Transport and Cities
From vehicle movement to cities measured by access to work and services
A successful city is measured not by the roads and homes it builds, but by the access it enables. Urban policy in Iraq in 2045 links public transport to land use, housing, employment and services, and prevents new cities from becoming dormitory suburbs that generate new congestion.
Chapter Overview
| Item | Reference |
|---|---|
| Code | V3-D07-C04 |
| Location | Volume Three - Part Seven - Chapter Four |
| Official title | Transport and Cities |
| Mandatory topics | Urban transport; new cities; easing pressure on old cities; urban planning; connecting housing to employment and services. |
| Central question | How can Iraq reorganise cities and mobility so that access to employment, education, health, markets and services becomes faster, safer and less costly, accommodating population growth without turning new cities into distant housing developments that create new congestion? |
| Baseline | 2024 for the census and traffic accidents; 2022-2024 for housing and informal settlements; 2025-2026 for institutional updates and ongoing projects. |
| Chapter boundaries | The chapter addresses urban transport, spatial planning, new cities and the relationship of housing to employment and services. It does not repeat the national roads, ports and railways covered in Chapter One, detailed water and energy networks, or the digital infrastructure and municipal services addressed in Chapters Five and Six. |
1. Executive Summary
Iraq has become urban in its population structure. The 2024 general census recorded 46,118,793 people, 70.2% of them living in urban areas. This urban population is more than a demographic figure: it represents daily demand for land, housing, roads, buses, schools, hospitals, markets, water and energy. It is also an economic opportunity if cities are designed to reduce access costs and increase the density of interaction and production.1
The baseline, however, shows that cities are growing faster than planning and mobility tools are being integrated. The National Development Plan 2024-2028 places an updated comprehensive transport plan, Baghdad Metro, rapid inter-governorate transport, stronger public transport, urban expansions, new cities and ring roads within broadly the same agenda. This matters because it reflects the connection between mobility and urban form. The plan also calls for attractive development nuclei in new cities so that they achieve economic independence rather than remain mere housing concentrations.2
Baghdad has begun gradually restoring its public bus network. In May 2025, the Ministry of Transport announced that 43 of 72 planned routes in the capital had opened, alongside consideration of electric buses. Meanwhile, Baghdad Metro remained a strategic project in preparation, evaluation and contracting through 2026, with an announced design of seven lines totalling approximately 150 km and 64 stations. This chapter therefore does not treat the metro as operational, nor reduce it to construction; it places it within a system of buses, walking, station connections, urban development, financing and operations.789
Safety is part of urban efficiency. The Statistics Authority recorded 11,763 traffic accidents in 2024 in the governorates covered by the report, resulting in 2,719 deaths and 11,896 injuries, with 66.7% of accidents occurring inside cities. These figures make speed, junctions, pedestrians, cycling, street design and enforcement part of urban transport policy, rather than a separate issue after a road has been built.6
For housing, the census alone cannot measure qualitative need. Combining census results with an overcrowding rate of 29.1% in the Household Socio-Economic Survey 2023-2024, the National Housing Policy 2025-2030 estimates a deficit of approximately 2.3 million units. It states that, since 2024, the Ministry of Construction has approved 21 new-city projects comprising approximately 765 thousand units, with eight additional projects awaiting approval comprising approximately 329 thousand units. This scale raises the chapter’s question from neighbourhood design to a major spatial, financial and environmental decision: where will these units be built, what jobs and services will accompany them, and how will residents travel?1112
The governing argument is that transport and cities form one system. A road that increases car speeds but moves homes farther from jobs may increase total distance travelled. A new city providing 100 thousand homes without jobs, a university, a hospital or reliable mass transit may reduce housing pressure while increasing traffic pressure. A station built far from walking routes and services becomes a piece of infrastructure rather than an urban centre. Iraq Vision 2045 therefore adopts “accessibility” as the unit of measurement: how many minutes, what cost and what risks does a citizen face in reaching essential opportunities?
| Housing | ← | Local street | ← | Public transport | ← | Employment/service centre | ← | Access |
|---|
The proposed path begins in 2027-2030 by establishing real mobility baselines through travel surveys and data on speeds, accidents and land use, redesigning the bus network, and setting a common new-city standard that links approvals to water, energy, transport, services and an economic base. In 2031-2035, it moves to high-capacity public transport corridors, station-oriented development, regeneration of existing areas and upgrading of informal settlements. During 2036-2040, networks expand and transport and urban development financing becomes partly based on land values and operating revenues. By 2045, major cities become polycentric, and most essential journeys can be completed without full dependence on the private car.
2. The Central Question and the Chapter’s Scope
4.1 Central Question
What urban and transport model does Iraq need to accommodate population and urban growth through 2045 while reducing access time and cost, improving safety, providing housing, easing pressure on old centres, and preventing new cities from becoming isolated residential extensions dependent on cars and distant services?
4.2 What the Chapter Addresses
- Urban transport as an interconnected service network: walking; cycling where safe and appropriate; buses; bus rapid transit (BRT) where viable; urban rail and metro; and private cars in a regulated rather than dominant role.
- New cities and urban expansions: site selection, economic base, infrastructure and services, occupancy stages, connections to the existing city, and financial and operating capacity.
- Easing pressure on old cities through the spatial distribution of jobs and services, rehabilitation of centres, and management of parking, traffic and urban freight, rather than horizontal expansion alone.
- Urban planning, land use and linking the density of housing, employment and services to public transport corridors.
- Informal settlements and unplanned expansion in terms of integrating them into planning, transport and services and preventing new informal settlements.
