Investment and the private sector
From announced capital to productive assets and a private market able to expand
The investment Iraq Vision 2045 needs is not the largest announced figure, the most licences or a race in exemptions. It is capital transformed into productive assets, productivity, value added, formal private-sector jobs, domestic linkages, knowledge and competitiveness. The state's task is to make this investment more viable and less risky than rent-seeking and speculation through predictable law, investment services measured by time and outcomes, productive finance, land conditional on performance, and partnerships that manage risks—not by guaranteeing profits or transferring losses to the budget.
Chapter introduction: from agriculture and food security to investment and the private sector
The preceding chapter established that Iraqi agriculture cannot be modernised through the public budget alone. Irrigation systems, mechanisation, cold storage, packaging, insurance, finance, logistics and agro-processing require private capital, contracts, markets and price signals. It left a clear question for this chapter: how can we make productive investment—including agricultural, industrial, digital and service investment—more attractive than rent-seeking trade and speculation, and distribute risks between state and investor without privatising profits and socialising losses?
This extends what was established in ‘The End of the Rentier State’ and ‘The Productive Economy’. The Constitution itself requires the state to reform the economy on modern foundations, invest resources, diversify sources and encourage the private sector, and guarantees encouragement of investment across sectors. Moving from text to results, however, requires more than an investment law, authority or one-stop shop. Success depends on whether capital actually moves into sustainable assets and capabilities, and whether companies can register, obtain finance, build, operate, expand, contract and exit under known rules. 1
Executive Summary
Iraq does not start from the absence of a private sector. The 2021 Labour Force Survey estimated approximately 5.3 million private-sector workers compared with 3.261 million in the public sector, but also found that fewer than 10% of private-sector workers had social security coverage at the time. Since then, Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. 18 of 2023 has expanded the legal framework for coverage. The issue is therefore not whether the private sector exists, but its quality, employment formality and ability to invest, expand and bear risks. 1124
The business environment reveals a deeper gap. The World Bank's 2022 Enterprise Survey covered 1,019 formal private non-agricultural establishments with five or more workers. Only 2.3% of firms in this sample had a bank loan or line of credit; 90.2% of investment was internally financed, while banks accounted for only 0.1% of investment financing. Moreover, 44% of firms reported competing with unregistered establishments, and bribery incidence in at least one measured transaction was 50.5%. This is not a picture of an ‘inherently weak private sector’, but one operating within financing, regulatory and enforcement markets that insufficiently reward formal expansion. 10
Iraqi banking data confirm that credit growth alone is insufficient. Total cash credit extended by banks operating in Iraq reached IQD 73.5 trillion in 2024, including IQD 43.9 trillion to the private sector, or 59.8% of the total, up 11.1% from 2023. Yet the Financial Stability Report shows that 68.39% of private-sector credit went to households, compared with 31.29% to companies. The governing indicator must therefore be not ‘private-sector credit’ alone, but credit to productive companies, its maturities, collateral, the share of investment financed by banks, and portfolio quality. 1213
Foreign investment makes the need to separate indicators even clearer. Iraq's country sheet in the World Investment Report 2025 records an inward foreign direct investment flow of negative USD 7.458 billion in 2024 under balance-of-payments methodology. This does not mean there were no foreign projects or that ‘investment in Iraq is negative’ in the everyday sense. Net flows are affected by withdrawals, intercompany debt, reinvested earnings, liquidation and transfers. By contrast, IFC announced approximately USD 1 billion in new investments and partnerships in energy, infrastructure, agribusiness and finance in September 2025, following more than USD 2.5 billion invested and mobilised since 2005. Licence values or announced project values must therefore not be combined with net FDI flows as if they were the same measure. 1516
Iraq already has an investment law, a national commission, governorate commissions and a one-stop shop. The amended law sets deadlines for agencies' approvals and provides investment guarantees. An electronic company-registration service also exists through the Ur portal, combining name reservation, registration, tax number and social security number in one process. This infrastructure, however, does not establish that the investor journey is short and predictable. Actual time must be measured from complete application to licence, and from licence to land, utilities, construction and operation, alongside return rates, contact points, rejection reasons and time to resolve administrative disputes. 349
An important institutional signal emerged in 2026: the National Investment Commission directed a redrawing of the investment map towards industrial and high-quality projects with strong economic returns, after reoffering strategic opportunities in April because earlier bids failed to meet conditions. These developments support the chapter's philosophy: opportunity quality and bankability matter more than opportunity counts; investor quality and execution capability matter more than announced commitments; and productive investment must pass performance gateways from allocation to commercial operation. 56
The central question and operational definitions
The central question is: what must the state change in rules, services, finance, land and partnerships so that the risk-adjusted return on productive investment in Iraq exceeds rent-seeking and speculative alternatives, and the private sector becomes a principal generator of value and formal jobs by 2045, without policy turning into privileges, monopolies or hidden fiscal commitments?
4.1 Chapter glossary
| Concept | Operational definition | What it does not mean |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | Deploying capital, knowledge or an asset to create future capacity generating production/service flows or income. | Not purchasing an existing asset merely to resell it. |
| Productive investment | Investment adding capacity, value, productivity, jobs/skills or infrastructure necessary for production, with a sustainable demand and financing model. | Not every licensed investment or large project. |
| Consumption-oriented/rent-seeking investment | Deploying money primarily in reliance on consumer spending, rising asset prices or privileges/protection without building sufficient competitiveness. | Does not mean trade or property are illegitimate or unimportant. |
| Private sector | Non-state-owned establishments and individuals operating across different sectors, sizes and business models. | Not a single homogeneous bloc requiring one policy. |
| Serious investor | An investor whose beneficial owner, financing, technical and managerial capacity, feasibility, timetable and track record can be verified, and who accepts auditable performance milestones. | Not a political description or a privilege for a large or foreign company. |
| Bankable project Bankable | A project whose demand, returns, risk allocation, contracts, inputs and permits allow an independent financier to assess and finance it. | Does not mean the state guarantees profits. |
| Anchor investor Anchor | A large company able to establish a demand/technology/standards chain and attract suppliers around it. | Does not mean granting a monopoly or open-ended exemptions. |
| Domestic linkage | A relationship of procurement, knowledge, finance, standards and skills between the investor and local companies/workers. | Not an arbitrary local-content percentage. |
| Partnership PPP | A long-term contract to provide a public asset/service, allocating risks, performance and payments under a defined framework. | Not free off-budget borrowing. |
| Investor protection | Protection of property, contracts, transfers, fair procedures and grievance rights under the law. | Not immunity from taxation, labour, environmental or competition rules. |
4.2 Measurement rule
The chapter distinguishes four often-confused figures: announced project value, investment-licence value, capital expenditure implemented, and investment flows recorded in national accounts or the balance of payments. These are not interchangeable. Nor are ‘registered company counts’ evidence of company growth, or ‘loan values’ evidence of investment unless the beneficiary, purpose and maturity are known.
