is subject to review.
Article (29) — Restricted Areas
Public, restricted and highly sensitive areas shall be designated within each port. Only holders of valid electronic authorisation linked to identity, role and time may enter restricted areas. Permits shall lapse automatically when their justification ends, an employee is transferred, or a contract expires.
Chapter Four — Security of the Borderline and Areas between Ports
Article (30) — Borderline Security Plan
The Border Forces Command shall prepare an annual sector plan identifying risk levels, gaps, unofficial routes, patrol deployment, and priorities for towers and aerial and river surveillance. Its strategic elements shall be presented to the National Council, while operational details shall be withheld from publication.
Article (31) — Area of Responsibility
The geographical responsibility of border units shall be defined through approved official digital maps, with deployment points linked by clear communication lines. No security gap shall be left between the responsibilities of Border Command and a port, between two federal formations, or between federal and regional forces.
Article (32) — Military Support
The armed forces may support the Ministry of Interior in border protection in the event of an external threat or major armed danger, or by decision of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. Policing and procedural responsibilities shall remain with the competent civilian bodies unless another legal arrangement is established.
Article (33) — Technical Surveillance
Radar, thermal cameras, sensors, unmanned aircraft, secure communications and warning systems may be used in border areas in accordance with the law. Data retention and access rules shall balance security requirements with privacy.
Article (34) — Unofficial Crossings
Border Command shall prepare and periodically update a national register of unofficial crossings, routes and high-risk locations. A closure, surveillance or field engineering plan shall be established for each location. Detailed vulnerabilities shall not be made public where disclosure would harm security.
Article (35) — Border Rivers and Waters
Surveillance of river and water sections of the border shall be organised through coordination among the Ministry of Interior, naval forces, Ministry of Water Resources, port authorities and environmental bodies. Responsibility for interception, rescue and investigation shall be specified for each sector.
Article (36) — Tunnels and Clandestine Facilities
Unauthorised tunnels, passages and facilities crossing borders or facilitating smuggling shall be treated as threats to sovereignty. They may be closed, removed or secured by order of the competent authority, while preserving evidence and notifying the judiciary where a crime is suspected.
Article (37) — Border Security Buffer
A security buffer may be designated in parts of the border zone, imposing proportionate restrictions on construction, excavation, photography or unusual movement. Restrictions shall be specified by a published regulation, with exemptions for residents' rights, land and farms to the extent permitted by security necessity, and compensation for expropriation or direct damage under the law.
Article (38) — Local Residents
Forces and civilian bodies shall adopt outreach programmes with border communities for reporting dangers, smuggling, mines and disasters. Informal informer networks outside the law and exploitation of residents' economic needs are prohibited. Reporters' confidentiality shall be protected under legislation in force.
Article (39) — Incident Response
The Ministry of Interior shall establish a unified protocol for infiltration, armed clashes, smuggling, rescue, and discovery of bodies or missing persons. It shall specify when an incident is a security, criminal or humanitarian matter, and who is responsible for the scene, evidence preservation and referral to the judiciary.
Chapter Five — Traveller, Migration and Asylum Management
Article (40) — Primary Traveller Screening
Traveller entry and departure procedures shall take place at a clearly designated service point using automated document reading and verification of validity, basic data and prohibition records in accordance with the law. Additional questioning and screening shall be limited to what risk indicators or legislation justify.
Article (41) — Avoiding Duplication
Security bodies may not repeat the same identity and document checks or questions without an independent functional justification. Verification results shall be transmitted electronically to the next body instead of re-entering data manually.
Article (42) — Travel Restrictions
No citizen may be prevented from leaving the country, nor any person prevented from entering or detained at a port, except on a lawful basis and under a verifiable decision issued by a competent authority. The official shall be able to see the decision's status, duration and issuing body without disclosure of more data than necessary.
Article (43) — Referral to Secondary Screening
A person shall be referred to secondary screening where there is a lawful reason or documented risk indicator. Secondary screening shall be separate from the general queue; its start, end, reason and responsible body shall be recorded. The person's basic needs shall be met, and the person shall not be held longer than necessary.
Article (44) — Children and Families
The best interests of the child shall be respected in border procedures. Children shall not be separated from their parents or lawful accompanying persons except where protection requires it or under a competent decision. Procedures shall verify the accompanying person's relationship and prevent child trafficking without arbitrarily obstructing families.
Article (45) — Persons with Disabilities and Older Persons
Ports shall provide accessible routes and assistance for persons with disabilities, older persons and patients, without unlawful charges. Requesting assistance shall not exempt a person from security or legal requirements.
Article (46) — Protection Applicants
If a person at the border expresses a serious fear of return or requests protection or asylum, the person shall immediately be referred to the competent body under applicable legislation and international obligations and shall not be automatically returned before their legal situation is assessed. Protection procedures shall be separated from criminal investigation where there is an independent suspicion.