4.3 What Is Left to Other Parts and Chapters
| Subject | Main location in the Vision | What is used here only |
|---|---|---|
| National roads, bridges, ports and intercity railways | V3-D07-C01 | Only the urban interface, ring roads and interchange stations. |
| Electricity and energy | V3-D07-C02 | The requirement for sufficient network capacity to serve new cities and stations. |
| Water and Water Security | V3-D07-C03 | The water constraint on location, density and expansion. |
| Internet and digital infrastructure | V3-D07-C05 | Data required for operations, without detailing digital networks. |
| Basic services and municipalities | V3-D07-C06 | The principle of service before occupancy, without detailing water, sanitation and waste. |
3. Operational Vocabulary and Measurement Rules
| Concept | Operational definition in the Vision | What it does not mean |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | A person’s ability to reach employment, education, health, markets and services within acceptable time, cost and risk. | It is not equivalent to vehicle speed alone. |
| Mobility | The ability to move between places using multiple modes. | It does not mean increasing journey counts as an objective. |
| Public transport | A collective transport service open to the public with a known route, network, timetable or service level. | It is not limited to government buses. |
| New city | A planned urban settlement with housing, services, an economic base, connectivity and a system of governance, finance and operations. | It is not simply a large housing complex or land plots. |
| Urban regeneration | Improving land use, infrastructure, housing, public space and economic activity in an existing area while protecting rights. | It is not the same as demolishing neighbourhoods or displacing residents. |
| Polycentric city | A city distributing major employment and services across several connected nodes rather than relying on one centre. | It does not mean administratively fragmenting the city. |
| TOD | Compact, relatively dense, mixed-use development around public transport corridors and stations, with high walkability and connectivity. | It is not simply constructing towers near a station. |
| Travel burden | The time, cost, uncertainty and safety burden that mobility places on residents and the economy. | It is not measured by vehicle queues alone. |
4. Iraq’s Urban Baseline
For the first time in decades, the 2024 general census provides a comprehensive demographic basis on which to recalibrate urban planning. A final population of approximately 46.119 million and an urbanisation rate of 70.2% mean that any national housing, transport and services policy is fundamentally a cities policy.1Nevertheless, at this chapter’s cutoff there is no published unified national baseline for household travel surveys, modal shares, commuting time, public transport coverage, bus waiting times or the number of jobs reachable within 30 or 45 minutes. This is a knowledge gap, not a reason to invent figures.
| Indicator | Available baseline | Methodological significance |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,118,793 in the 2024 census1 | A concentration of demand for housing, transport and services, not an objective in itself. |
| Urban population share | 70.2% in 2024.1 | Priority for governance, transport and housing within urban systems. |
| Qualitative housing deficit | Approximately 2.3 million units according to NHP 2025-2030, accounting for overcrowding and quality.12 | Housing requires more supply, but location, service and affordability are decisive. |
| Informal housing | 624,864 units through 2022 according to the Development Plan, including 148,514 in Baghdad.2 | Unplanned expansion has become an urban stock requiring classification, upgrading and prevention of recurrence. |
| Traffic accidents | 11,763 recorded accidents in 2024; 2,719 deaths; 11,896 injured; 66.7% of accidents inside cities.6 | Safety is a planning, design and enforcement function, not simply an awareness campaign. |
| Mass-transit routes in Baghdad | 43 of 72 routes open in May 2025, according to the Ministry of Transport.7 | Network restoration is underway, but service levels, coverage and regularity require a baseline. |
| New-city portfolio | 21 projects of approximately 765 thousand units, with 8 further projects of approximately 329 thousand awaiting approval since 2024, according to NHP.12 | The scale can transform spatial form, making a strict decision-gate system necessary. |
The National Development Plan adds an important institutional picture: the Ministry of Planning does not treat the city simply as a land-use plan. Its Regional and Local Development Directorate is responsible for establishing an urban system of city sizes, preparing urban and rural development policies, reviewing structure plans, studying locations of new cities and urban settlements, and coordinating land uses with economic and social functions.3During 2024-2026, the Ministry also began updating planning standards for transport, housing and new-city site selection, incorporating density, connectivity, the economic base, services and environmental safeguards into assessment.45
5. The Real Problem: An Access Gap, Not a Shortage of Roads
Road length can increase while access deteriorates. This occurs when land prices or expansion decisions push housing away from employment; when universities, hospitals and government offices concentrate in a few nodes; when the public transport network is poorly connected; or when reaching a station is itself difficult and unsafe. Residents then have to travel farther, increasing vehicle numbers, costs and time even if some junctions improve.
The Vision therefore distinguishes “mobility” from “accessibility”. Mobility measures movement, while accessibility measures the outcome for which people travel. One person may cover ten kilometres at higher speed but arrive after forty minutes because of parking and transfers, while another reaches work in twenty minutes from a mixed-use neighbourhood on a reliable bus. This is not merely an engineering difference; it affects household and economic productivity and equality of opportunity.
| Housing location decision | ← | Distance to opportunities | ← | Choice of transport mode | ← | Traffic volume | ← | Access time/cost |
|---|
The access gap creates four types of cost: time costs that reduce hours for work, rest and education; financial costs of fuel, fares, maintenance and parking; social costs falling more heavily on women, young people, older people and those without cars; and economic costs to businesses through delayed workers and freight and a smaller accessible labour market. Transport policy thus becomes part of labour-market and productivity policy, rather than a separate service.
6. Urban Transport: The Hierarchy of Mobility and Choice
The Vision does not replace cars with a single mode. A modern city needs a functional hierarchy assigning each mode to what it does well. Walking is the first and last part of most journeys; buses are flexible and quick to scale; bus rapid transit can carry large volumes with a dedicated route, priority and good operations; rail and metro suit corridors with high, stable demand; and private cars remain an important option but become less efficient when used to carry every individual through a city’s most congested sections.