The constitutional, legal and institutional framework
5.1 The Constitution: the private sector is part of the economic design
Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution provide a clear foundation for this chapter: reforming the economy on modern foundations, investing resources, diversifying sources, encouraging and developing the private sector, and encouraging investment across sectors. Article 23 protects private property and regulates expropriation for public benefit with fair compensation, while Article 24 guarantees the free movement of Iraqi labour, goods and capital between governorates and regions. The Vision therefore treats the private sector not as an optional state appendage, but as a constitutional engine of the economy, operating within law, competition, labour rights and safeguards for public money. 1
5.2 The Investment Law: existing guarantees before any new law
Investment Law No. 13 of 2006, as amended and published by the National Investment Commission, provides guarantees and facilitation measures and defines the licensing process. Article 20 requires the one-stop shop to coordinate with sectoral bodies; an agency must approve, reject or request amendment within 15 days, with silence deemed approval under the published text, while rejection must give reasons. This is a strong rule on paper. The first reform is therefore not another deadline, but measuring compliance with the existing one and publishing total processing time and reasons for exceptions. 3
The Commission's investment guide sets a 45-day ceiling for issuing a licence after submission, while the one-stop shop page confirms its role in receiving applications, obtaining approvals, allocating land and monitoring progress and delays. The mandate therefore exists. The 2045 gap is to turn it into a data-managed digital service where investors have a case number, decision owner, remaining time and written reasons for any stoppage. 421
5.3 What is in force and what is still being legislated
A direct legal error must be avoided in public-private partnerships. Government bodies have partnership and investment instructions and practices, but the public-private partnership bill completed only its first reading in the Council of Representatives on 7 September 2026. The chapter therefore does not treat it as enacted law or base rights and obligations on it; it uses it as evidence that the broader legislative framework is still in the legislative process. 8
The Private Sector Development Strategy 2014–2030 has entered an official updating process supported by UNDP. An April 2025 workshop presented five revised pillars covering the business environment, impactful investment, institutional-framework governance, supportive macroeconomic policies, and monitoring and risk management. In December 2025, the Ministry of Planning was discussing the ‘draft updated strategy’. As of this chapter's data freeze, the research uses no official source proving adoption of a final updated version. The Vision therefore records the ongoing process without assuming an unpublished document. 7
| Component | Established status | The Vision's decision |
|---|---|---|
| Constitution | In force | Reference for the economic, property and investment argument. |
| Investment Law 13/2006, as amended | In force | Measure implementation before proposing a parallel legal layer. |
| One-stop shop NIC/PIC | Exists legally and operationally | Turn it into a measured service journey. |
| Private Sector Strategy 2014–2030 | Under official update; an updated draft discussed in late 2025 | Coordinate with the update rather than invent a competing strategy. |
| PPP Comprehensive | Bill; first reading 7/9/2026 | Not treated as enacted law; fiscal and procedural safeguards are built now within existing powers. |
| Electronic company registration | Existing service through Ur | Measure time/rejection/resubmission, not merely portal existence. |
Baseline: a private sector that exists but operates below capacity
6.1 Employment: the private sector is larger in numbers, not necessarily better in conditions
The latest available detailed national labour force survey remains the 2021 survey conducted by Iraqi statistical bodies in partnership with the International Labour Organization. According to the ILOsummary, 5.3 million people work in the private sector compared with 3.261 million in the public sector. This overturns the notion that ‘all Iraqis work for the state’, but does not establish that the private sector has become a generator of quality jobs: at the same baseline, fewer than 10% of private-sector workers had social security coverage. After the 2023 law, the baseline must be updated rather than repeating the old share as if it described 2026. 1124
6.2 The formal company: self-financing and regulatory friction
The Iraq Enterprise Survey 2022 excludes agriculture, informal establishments, firms with fewer than five workers and wholly state-owned enterprises. It therefore measures only the experience of formal non-agricultural establishments. Within that scope, 43.9% of firms have a bank account, only 2.3% have a loan or line of credit, and 90.2% of investment is internally financed versus 0.1% by banks. This is a stark baseline: a company seeking expansion relies more on retained earnings than on the financial system. 10
In the sample, obtaining an operating licence took an average of 20.3 days, an import licence 25 days and a construction permit 52.4 days. Access to finance was the largest obstacle for 24.8% of firms, corruption for 14.6%, licences and permits for 11.4%, and electricity for 9.3%. These are 2022 figures, not an assessment of the current government, but they provide a historical baseline to be remeasured using the same definitions after service digitalisation and reforms. 10
6.3 Credit: growth in volume does not equal investment financing
The Central Bank's 2024 Economic Report puts total cash credit at IQD 73.5 trillion, with IQD 43.9 trillion to the private sector. The Financial Stability Report breaks private credit down further: 68.39% to households and 31.29% to companies. If personal credit backed by salaries or used for consumption rises, the ‘private credit’ figure may improve without changing a factory's, farm's or technology company's ability to finance a long-term asset. The Vision therefore requires a corporate-credit dashboard: sector, size, maturity, purpose, collateral, price, defaults and investment financed. 1213
6.4 Foreign investment: an apparent contradiction requiring explanation
According to UNCTAD , inward FDI flows to Iraq were USD -7.458 billion in 2024, after USD -5.364 billion in 2023. This is a net balance-of-payments series, not a list of new projects. Actual projects and partnerships nevertheless exist; IFC announced approximately USD 1 billion in new investments and partnerships in 2025, covering manufacturing, agriculture, finance and infrastructure. The methodological decision is to publish a dual dashboard: balance-of-payments flows according to UNCTAD/the Central Bank, and a portfolio of implemented greenfield projects/expansions under a separate definition, without using one to negate the other. 1516
| Indicator | Latest valid baseline | Correct interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Private-sector workers | 5.3 million, 2021 survey | Significant scale; formality and quality require updating after the 2023 law. |
| Loan/line of credit for a formal firm | 2.3%, WBES 2022 | A financing bottleneck; sample covers formal non-agricultural firms with 5+ workers. |
| Internally financed investment | 90.2%, WBES 2022 | Heavy reliance on owners' funds/profits. |
| Cash credit to the private sector | IQD 43.9 trillion, 2024 | Not all corporate; 68.39% goes to households. |
| Corporate share of private-sector credit | 31.29%, 2024 | Closer to productive finance, but does not identify loan purpose. |
| FDI net inflow | USD -7.458 billion, 2024 | Net BOP flow; not the value of new projects. |
| Operating-licence time | 20.3 days, WBES 2022 | Historical baseline; requires remeasurement after digitalisation. |
Productive rather than consumption-oriented investment: the outcome test
The state needs an economic project test, not a moral classification of traders and manufacturers. Trade, housing, retail and personal services have real functions, but subsidised land, exemptions, guarantees or public infrastructure allocated to a project must be tied to its claimed benefit. Productive investment here increases repeatable capacity: a machine, modern farm, warehouse, software, data centre, laboratory, tourist hotel, clinic, logistics, energy or a professional service that exports or raises other establishments' productivity.