Article (47) — Trafficking Victims
A person showing indicators of human trafficking or exploitation shall be treated as a potential victim pending specialist assessment, and shall have access to protection, care and an interpreter where needed. The person shall not be punished for an act directly connected with trafficking except in accordance with the law.
Article (48) — Detainees and Wanted Persons
Where a valid arrest warrant or judicial request is identified, the competent law enforcement body shall execute the measure and hand over the person under an official record stating the time, authority and reasons. The person shall not remain in the custody of civilian port employees after handover is completed.
Article (49) — Complaints
Each port shall provide a clear means of submitting complaints about treatment, extortion, delays or discrimination, with a tracking number and the ability to submit after departure. Complaints involving suspected crime or corruption shall be referred directly to the competent body.
Chapter Six — Goods, Freight and Means of Transport
Article (50) — Single Window
The state shall adopt a single electronic window for submitting data and documents relating to the movement of goods across borders. Bodies shall reuse data already entered. A service user may not be required to provide a paper copy of electronically authenticated information except during system failure or where a specific legal provision requires it.
Article (51) — Advance Data
Advance information on the consignment, means of transport, carrier, importer or exporter may be required within reasonable timeframes and standards, to assess risk and determine inspection before arrival. Trade secrets shall be protected, and data shall not be used for an unlawful purpose.
Article (52) — Risk Management
Inspections shall be based on a national risk management system integrating customs, security, health and technical indicators and assigning consignments to channels according to risk level. A high inspection rate shall not be an end in itself; performance shall be measured by targeting accuracy, release time and compliance.
Article (53) — Non-intrusive Inspection
Where appropriate, priority shall be given to X-ray equipment, scanners, automatic weighing and non-intrusive detection before opening a consignment. Equipment results shall be electronically linked to the declaration and stored in a manner preventing images from being substituted or separated from the consignment's identity.
Article (54) — Manual Inspection
A package or container shall not be opened for manual inspection except under a risk criterion, audit selection or lawful reason. The reason for opening, personnel involved, start and end times, and condition of seals shall be recorded, and the consignment shall be resealed with a traceable seal.
Article (55) — Seals and Tracking
Numbered or electronic seals shall be used for consignments requiring them, with the chain of custody documented from entry to release or transit. Loss of or tampering with a seal shall require investigation but shall not alone justify confiscation of goods without completing the procedures.
Article (56) — Transit
International transit movement shall be governed by procedures ensuring financial or customs guarantees, tracking, routes and deadlines, using recognised international transport systems where applicable to Iraq, without opening cargo at every point without a reason.
Article (57) — Dangerous Goods
Safe routes and areas shall be allocated for dangerous goods, chemical, biological and radiological materials, explosives and fuel. Their import, export or transit shall be permitted only with the required licences and controls and under the supervision of the competent technical body.
Article (58) — Medicines and Health Supplies
Unauthorised or non-compliant medicines and health supplies shall not be released. Approvals shall be verified electronically with the Ministry of Health and the competent regulatory body. No port employee may create a substitute approval or grant an oral exemption.
Article (59) — Animals, Plants and Food
Veterinary, agricultural and health quarantine procedures shall be applied according to risk assessment and approved certificates. National digital systems shall be used to verify certificates. Maximum periods for sampling and laboratory results shall be set where possible to prevent goods from spoiling.
Article (60) — Means of Transport
Vehicles, trains, ships and aircraft shall be subject to entry and departure registration and verification of crew, cargo and operational data. Violations shall be linked to the means of transport, rather than the driver alone, where responsibility lies with the carrier or operator.
Article (61) — Conditional Release
Goods may be released against a guarantee, undertaking or deposit of samples where the dispute concerns value, classification or a technical result not involving a grave health or security risk, in accordance with customs law and relevant legislation.
Chapter Seven — Data, Digital Systems and Interoperability
Article (62) — National Border Platform
The Authority shall connect port systems through a federal interoperability platform that does not require replacement of existing specialist systems, but enables exchange of data, decisions and timestamps through standard interface specifications and a transaction log that unauthorised employees cannot alter.
Article (63) — Reuse of Existing Systems
Priority shall be given to developing and connecting existing national systems, including customs systems and government platforms for transit, certificates and transport, before purchasing a parallel system performing the same function. Any new project shall identify a gap not addressed by the current infrastructure.
Article (64) — Identity and Permissions
System permissions shall be granted according to job role and the principle of least privilege; shared accounts are prohibited. Multi-factor authentication shall be used for sensitive functions, and every login, amendment or highly sensitive query shall be logged for audit purposes.
Article (65) — Data Quality
A source body shall be designated for each principal field. A consuming body shall not alter identity or consignment data whose original source is another body. A correction mechanism shall preserve the audit trail, reason and identity of the employee authorising the amendment.