| Layer | Function | Condition for success | Common mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walking | Short trips and access to stations and services. | Continuous pavements, safe crossings, shade, lighting and accessibility for people with disabilities. | Treating it as beautification after designing the street for cars. |
| Cycling/micromobility | Short and medium trips where environment, climate and safety allow. | A safe, connected network, parking and public transport connections. | Marking a disconnected or unprotected route. |
| Bus | Wide coverage, neighbourhood and corridor connections, and feeder services to higher-capacity stations. | An understandable network, frequency, traffic priority, stops, information and integrated fares. | Opening routes without a service timetable or reliability measurement. |
| BRT/bus rapid transit | High-demand corridors, often at lower capital cost than rail. | Dedicated lanes, stations, rapid fare collection and junction priority. | Red buses in mixed congestion labelled rapid transit. |
| Metro/urban rail | High demand, regular travel and connections between major nodes. | Demonstrated demand, bus integration, lifecycle financing and development around stations. | Building the line separately from station access and land use. |
| Cars and taxis | Flexible trips, special purposes and low-density areas. | Parking, speed and demand management, with alternatives available. | Subsidising unrestricted road use and free parking. |
This hierarchy aligns with international transit-oriented development tools, which prioritise walking, cycling, mass transit and integrated land uses instead of treating the station as a stand-alone facility.1920It is adapted to Iraq’s heat, street patterns, municipal capacity, security and financing stages. The requirement is not to copy a foreign city, but to make every mode part of one network, with one user interface and understandable information.
7. Buses and the Public Transport Network
The quickest route to better urban transport in the early years is not to wait for the metro. A bus network can expand faster, alter routes as demand changes and serve neighbourhoods that do not justify heavy rail. The Ministry of Transport’s announcement that 43 of 72 Baghdad routes were open in May 2025 signals the restoration of a public function that had declined.7But the Vision’s criterion is not the number of open routes: a route may exist on paper yet offer no practical option if frequency is unreliable, transfers difficult or stops unsafe.
The Vision proposes redesigning the network in Baghdad and major cities around three service types: high-frequency trunk routes along corridors; feeder routes connecting neighbourhoods to corridors and stations; and local or demand-responsive routes in low-density areas. A service standard must be published for every route: operating hours, maximum peak and off-peak headways, the proportion of scheduled trips operated, timetable deviation, loads and complaints.
| Network element | 2027-2030 | 2031-2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Planning | Demand surveys, renumbering and clear routes. | Integration among governorates and major cities. | A network regularly updated according to accessibility data. |
| Wages | Gradual introduction of a unified ticket/card within Baghdad. | Bus–rapid transit–metro integration when operational. | Daily/monthly caps protecting affordability. |
| Priority | Pilot corridors and signal priority. | A network of high-performance bus corridors. | Continuous priority along main corridors. |
| Contracts | Measure completed trips and reliability. | Competitive service contracts where appropriate. | Reward outcomes, not vehicle counts. |
| Information | Maps, times and complaints. | Real-time arrivals and open data. | An integrated multimodal mobility platform. |
8. Baghdad Metro and Urban Rail
Baghdad Metro is the largest potential urban project in this part, and therefore requires greater discipline than treating it as a modernisation symbol. The National Investment Commission’s announced design includes seven lines totalling approximately 150 km and 64 stations, workshops and control centres, under a design, build, operate, maintain, finance and transfer model.8During 2025-2026, review of bids, financial and technical criteria and the consultancy study continued, with a public–private partnership approach. At the chapter’s cutoff, the project was therefore not an operating network and the baseline must not be built as though it were complete.9
The Vision’s decision is to support high-capacity rail transport in Baghdad on the basis of demonstrated demand and financeable phases, subject to four conditions. First, prioritise corridors carrying the most residents, jobs and journeys, rather than a political distribution of lines. Second, design the bus network to feed stations rather than compete with them. Third, reserve walking and transfer space, organised parking and land with development potential around stations before construction. Fourth, calculate the state’s commitment over the project lifecycle—construction, energy, maintenance, renewal, operations, security and revenue—not construction cost alone.
| Demonstrated demand | ← | Priority corridor | ← | Accessible station | ← | Bus integration | ← | Development around the station | ← | Operations and maintenance |
|---|
The Vision does not adopt a publicised percentage reduction in congestion as a predetermined target, because metro effects depend on land-use behaviour, cars, buses, prices and parking. Even the best line may reduce traffic along a corridor only for the road to fill again if parking remains cheap and expansion distant. Success is measured after actual operations begin: actual passengers, time saved, access to jobs, shifts from cars, safety, reliability and a known subsidy cost.
9. Mass Transit Outside Baghdad
Not every Iraqi city needs a metro. Demand, urban form, street widths, locations of centres and universities, religious and tourism seasonality, and financial capacity differ greatly. The National Development Plan includes rapid transit between Najaf and Karbala among projects to begin, and the National Investment Commission announced an opportunity for Najaf–Karbala metro/rapid transit on a proposed 90 km route with four main stations, from Najaf Airport to central Najaf, then Karbala Airport and its centre.210This illustrates the need to design transport around real demand patterns, including pilgrimage visits, airports and religious centres, rather than around the mode’s classification.
Iraq Vision 2045 uses a “technology selection ladder” instead of assuming every city needs rail. Where demand is moderate and dispersed, good buses and priority corridors may be the solution. A dense, stable corridor can move to BRT. When demand exceeds a certain level and the street’s capacity, rail becomes justified. Decisions are based on demand, time, cost, lifecycle, scalability and land-use effects.
| City/corridor type | Preferred initial instrument | When is capacity increased? |
|---|---|---|
| A medium-sized polycentric city | A bus network + interchange stations + junction priority. | When high, recurring corridor demand is demonstrated. |
| A dense linear corridor | BRT or high-capacity buses with a dedicated lane. | When demand exceeds bus and frequency capacity. |
| Connecting two nearby cities | Rapid transit/rail or intercity buses according to demand and route. | After analysing daily and seasonal journeys and land. |
| A tourism/religious city with peaks | A flexible network + interchange parking + high-capacity seasonal mass transit. | When peaks recur often enough to justify permanent infrastructure. |
10. Congestion: Manage Demand Before Adding Capacity
Widening a street or building a flyover may be necessary to address a specific bottleneck, but it is not a complete congestion policy. Increasing free capacity on an attractive corridor can draw trips from other routes, times and modes, after which congestion returns. Removing a local engineering bottleneck must therefore be distinguished from managing total urban demand.