The proposed test does not predetermine the preferred sector; it takes the project through seven questions: does it add a new asset? Does it have demonstrable demand? Does it generate domestic value? Are its jobs formal and capable of developing skills? Does it build local suppliers' capabilities? Is the financing real and risk-bearing? Does it depend on permanent support or monopoly protection? Are its environmental, water and fiscal costs accounted for? Every additional incentive must carry an additional measurable commitment.
| Productive-investment gateway | Evidence for passage | If it fails |
|---|---|---|
| Additionality | A new asset/capability or genuine expansion | No special productive incentive for merely transferring ownership of an existing asset. |
| Demand | A verifiable contract/market/study | Redesign or fully self-finance the commercial risk. |
| Financing | Verified funds + equity contribution + debt structure | No long-term land allocation or guarantee before financial close. |
| Domestic value | Wages, procurement, processing, service, knowledge | Do not impose a nominal percentage; build a verifiable linkage plan. |
| Employment | Formal jobs and a skills/safety record | Do not count a temporary worker twice or a promise as an achieved job. |
| Sustainment | Water/energy/environment/land and compliance cost | A mitigation gateway before implementation. |
| Independence from support | Project economics after incentives expire | Reject a model surviving solely on permanent exemptions or protected public procurement. |
Why does capital flow into rent-seeking and speculation?
Capital does not select an activity because it is ‘patriotic’ or ‘unpatriotic’; it selects return, risk and liquidity. If purchasing land, a short-term supply contract or import trading offers a faster cash cycle, while a factory needs electricity, long-term finance, approvals, skills, markets and enforceable contracts, money will rationally move to the shorter, less risky activity. Changing behaviour begins by changing risk-adjusted returns, not by blaming investors.
Several distortions coincide in Iraq: large public spending that fuels consumption demand, limited corporate bank financing, unstable electricity and services in some locations, administrative friction, informal competition and uneven rule enforcement. This creates a ‘discount on long-term investment’. Industrial and agricultural policies cannot succeed without reducing that discount through reliable infrastructure, finance, enforceable contracts and predictable government services. 1014
| Source of rent/speculation | Why does it appear attractive? | Reform that changes the incentive |
|---|---|---|
| Land | Capital gain with limited implementation | Allocation through use rights, implementation milestones and orderly repossession. |
| Short-term government contract | Relatively guaranteed demand and a faster cycle | Competitive procurement linking quality and completion and allowing productive suppliers to expand. |
| Imports/trade | Working capital and a faster cash cycle than a factory | Chain finance, logistics, standards and lower production costs, not permanent bans. |
| Personal loan | Easier security/collection through salaries | Corporate credit based on cash flows, data and varied collateral. |
| Special exemption | Raises project returns before productivity improves | A time- and outcome-conditioned incentive: sunset + clawback for non-performance. |
From an announced opportunity to a bankable project
The National Investment Commission's reoffering of strategic opportunities on 12 April 2026 because earlier bids failed to satisfy requirements reveals a practical gap: an announcement does not make a project bankable. Institutional investors need legally clear land, demand or a revenue model, preliminary studies, utilities, environmental constraints, an owning agency, a contracting mechanism, risk allocation and a decision timetable. Every missing item becomes a risk premium, delay or withdrawal. 6
The Commission's September 2026 direction to redraw the map towards industry, high-quality projects and agricultural, digital and climate developers accords with the Vision, provided the ‘map’ becomes a portfolio of projects at different maturity levels rather than a catalogue of land and ideas. 5
| Opportunity maturity level | Required information | Permissible action |
|---|---|---|
| 0 — Idea | Need/preliminary market/owning agency | Publish for exploration only; no promise of cost or return. |
| 1 — Pre-feasibility | Location, demand, alternatives, initial constraints | Expression-of-interest invitation/market study. |
| 2 — Feasibility | CAPEX/OPEX preliminary, land, utilities, environment, risks | Preliminary request for bids/qualification. |
| 3 — Ready for contracting | Land documents, key approvals, contract/mechanism, risks | Competition and solicitation of financed bids. |
| 4 — Financial close | Binding finance and defined guarantees/contracts | Begin implementation against milestones. |
| 5 — Operation | An operating asset and revenue/production/service | Counted as ‘implemented investment’ in the achievement dashboard. |
This ladder prevents inflated achievement. The Vision does not add a level-zero opportunity's value to an operating level-five asset. Each major project receives a single published identifier following it from map to licence, land, implementation and operation, making accumulated delays and points of project failure visible.