Article (66) — Data Exchange
Bodies shall exchange the minimum necessary data in a timely manner. Isolated databases that prevent enforcement of the law or require citizens to carry documents already available to the state are prohibited. This does not entail disclosing raw intelligence to persons without clearance.
Article (67) — Data Protection
Data shall be classified as public, restricted or secret according to its nature, with retention, deletion and archiving periods defined. Sensitive data shall be encrypted in transit and at rest. Traveller or trade data may not be used for commercial, political or personal purposes.
Article (68) — Cybersecurity
Systems shall comply with national cybersecurity standards and maintain incident response plans, backups and periodic continuity tests. Each port shall have an emergency operating mode allowing minimum border functions to continue during network outages without enabling transactions outside the record.
Article (69) — Analytics and Risk Management
Advanced analytics may be used for risk assessment provided there is a legal basis, auditable criteria and human review of decisions affecting entry rights, detention or confiscation. A risk model alone shall not constitute sole evidence of a crime.
Article (70) — Cameras and Recording
Inspection, receipt, handover and sensitive storage areas shall be covered by cameras under a security plan. Recording retention periods shall balance investigation needs and privacy. Deliberately disabling a camera, changing its angle or erasing recordings outside documented maintenance procedures is prohibited.
Article (71) — Open Data
The Authority shall publish aggregate data on numbers of travellers, vehicles and consignments, processing times, closures, service levels and complaints, without revealing trade or security secrets, to enable public scrutiny and improve planning.
Chapter Eight — Integrity, Anti-corruption and Conflicts of Interest
Article (72) — Code of Conduct
The Council of Ministers shall adopt a unified code of conduct for port personnel covering gifts, hospitality, dealings with intermediaries, disclosure of interests, contact with traders, use of information and contact with parties outside working hours. The code shall apply in addition to disciplinary and integrity laws.
Article (73) — Prohibition of Unofficial Payments
No sum, fee, charge or service payment may be collected at a port outside official rules and channels. Verifiable electronic or official receipts shall be issued. A local cash fund may not be maintained except in an exceptional case specified by law and treasury instructions.
Article (74) — Rotation in Sensitive Posts
Posts presenting the highest risks through direct contact with money, consignments and inspection decisions shall be identified and subject to a considered rotation policy that does not cause loss of expertise. A competent employee's assignment may be extended following a risk review and reasoned approval.
Article (75) — Disclosure of Interests
Holders of posts specified by regulation shall disclose commercial interests, influential family relationships and any activity that could create a conflict. They shall not process transactions concerning themselves, relatives, business partners or entities in which they have a direct interest.
Article (76) — Unannounced Audits
The Authority, Commission of Integrity, Federal Board of Supreme Audit and competent oversight bodies may conduct unannounced audits within their respective mandates, including comparison of digital records with cameras, seals, weights and stock. Audit plans shall remain confidential so that audits do not become merely formal exercises.
Article (77) — Protected Reporting
Secure and confidential channels shall be provided for reporting bribery, smuggling, manipulation and pressure on employees. Retaliation against good-faith reporters is prohibited. Where possible, the reporter's identity shall be kept separate from the investigation file.
Article (78) — Intermediaries and Agents
The activities of customs brokers, agents and service providers within ports shall be regulated through licences, published lists, official fees and violation records. Unlicensed intermediaries may not enter restricted areas or be used to sell queue positions or influence.
Article (79) — Insider Risks
Each body shall establish a programme to detect internal collusion, misuse of privileges, and leaks of consignment data or patrol schedules, respecting employees' rights and ensuring that security vetting does not become an instrument of arbitrary treatment.
Article (80) — Port Procurement
Procurement of port infrastructure, equipment and services shall comply with public procurement and financial oversight laws. Where possible, the body defining specifications shall be separate from the contracting committee and the body receiving equipment and verifying its performance.
Article (81) — Referral to Integrity Authorities and the Judiciary
Where corruption, smuggling, forgery or abuse of authority is suspected, evidence shall immediately be preserved and the case referred to the competent investigative body; an administrative penalty alone shall not suffice. An administrative settlement may not conceal a criminal incident.
Chapter Nine — Enforcement, Investigation and Chain of Custody
Article (82) — Enforcement Officer Status
Legally authorised employees of the relevant bodies shall exercise judicial enforcement powers within their mandates. This Law does not confer general enforcement status on every Authority employee. A joint procedures manual shall specify who records the incident, who receives it, who prepares the report and who refers it to the judiciary.
Article (83) — Seizure Report
A seizure report shall be prepared under the relevant law and include the time and place of the incident, identities of the personnel involved, descriptions of seized items and seals, photographs, weighing or inspection data, and initial statements. Where possible, it shall be electronically linked to the transaction and consignment.
Article (84) — Chain of Custody
Every receipt or handover of seized items shall be recorded with a timestamp, recipient's identity, purpose and storage location, using appropriate containers or seals. The judiciary shall be notified of any material break in the chain of custody; a gap shall not be remedied through a subsequent undated report.