The Vision proposes a package beginning with lower-cost measures: signal and junction management; preventing parking that blocks travel lanes; regulating loading and unloading; peripheral and interchange parking where strong public transport exists; shifting freight movements outside peak hours in sensitive centres; gradually introducing parking prices by location and time; and linking any new capacity to measures protecting public transport and pedestrians.
| Instrument | Problem addressed | Equity condition |
|---|---|---|
| Parking management | Occupation of street space and searching for parking. | Public transport alternatives and defined exemptions for those in need, rather than universal free parking. |
| Bus priority | Delay to a vehicle carrying many people behind individual cars. | An actual, transparent service level. |
| Urban freight management | Loading conflicts with peak periods and sensitive routes. | Time windows and alternative loading zones. |
| Adaptive signals | Variable demand and uncoordinated junctions. | Auditable data and no exclusion of pedestrian crossings. |
| Potential congestion charging at a later stage | Excessive demand in defined centres once alternatives mature. | Not introduced before reliable public transport exists, with protection for low-income groups. |
11. Road Safety: From Accidents to a Safe System
In 2024, 7,850 recorded accidents occurred inside cities, or 66.7% of the total 11,763 within the report’s scope, while deaths numbered 2,719 and injuries 11,896.6The report attributes 77.6% of accidents to drivers, but Iraq Vision 2045 rejects the inference that “driver awareness” alone is the answer. People make mistakes; system design must prevent ordinary mistakes from becoming deaths.
The safety system rests on safe speeds, separation of dangerous conflicts, pedestrian crossings, junction design, lighting and visibility, helmets, seat belts and enforced laws, emergency medical response and analysis of spatial accident data. The Baghdad Mayoralty, municipalities and traffic authorities must move from accident counts to “blackspot maps”, linking each location to engineering and enforcement measures and a timetable.
| Accident/near miss | ← | Location, cause and circumstances | ← | Engineering/enforcement intervention | ← | Follow-up after implementation | ← | Learning and better design |
|---|
12. New Cities: When Are They Genuinely Cities?
Iraq needs substantial housing supply, but increased supply alone does not guarantee a successful city. The National Housing Policy 2025-2030 addresses housing within a broader framework of land, finance, infrastructure, sustainability and coordination, emphasising balanced urban and rural development, infrastructure improvement and upgrading informal areas.1112In February 2026, the Ministry of Planning also set new-city location criteria covering target populations, housing need, reduction of spatial gaps, connections to existing cities, the economic base and environmental safeguards.4
Iraq Vision 2045 therefore adopts a strict definition: a new city is not a number of units. It is a living system capable of generating demand, employment and services within itself and connecting to the parent city without depending on it for every journey. Construction must therefore be preceded by a test of location, function, connectivity, water, energy, finance and operations. A cheap site creating permanent transport, water and service costs may cost the nation more than higher-priced land closer to networks and jobs.
| Decision gateway | Question that must be resolved before proceeding | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Location | Is the site connected, serviceable and free from consuming productive farmland or a critical resource? | Spatial, water, environmental and connectivity analysis. |
| 2. Economic base | Why will people live here beyond housing availability? | Deliverable jobs, universities, services, industry, tourism or a transport node. |
| 3. Infrastructure | Are water, energy, sewerage, roads and transport financed and scheduled? | Contracts or funding and staged capacity before occupancy. |
| 4. Accessibility | Can residents reach jobs and services without a long car journey for every household? | A public transport, walking and local-centres plan. |
| 5. Housing and affordability | For whom are the units being built, and with what financing product? | A mix of prices and types and transparent allocation. |
| 6. Operations | Who manages the city after construction, and who finances maintenance? | A governance, revenue and operating structure. |
13. Iraq’s New-City Portfolio and Decision Gates
The ongoing portfolio is large enough to affect national urban form. The National Housing Policy document refers to 21 new-city projects of approximately 765 thousand units since 2024, with eight additional projects awaiting approval of approximately 329 thousand units.12In Baghdad, implementation work for New Sadr City began in 2025 on approximately 4,000 dunums, with 60 thousand planned units and an infrastructure phase serving 11 thousand units.13The Ministry of Construction previously announced that Ali Al-Wardi City was planned for 120 thousand units.14These figures illustrate scale, rather than judge the success of any project before operation.
The Vision’s decision is to manage these projects as a portfolio with stop and correction gates, rather than irreversible commitments. Every city is reviewed annually against five indicators: occupied units, not only built units; jobs and services that have begun operating; access time to major employment centres; the share of infrastructure ready before occupancy; and the future fiscal burden on the state. If a city fails to create a basis for urban life, later stages are revised rather than continuing to add units to an incomplete place.
The million-housing-unit initiative announced in 2026 aligns with this logic if understood as a combination of new cities, land for property developers and serviced investment developments, rather than a numerical race. In July 2026, the Ministry of Agriculture stressed selecting non-productive land close to city centres and preventing the destruction of farmland and orchards.1516This is an important rule: urban expansion must protect food and water capacity as much as it solves the housing problem.
14. Easing Pressure on Existing Cities
Easing pressure does not mean administratively stopping Baghdad or other major cities from growing. It means reducing the need for residents to pass through the same centres for employment and services, and using existing land and infrastructure more efficiently before continuing to extend the city. The National Development Plan itself calls for attractive development nuclei in new cities, ring roads and connections between new and existing cities, reflecting an approach that distributes growth rather than merely pushes it outward.2
The Vision works at three levels. Within old centres, parking, freight and public space are reorganised, with walking and public transport prioritised where areas cannot accommodate more cars. Within existing neighbourhoods, vacant land and degraded sites are developed and density increased along serviceable corridors instead of unplanned expansion. At the edges, real employment and service centres connected to transport are built, gradually turning the city into a network of centres rather than a single axis.