The investor journey: the one-stop shop as a service, not a label
The one-stop shop exists in law, with powers to obtain approvals, allocate land and monitor implementation. This chapter therefore proposes no ‘new window’, but re-engineers the journey: investors enter once with a data file, information is reused across bodies, requirements are visible before application, and every request has a running clock and decision owner. Physical attendance is limited to what law, safety or verification genuinely requires. 34
A similar digital structure exists commercially through company registration on the Ur portal: one form, name reservation, registration with the Companies Registration Department, tax number, social security number, payment and tracking. Some special services still require originals to be delivered in person. The lesson is not to announce ‘complete digitalisation’, but to measure the share of genuinely digital steps, how often previously submitted documents are requested again, and completion time from the user's perspective. 9
| Investor-journey indicator | Baseline | Professional target |
|---|---|---|
| Investment-licence time for a complete application | The law/guide sets a ceiling of up to 45 days | Published legal compliance, with published median and P95. |
| Sectoral body's response | 15 days under published Article 20 | Compliance rate + reasons for reasoned rejection. |
| Number of contact points | No unified published baseline | Establish a 2027 baseline and reduce through re-engineering. |
| Rate of returns for additional information | No baseline | Classify reason, agency and template, and improve requirements. |
| Time from licence to operation | No consistent national baseline | Measure by sector and project size, not a single aggregate figure. |
| Investor satisfaction after service | No baseline | A short transaction survey independent of promotional campaigns. |
Attracting major companies: an anchor investor, not an isolated investor
A major company creates development value when it establishes a chain around itself, not an isolated enclave importing inputs and skills and merely remitting profits. The ‘anchor investor’ may be a manufacturer, logistics operator, technology, tourism, agricultural or healthcare company. Its value lies in bringing standards, contracts, demand and stability that allow smaller companies to invest around it.
An attraction programme begins not with conferences, but with sectors/chains where Iraq has an advantage, demand or resources, followed by specific target companies, an Iraqi value proposition, an account manager, post-entry problem-solving and a supplier and skills plan. The KPI is not meeting or memorandum counts, but the share of targeted companies progressing to feasibility studies and implemented investment, asset value, formal jobs, competitive domestic procurement and research/skills.
The announcement by IFC of approximately USD 1 billion in new partnerships and investments in 2025 provides practical evidence of bankable projects when company, structure and sector are clear: building materials, trade finance, an agricultural infrastructure study and others. It does not estimate all ‘investment in Iraq’; it establishes only that institutional deals can be built in productive sectors. 16
| Investor account stage | State action | KPI |
|---|---|---|
| Targeting | A specific company/sector based on a capability gap | Share of targets with a sectoral rationale. |
| Qualification | Finance, track record, beneficial owner, technology, market | Qualified applicants as a share of applicants. |
| Landing | Land/service/licence/utilities | Time to resolve critical problems. |
| Aftercare | Expansion, suppliers, skills, exports | Reinvestment/expansion value. |
| Linkages | Supplier matching, QCD and accreditation | Competitive domestic procurement from qualified suppliers. |
Iraqi companies: from small-scale survival to expansion
The most dangerous deviation in private-sector policy is equating support for companies with helping small enterprises remain small forever. The economy needs a ladder allowing a small business to close, stabilise or expand, a medium-sized business to become large, and a large business to compete beyond Iraq. Public support must address a market failure or specific capability, not protect small size as an end in itself.
An Iraqi company seeking expansion needs four intangible assets: auditable accounts, management and processes, quality/safety standards, and financial data enabling banks and buyers to assess it. The expansion programme therefore combines business diagnostics, accounting and cash-flow management, digitalisation, accreditation, lean production, safety and governance, then connects them to real demand from an anchor investor, competitive procurement or a market. This is closer to productivity than a subsidised loan without diagnosis.
| Company type | Predominant constraint | Appropriate policy |
|---|---|---|
| Micro/informal | The cost/complexity of formality and its limited returns | Clear value from registration: payments, social security, contracts, finance, services; simplification, not permanent amnesty. |
| Small formal | Management/cash/standards/market | Diagnosis + business development services + working-capital finance. |
| Medium | Expansion finance, governance, suppliers/exports | Investment loans/partial guarantees/capital markets where appropriate. |
| Large Iraqi | Competition, innovation, internationalisation, governance | Competitive neutrality, research/skills, openness and partnerships. |
| Company dependent on a state contract | Dependence on one buyer | Diversify customers, make procurement transparent and prevent contract rents. |
Local suppliers and linkages between foreign and domestic investment
Local content should not begin with a uniform mandatory percentage. If the state imposes a share beyond suppliers' capabilities, costs rise or the percentage becomes nominal assembly. The alternative is a ‘supplier capability matrix’: quality, cost and delivery QCD, safety, accreditation, finance and the ability to scale. Investors then identify where they can buy locally now, where suppliers need development, and where imports remain more efficient.
Vietnam's experience is useful because it reveals a risk even in an economy successful at attracting FDI: foreign companies accounted for 73% of exports, while domestic companies' participation in global value chains fell from 35% to 18% between 2009 and 2023. The World Bank recommends lower compliance costs, digitalisation, supply-chain finance and a supplier development programme. The lesson for Iraq is not Vietnam's export model, but the warning that success in attracting companies does not guarantee the domestic spread of knowledge and value. 19
| Linkage instrument | Function | Condition preventing favouritism |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified supplier database | Reducing buyers' search costs | Published criteria and an updatable assessment. |
| Meet the Buyer | Revealing specifications and gaps | Open entry for qualified suppliers; no implicit award. |
| Supplier Development | Improving QCD/accreditation/management | Selection based on gap and impact, not political ties. |
| Supply-chain finance | Converting an invoice/purchase order into finance | A real contract, verification and risk pricing. |
| Laboratory/accreditation | Reducing the cost of demonstrating quality | Independent accreditation and recognised standards. |
| Anchor-investor incentive | Rewarding training/real linkages | Procurement/skills indicators, not a local-content promise. |
Productive finance: shifting credit from consumption to companies with growth potential
The Central Bank's 2024 report shows that overall credit depth remains low relative to the economy's needs, prompting the National Bank Lending Strategy 2024–2029. The Vision adds a question: what kind of credit? Companies' 31.29% share of private-sector credit in 2024 means that growth in total lending may remain far removed from corporate investment capital. 1213
In 2025, the IMF links private-sector development to reforming state banks, strengthening private banks, credit, governance and digitalisation, with instruments such as a stronger credit bureau and deposit insurance. The Vision does not automatically propose a new development bank. Before a new institution, existing channels must be improved: credit information, movable collateral, cash-flow assessment, invoice and supply-chain finance, long-term finance for productive assets, and equity/quasi-equity for growth-capable companies. 14
14.1 A financing ladder instead of one loan for everyone
| Enterprise stage | Most relevant instrument | Governing information |
|---|---|---|
| Start-up/innovation | Founder capital/angel investor/private fund | Team, market, business model; early debt may be unsuitable. |
| Working capital | Facility/invoice/supply chain | Cash cycle and verified order/invoice. |
| Asset expansion | Investment loan/finance lease | Cash flow, asset, economic life, owner's contribution. |
| Growing medium-sized company | Debt + equity/market | Governance, accounts and auditable expansion. |
| Infrastructure project | Project finance/PPP where appropriate | Contract, revenue, risk allocation, financial close. |
Government can bear some credit risk where a clear market failure exists, but a public guarantee must be partial, priced, capped and coupled with assessment by a bank retaining some risk. A full guarantee removes discipline and turns corporate default into public debt. Every guarantee programme's performance must be published: lending genuinely added, defaults, net losses, jobs/investment, and whether the bank would have financed the company without the guarantee.