Article (85) — Reinspection
This Law shall not restrict an investigating judge's power to order reinspection, expert examination or testing where necessary. During reinspection, the condition of evidence shall be preserved, changes documented, results compared with the initial report, and reasons for differences stated.
Article (86) — Seized Goods Storage
Warehouses and yards designated for seized items shall be managed through inventory controls, cameras, seals and defined access permissions. Dangerous or perishable materials shall be separated and lawfully disposed of, rather than retained until they spoil where the law permits sale, destruction or re-export.
Article (87) — Technical Expertise
Laboratory and standards tests shall be conducted by an accredited body or competent official laboratory. Samples shall be linked to consignments through tracking codes preventing substitution. An interested party may request a second test or counter-expertise under the law where a reference sample can be retained.
Article (88) — Rights of the Interested Party
The interested party shall be notified of the reason for seizure or non-release, the body making the decision and the means of objection, unless the law prohibits disclosure of confidential information needed for an ongoing investigation. Goods or vehicles may not be held in limbo without a written decision.
Article (89) — Prompt Referral
Joint instructions shall set deadlines for referring cases and seized items to the judiciary or competent body to prevent loss of evidence or spoilage of goods. Exceeding a deadline shall be subject to review and an explanation of the reason.
Article (90) — Coordination with the Judiciary
Respecting judicial independence, the Authority and Supreme Judicial Council shall establish administrative communication channels to standardise requirements for reports, evidence preservation, electronic notifications and legal training, without interference in a judge's decision or the course of proceedings.
Chapter Ten — Emergencies, Public Health and Business Continuity
Article (91) — Emergency Plan
Each port shall maintain a multi-hazard emergency plan covering armed attacks, fires, explosions, dangerous materials, epidemics, floods, power and cyber system failures, and overcrowding. It shall identify alternative command arrangements, assembly and evacuation points, and communication with the other side of the border.
Article (92) — Epidemics and Health Risks
Border health measures shall be implemented by decision of the Ministry of Health or competent body under the law, limited in time and geographical scope, proportionate to risk, and periodically reviewed. Port management shall not create health requirements on its own initiative.
Article (93) — Continuity of Essential Trade
During crises, priority shall be given to the movement of medicines, food, fuel, relief materials and critical infrastructure supplies under specific risk controls. This shall not exempt them from inspection, but shall provide a coordinated fast channel.
Article (94) — Technical Outages
During electronic system outages, a pre-numbered emergency register or secure alternative shall be used. Transactions shall be entered into the system immediately upon restoration, marked as completed during the outage. Personal files or unapproved applications may not be used to store border data.
Article (95) — Evacuation and Partial Closure
In coordination with the security force commander, the port director may evacuate part of the port or suspend a particular route in the event of immediate danger, while maintaining emergency corridors, notifying the Authority and competent authorities, and recording the reason for the decision and when it is lifted.
Article (96) — Joint Exercises
Major ports shall conduct periodic exercises testing evacuation, medical response, system outages, hazardous materials incidents and attempted breaches. Weaknesses and remediation plans shall be documented without publishing details that could be exploited to compromise security.
Chapter Eleven — Federal, Regional and International Coordination
Article (97) — Sector Coordination Rooms
The National Council may establish sector coordination rooms for the western, eastern, northern, southern or maritime borders as needed, comprising federal bodies and representatives of the Region and governorates. These rooms shall not create new sovereign powers.
Article (98) — Uniform Procedures at All Ports
Uniform federal standards for tariffs, documents, residence and security data shall apply at all international ports. Local operational needs shall be addressed through a published implementation procedure that does not change the federal rule or create a fee or exemption not established by law.
Article (99) — Resolving Disagreements
If a disagreement arises between a federal body and a body in a Region or governorate over a border procedure, the minimum measures necessary for security and protection of rights shall continue. Unilateral decisions completely halting port movement are prohibited. The dispute shall immediately be referred to the National Council or competent judicial authority according to its nature.
Article (100) — Contact Points with Neighbouring States
In coordination with competent bodies, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs shall designate official channels with neighbouring states for border incidents, operating hours, return of persons and missing vehicles, health coordination and rescue. Local arrangements with implications for sovereignty may not be established outside these channels.
Article (101) — Joint Centres
Joint contact points or centres may be established on both sides of the border under an approved governmental agreement or memorandum to exchange operational information and coordinate movement. No foreign body may exercise executive authority within Iraqi territory except as permitted by a ratified agreement and a law in force.
Article (102) — International Information Exchange
Information on consignments, vehicles, travel documents and risks may be exchanged with states and organisations under agreements and the law, respecting purpose limitation and data minimisation. Sensitive data shall not be transferred where doing so threatens fundamental rights, an Iraqi investigation or national security.