| Strategy | Implementation instrument | Success indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Regeneration within the centre | Reuse buildings and land, improve walking, organise parking and activate street frontages. | More visits and business without a corresponding increase in car trips. |
| Selective densification | Higher-density housing and employment around transport and service corridors. | More residents and jobs within short access times. |
| Secondary centres | Relocate government functions, services, universities and economic activities to carefully chosen nodes. | Fewer cross-city trips to the main centre. |
| Ring roads | Divert through traffic and freight away from the core where viable. | Less truck and through traffic inside the centre. |
15. Informal Settlements: Upgrading Places and Preventing Recurrence
The National Development Plan recorded 624,864 informal housing units through 2022, including 148,514 in Baghdad.2This figure does not mean that every unit or settlement can be treated in the same way. The national roadmap for addressing informal settlements, discussed by the Ministry of Planning and UN-Habitat in 2024, is based on legal/technical, financial, institutional and coordination frameworks. It calls for mapping and feasibility studies to determine whether redevelopment, rehabilitation or resettlement is the most appropriate intervention.17
Iraq Vision 2045 adopts “upgrading first where safe and serviceable”. If a settlement is on land capable of regularisation and does not conflict with flood risk, an infrastructure corridor or a critical public right, priority goes to establishing the feasible legal status, connecting services, opening access and gradually improving streets and public space with community participation. Unsafe sites or those impossible to service require organised relocation to a real alternative before clearance, protecting housing rights, compensation and due process.
More important is preventing new informal settlements. They arise when land is allocated without services, plans lag behind population growth, formal housing becomes unaffordable or serviced land is withheld from the market. Informal settlements are therefore linked to land, finance, housing and transport policies, rather than simply a municipal enforcement campaign. The National Housing Policy itself proposes a national informal-settlement upgrading programme, expanded infrastructure and services, and reduced unnecessary displacement.12
| Inventory and classification | ← | Rights/risk/serviceability | ← | Upgrading, redevelopment or relocation | ← | Infrastructure, tenure and service | ← | Prevent recurrence |
|---|
16. Urban Planning: Linking Land Use to Transport
The purpose of a master plan is not to colour in land uses and then leave markets and transport to shape reality on their own. The Ministry of Planning itself tasks its directorates with studying city sizes and economic and social functions, reviewing plans, and assessing project and new-city locations.3The requirement for 2045 is to turn this function into an “accessibility budget”: every decision on density, a university, hospital, government complex or major market must explain how people will reach it.
The chapter adopts four rules. First, no high density without transport and service capacity. Second, no major public investment generating thousands of trips at a site without an access plan. Third, major jobs and services are located, as far as possible, along public transport corridors or bear the cost of connection. Fourth, master plans are not updated only after long intervals; flexible layers for corridors and priority development areas are used with regular data review.
| Land-use decision | Potential transport effect | 2045 rule |
|---|---|---|
| Large university/hospital | Daily travel peaks and extensive parking. | A site on a high-quality public transport corridor and a pedestrian access plan. |
| Large housing development | Daily journeys to work and education. | Public transport service and a local service centre before full occupancy. |
| Industrial/logistics zone | Workers + trucks + shifts. | Collective worker transport and a freight route that does not cut through neighbourhoods. |
| Central government building | Visitors and employees from across the city. | Digitise services + distribute some functions + mass-transit access. |
| Large shopping centre | Evening/holiday trips and parking. | Multimodal access management, priced parking and corridor connections. |
17. Connecting Housing to Employment and Services
Cheap housing in a place expensive to reach may not actually be affordable. A family pays the housing price, then pays transport and time costs every day. The Vision therefore uses the “combined cost of housing and mobility” to assess new cities and subsidised housing projects. If a project reduces the unit price but requires a household to own two cars or travel for two hours, part of the subsidy has shifted from housing to fuel and time.
The National Housing Policy connects housing to infrastructure, sustainability and balanced development, while the World Bank defines TOD as clustering employment, housing and services around public transport in a compact, walkable environment.121920Iraq Vision 2045 translates this into two national standards: nearby daily services within the neighbourhood or local centre, and jobs and higher-level services reachable within a reasonable time by public transport.
This does not mean abolishing urban specialisation or requiring each neighbourhood to be self-sufficient. Referral hospitals, universities and large factories will remain regional facilities. The requirement is that the simplest need should not become a long journey, and access to major opportunities should not depend on owning a private car.
18. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
Transit-oriented development is not a superficial design formula. The World Bank defines it as planning that concentrates density and activities within a short walk of rapid transit, integrating transport, land use, design and finance. The 3V framework uses three dimensions to determine what suits each station area: the node’s value in the network, place quality and market potential.1920
In Baghdad and other Iraqi cities, TOD can help finance infrastructure if development rights are reserved early. A metro or BRT station raises nearby land values by improving access. Instead of the entire increase becoming private gain unconnected to the project, part can be captured through development charges, auctions of building rights, joint development agreements or better municipal property revenue, while protecting existing residents from displacement.
| 3V dimension | Assessment question in Iraq | Planning decision |
|---|---|---|
| Node | How many lines, passengers and transfers does the location serve? | Give greater priority to integration and interchange stations. |
| Place | Is it walkable? Are there schools, healthcare, public spaces and mixed uses? | Improve streets, frontages and services before increasing density. |
| Market | Is there real demand, developable land and financing capacity? | Determine density, phasing and the value-capture instrument. |
19. The Urban Environment, Heat and Resilience
Iraq is a hot country, so importing walking standards from temperate cities is insufficient. Walkability depends on shade, pavement width, suitable trees, paving materials, water points, resting places, shelter at stops and the time of day. A bus or metro station must become part of heat-protection infrastructure, rather than just a small canopy.
A compact city does not mean indiscriminate densification. Density that reduces distances can increase heat islands if trees, open spaces and airflow disappear. The chapter therefore links densification to minimum public space and access to parks, protection of drainage and floodwater routes, and application of building and energy standards addressed elsewhere.
New-city site selection must also incorporate water, heat, soil and flood risks from the outset. In 2026, the Ministry of Planning included environmental safeguards, carrying capacity, connectivity and services in discussions of site criteria.4Iraq Vision 2045 turns this from a recommendation into an auditable approval gate.