Land and industrial and agricultural property: use rights in return for performance
In investment, land can shift from a production input to a speculative instrument. The remedy is not to stop allocating land, but to separate site value from development rights: published valuation, clear contract, deadlines, minimum expenditure/progress, restrictions on transferring rights before a specified stage, and repossession or reoffering upon breach, with grievance rights. Public land is not granted in exchange for an ‘intention to invest’.
For industrial, agricultural and tourism zones, real value lies in shared infrastructure: reliable electricity, suitable water/drainage, roads, fibre, laboratories/customs where needed, site management and safety. A project entering a ready zone bears less risk than one negotiating utilities with five agencies. Zones are therefore measured by productive occupancy, consumption/production, jobs and value, not dunums allocated.
| Land milestone | Document/outcome | Consequence of breach |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation | Published location, boundaries and legal right | No contract starts before ownership/conflicts are resolved. |
| Financial close | Verified financing | Suspension/cancellation under the contract if unmet. |
| Commencement of works | Auditable design/construction progress | A time-bound warning, then a proportionate sanction. |
| Commercial operation | An operating asset | Transition from ‘investment land’ to a production establishment. |
| Expansion/transfer | Proven performance and lawful approval | Prevents early trading in the concession. |
Public-private partnerships: financing or a deferred fiscal commitment?
PPP is not a way to hide a project's cost from the budget. If a company builds an asset in return for government payments, a demand guarantee or price-difference compensation, the state still bears a current or contingent commitment. The PPP gateway is therefore fiscal before it is legal: does the project need PPPat all? Does it deliver value for money compared with public procurement? Who bears construction, demand, operation, currency and force-majeure risks? What contingent commitment arises under an adverse scenario?
The PPP bill was at first reading in September 2026, so this chapter does not assume it is in force. Until legislation is completed, the state can apply fiscal disclosure, competition and risk assessment through existing instructions and contracts, and make the Ministry of Finance a mandatory participant in assessing major projects' contingent liabilities. 8
The PFRAM tool developed by the IMF and World Bank illustrates the principle: assessing a partnership project's effects on cash flows, budgets, debt and risk across scenarios. Iraq need not copy the tool literally, but must maintain a unified register of partnership payments, guarantees, compensation and termination rights. 20
| Gateway for PPP | Question | Decision-making |
|---|---|---|
| Public need | Is there a service/asset with a measurable output? | If not, PPP is not the remedy. |
| Alternatives | Is public procurement/public management less costly and risky? | Choose a value-for-money alternative. |
| Risk allocation | Who can manage each risk at the lowest cost? | Do not assign private parties risks they cannot control, then compensate them later. |
| Public finance | What is the NPV of payments, guarantees and scenarios? | Record the commitment before contracting. |
| Competition | Are bids comparable? | Qualification, competition and contractual transparency. |
| Performance | What are the SLA/service indicators? | Payment tied to availability/quality where appropriate. |
Protecting serious investors, the state and the market
Protection is not a privilege; it is predictability. Serious investors need property and contract protection, lawful funds transfers, reasoned administrative decisions, known deadlines, grievance rights and no arbitrary alteration of terms for an implemented project. The Investment Law already includes guarantees, restrictions on confiscation/nationalisation outside legal frameworks, and rights concerning transfers of capital and profits under applicable rules. 321
Protection is reciprocal, however. The state and society need to know the beneficial owner, funding source and tax, labour and environmental compliance, and to prevent conflicts of interest, monopoly, collusion and money laundering. The Ur portal includes a beneficial-ownership disclosure service when establishing a company or changing its ownership structure, based on the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Law. Such data should connect to major investment files without becoming unlawful disclosure of personal information. 22
| Investor's right | Corresponding safeguard for the state |
|---|---|
| Decision within a published period | A complete file and accurate information. |
| Contract and property protection | Fulfilment of milestones, obligations and lawful taxes/fees. |
| Lawful transfer of profits/capital | Banking, tax and anti-money-laundering compliance. |
| Grievance and review | Acceptance of judicial/arbitral oversight under the contract's legal basis. |
| Incentive/land where eligible | An auditable outcome and clawback for material breach. |
| Legitimate commercial confidentiality | Public disclosure of what must be published: contract/incentive/beneficiary where required by law. |
Private-sector jobs: numbers, quality and formality
A job-generating private sector does not mean shifting unemployment's burden from the state budget to precarious jobs. The goal is a job creating value, paying wages commensurate with productivity, complying with safety and social security rules and offering a skills pathway. Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. 18 of 2023 expands the legal basis for coverage, but an ILO report in 2025 on perceptions of implementation in Baghdad and Basra still identifies awareness, registration and procedural-complexity gaps. Formalisation is therefore a service and enforcement programme together, not merely a penalties campaign. 24
Nor should an investor's KPI be ‘jobs pledged’ at contract signing. A job counts only through payroll/social security records or proof of employment. Permanent and temporary, full- and part-time, and Iraqi and foreign workers are distinguished without turning ratios into unlawful discrimination. Capital-intensive projects may be highly productive with fewer but skilled jobs. Impact is therefore measured through a combination of jobs, wages, skills and value, not numbers alone.