Article (103) — Joint Operations
Coordinated operations against smuggling, trafficking or transnational crime may be conducted with neighbouring states by decision of the competent federal bodies. Each force shall remain within its own state's territory unless an explicit international and domestic legal basis provides otherwise.
Chapter Twelve — Infrastructure, Financing and Services
Article (104) — Port Investment Plan
The Authority shall develop a multi-year investment plan prioritised by risk, traffic volume and infrastructure condition, coordinating with the Ministries of Planning, Finance, Transport and Interior and other bodies to prevent duplicate projects or facilities disproportionate to the port's size.
Article (105) — Ownership of Assets
Ownership of federally funded land, buildings and equipment shall be registered in the name of the competent legal body. A unified asset register for each port shall identify the owner, user and body responsible for maintenance, preventing disputes when management changes.
Article (106) — Maintenance and Life Cycle
Inspection or surveillance equipment shall not be purchased unless the procurement study includes operating, maintenance, software, spare parts and training costs, useful life and a replacement plan. Maintenance shall be budgeted before expansion through purchases of new equipment.
Article (107) — Commercial Services
Cafés, parking, warehouses and non-sovereign commercial services shall be governed by transparent contracts and published charges, with their areas separated from security and customs decision-making areas. No commercial concession may enable its holder to influence the order of transactions or access data.
Article (108) — Service Charges
Neither the Authority nor port management may introduce a fee or charge without a legal basis. Applicable charges and payment methods shall be displayed prominently and published online. Direct cash collection shall be prohibited wherever electronic payment is possible.
Article (109) — Budget
The Authority's budget shall form part of the federal general budget, with clear classifications for operations, maintenance, security and digital infrastructure. Sovereign port expenditure may not be financed through local collections outside state accounts.
Article (110) — Joint Procurement
Bodies operating at ports may jointly procure electricity, communications, maintenance, inspection and general services where this reduces costs and avoids multiple suppliers. Each contract shall remain subject to financial, competition and audit legislation.
Chapter Thirteen — Oversight, Performance and Transparency
Article (111) — Parliamentary Oversight
National border policy, expenditure, agreements and results shall be subject to parliamentary oversight under the Constitution. The government shall submit an annual report to the Council of Representatives covering general trends in smuggling and crossings, infrastructure condition, processing times, projects and financial oversight, withholding operational details whose publication would harm security.
Article (112) — Federal Board of Supreme Audit
The Federal Board of Supreme Audit shall exercise its mandate over the Authority, expenditure, revenue and systems with financial implications, and shall have access to digital records under the law. Bodies shall follow up audit findings through a time-bound corrective plan.
Article (113) — Commission of Integrity
The Commission of Integrity shall exercise its responsibilities for corruption offences, illicit enrichment and conflicts of interest under the law. The Authority, Ministry of Interior and customs shall provide organised access to data necessary for investigations in response to lawful requests.
Article (114) — Performance Indicators
The National Council shall adopt uniform indicators, including traveller crossing time, consignment release time, inspection rate, targeting accuracy, number of system outages, complaints, integrity violations and the proportion of digital transactions. No single indicator shall be used to judge performance.
Article (115) — Measuring Release Time
Bodies shall periodically study goods release time from arrival to permission to depart, distinguishing the time attributable to each body, the service user or the laboratory. Aggregate results and plans to reduce unjustified delays shall be published.
Article (116) — Monthly Reports
Each port director shall submit a monthly report to the Authority covering traffic, violations, stoppages, incidents, service time and coordination problems. Reports shall be consolidated into a national dashboard enabling comparison of ports and detection of deviations.
Article (117) — Public Transparency
The Authority shall publish laws, instructions, operating hours, charges, services, lists of licensed customs brokers, complaint procedures and general statistics. A procedure affecting the public may not be kept secret merely because a security body issued it, where it does not reveal operational details.
Article (118) — Independent Review
The Council of Ministers may commission an independent academic, oversight or advisory body to assess the border system or a particular port for integrity, efficiency, security and trade facilitation, protecting confidential data and without replacing constitutional bodies.
Chapter Fourteen — Liability, Violations and Penalties
Article (119) — Individual Responsibility
Every employee or service member shall be responsible for decisions or actions taken within their mandate. A superior's order shall not exempt them from liability where it constitutes a manifest crime or requires collection of an unlawful sum or admission of a person or consignment contrary to a binding decision.
Article (120) — Abuse of Office
Without prejudice to any heavier penalty, anyone exploiting their port position to facilitate smuggling or unlawful crossing, alter an inspection result, arrange queue priority in exchange for a benefit, or obstruct a transaction for extortion shall be punished under laws in force.
Article (121) — Tampering with Records
Intentionally altering weights, images, seals, entry and departure data, inspection results, custody records or procedure times to conceal a violation shall require referral to the competent investigative bodies, in addition to disciplinary liability.
