Skip to content
POL-50

This is a proposal for discussion, not an enacted law.

Ali Zuweid's Political Programme

Proposed bill · Energy, Infrastructure, Water, Environment and Urban Development

Electricity Market Regulation and Power Sector Restructuring Law

Document numberPOL-50
Version1.0
Publication and update date5 October 2026
ScopeRepublic of Iraq

Executive Summary

This bill addresses Iraq's structural electricity problems legislatively: one ministry makes policy, undertakes much regulation and simultaneously owns generation, transmission and distribution companies. The sector needs clear separation between policymaker, market regulator and consumer protector, network operator, and electricity producers and sellers. The bill does not propose automatic privatisation. It establishes independent regulation, unifies federal transmission operation, requires accounting and functional separation, and prepares public companies to operate on measurable performance and cost rules.

The market moves gradually from a regulated model close to present conditions towards wider competition once metering, settlement, collection and network capability are ready. The bill prohibits a merely formal transition to a ‘free market’ without prerequisites. Early priorities remain unified data, reduced losses, modern metering, improved collection and service quality, a neutral transmission operator and an independent regulator. Later, large consumers may contract directly, while storage, demand management and new sources participate in system services.

The bill establishes gradual tariffs and financial sustainability: no broad household increases before improved metering, collection and service and clear vulnerable-consumer protection, moving from invisible general subsidies to transparent targeted support. It requires government bodies to pay, regulates consumer rights, bills, objections and compensation, and establishes interconnection, investment, contract, transparency, beneficial ownership, cybersecurity and emergency rules.

Proposed Legislative Policy

Institutional transformation established by the Law
FunctionTarget arrangementLegal safeguard
Policy and planningMinistry of ElectricityNo interference in licensing, tariffs or daily operations
Economic regulation and consumer protectionIndependent regulatory authorityProfessional board, public consultation, reasoned decisions and judicial appeal
Transmission and system operationUnified, neutral federal transmission operatorNon-discriminatory access, grid code and separation from generation and supply interests
GenerationPublic and private companies gradually competingLicensing, cost measurement and competitive new contracts
DistributionPerformance-based regulated geographical monopolyRegulated tariffs, loss and quality targets and independent oversight
SupplyInitially regulated, progressively open to competitionUniversal service and consumer protection before market opening

Competition is not an end in itself. Transmission and distribution remain regulated natural monopolies; generation and supply open where competition can reduce costs and improve choice. Reform starts with separate accounts and data and access and tariff rules. Wider liberalisation follows only if indicators demonstrate readiness.

Statement of Reasons

This Law is enacted to establish modern integrated power-sector regulation; separate policy from regulation and commerce; ensure independent tariffs, access and consumer protection; unify federal transmission operation; restructure public companies with measurable accounts and performance; prepare gradual, orderly investment and technology entry; address losses, weak metering and collection; improve continuity and supply security; and regulate interconnection and cross-border trade.

General Explanatory Memorandum

1. Why a sectoral law rather than limited administrative amendment?

The 2017 law organised the Ministry and companies but concentrated potentially conflicting policy, ownership, investment and tariff functions. A modern market needs an independent regulator assessing network and service costs, resolving disputes and ensuring neutral access to monopoly infrastructure. Independence does not weaken the Ministry; it refocuses it on policy, planning and energy security while reducing conflicts in daily technical and economic decisions.

2. Why no proposed privatisation?

Public ownership is not the only legal problem, and private ownership does not automatically ensure efficiency. Deeper problems are absent functional separation, auditable accounts, incentives and performance accountability. The bill normally retains public network assets, converts them into regulated performance-based institutions and opens generation, services and partnerships to private participation where valuable. Privatisation or long concessions require separate decisions and legal and financial assessment.

3. Gradual markets, not institutional shock

Liberalisation without time-based metering, settlement and reliable collection may turn administrative problems into commercial debt and disputes. The bill stages regulated central purchasing and competitive new contracts, large-consumer eligibility, then balancing or day-ahead markets when ready. Practical indicators, not dates alone, determine transitions.