| Job indicator | What is measured | What is prevented |
|---|---|---|
| Actual jobs | A unique worker within a period + contract type | Counting promises or a contractor more than once. |
| Formality | Registration, social security and legal rights | Automatically treating every private-sector job as ‘formal’. |
| Quality | Wage/stability/safety/hours | Inflating numbers with brief, low-value jobs. |
| Skills | Training hours + accreditation + career transition | Treating a seminar as productive training. |
| Progression | Promotion/wages/productivity over time | An employment policy without a capability pathway. |
Digitalisation and registration: from the portal to actual time
The Ur portal already provides company registration through a one-stop system: name reservation, registration, tax number, social security number, one form, electronic payment and tracking. This is important infrastructure, but does not automatically mean incorporation is ‘instant’ or that all documents and bodies operate without attendance. Even the VIP fast service explains that some originals must be delivered and certified documents collected in person. The correct measure is the user journey, not the number of published services. 9
Vision 2045 adopts the Once-Only principle: if the state holds verified information, it does not request it from the company again without a legal reason or an update. A single company identifier links registration, tax, social security, licences, beneficial ownership and tenders—with permissions and privacy—to make oversight less intrusive and more accurate. This also allows ‘transition to formality’ to be measured through service use, not paper registration alone.
| Digital system | Function | KPI |
|---|---|---|
| Company identity | One identifier across agencies | Share of transactions using the same identifier. |
| Once-Only | Reuse of verified data | Number of repeated documents per journey. |
| Status API/tracking | Status, decision owner and time | Share of applications visible to the user. |
| Rejection reasons | Coded list + reasoned text | Leading return reasons and their decline. |
| Beneficial owner | Ownership transparency for competent authorities | Completeness and updating with access protection. |
| Public service dashboard | Time, P50/P95 and completion rate | Measure experience, not transaction counts alone. |
International comparisons: transferring the mechanism, not the country
20.1 Morocco: incentives tied to impact, not investor nationality
The OECD Investment Policy Review of Morocco 2024 describes the 2022 Investment Charter as a framework linking investment support to objectives such as stable jobs, regional development, priority sectors and sustainability, alongside simplification, digitalisation and investment-governance reforms. The transferable lesson for Iraq is neither Morocco's support percentages nor its numerical targets, but ‘incentives for defined impact’ and unified governance with regional services. 18
20.2 Vietnam: FDI without domestic linkages may build a dual economy
Vietnam 2045 warns that investment attraction and exports can succeed while domestic companies remain outside the chain. Programme recommendations include reducing compliance costs, digitalisation, supply-chain finance and supplier development. Iraq needs this mechanism early, rather than waiting for an ‘advanced foreign company–weak domestic supplier’ divide and addressing it later. 19
20.3 OECD: investment quality has at least four dimensions
The OECD tool for FDI quality shifts discussion from investment quantity to its effects on productivity and innovation, job quality and skills, equality and decarbonisation. The Vision does not adopt every OECD indicator literally, but uses the idea: every major investment benefiting from public support needs a before/after impact scorecard, not a capital figure alone. 17
| Iraqi problem | Comparative mechanism | What Cannot Be Transferred |
|---|---|---|
| Exemptions without outcomes | Morocco: support linked to objectives and impact | Moroccan incentive rates and numerical targets. |
| An isolated foreign company | Vietnam: Supplier Development + Matchmaking | Vietnam's export model or specific content rules. |
| Focus on the volume of FDI | OECD FDI Qualities | An international ranking as a political objective in itself. |
| PPP as off-budget financing | PFRAM: fiscal-impact and risk assessment | A technical tool without adaptation to Iraqi data. |
Investment and the private sector in Iraq in 2045
In 2045, Iraq is an economy where an entrepreneur can move from idea to company, finance, location and operation through a predictable digital and legal journey, and expand without relations with the state being the principal asset governing growth. The private market does not become a ‘replacement for the state’. The state remains responsible for law, infrastructure, competition, data, justice and stability, but stops crowding companies out of every activity or guaranteeing their profits.
The foreign investor in this model is not measured by capital size alone. A good company reinvests, buys from qualified suppliers, trains, transfers standards or management and competes without monopoly. Iraqi companies are not treated merely as state contractors; they can obtain finance, enter a chain, sell beyond their governorate and Iraq, and attract partners or capital without sacrificing governance.
The financial system, in turn, becomes able to price corporate risk, not merely an employee's salary. Public land changes from a reward into a production input subject to milestones, and PPP changes from a financing slogan into a performance contract with known fiscal commitments. This is what ‘the private sector as a job generator’ means in Vision 2045: a sector accumulating capital, productivity and skills, not merely more shops and contractors.
Stages of transformation, 2027–2045
| Phase | Priority | Governing outputs |
|---|---|---|
| 2027–2030: establishing measurement and discipline | Investor journey, enterprise baseline, corporate finance, land, PPP, employment formality | Project/company identifier; service-time dashboard; repeat enterprise survey; PPPcommitments register; productive-investment gateways. |
| 2031–2035: expanding productive investment | Anchor investors, suppliers, long-term finance, productive zones | Measurable supplier programmes; medium-sized company expansion; performance incentives; aftercare. |
| 2036–2040: deepening knowledge and capital | Innovation, equity finance, high-value services, internationalisation of Iraqi companies | A deeper financing market; regional Iraqi companies; research–business linkages; advanced management. |
| 2041–2045: a mature market and an enabling state | Sustained rules rather than campaigns, competition and exit, green and digital investment | Stable service institutions; private capital leading most commercial expansion; transparent public risks. |
Phase figures are not filled with hypothetical ladders. Where a legal limit exists, such as 45 days for licensing and 15 days for an agency response, it serves as the compliance standard. Private-investment share, formal coverage and corporate credit require an updated 2027–2030 baseline, after which quantitative targets are adopted based on it and on financial-system and market capacity.