Article (122) — Unauthorised Entry
Anyone intentionally entering a restricted area, using another person's card, identity or permit, or assisting such conduct shall be punished under the law. Employment-related liability shall be doubled where the offender is an employee or contractor entrusted with the access system.
Article (123) — Unlawful Crossing
Penalties under existing laws shall apply to unlawful crossing, smuggling, trafficking and forgery; this Law does not create double punishment for the same act. Anyone requesting international protection or showing indicators of trafficking shall be referred to the appropriate legal process.
Article (124) — Company Liability
The use of a transport, customs clearance or warehousing company shall not exempt the natural person responsible. Administrative measures may be taken against a licence or contract where a repeated pattern of violations is established through procedures ensuring notice, response and appeal.
Article (125) — Administrative Penalties
No administrative penalty may be imposed on a service user or company without a statutory provision or lawful delegation. It shall be written, reasoned, proportionate and open to complaint or appeal. Detention of goods may not be used to pressure payment of a disputed fine where the law permits an alternative guarantee.
Article (126) — Preservation of Other Laws
This Chapter shall not prejudice judicial jurisdiction or customs, penal, counter-terrorism, anti-trafficking, narcotics control, integrity, procedural or other penal legislation.
Chapter Fifteen — Complaints, Appeals and Protection of Service Users
Article (127) — Written Decisions
A decision refusing entry, seizing goods, stopping a vehicle, revoking a licence or imposing an administrative penalty shall be written or electronically recorded and state its legal basis, issuing body and means of objection, unless the law permits withholding part of the reasons to protect an investigation or confidential information.
Article (128) — Administrative Complaints
Each body shall establish an expedited procedure for complaints against its border decisions and determine them within a period appropriate to the transaction. A complaint shall not prevent recourse to the courts where permitted by law.
Article (129) — Urgent Matters
Priority shall be given to complaints concerning medicines, perishable goods, detained travellers and vehicles carrying aid or essential materials, without compromising investigations or security.
Article (130) — Compensation
Claims for compensation for seizure, damage, unlawful delay or abuse of authority shall be governed by state and employee liability rules under laws in force. Delay resulting merely from a lawful inspection shall not automatically entitle a person to compensation.
Article (131) — Access to Information
An applicant shall be entitled to information on the status of their transaction, the body holding it, missing documents, official charges and expected service time, excluding information whose disclosure is prohibited by law.
Article (132) — Interpretation and Assistance
Language assistance shall be provided where possible in matters concerning rights, investigations or protection. Persons with disabilities shall be entitled to reasonable accommodation to complete procedures.
Chapter Sixteen — Transitional and Final Provisions
Article (133) — Continuation of the Authority
The Border Ports Authority established under Law No. (30) of 2016 shall continue with its legal personality, rights, obligations, assets and employees, adapting its units and functions to this Law without interruption of service.
Article (134) — Repeal of the Previous Authority Law
Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 shall be repealed upon this Law's entry into force. Regulations, instructions and decisions issued under it shall remain effective insofar as they do not conflict with this Law, until replaced within the specified periods.
Article (135) — Existing Instructions
Instructions governing the Border Ports Authority's units and functions and all operational instructions shall be reviewed within one hundred and eighty days. Provisions creating duplication, allowing non-uniform procedures, or conflicting with interoperability and risk management shall be repealed.
Article (136) — Transition Plan
Within ninety days of publication of this Law, the Council of Ministers shall approve a transition plan specifying stages for connecting systems, allocating responsibilities, classifying ports, auditing permits, establishing command centres and transferring contracts and projects, without suspending port operations.
Article (137) — Responsibility Matrix
Within ninety days, the Authority shall prepare a national matrix specifying, for every port procedure, the decision-making body, implementing body, body receiving the result and completion time. The non-security version shall be published for the public.
Article (138) — Electronic Connectivity
The principal bodies shall connect to the national platform within no more than eighteen months. The Council of Ministers may extend the period for a particular body by a reasoned decision where a documented technical or contractual obstacle exists.
Article (139) — Permit Review
All cards and permits for access to restricted areas shall be reviewed within six months of entry into force. Those not linked to a current role or valid contract shall be cancelled. Permits shall not transfer automatically to the new system.
Article (140) — Standardising Charges
In coordination with the Authority, the Ministry of Finance shall, within one hundred and twenty days, prepare a national register of fees and charges collected at ports, halt collections lacking a lawful basis or valid decision, and unify payment and collection channels.
Article (141) — Preservation of Specific Laws
Customs, passports, foreigners' residence, health, agricultural and veterinary quarantine, transport, penal and procedural laws and all other specific laws shall remain in force. This Law shall operate as a framework for coordination and integrated management unless an amendment or repeal is expressly provided.