4. Unified transmission and system operation

The 2017 law lists regional transmission companies within the Ministry. Growing international links and generation sources increase the need for a unified federal operator neutrally allocating capacity, scheduling generation and managing congestion, frequency and reserves. The bill unifies assets or operation under a federal company rather than requiring sale, separating generation and supply interests.

5. Losses, metering and collection

Tariffs and costs cannot be reformed without knowing energy entering each network level and actual sales and collection. Divergent national and international loss figures themselves signal a data problem. The bill legally requires technical/commercial separation and consistent metering and links part of allowed distribution revenue to realistic loss reduction.

6. Tariffs and social protection

The bill proposes no automatic immediate price rise. Reform begins with metering, collection, ending unfunded exemptions, government payment and better service. A multiyear cost-revenue roadmap follows, with targeted vulnerable support and basic consumption protection instead of open-ended subsidies disproportionately benefiting large consumers and concealing budget costs.

7. Consumer protection within economic reform

Collection rights are paired with accurate meters, understandable bills, effective objections and published quality standards. The bill prevents automatic vulnerable-household disconnection without notice and safeguards, introduces compensation for certain failures and simplified small-dispute settlement with judicial appeal retained.

8. Regional interconnection

Links with Jordan, Türkiye and Gulf Cooperation Council countries add flexibility and diversity but require technical and commercial obligations, independent operation and clear capacity, procurement and settlement rules. Interconnection strengthens security rather than replacing domestic capacity, grid and fuel reform.

9. Renewable energy relationship

Market and renewable laws remain separate. The former covers networks, licensing, metering, settlement, access and general tariffs; the latter incentives, auctions, prosumers and renewable-specific technical or financial mechanisms. This avoids duplication while renewable resources enter under common market rules with their specialised benefits.

10. Governance and transparency

The bill requires published tariff methodologies, indicators and state-obligating contract summaries, beneficial ownership disclosure and equal public/private access, metering and safety rules. It regulates Authority conflicts and makes decisions subject to grievances and judicial appeal.

Alignment with Existing Legislation

Legislation requiring alignment
LegislationPositionProposed treatment
Ministry of Electricity Law No. 53 of 2017Organises the Ministry and companies with broad regulatory, operating and investment powersTemporarily retained; government amendments within one year remove conflicts and separate regulation from ownership and operation
Electricity Supply and Conditions Instructions No. 1 of 2023Govern supply terms, meters, charges and servicesRetained until Authority replacement, with gradual tariff-power transfer
Amended Public Companies Law No. 22 of 1997Governs public-company legal formsApplies alongside this Law's accounting separation and corporate governance
Amended Federal Financial Management Law No. 6 of 2019Governs budgets, public commitments and guaranteesApplies to sovereign guarantees, subsidies, contingent liabilities and treasury-obligating contracts
Investment, competition, consumer protection and anti-money-laundering lawsRegulate general licensing, competition, beneficial ownership and consumer rightsApply concurrently; sector licences do not replace other approvals
Environmental, cybersecurity and data protection laws when effectiveRegulate environmental and digital obligationsApply to electricity operators as critical infrastructure

Transitional Provisions and Implementation Requirements

Legal transition programme
Period from entry into forceMilestone
0–3 monthsTransition committee and inventory of regulatory functions, assets, contracts and data
Within 6 monthsAppoint the Federal Electricity Market Regulatory Authority board
Within 12 monthsTransfer core regulatory functions; submit Ministry Law amendments
Within 18 monthsIssue licence, tariff, grid, distribution, metering and quality rules
Within 24 monthsUnify transmission companies or operation under one federal company with functionally independent control
From the second yearSeparate activity accounts and unified loss, collection and quality baselines
3–5 yearsLimited large-consumer opening if metering, settlement and grid conditions are met; develop balancing markets
After 5 yearsIndependently assess wider supply and short-term competition rather than presume its feasibility

These periods concern legal and institutional foundations, not promises to complete every infrastructure project or achieve 24-hour supply within them. Full stability also depends on fuel, generation and network investment programmes beyond this Law.