Indicator and Target Dashboard
| Indicator | Baseline | 2030 | 2035/2040/2045 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment-licence time for a complete file | Legal ceiling of up to 45 days; no published national dashboard of actual performance | Comply with the ceiling + publish P50/P95 | Reduce time after re-engineering based on performance data; no invented figure. |
| Sectoral body's response | 15 days in the published Investment Law | Measure compliance and reasoned rejection rates | Continued compliance monitoring. |
| Companies with a loan/line of credit | 2.3% of WBES 2022 establishments within its coverage | Update the survey in 2027; target after the baseline | Sustained increase with portfolio quality. |
| Bank-financed investment | 0.1% in WBES 2022 within its coverage | Remeasure and disaggregate by company size | Target after baseline |
| Corporate share of private-sector credit | 31.29% in 2024 | An upward trend conditional on credit quality | Values set after the lending strategy and 2027 baseline. |
| Formality/social security for private-sector workers | <10% in 2021 before the 2023 law | New baseline after implementation of the law | Increasing lawful coverage; do not use the 2021 figure as the state of affairs in 2045. |
| Competition from informal establishments | 44% of WBES 2022 establishments said they faced it | Remeasurement | A decline through valuable formality and equal enforcement. |
| Implemented productive investment | No published unified national definition combining additionality and performance | Launch an identifier and maturity-level register | An increasing share of the portfolio reaches actual operation. |
| Investors' procurement from qualified domestic suppliers | No baseline | Establish a sectoral baseline | Sectoral targets after the baseline, not a uniform national percentage. |
| Contingent PPP liabilities | No verified unified public register in the sources used | A central register and fiscal screening for every major project | Full inclusion in fiscal-risk reports. |
23.1 Indicators not used alone
The Vision does not use licence counts, announced opportunity values, registered-company counts, net FDI values or private-credit volume alone as success indicators. Each needs a ‘twin indicator’: licences with operation, companies with survival/growth, FDI with assets and linkages, credit with companies and purpose, and incentives with outcomes.
Implementation programme package
24.1 Programme One: the productive-investment gateway and bankable opportunity portfolio
The National Investment Commission, coordinating with governorates and ministries, leads the conversion of the investment map into a pipeline with maturity levels 0–5. Projects are not announced as investment-ready until reaching a defined level, and core information and constraints are published. The programme builds on the 2026 direction to redraw the map and creates no competing platform if the Commission's infrastructure can be developed. 5
24.2 Programme Two: Investor Journey SLA
Unify licensing, land, utilities, construction and operation into one register, with a project identifier, deadline, decision owner, reason for stoppage and P50/P95indicators. It starts from existing legal provisions rather than waiting for a new law. An aggregate dashboard protects commercial confidentiality while revealing institutional performance.
24.3 Programme Three: the anchor investor and post-entry support
Promotion/service units within the existing Commission target specific companies in priority chains and manage aftercare for expansion, suppliers and skills. Incentives are tied not merely to project size, but to outcomes, with part of the support recoverable upon non-achievement under the contract and law.
24.4 Programme Four: Iraqi supplier development — Scale-Up & Supplier
A competitive programme for companies with growth potential links management diagnostics, quality, digitalisation, safety and finance to real buyer demand. It does not distribute loans en masse; companies enter with a gap programme and exit with a standard, contract or proven capability.
24.5 Programme Five: financing the productive company
The Central Bank and banking sector build a corporate-credit dashboard and accelerate credit-information, collateral and cash-flow-, invoice- and supply-chain-based finance reforms. Any public guarantee is partial, capped and priced, with banks retaining some risk. No new financing institution is established unless a gap assessment proves it superior to reforming existing channels.
24.6 Programme Six: the partnership fiscal-risk gateway — PPP Fiscal Gate
The Ministries of Finance and Planning require a standardised value-for-money and contingent-liability assessment before approving any major PPP project. Every demand, price or currency guarantee and termination compensation enters a risk register, with sensitivity analysis before signing.
24.7 Programme Seven: investment land tied to performance
Digitalise the allocated-land portfolio, show legal status, utilities and milestones, and tie continued use rights to financial close, commencement and operation. Reviews of delayed projects distinguish investor failure from state failure to deliver land/utilities/approvals before imposing sanctions.
24.8 Programme Eight: formal, skilled private-sector work
Connect company and worker registration, social security and services through a digital system, simplify compliance, then apply graduated enforcement. Investment incentives are tied to actual registered employment and a skills plan where jobs form part of the support rationale. Data from the new social security law establish a baseline for use after 2027.
| Programme | Proposed lead | Principal outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Productive-investment gateway | National Investment Commission + sectoral bodies | Opportunities at defined maturity levels and projects reaching operation. |
| Investor Journey SLA | NIC/PIC + digital transformation | Transaction time, transparency and accountability. |
| Anchor investor/Aftercare | NIC + ministries/governorates | Expansion and domestic linkages, not MOUs alone. |
| Supplier/Scale-Up | Ministry of Planning/Trade + private sector | Iraqi companies qualified for larger contracts. |
| Corporate finance | Central Bank + banks | Higher-quality credit/productive instruments. |
| PPP Fiscal Gate | Finance + Planning | Known fiscal commitments and value for money. |
| Performance-based land | NIC/PIC + landowners | Reduced land holding and unjustified delays. |
| Formal work | Labour + companies + digital transformation | Registered, protected private-sector jobs with skills potential. |
Implementation, Cost and Financing Matrix
The chapter gives no total figure for the cost of ‘private-sector development’. Most desired investment must be financed by private capital itself; otherwise the burden moves to the state and the economic model remains unchanged. Public money finances public goods or the removal of specific market failures: data, infrastructure, regulation, shared training, partial guarantees or project preparation. Every contribution must be evaluable after implementation.
| Intervention | Type of public cost | Funding source | Decision gateway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investor-journey digitalisation/performance dashboard | Low–medium; systems and data integration | Operating/digital transformation budget | Reuse existing systems first. |
| Opportunity preparation/feasibility studies | Medium, depending on the project | Project owner/investment budget/technical support | No study without a potential decision and market. |
| Supplier Development | Medium and recurring | Shared public-private/anchor investor | Company contribution and a QCDoutcome/contract. |
| Credit guarantees | Contingent liability | Fund/programme capital within a ceiling | Risk pricing + bank participation + published losses. |
| Productive-zone utilities | Large | Public/private investment/PPP according to VfM | Demand, occupancy and life-cycle cost analysis. |
| PPP | Potentially large long-term commitments | User/budget/project revenue | PFRAM/VfM and a commitment register before contracting. |
| Investment incentive | Tax expenditure/land/grant | The state within a ceiling | Additionality + sunset + clawback. |
25.1 The additionality rule
Before any incentive, the agency asks: would the same investment occur at the same scale, location and time without support? If so, support is a financial transfer with no additional impact. If the incentive shifts the location to a weaker governorate, adds training or accelerates an investment with public benefits, additionality is measured and the incentive priced at the minimum necessary, not the maximum the investor requests.