Article (142) — Regulations and Instructions
The Council of Ministers shall issue regulations needed to define the border zone, port opening criteria, integrated management, data protection and emergencies. The Authority and competent ministries shall issue technical instructions within their respective mandates within one hundred and eighty days.
Article (143) — Review after Three Years
Three years after entry into force, the government shall submit to the Council of Representatives a comprehensive assessment of the Law's effect on border security, smuggling, revenue, crossing times, integrity and interoperability, accompanied by any necessary draft amendments.
Article (144) — Entry into Force
This Law shall enter into force ninety days after publication in the Official Gazette.
IV — Statement of Reasons
This Law is enacted to unify the legal framework for protecting the borders of the Republic of Iraq and managing international ports of entry; implement exclusive federal responsibilities concerning national security, customs, foreign trade, nationality and residence; address overlapping roles among bodies operating within ports and between borderline security and crossing management; develop Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 into a broader framework that preserves the Authority and precisely defines its mandate; adopt risk management, interoperability, digital transformation, integrity, chain of custody and parliamentary oversight; and facilitate legitimate movement of persons and goods while protecting human rights and national sovereignty.
V — Explanatory Memorandum
1. The Law Integrates the Process, Not the Institutions
One of the most common mistakes in border reform is trying to create a single agency that does everything. Customs decisions require financial and legal expertise, entry decisions require residence and passport competence, and health inspections require a technical body. The draft therefore preserves institutions and prevents their duplication, while connecting their steps within a single pathway with clear responsibilities and timeframes.
2. The Borderline Differs from the Port of Entry
Protecting the areas between ports is a continuous border security function involving surveillance, patrols and response. A port itself is an organised crossing point where multiple services and decisions intersect. The Law separates the two domains and then establishes handover rules so that the area near a port does not become a gap in responsibility.
3. Retaining the Border Ports Authority Instead of Creating a New Authority
Law No. (30) of 2016 established an existing authority with assets, staff and institutional experience. The less costly and faster solution is to broaden the legal framework and clarify responsibilities, rather than create a parallel authority. The same legal entity therefore continues, with its function directed towards managing joint operations, data and infrastructure, while technical bodies retain their decision-making powers.
4. From Universal Inspection to Risk Management
Inspecting every traveller and consignment consumes time and resources and may actually reduce security quality by treating high and low risks alike. The proposed model collects advance data, targets higher-risk cases and retains random audit selection, measuring targeting accuracy rather than merely the number of inspections.
5. Digitalisation Does Not Mean a New System Every Time
Government projects and systems already exist for customs, transit and certificates. Buying a new platform does not solve the problem if data remain isolated. The draft therefore makes interoperability the default, identifies the “source of truth” for each data item, prohibits shared accounts, and links every amendment to the employee's identity and its time.
6. Integrity Is Part of Operational Design
Penalties after corruption occurs are not enough. The Law prohibits unofficial payments, makes charges verifiable, links weights, images and seals to transactions, applies individual access permissions, and encourages unannounced audits and protected reporting. These tools reduce opportunities for manipulation before they become criminal cases.
7. The Federation, Region and Governorates
The Constitution establishes exclusive federal responsibilities for national security, borders, customs, nationality and residence. At the same time, ports located in governorates or the Region require local services and daily cooperation. The draft therefore distinguishes sovereignty, which remains federal, from implementation and service arrangements that may be governed by agreements, protocols and data exchange.
8. Security and Human Rights Are Not Conflicting Choices
The draft gives border agencies clear powers but ties restrictions to a legal basis and a documentable reason, prohibits indefinite detention, and ensures referral of protection applicants and trafficking victims to the appropriate procedures. Legal discipline improves security by preserving the admissibility of evidence in court and reducing arbitrary decisions.
VI — Alignment with Existing Legislation and Institutions
| Reference or Institution | Status after the Draft Enters into Force |
|---|---|
| Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 | Repealed and replaced by this Law, while preserving the Authority, its rights, obligations, assets and staff. |
| Instructions No. (3) of 2018 | Remain temporarily effective insofar as consistent, then reviewed within 180 days. |
| Customs Law No. (23) of 1984, as amended | Remains the specific law governing customs decisions and procedures; the draft adds a framework for coordination, risk management, interoperability and a shared chain of custody. |
| Foreigners' Residence Law No. (76) of 2017 | Remains the reference for foreigners' entry, residence and departure; the draft unifies procedures within the port. |
| Passports Law No. (32) of 2015 | Remains the reference for citizens' travel documents, subject to applicable judicial rulings concerning any amendments. |
| Ministry of Interior / Border Forces Command | Responsible for security of the borderline and areas between ports, coordinating with ports and the armed forces according to the risk. |
| Border Ports Authority | Becomes the hub for coordination, operational management, shared infrastructure and data within ports, without absorbing other bodies' responsibilities. |
| Existing Digital Systems | Integrated through interoperability; replaced only where a functional or security gap is demonstrated. |
VII — Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements
First 90 Days: Form the National Council, approve the transition plan, prepare the responsibility matrix, and inventory current charges, systems and permits.