20. Urban Governance and Institutions
A city is not managed by a single entity. In Baghdad, the Mayoralty, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Construction, traffic authorities, Baghdad Governorate, National Investment Commission and service entities intersect; arrangements differ in other governorates. Multiple entities are not intrinsically a defect. The defect is that no one owns the outcome of “access time”, “transport reliability” or “new-city integration”.
The Vision proposes establishing or activating urban transport coordination bodies at metropolitan level, starting with Baghdad—not as a new ministry, but as a joint function with data, a network plan, contracts, fare and station standards, and land-use integration. Asset ownership and operations remain distributed according to law, while planning, data and outcomes are brought into one framework.
| Ministry of Planning/spatial policy | ← | Local government/land use | ← | Ministry of Transport/operators | ← | Traffic authorities/safety | ← | Service entities/capacity |
|---|
| Function | Proposed institutional owner | Mandatory annual output |
|---|---|---|
| Urban accessibility plan | Metropolitan urban transport authority/committee + local planning. | A 30/45-minute access map and network coverage. |
| Master plan and land use | The competent planning body, coordinated with the Ministry of Planning. | Updates to priority areas and corridors, with transport impact. |
| Public transport operations | Ministry of Transport/companies or contracted operators. | A published service-level and performance schedule. |
| Safety | Traffic authorities + municipality + Health + Transport. | A blackspot map and road-death reduction plan. |
| New cities | New Cities Implementation Authority/competent entities + Planning + governorates. | Gate report: occupancy, infrastructure, jobs, access and finances. |
21. Data and the Urban Accessibility Observatory
The largest gap in this chapter is not a lack of projects; it is the absence of a unified urban baseline showing where Iraqis travel, how long trips take, by which mode and what share of income they consume. Current data are scattered across traffic, transport, planning, municipalities, telecommunications operators and apps. The Vision does not need all data gathered into one huge central warehouse; it needs a dictionary, indicators and lawful sharing of necessary data.
An “Urban Accessibility Observatory” is established as a data function, not a bloated institution. It begins in Baghdad and three pilot metropolitan areas, combining a household travel survey every 3-5 years, passenger and bus counts, journey-time data, geolocated accidents, pavement and crossing networks, land uses, job and service locations, and housing and transport prices. It publishes aggregated outputs that protect privacy.
| Dataset | Frequency | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Household travel survey | Every 3-5 years, with shorter annual updates. | Modal shares, trip purposes, time and cost. |
| Public transport operating data | Daily/monthly. | Reliability, frequency, loads and points of failure. |
| Accidents, deaths and injuries | Monthly + annual audit. | Blackspots, speed and street design. |
| Land use and permits | Continuous updating | Link growth to capacity and the network. |
| Employment, education and health locations | Quarterly/semi-annually. | Calculate 30/45-minute accessibility. |
| Housing, rent and transport prices | Quarterly | Measure affordability and combined costs. |
22. Financing and Land-Value Capture
Urban transport and new cities create substantial land value, but the traditional model can leave the state paying for roads, stations and infrastructure while property appreciation remains outside the financing cycle. Iraq Vision 2045 shifts part of the financing to “those benefiting from accessibility value”, while protecting affordability.
Instruments include developer infrastructure contributions, betterment or development charges in defined areas, joint development of public land around stations, transparent auctions of additional building rights, parking revenues, operating and advertising contracts, and PPPs where risks can be allocated. The World Bank includes land-value capture and financing in TOD tools, while emphasising in practice that their success depends on planning, markets and governance.1920
For new cities, Iraqi investment opportunity announcements have already required financing plans, feasibility studies, implementation phases, shares of units for the state and performance guarantees in some projects.22The Vision builds on this direction but extends the test to infrastructure operating costs after handover and the city’s ability to generate municipal revenue and maintain assets.
| Instrument | Best use | Risk | Safeguard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment budget | Public infrastructure with broad benefits that cannot be fully recovered. | Projects without demand or operations. | Feasibility and phasing gate. |
| PPP | Assets/services whose outputs can be specified and risks allocated. | Hidden fiscal obligations or unrealistic demand guarantees. | Disclosure of commitments and a value-for-money study. |
| Land-value capture | Around corridors and stations whose value has increased through public infrastructure. | Speculation and displacement of residents. | Transparency + affordable housing + allocating a share to transport/place improvement. |
| Parking revenues | High-demand centres. | Becoming a tax without alternatives. | Improve local public transport and streets. |
| Developer charges | New cities and expansions. | Raising prices or delaying the market. | Predetermined standards, phasing and a direct infrastructure link. |
23. The Iraqi City in 2045
The Vision does not assume one uniform Iraqi city by 2045. Baghdad will need a layered mass-transit network and secondary centres; Basra must integrate industry, the port, heat and mobility; Mosul must link reconstruction to centres and riverbanks; Najaf and Karbala must address seasonal demand and connections between the two cities; and medium-sized cities need to protect accessibility before congestion becomes a major problem.
There are, however, shared characteristics. The Iraqi city in 2045 knows where people live and work and how they travel; places jobs and services near transport; makes short walks safe; gives buses space proportionate to the people they carry; manages cars rather than fighting them or making them the only option; holds new cities accountable for occupancy, employment and service rather than construction alone; and treats informality as a failure of land, housing and service systems to be corrected, rather than a social identity of residents.