Financial and Implementation Impact

The Law gives no aggregate electricity reform cost, which requires separate investment planning for generation, fuel, transmission, distribution and meters within government planning and Iraq Vision 2045. Direct legislative costs centre on the regulator, market, metering and settlement systems, and accounting and company restructuring. Existing human and technical resources and reasonable fees may finance a substantial share.

The main financial effect is changed cost, subsidy and loss accounting rather than establishing the Authority. In 2025, the IMF identified better collection and meters as essential to financial reform and noted tariffs alone cannot solve high losses. The bill therefore requires unified loss baselines, visible budget subsidies and financial-management-law assessment of guarantees and long contracts.

Implementation needs three information systems: licensing and regulation, market metering and settlement, and unified performance data. They should reuse Ministry and company systems where possible rather than create parallel ones, with auditability, exchange and cybersecurity.

Brief International Comparison

Modern electricity models, despite different liberalisation and ownership, share independent tariff and market regulators, transmission separation from generation and supply, non-discriminatory access, technical codes, metering and settlement, consumer protection and universal service. EU Directive 2019/944 is an advanced example; Egyptian electricity law provides a regional independent-regulator and regulated-access model.

The bill does not copy full advanced-market liberalisation. Iraqi losses, metering, collection and capacity gaps require transition. It adopts separation and independent regulation without an immediate complete power exchange or universal household supplier choice. This also aligns with recent IEA literature stressing market design serving security, investment and flexibility rather than becoming detached from system characteristics.

Sources and References

  1. Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005
    General constitutional reference for federal, regional and governorate powers and legislative and oversight authority.
  2. Ministry of Electricity Law No. (53) of 2017 — Iraqi Gazette issue 4443
    Applicable law governing the Ministry, units, generation, transmission and distribution companies, tariffs and investment.
  3. Electricity Supply and Conditions Instructions No. (1) of 2023 — Iraqi Gazette issue 4735
    Current supply, metering, services and subscription framework.
  4. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Discussion of Electricity Ministry amendments and renewable energy bill, 21 July 2026
    Confirms ongoing amendment of the 2017 law alongside renewable legislation.
  5. Iraqi Council of Representatives — Electricity and Energy Committee, 4 October 2026
    Latest parliamentary follow-up available before preparation on renewables, ministerial budget and government programme.
  6. Iraqi News Agency — Planned capacity and summer 2026 demand
    Official Iraqi data indicate demand around 55 thousand megawatts against planned summer generation of 29–30 thousand, highly sensitive to gas availability.
  7. Iraqi News Agency — Current generation around 22 thousand megawatts, 13 June 2026
    Recent reference for actual generation and system allocation.
  8. Iraqi News Agency — Regional interconnection of 1,250 megawatts, 28 April 2026
    Reference for Turkish, Gulf and Jordanian links and supply diversification.
  9. International Monetary Fund — Iraq 2025 Article IV consultation
    Identifies high distribution losses, weak cost recovery and need for metering and collection improvements before tariff reform while protecting low-income groups.
  10. World Bank — Iraq electric power transmission and distribution loss indicator
    International IEA-based data showing exceptionally high losses under definitions differing from national distribution data.
  11. IEA — National Climate Resilience Assessment for Iraq
    Analysis of available generation, demand growth, losses, fuel dependence and grid climate resilience.
  12. UNDP Iraq — Energy Transition: From Policies to Actions in the Power Sector of Iraq, 2025
    Describes transmission, distribution and loss challenges, network modernisation and energy transition management needs.
  13. EU Directive 2019/944 on common rules for the internal market for electricity
    Comparative reference for unbundling, regulator independence, access, universal service, consumer protection and tariffs.
  14. IEA — Electricity Market Design, 2025
    Recent electricity market design reference on aligning short-term markets, investment mechanisms and supply security.
  15. Egyptian Electric Utility and Consumer Protection Regulatory Agency — Electricity Law No. 87 of 2015 and regulatory frameworks
    Regional comparison for market regulation, transmission access and the regulator's role.

Last live-source verification date: 5 October 2026. Diagnostic figures reflect sources at preparation and do not become legal targets unless expressly stated in the Law.

What are you looking for?

Search content published on the website.