Within 180 days: Update instructions, adopt unified operating procedures and the code of conduct, begin reviewing access cards, and establish risk management and emergency standards.
Within 12 months: Activate command centres at major ports, unify performance dashboards, and connect core records, cameras, weights and chain of custody.
Within 18 months: Complete interoperability for the principal bodies or grant a reasoned extension to a particular body, maintaining secure alternatives without disrupting legitimate movement.
VIII — Financial and Implementation Impact
The draft does not recommend establishing a new ministry or authority, thereby avoiding the fixed cost of additional structures. Its main fiscal impact lies in connecting systems, command centres, maintenance of inspection and surveillance equipment, upgrading infrastructure at weaker ports, training and cybersecurity. Because these costs vary substantially between ports, and public sources lack a unified asset database supporting a reliable estimate, the draft does not provide a falsely precise aggregate figure.
Mandatory Financing Method: Before any capital project is included, the Authority, in coordination with the Ministries of Planning and Finance, shall prepare an asset baseline. Each project shall account for establishment costs; five years of operations, maintenance, communications, licensing, spare parts and training; existing equipment that can be reused; and integration costs with current systems. Alternatives shall then be compared by life-cycle cost rather than purchase price.
Some reforms are expected to generate operational savings by reducing paperwork, duplication, untargeted inspections and parallel systems, and may improve revenue by reducing smuggling and manipulation. These savings must not, however, be booked as guaranteed revenue before a baseline is established and actual measurement conducted.
Ninth — Comparative International References
The draft draws on the international shift towards coordinated border management, particularly the World Customs Organization's SAFE Framework, which combines supply chain security, trade facilitation, cooperation between customs and government agencies, and risk management. The 2025 edition emphasises inter-agency cooperation, insider threats and integrity, principles reflected in the rules on interoperability, auditing and internal collusion risks.
Other countries' models are not transposed literally to Iraq. Its federal constitutional structure, multiple land, maritime and air ports, the presence of a Region and governorates, and borders with differing security environments require an Iraqi model that preserves federal decision-making while allowing flexible implementation arrangements without duplicated sovereign authority.
X — Sources and References
- Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005 — Iraqi Council of Representatives — Official/Institutional Link. Articles 109 and 110, particularly exclusive federal responsibility for national security policy, protection of Iraq's borders, customs policy, and regulation of nationality and residence.
- Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 — Ministry of Justice — Official/Institutional Link. The Authority's existing legal framework before the proposed law.
- Border Ports Authority Law No. (30) of 2016 — Translation Published by the Ministry of Justice — Official/Institutional Link. Reference for the structure of the existing law and the Authority's status.
- Instructions No. (3) of 2018 — Units and Functions of the Border Ports Authority — Official/Institutional Link. Regulatory reference for units and functions established under the law in force.
- Supreme Judicial Council Study on Border Ports — 23/Studies/2025 — Official/Institutional Link. Explains the practical relationship between seizure reports, customs law, the role of port employees and judicial enforcement.
- Customs Law No. (23) of 1984, as Amended — Published Official References — Official/Institutional Link. Remains the specific reference for customs procedures and enforcement, complemented by the proposed law's integrated management provisions.
- Foreigners' Residence Law No. (76) of 2017 — Ministry of Justice — Official/Institutional Link. Reference for foreigners' entry, residence and departure.
- Passports Law No. (32) of 2015 — Ministry of Justice — Official/Institutional Link. Reference for citizens' travel documents, noting subsequent judicial developments concerning its amendment.
- Ministry of Justice — Federal Supreme Court Decision Concerning the First Amendment to the Passports Law — Official/Institutional Link. Documents the ruling that First Amendment Law No. (6) of 2025 is unconstitutional.
- Ministry of Finance — ASYCUDA Project and Integration of Customs Procedures — Official/Institutional Link. Documents existing digital customs systems and connections with the Border Ports Authority and other bodies, supporting the principle of connecting systems rather than creating a parallel one.
- National Centre for Digital Transformation — Uboor Platform — Official/Institutional Link. An example of existing government infrastructure for certificates, transit movement, TIR and data connectivity.
- Council of Representatives — Committee on Border Ports and Protection of the National Product — Official/Institutional Link. Reference for current parliamentary oversight of port and customs operations.
- World Customs Organization — SAFE Framework of Standards 2025 — Official/Institutional Link. International reference for supply chain risk management, cooperation between customs and government bodies, and trade security and facilitation.
- IOM Iraq — Cross-border Monitoring Report, Sep–Nov 2025 — Official/Institutional Link. A recent reference on the nature of movement through some Iraqi crossings with Türkiye and Syria.
Ali Zuweid's Political Programme · POL-30 · Version 1.0