24. Transformation Stages, 2027-2045
| Phase | Governing objective | Key decisions | Transition Condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027-2030: Measurement and network restoration | Understand mobility, improve public transport quickly and stop creating new problems. | Travel surveys; bus-network redesign; new-city standards; accident maps; protection of transport corridors; priority master-plan updates. | Unified baselines available, improved service reliability and every new city passing location, infrastructure and access gates. |
| 2031-2035: Building corridors and centres | Turn the network from separate routes into an urban structure. | BRT/rail where viable; operate rail phases with demonstrated demand; TOD; secondary centres; large-scale informal-settlement upgrading. | Greater public transport accessibility, stable operating finance and integrated land use. |
| 2036-2040: Expansion and partial self-financing | Expand the network, connect new cities and redirect land value. | More high-capacity corridors; land-value capture; urban regeneration; advanced demand management. | A multimodal network with stable equity and cost indicators. |
| 2041-2045: Urban stability | Make accessibility the normal planning criterion. | Continuous network updates, maintenance and renewal, and closure of safety and accessibility gaps. | Achievement of 2045 targets and sustainable financing and maintenance. |
25. Indicators and Targets Dashboard
The following targets are proposed policy commitments, not forecasts. Where a unified national baseline does not exist, it is established in 2027-2028 before setting intermediate values. Missing entries are not filled with estimates.
| Indicator | Baseline | 2030 | 2035 | 2045 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major-city residents able to reach an employment centre/higher-level service within 45 minutes by public transport | Established in 2027-2028 | Baseline + improvement of ≥10 percentage points | ≥65% | ≥80% |
| Residents of planned urban areas within ~15-minute local access to basic daily services | GIS baseline established in 2027 | ≥60% in pilot cities | ≥75% | ≥90% |
| Share of residents within reasonable walking distance of frequent public transport | Established in 2027 | ≥60% in Baghdad and pilot cities | ≥75% | ≥85% in major metropolitan areas |
| Reliability of scheduled public transport trips | 2027 operational baseline | ≥80% | ≥88% | ≥95% |
| Reduction in the road-death rate | Unified 2027 baseline | Reduction of ≥50% | Continued decline | ≤3/100 thousand |
| New cities passing location/infrastructure/access/economic gates before large-scale occupancy | Not standardised | 100% of new projects | 100% | 100% |
| Informal settlements updated and classified in GIS | 2027 update | 100% inventoried and classified | Implementation of priority upgrading programmes | No large settlement without a legal/service pathway |
| Share of local operating revenues/value capture in non-capital urban transport financing | Established in 2028 | Limited pilots | ≥15% in mature networks | ≥25% where markets allow, with social protection |
26. Implementation Programme Package
| Code | Programme | Outcome | Lead Body | Horizon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | National Urban Accessibility Observatory | Baseline for journeys, accessibility, accidents and land. | Ministry of Planning + Statistics Authority + local governments | 2027–2030, then permanent |
| P2 | Baghdad Public Transport Network Redesign | A trunk/feeder network with integrated frequencies, fares and information. | Ministry of Transport + Baghdad Mayoralty + traffic authorities | 2027-2031 |
| P3 | Public Transport Programme for Major Metropolitan Areas | Demand-based network plans for cities > a population/employment threshold determined by study. | Ministry of Transport + governorates | 2027-2035 |
| P4 | BRT Corridors and Bus Priority | Increase speed and reliability before jumping to rail on every corridor. | Transport + municipalities + traffic authorities | 2028-2038 |
| P5 | Baghdad Metro Readiness and TOD Programme | Demand-based metro phases + feeder buses + station development + lifecycle planning. | Investment Commission + Baghdad Mayoralty + Transport | 2027-2040 |
| P6 | Urban Road Safety Programme | Speeds, blackspots, crossings, enforcement, emergency care and data. | Traffic authorities + municipalities + Health + Planning | 2027-2045 |
| P7 | New-City Gate System | Prevent occupancy before infrastructure, accessibility and an economic base are in place. | New Cities Implementation Authority + Planning + governorates | 2027–ongoing |
| P8 | Secondary Centres and Urban Regeneration Programme | Ease pressure through employment, services and selective densification. | Local governments + Planning + Investment | 2028-2045 |
| P9 | National Informal-Settlement Upgrading Programme | Inventory, regularisation/upgrading, relocation where necessary, and services. | Planning + Construction + governorates + UN-Habitat/partners | 2027-2040 |
| P10 | Accessibility-Linked Housing Policy | Assess subsidised housing and new cities by the combined cost of housing and transport. | Construction + Planning + banks/funds | 2028-2045 |
| P11 | TOD and Land-Value Capture Programme | Station areas, mixed-use density, affordable housing and financing part of transport. | Municipalities/Baghdad Mayoralty + Investment + Finance | 2030-2045 |
| P12 | Parking and Urban Freight Management | Parking pricing/regulation, loading and unloading, and freight time windows. | Local governments + traffic authorities | 2027-2035 |
| P13 | Complete Streets and Heat Programme | Pavements, crossings, shade, universal accessibility and comfortable stops. | Municipalities + Construction + traffic authorities | 2027-2045 |
| P14 | Cities with Services Before Occupancy | Link housing-stage approvals to capacity in water, energy, sewerage, schools, health and transport. | Council of Ministers/sectoral entities + new cities | 2027–ongoing |
27. Implementation, Cost and Financing Matrix
| Package | Relative cost | Financing sources | Financial risk to control | Gate indicator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data, planning and observatory | Low | Federal/local budget + technical support. | Platforms without updates or common definitions. | Published baseline and annual indicators. |
| Buses and priority/BRT | Medium–high. | Budget, operating contracts, fares and development finance. | Fleet procurement without operations and maintenance. | Cost/passenger and reliability before expansion. |
| Metro/urban rail | Very large | PPP/investment + long-term finance + transparent public contribution. | Demand guarantees/hidden debt/lifecycle cost. | Demonstrated demand + finance + operations + TOD. |
| New cities | Very large, distributed | Developers + housing finance + infrastructure contributions + land. | Public infrastructure financing an unoccupied project. | Occupancy, infrastructure and jobs before the next phase. |
| Informal-settlement upgrading | Medium–high. | Local/national budget + development finance + community contributions where possible. | Costly demolition that creates new informality. | A legal and service solution and participation before implementation. |
| TOD/urban regeneration | Medium, with potential revenue | Value capture, joint development, municipalities and private sector. | Appropriation of value and displacement of residents. | Transparency + affordable housing + returns to infrastructure. |
The chapter does not set one national cost figure because Baghdad Metro alone could change the portfolio’s financial scale, and the number and phases of new cities are not fixed. The rule is that every capital programme moves from an “idea” to a “project” only after a feasibility study, lifecycle costing, a financing source and a clear operating commitment. Megaprojects are not combined into a Vision total for rhetorical purposes.