Risks and safeguards
| Risk | Early signal | Safeguard/mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Exemption race | More exemptions without implementation/jobs | Tax-expenditure register + impact + sunset/clawback. |
| Land for speculation | Allocations without financial close or construction | Contract milestones and orderly repossession. |
| Property investment crowding out productive investment | A map concentrated in land/housing with weak industry/productive services | Classify the portfolio by impact, not by banning property. |
| FDI island | Imported inputs and skills without local suppliers | Supplier Development and aftercare. |
| Monopoly in the name of a strategic investor | Long exclusivity/exemption from competition | Law, competition review and a fixed-term contract. |
| PPP concealing debt | Guarantees and payments outside fiscal reports | Commitments register, sensitivity analysis and VfM. |
| Politicised credit guarantee | Companies selected through connections/high defaults | A bank retaining risk + rules-based criteria + audit. |
| Digitalising bureaucracy | An electronic portal with repeated documents and visits | Re-engineering before digitalisation and Once-Only. |
| Punitive formalisation | Closing small companies without benefits from registration | Simplification and service value, then graduated enforcement. |
| Inflated achievements | Adding MOUs/licences/opportunities to implemented investment | Maturity levels and a single project identifier. |
| Low-quality jobs | Large numbers with high turnover and poor wages/safety | Formality, quality and skills indicators. |
| Sudden rule changes | Retroactive decisions/unstable interpretations | Regulatory impact assessment, transitions, publication and grievance. |
26.1 Project red flags
- A request for a comprehensive government guarantee without financial close or a genuine equity contribution.
- A large land allocation with an unfunded expenditure schedule or a company with no execution record.
- A tax incentive that cannot be linked to a measurable job, asset or impact.
- A PPP contract containing demand/currency/price guarantees without inclusion in fiscal risks.
- A project claiming ‘technology transfer’ without a training/licensing/supplier/research plan or indicator.
- Investment relying on permanent import protection to remain profitable.
- Announced project value inconsistent with finance, disbursement schedule or implementation contract.
Conclusion and the bridge to non-oil exports
The private sector in Iraq in 2045 is built neither by a decision to ‘leave the economy to the market’ nor by the opposite decision to restore the state as producer, financier and guarantor of everything. It rests on a clear division: the state protects rules, competition, rights, infrastructure, data and stability, and purchases a specific public benefit where a market failure exists; the investor bears project risk, profits from success and exits or restructures upon failure within the law.
When opportunities become bankable, companies can expand, credit reaches productive assets, major investors connect to suppliers, land is tied to performance and private jobs are formal and skill-building, the question shifts from ‘How do we attract capital?’ to ‘How do we make what this capital produces competitive beyond the domestic market?’ This is where the next chapter, V2-D04-C06 — Non-Oil Exports — begins: export capability, competitive products, connecting industry to markets and reducing economic vulnerability to oil.
Principal references and sources
- Iraqi Constitution, Iraqi Council of Representatives — Articles 23–26 and other relevant provisions — Source
- Ministry of Planning — Summary of the National Development Plan 2024–2028 — Source
- National Investment Commission — Investment Law No. 13 of 2006, as amended (published text) — Source
- National Investment Commission — One-Stop Shop and Investor Services Department — Source
- National Investment Commission — redrawing the country's investment map, 17 September 2026 — Source
- National Investment Commission — reoffering strategic investment opportunities, 12 April 2026 — Source
- Ministry of Planning — updating the Private Sector Development Strategy 2014–2030, 2025 — Source
- Iraqi Council of Representatives — session of 7 September 2026: first reading of the PPP — Source
- Ur portal — online application for company registration through the one-stop system — Source
- World Bank Enterprise Surveys — Iraq 2022 Country Profile — Source
- International Labour Organization — Iraq Labour Force Survey 2021 — Source
- Central Bank of Iraq — Annual Economic Report 2024 — Source
- Central Bank of Iraq — Financial Stability Report 2024 — Source
- International Monetary Fund — Iraq 2025 Article IV Consultation — Source
- UNCTAD — World Investment Report 2025, Iraq Country Fact Sheet — Source
- IFC — 20 Years in Iraq and $1bn in new investments, September 2025 — Source
- OECD — FDI Qualities Policy Toolkit, 2022 — Source
- OECD — Investment Policy Review: Morocco 2024 — Source
- World Bank — Viet Nam 2045: Trading Up in a Changing World — Source
- IMF/World Bank — Public-Private Partnerships Fiscal Risk Assessment Model (PFRAM) — Source
- National Investment Commission — Investor Guide — Source
- Ur portal — beneficial-ownership disclosure when establishing/amending a company — Source
- National Investment Commission — 100-day action plan and activation of the one-stop shop, 28 August 2026 — Source
- Ministry of Justice — Workers' Retirement and Social Security Law No. 18 of 2023 — Source
29.1 Methodological note on the data
Research was frozen on 5 October 2026. Relatively old figures, such as the 2021 Labour Force Survey and 2022 Enterprise Survey, were used as historical baselines because they were the latest detailed national/comparative surveys verifiable within their scope, not as complete descriptions of 2026. The Central Bank's 2024 financing data are more recent but do not by themselves reveal each loan's ultimate purpose. The FDI flow from UNCTAD was treated under its balance-of-payments definition and not combined with project or licence values. The PPP bill was recorded as a legislative constraint, not enacted law.
29.2 Confidence and use register
| Evidence category | Use | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Constitution/enacted law | Rights, jurisdiction, deadlines and guarantees | High; governing text with verification of the published version. |
| Official Iraqi institution | Credit, service, strategy, activity | High for the fact; some operating indicators require a methodology. |
| Enterprise/labour force survey | A baseline for behaviour, finance and employment | High within coverage and year; no generalisation beyond the sample. |
| IMF/UNCTAD/IFC/OECD/World Bank | Comparison, methodology and external verification | High, respecting differences in definitions. |
| 2026 statement/operating plan | Recent institutional direction | Medium–high; not automatically an achieved outcome. |
| Target without a baseline | Deferred | No figure; establish the baseline first, then derive the target. |
End of chapter