28. Risks and Safeguards
| Risk | Likelihood / Impact | Early-warning signal | Safeguard |
|---|---|---|---|
| A new city without enough residents/jobs | Medium / high | Low occupancy after handover; long trips to the parent city. | Phased gates and suspension of expansion until jobs and services improve. |
| Metro or rail beyond financial capacity | Medium/very high | Rising guarantees, delayed financial close and unfunded operating costs. | PPP analysis, value for money, lifecycle costing and disclosure of commitments. |
| Turning streets into car-only projects | High/high | More capacity without more public transport or walking; rapid return of congestion. | Multimodal accessibility assessment for every project. |
| Displacement through regeneration/TOD | Medium / high | Rising rents/evictions around stations. | Affordable housing, occupancy rights and relocation support where necessary. |
| Demolition of informal settlements without alternatives | Medium / high | Clearance before alternative housing and services are contracted. | Upgrade first; relocate only unsafe sites, with due process and an alternative. |
| Destruction of farmland and worsening water scarcity | Medium / high | Allocation of productive sites or sites without a water balance. | Agricultural/water/environmental approval before land allocation. |
| Mobility data used for surveillance | Low-medium/high | Unnecessary collection of individual identifiers. | Aggregation, data minimisation, a defined purpose, oversight and deletion. |
| Unfair fees and pricing | Medium/medium | Charges introduced before alternatives, or a greater impact on the poor. | Distributional impact assessment, defined exemptions and reinvestment of revenue in transport. |
29. Conclusion and the Bridge to Internet and Digital Infrastructure
This chapter establishes a different foundation for urban policy in Iraq: we begin not by asking “How many roads, flyovers and cities will we build?”, but “How many opportunities and services will become easier, faster and safer to reach?”. This principle does not diminish the importance of major infrastructure; it makes it accountable for an outcome. Buses are measured by journey reliability, the metro by the people and opportunities it connects, new cities by occupancy, employment and services, and urban planning by reduced unavoidable distances between daily life and opportunities.
During 2027-2045, Iraq moves from addressing congestion project by project to managing an urban system: a hierarchical public transport network, polycentric cities, strict expansion gates, informal-settlement upgrading, and housing linked to employment and services. Success reduces economic costs, improves equality of opportunity, frees household time, protects land and water and reduces deaths.
Principal references and sources
- Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — “The 2024 General Census and Household Surveys: The Integrated Digital Map to Close Development Gaps in Iraq”; final population 46,118,793 and urban share 70.2%.↩
- Iraqi Ministry of Planning — National Development Plan 2024-2028, particularly transport, buildings, services, spatial development, housing and informal settlements.↩
- Ministry of Planning — Regional and Local Development Directorate: responsibilities for spatial and urban development policies, land use, master plans and new-city locations.↩
- Ministry of Planning — “Discussion of Housing and Municipal Service Standards Within the Development Plan Framework”, 5 February 2026; criteria for new-city locations and urban expansion.↩
- Ministry of Planning — “Discussion of the Planning Standards Guide for the Transport and Communications Sector”, 8 December 2024; updating road, train, cycling and metro standards and institutional integration.↩
- Statistics and Geographic Information Systems Authority — Statistical Report on Recorded Traffic Accidents for 2024.↩
- Ministry of Transport via the Iraqi News Agency — “We Are Studying the Introduction of Electric Public Transport Buses Within Baghdad”, 11 May 2025; 43 of 72 routes opened.↩
- National Investment Commission — Baghdad Metro Project: 7 lines, approximately 150 km, 64 stations and contracting, operations, maintenance and financing requirements.↩
- Iraqi News Agency — Baghdad Metro updates, 2025-2026: the project remained under study/evaluation, followed by completion of the consultancy study and a PPP approach; this chapter does not treat it as an implemented network.↩
- National Investment Commission — Najaf–Karbala Metro opportunity (Phase 1): proposed 90 km route, four main stations and a DBOMFT model.↩
- United Nations in Iraq/UN-Habitat — Launch of the National Housing Policy 2025-2030, 14 October 2025.↩
- Government of Iraq and UN-Habitat — National Housing Policy 2025-2030: qualitative housing deficit, new-city portfolio, balanced development, informal-settlement upgrading and integrated infrastructure.↩
- Baghdad Mayoralty via the Iraqi News Agency — Launch of implementation work for New Sadr City, 28 May 2025; 60 thousand units and approximately 4,000 dunums.↩
- Ministry of Construction and Housing via the Iraqi News Agency — New housing cities and Ali Al-Wardi City, 18 March 2024; 120 thousand planned units.↩
- Ministry of Construction and Housing via the Iraqi News Agency — “A Housing Roadmap to Address the Housing Crisis” and the million-unit project, 31 May 2026.↩
- Ministry of Agriculture via the Iraqi News Agency — The million-housing-unit initiative, non-productive land and preventing destruction of farmland, 10 July 2026.↩
- UN-Habitat and Ministry of Planning — Roadmap for Rehabilitation of Informal Settlements in Iraq, policy dialogue, 12 December 2024.↩
- UN-Habitat Iraq - Urbanization in Iraq: overview, urban share, informal-settlement and planning context.
- World Bank — Transit-Oriented Development Implementation Resources and Tools, 2024/Second Edition: integrating transport, land use, walking, cycling, finance and safety.↩
- World Bank — Transforming the Urban Space Through Transit-Oriented Development: The 3V Approach; node/place/market potential.↩
- UN-Habitat — Iraq Urban Research and Capacity Development; urban planning, mapping and regularisation/upgrading of informal settlements.
- National Investment Commission/New Cities Implementation Authority — Sample new-city opportunities, 2023-2024, and requirements for financing, feasibility, completion phases and performance guarantees.↩